Take that! Obama: Climate summit a ‘powerful rebuke’ to terrorists

Via The Hill: The two leaders met in Washington a week and a half after ISIS carried out multiple terrorist attacks in Paris, killing 130, and less than a week before Obama goes to the French capital to work with world leaders on an international pact to fight climate change.

Obama struck a similar tone Sunday at a news conference in Malaysia.

“I think it is absolutely vital for every country, every leader, to send a signal that the viciousness of a handful of killers does not stop the world from doing vital business, and that Paris … is not going to be cowered by the violent, demented actions of a few,” Obama said about the upcoming climate conference.

Obama and other administration officials have been criticized for their insistence that climate change is a threat to national security on par with terrorism.

Obama and dozens of other international leaders will participate in an event at the conference Monday, but he will leave Tuesday, and the conference will continue until at least Dec. 11.

Related Links:

The Time Has Come: ‘Climate Hustle’ Set To Rock Climate Debate – Film Set for Paris Red Carpet Premier on Dec. 7

logo

Share:

1,086 Responses

        1. you are an idiot…Trump does not know anything. he is exactly like obummer just saying things you like to hear. while obummer said things the left liked to hear ./…. man we are surrounded by fools…

    1. Barack Obama: focusing like a laser on the utterly irrelevant. Obama has already assigned NASA to “muslim outreach” so distracting from core missions is nothing new.

      1. Our joke of a President couldn’t care less about leading.
        All he wants to do is facilitate race riots and make sure the police are dismantled if they protect anyone

              1. His idol is of course (THE SUPREME LEADER)!
                The same old goat of an Ayatollah who continues to call Obama and Kerry liars and shouts “Death to America.”

        1. Maybe if he had explained “leading from his behind” seven years ago enough less people would have voted for him and we would be complaining about President Palin right now (since the office would have been too much for President McCain to handle)

              1. PLEASE! Change your name to: Voice of Gullible!
                Vladimir’s girlfriend loves to draw Red Lines and then claim he did not!
                You talk about from the Halls of Montezuma to the Shores of Tripoli. Thank God Thomas Jefferson fought and defeated the very same guys (Barbary Pirates were Muslim Terrorist) and they got their right to attack our ships from the Koran too.
                Did you get to keep your doctor or insurance plan?
                OH! I forgot that is not a lie!
                The President misled us!
                What a sham you DEMIs are!

      2. The objectives of “climate change” are to confiscate wealth from those who create it. Most of the money and power will go to the political class. The rest will be sent to the Third World so it can go into the bank accounts of brutal dictators. But it’s “immoral” to oppose this theft and corruption.

        1. Well of course. Strangling regulations in the US just push more industry to China. The low-efficiency, dirty coal results in more pollution, including CO2 for the same production. The lost American jobs are just a bonus for Obama.

          1. If it was about CO2, we would slap huge tariffs on imports from China. And do the same for farm products from Indonesia in light of their annual slash and burn fest.

          2. Exactly. So Obama should buy everyone a Tesla…if the government pays for it, then it is free….and it runs on electricity that comes out of the wall in anyone’s house…so it has absolutely no polution. And we could give poor people and historically under-utilised people people, drivers from the pool of obese, liberal art, ivy league graduates for 15 dollars an hour so they could be driven to their government operated Sympathy and Understanding Sessions at the Comfort and Peace Sanctuary.
            There, i solve Global Warming, Peace in our Time, Global Cooling, Ozone Holes, White Privilege, Climate Change, Polar Bear Stuff, Glass Ceilings, Rape and Sex Deranged White-trash Presidents and the Ills besetting HRH (Sir Edmund) Corkscrew Whitewater, Queen of the Cattle Futures and the Winner of the Batter of Fort Marcy Park and the the Battle of Mount Carmel….with only 46 children killed.

            Solyndra, anyone?

              1. Global warming is just another government tax scam, like US income tax.

                If people read their tax law, and followed it, then govt wouldn’t have money to abuse us.

                Politicians are lying about taxes. U.S. tax law is codified, and easy as 1,2.

                1.
                -EXEMPT INCOME-
                26 CFR 1.861-8T(d)(2)(ii)
                “exempt income means any income that is … exempt, excluded, or eliminated for federal income tax purposes.”

                2.
                -INCOME NOT EXEMPT- [aka, The list of Taxable Income]
                26 CFR 1.861-8T(d)(2)(iii)
                “Income that is not considered tax exempt. The following items are not considered to be exempt, eliminated, or excluded income

                (A) In the case of a foreign taxpayer … gross income (whether domestic or foreign source)
                (B) gross income of a DISC or a FSC; [Domestic International Sales Corp, Foreign Sales Corp]
                (C) gross income of a possessions corporation
                (D) Foreign earned income as defined in section 911”

                Taxpayers, Do you make Foreign earned income? No? Then according to code (law), you don’t owe any income tax. As usual, politicians are robbing citizens under color of law.

                SOURCE: ecfr DOT gov
                HOW TO: Click Simple Search, find “exempt income means”

                MORE:
                Computer scientist data-mines tax code, whatistaxed DOT com

                1. The Earth was very hot millions of years ago. It was very cold millions of years ago. It was very warm tens of thousands of years ago. It was cools tens of thousands of years ago. It was very hot thousands of years ago. It was frozen thousands of years ago.

                  So there has never been climate change until man erupted onto the scene? Really Ohole?

              2. “…little children and trans-sexuals”

                I can just see the TV ad with the sad faced trannies: “Won’t you help? For just pennies a day (s)he can have enough to eat.” ROFL

                1. You forgot to add the transsexual first-monkey to the commercial. That thing “wears the pants” and “the balls” in the blackhouse. Barry has his goats for sex.

                  1. .❝my neighbor’s mom is making $98 HOURLY on the internet❞….A few days ago new McLaren F1 subsequent after earning 18,512$,,,this was my previous month’s paycheck ,and-a little over, $17k Last month ..3-5 h/r of work a day ..with extra open doors & weekly paychecks.. it’s realy the easiest work I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months ago and now making over $87, p/h..Learn More right Here….
                    av..
                    ➤➤
                    ➤➤➤ http://GlobalSuperEmploymentVacanciesReportFree/GetPaid/$97hourly… ❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦

                  2. .❝my neighbor’s mom is making $98 HOURLY on the internet❞….A few days ago new McLaren F1 subsequent after earning 18,512$,,,this was my previous month’s paycheck ,and-a little over, $17k Last month ..3-5 h/r of work a day ..with extra open doors & weekly paychecks.. it’s realy the easiest work I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months ago and now making over $87, p/h..Learn More right Here….
                    rv….
                    ➤➤
                    ➤➤➤ http://GlobalSuperEmploymentVacanciesReportNetWork/GetPaid/$97hourly… ❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦

                1. The rich are the ones who pay 90% of the taxes that pay for welfare, infrastructure, military, etc and allow the rest of us to live off of them for free. They also invest to create jobs. Both of these facts make them evil in the minds of democrats. On the other hand George Soros, the darling of democrats, games the financial system taking down banks, destroying peoples investments, etc and does nothing but try to enrich himself.

                  1. Educate yourself. Look through the statistics thrown at you by mass media, wherever you get it. The great American middle class supports all this through taxes. They start the “rich” bracket at $250,000. That’s not rich, that’s just well off. How much do you have to have before you can be rich today? How much do the truly rich HAVE?
                    I learned a long time ago that there is one type of citizen subject to income taxes, and that’s the middle class. If you’re poor enough, you don’t pay income taxes. If you’re rich enough, you donate to a senator or congressman who writes a loophole into the tax law to protect you. The middle class have enough money to tax, but not enough to buy their way out of paying them.

                    1. Educate yourself by looking at IRS stats. 10% of tax payers pay 90% of the income taxes. Maybe the middle class has been shrunk to 10% under Obama and they are not working in good jobs so I doubt the middle class are the major taxpayers. 47% of citizens don’t pay any tax and many of those get tax credits which means they get money even if they don’t pay any tax. So half t he citizens support the other half who live off the government. But it is the top 10% of earners who pay 90% of the income taxes so I am happy to have them around to pay my bills.

                    2. Yes, and the top 1% pay roughly 40% of all income taxes. But the left apparently thinks this is inadequate. So yes, it’s the so-called rich that do the heavy lifting, not the middle class.

                2. It’s like the old joke among boat owners: anyone that has a boat that’s at least one foot longer than yours owns a yacht. Congratulations! Without knowing you at all, I would guess that the majority of Democrats would consider you one of “The Rich”.

                3. I can fix Climate Change, but it will be expensive. I will need about half your income. Please, email your bank account information ASAP. Remember, it is all to save the drowning polar bears.

                1. Yes, sir, a criminal that should be shot on sight or hung from a lamp pole! How can so very many people in direct contact with this lying, worthless thing not pull a “Jack Ruby” on it?

            1. NO! NO! NO!
              It is no longer Global Warming!
              They got caught cooking the scientific data so now it is Climate Change! The one who benefited the most is Fat Al Gore.
              He got almost as fat as his bankbook!
              Thank God Tipper Gore divorced him after he sold media to the those chumps.

              1. Al Gore wouldn’t sell the remnants of his Current TV network to Glenn Beck because their political views were too different, and Al wanted something more politically compatible with Current’s former viewership. So Gore sold it to Al-Jazeera instead. Pro-terrorist, anti-America Al Jazeera.

                You can’t make this stuff up.

            2. OBAMA ALREADY PUTS 7 GRAND OF GOVERNMENT MONEY INTO EVERY TESLA BUILT .
              SO NO , HE ISN’T BUYING A TESLA FOR EVERYONE , HE’s JUST MAKING THEM PAY FOR IT .

            3. I drive past the former Solyndra building 2x every day. it’s a constant reminder of Crony Capitalism and Obama giving money to his campaign bundler. And we have not gotten the 10s of thousands of high paying jobs all that money was supposed to help create. Or save.

            4. Oh Mister Lee the General, you read my mind. -oh you, so kind. LOL, Sans niaiser les Tesla sont overpriced. On veut plus de char de mm avec un budget plus léger mettons. Ce que le Qc fais de bien c’est promouvoir avec des déductions d’impôts, les chars électriques. C’es tune bonne initiative. Reste qu’èn moyenne 40 milles comme moyen de transport durable, faut qq1 travaille ds maison hein

            1. The iPhones get particularly dirty when they become obsolete, are shipped to China, and the metals recovered after the iPhones are burned in the open in small Mom & Pop recycle operations.

            1. All of our coal-fired power plants have “scrubbers” that remove the majority of pollutants. They have had those “scrubbers” for decades. There is no way they can be replaced with any of the “green energy” solutions. Only natural gas is cheaper than coal when producing electricity. Fracking has given us an abundance of natural gas but it is very expensive to make the switch from coal to natural gas. Cheap and plentiful sources of energy are necessary for a thriving economy. We have enough coal in the ground to provide all of our electrical needs for hundreds of years. It is a mistake to take coal completely out of the picture.

          3. The only message COP21 is sending to ISIS is to show how weak and feckless Obama is, in the aftermath of the Paris terrorist attack. It is monumentally embarrassing.

        2. A number 1 correct! Scientist Carter in a chapter in Mark Steyn’s book shows increased temperature PRECEDES CO2 increase. So, CO2 cannot be a causative factor. My view: Sun is major factor in climate change.

            1. .❝my neighbor’s mom is making $98 HOURLY on the internet❞….A few days ago new McLaren F1 subsequent after earning 18,512$,,,this was my previous month’s paycheck ,and-a little over, $17k Last month ..3-5 h/r of work a day ..with extra open doors & weekly paychecks.. it’s realy the easiest work I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months ago and now making over $87, p/h..Learn More right Here….
              av….
              ➤➤
              ➤➤➤ http://GlobalSuperEmploymentVacanciesReportFree/GetPaid/$97hourly… ❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦

            1. And all by “playing on our fears” about global warming.

              BTW, noticed how global warming Chicken Littles’ predictions are never any closer than 50 to100 years away.

              “In 80 years sea level will have raised 1 inch! AAHHHHHH! Everybody run! Women, children and greenies first!”

              Oh, please.

              1. Ha ha. The thing that made me quit paying them any attention is that when they are asked what to do about it, their parroted answer is always the same–do with less or cull the herd. It’s purely a control scam and you can’t pay a one of them to see that.

        3. Now you are being racist against the political class and brutal dictators. I suppose next you are going to say that al-Qaeda and ISIS are not the “moderate” terrorists, and the refugees are not all widows and orphans. Obama would not lie to you.

          1. NEVER!
            This President has never told a lie to America!
            He misled us about keeping our doctors and insurance plan and Not a smidgen of corruption in the IRS scandal. Lois Lerner just wanted to mimic Al Capone and plead the FIFTH!
            Neither has Slick Willie and his Wench!
            Oral sex is not sex where he comes from and Hillary knows it was the video in Benghazi!
            John Kerry voted for the war in Iraq before he voted against it. Why did we not pull out all of our forces after he voted against it? Maybe he would have for it after voting against the third time? What a sham.

        4. The progressives believe that there are masses and elites. They believe that there can actually be wealth equality and some sort of global balance.

          This is no different than believing that being nice to terrorists and denying their religion will somehow calm them. Or, like the cuddly polar bear that you think you can pet… Dangerous, period.

          1. The progressives really don’t believe in equality. They believe they are entitled to be the elites, and the rest of us are the masses–who will have equality of misery. Their vision is identical to that of the Communist leadership of the old USSR.

        5. There has been nothing except excellent weather in Delray Beach, FL where I
          live since Hurricane Wilma in 2005 which crossed Florida from the West unlike
          most East Coast hurricanes which come from the Atlantic pushing storm surges in
          front of them. Yet the EPA is giving a Black church $30,000 to study Climate
          Change in Delray Beach. This is just the Democratic Party buying votes for
          Hillary, and it is criminal. The church is unqualified to perform the study. It
          is a lie about increasingly bad weather in the area. An occasional Hurricane is
          normal anywhere in Florida, but there have been none in 5 years. After Wilma,
          everyone installed hurricane shutters, to prevent flying debris from coming
          through windows. Roof tiles had to be fastened in a way to prevent them from
          becoming flying projectiles. Everything that needed doing was done then. Full report here: http://freebeacon.com/issues/epa-gives-30000-to-unitarian-church-that-preaches-against-white-privilege

        6. And to keep us from
          accumulating wealth. Only the cronies who get in bed with the politically powerful and thus receive taxpayer grants and guaranteed loans can acquire wealth…as long as they see that a healthy percentage finds its way into the reelection coffers of the same politicians.

        7. I have a question, what happens to all of those billions of dollars the Just Us Department collects when they fine a big corporation for some alleged misconduct i.e. Volkswagen for fudging the emissions software? Does it go to the general fund or the DNC?

        1. You’re right. They have to provide a platform and credentials for the charlatans to fool the sheep. Sort of like lab coats that actors wear in a Preparation H commercial.

      3. Don’t forget the Obama’s and Rahm Emmanuel were partners in a Chicago carbon trading company. I’m sure the Obama’s would like to follow in Al Gore’s multi-billion dollar swindle!

    2. Let’s see the “rationale”: We are being told that climate change
      (global warming) is responsible for terrorism (that must explain why
      during the Medieval warming period there was a lot of conflict with
      Muslims). So the fact that we are going to “reverse” climate change
      (natural cyclical changes) will show the terrorists that we love them
      and as such they will embrace us (without suicide belts). I am glad we have such a strong and well thought plan to combat terrorism…

        1. Yes, them and anyone else who actually believes in America. The enemy could never have taken us over through a military invasion. They invaded us peacefully through our education system , media and pop culture.

          1. “At what point shall we expect the approach of danger? By what means shall we fortify against it?– Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant, to step the Ocean, and crush us at a blow? Never!–All the armies of Europe, Asia and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth (our own excepted) in their military chest; with a Buonaparte for a commander, could not by force, take a drink from the Ohio, or make a track on the Blue Ridge, in a trial of a thousand years.

            At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide.”

            Abraham Lincoln, 1838

    3. The entirety of the Democrat Party has embraced the fantasy that socialism leads to a better future. This in the face of the 20th century debacles that all trace their origins to a form of socialism. You want death, chose socialism. If you want a true welfare state, chose capitalism.

    4. Pruning ISIS, AQ and Boko like rosebushes, then joining climate clergy to demand sacrifice be brought to the temple to forestall earthquakes, floods, drought.

      What a sick twisted Islamarxist megalomaniac, derelict to his sworn duty, traitor to America, yet we have a gutless congress too race guilted to take him down.

  1. Only one more year of this delusional behavior to go. ISIS is at war with the West, so there is no way they will interfere with these left-wing loonies getting together with a plan to bankrupt the U.S. and Europe by throwing billions/trillions of dollars down the drain to stop “climate change”.

      1. Oh come on. It’s not like he’s tried to overthrow secular governments and replace them with islamic terrorists in Egypt, Libya and Syria. Or flood the US with hordes of potential terrorists without any screening. Oh wait….

        1. Obama has told us who he is: “My muslim faith…”
          “The future must not belong to those who slander” Mohammed.
          “There is nothing more beautiful than” the squealing pederast muzzie call to prayer.

      1. Like when he recently told the developing countries to avoid the pitfalls of America, where there is a great disparity of income between the rich and the poor, and whose political system is sharply divided along racial lines?

      1. not if the goal is to destroy the US (both constitution and bill of rights) If thats the case he gets a gold star… watch ‘obama deception’ to see whos pulling the strings on this CIA trained puppet hellbent on sending the US into 3rd world despotism

    1. not only stupid, but insanely detached from any semblance of reality. he should be taken off the stage in a straight jacket and brought to the nearest loony bin NOW.

      1. Obama is correct about American stupidity. He was elected twice.
        “Democracy is the pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance.”
        H.L. Mencken

    2. Sorry, or this might be his plan all along. The destruction of a nation. We the People will have to take our country back………………..that’s OK, we can do that.

  2. Barack “the liar” Obama; “If you mess with the USA, we’ll get you…. WE’LL … We’ll….. we’ll. . . ah. . . . . . yea . . . . we’ll call out our weathermen and they’ll show YOU a thing or two buddy…. “

    1. Trouble is, he won’t be out of the picture. He will be the un-George Bush. Instead of keeping quiet, he will not be community agitating, he will be country agitating, and it will be without any restraints. Scary, ain’t it?

      1. He can agitate all he wants when he leaves, but he will have no legal authority to do anything (THANK GOD!!!!!!). One can only hope his assigned SS agent will temporarily leave the room one day and a “Jack Ruby” will step up.

  3. Betcha Obama talks Hollande out of fighting ISIS and into expediting getting the Syrian refugees into Europe and the U.S. Right now it is all Obama cares about.

  4. “What a powerful rebuke to the terrorists it will be, when the world stands as one and shows that we will not be deterred from building a better future for our children,” he added.

    of all the blithering cr ap to come out of this oblowhole’s pie hole THIS just might be the most insane littany of drivel EVER to spew out.

  5. What a blithering idiot!…. “Take that , you bad guys…we’re addressing CLIMATE CHANGE!”

    Obama and the leftists are delusional ….they’re absolutely insane!

  6. I didn’t see the State Department issue a warning about travel due to climate. Obama still insists that climate change is a greater threat to our security. I wonder if he has the SS check out shadows as well.

  7. Of course. Once the terrorists see we are serious about globull warming, they will scatter in fear.

    Truth is, Hussein Obama is a cultist. He only cares about his personality cult. Until terrorists strike his $30,000 a plate fundraiser gang, expect nothing more than dopey platitudes from him.

  8. This climate-change stuff is Barack Obama’s asymmetric psychological/political war against America: 1) disinformation, 2) distraction, 3) demoralization, 4) destabilization, 5) trash the Constitution, 6) created/exploited crisis, 7) government “solution” to the crisis, 8) normalization to the new tyranny, 9) repeat.

  9. The trouble with this false claim of “climate change” is that we, the people, will pick up the tab on the order of several trillion dollars over the life of this thing. This will put us further in debt. We all will truly be indentured servants ruled by an elite class of progressives. The times they are looking very ugly unless someone stops them.

  10. I feel safe now that climate control is his top concern. His way is just change the subject and all the real important stuff will go away.
    Leadership at last!!!!!!!

  11. I think we need to ban ALL carbonation in beverages. If we could do this immediately, the sea ice will return and the Polar Bears will no longer need EBT cards.

        1. You need to go – the food is spectacular and the architecture and art magnificent. Paris is without a doubt the most beautiful city in the world. Rome is a close second.

          We are about to see the Europeans wake up from the fantasy they have been enjoying since we won WWII and then rebuilt their cities for them. They’re not bad people – they just have had the luxury of not having to worry about anything since 1950 or so. Now that they face an existential threat they’ll get their acts together. The French National Front is a good start.

  12. “What a powerful rebuke to the terrorists it will be, when the world stands as one and shows that we will not be deterred from building a better future for our children,” he(Obama) added.

    The ones who survive Planned Parenthood!

  13. Obama struck a similar tone Sunday at a news conference in Malaysia, “We will not be deterred from fleecing our people of their hard earned cash on a fantasy in order to gain massive amounts of power and wealth for ourselves!”

    At least that’s what I heard…

  14. Not sure what planet this loon is living on. He should be embarrassed as well as all the other leaders who buy into this fantasy. Someday the people will wake up and put a stop to this. It may be too late. Every day Obama dreams up ways to stop our economy and make our lives worse.

  15. Then the scene faded from color to black and white as the camera swung 180 degrees, stopping on a medium shot of a short man with black hair wearing a perfectly tailored Kuppenheimer suit. A lit Chesterfield smoldered in his right hand as he addressed the camera in deep sonorous tones that belied his lack of height:

    “Submitted for your approval, an excursion to a country that was once a shining beacon of science in search of the truth but which is now ruled by a power-hungry despot whose delusional arrogance is matched only by his environmental hypocrisy, a nation once known as the United States of America but with each passing day becomes more and more a part of The Twilight Zone.”

  16. “Stop attacking us! Stop Shariah Law! Or…we will reduce carbon emissions!!” Did you hear that, Ackmehd?? Allah be praised. We should surrender and turn in our weapons! He really has us with this one!! We have no choice!

    1. It’s no laughing matter when they keep getting elected, though. We’ve got a huge problem on our hands here, and it’s called the American Electorate.

  17. “The danger to America is not Barack Hussein Obama, but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools, such as those who made him their president.”

    1. Another day, another proof that I was right! Obama-haters are truly the biggest fake Chrisitan, real racist, bigoted, black-hating klansman tea bagger scumbags in America today. No wonder they love Trump, he’s a racist, bigoted, black-hating klasnman tea bagger scumbag as well.

      Many regulations are good and necessary. Obviously there are many regulations which might be supported or opposed by people with differing views. Just because it is a regulation does not mean it is necessarily bad. The problem with cons is that to them any regulation is bad. Some regulations are good and bad as there may be an economic cost tied to their implementation. The biggest problem is that very few of us, if any, actually know what these regulations are or how they will affect us or American business. Just saying they are bad for business doesn’t quite cut it, although in some instances this most likely is true.

      Do you have any real arguments? Or are you just a troll, trying to make reasonable people leave the conversation?
      Hey morons! We’ve been doing that for many years through many presidents. You’re research is limited by the racist evil agenda that you have.
      He is not evil, and I have no reason to believe he hates America.
      Hes a Christian, not a Muslim. He doesn’t hate America. Is he a traitor? Who has he betrayed and how did he betray them? No, Obama is not a communist, he is a democrat.
      He is also not a terrorist; as he has not committed acts of terror. Obama is married to his wife Michelle; so no he is not homosexual. Even if he was; that is no from.
      Barack Obama cannot be impeached as all you have claimed; cannot be proven and make little sense. You sound like a very uneducated a paranoid little man.
      If you truly believe that you’d prefer Putin as your President, then I will tell you to move to Russia and see what happens when you attempt to exercise your freedom of speech about things political in a public forum. I guess you REALLY miss having a White Man as President.

      1. Yes, the King is in violation of the United States Constitution. I am an American Patriot “little man”, you call me, when the S%$#t hits the fan we will see won’t we. NOW STFU! Dickweed. Oh and keep drinking the Kool Aid you blind MFer.

  18. What’s the difference between “climate change” people and ISIS?

    One is a collaborative cult of individuals using lies, deception, propaganda, coercion, and intimidation to pursue their goal of the complete elimination of all people who don’t believe in their made-up belief system that pushes subjugation and death upon millions of people. The other are islamic radicals.

  19. World leaders will start taxing coal companies and miraculously ISIS will lay down their weapons, stop beheading Christians and stop raping Yazidi’s. Praise be to God.

  20. …meh…picture this newflash: “Mr. BHO once again spews out his excess CO2 …to no effect…as ISIS/ISIL…along with other Islamist and non-Islamist terrorists alike…tell Mr. BHO…’Aww, blow it out your_ _ _!…’ “

  21. I never cease to be amazed at Obama’s buffoonery. This classical stupid, there you naughty murderers we are going to have a climate summit, take that! Isis is real, global warming is a hoax. Instead of dealing with reality he would rather fantasize and play with himself. If it were not so dangerous it would be hilarious, he is having an orgasm over climate change while people are dying because he “ended the war in Iraq” put Al Qaeda on the run, and contained ISIS. What a total jerk off.

  22. …wonder if the Islamic radical caliphate has thought about hiring Mr.BHO as its termite in the West…Mr. BHO seems to eat way at the credibility and strength of the West every time he speechifies…

  23. ISIS must be ready to surrender as they see Obama wage war on global warming? Such a stunning rebuke. Such a setback. How can ISIS go on when they see our president so engaged in stopping global warming, with carbon taxes and EPA regulations? Strangely, by rejecting the Keystone Pipeline and making it harder for Americans to get oil elsewhere, we now buy more Arab oil which funds terrorist groups. The more Obama supports Arab oil, the more the Mideast goes into flames, with more money to export that terrorism worldwide. The more regulations the US and West has on oil, the more market share the Arab oil producers get, including ISIS. We’re financing terrorism with Obama’s energy policies, while he pretends he’s “rebuking” ISIS with a global warming summit. Historians of the future will look back on Obama’s presidency as similar to the Salem witchcraft hysteria and wonder how so many leaders lost their minds. Best historical explanation might be Obama never stopped using drugs and he’s a lifelong addict. That would be Obama’s best defense for his insane policies.

  24. …great work , Mr. BHO…just go head and hand ISIS/ISIL their ultimate weapon…now ISIS/ISIL knows that all they have to do is threaten to…gather together, take a collective, deep inhalation of the world’s O2..and blow out all their CO2…that threat will force the West to cave to the caliphate…

  25. Great, so when the upcoming mini-ice age arrives (the Maunder Minimum), what are they going to call it then, and who are they going to blame? The climate has been changing for the last 4.5 billion years and will continue until the sun burns out. Liberals would be funny if they weren’t so dangerous. I can’t decide, at this point, which is worse, liberal/socialists or muslims.
    $

  26. Climate summit a rebuke? That was to rank in the top five of the dumbest things I have ever heard. Folks meeting to promote a hoax, seize monies under the rouse of saving something based on junk science. A rebuke? A joke! Cancel it and discuss how to destroy ISIS.

  27. Maybe if Obama would just Make Love to His Leader of His ISIS the whole World could hold hands, drink a Coke & teach The World to Sing in Perfect Harmony & then Everybody could ride Unicorns & Eat Cotton Candy. Obama the Femme, The Feisty, The Fool. But Hey – Climate Change was a Change that just Got Fixed – NOT! So While the World Burns, Obama Fiddles.

  28. Obama learned from his Alinsky mentors that the more absurd your thoughts and actions are, the more difficult it is to oppose them. At a deep level, humans do not psychological discord. When we’re confronted with it, we “connect the dots” internally so that we can make sense of it and resolve the dissonance. So when Obama says he’s going to fight terrorism by focusing on climate change, inside your mind you think to yourself (though you don’t want to admit it); “clearly, there must be a method to the madness. clearly, he must know something we don’t.” Admit it, even the most staunch detractors among you (myself included), get caught up in that logic. It’s mindphuck, and it’s pure evil, driven by ideological madness and hatred.

  29. “climate change is a threat to national security on par with terrorism”

    Bush style translation….”you’re either with us (delusional climate change cultists) or you’re with the terrorists”

  30. Einstein developed and proved the remarkable formula E=MC2 : Energy = Mass x Speed of Light squared. He was a brilliant genius as we all know.

    Another lesser known of Einstein’s formulas determined: If you were to strip naked and run around in a circle at the speed of 298 KM/sec (the speed of light) it could be possible for you to screw yourself…..!

    Should you determine you are not physically capable of achieving that speed at your age, you can easily achieve the same result by voting Democrat in the Nov. 8, 2016 election.

  31. Terrorists beware! Mena old Obama is going to punish American workers with his proposal to pay the world’s Fantasy Climate Change tax. Are you shaking in your boots, or sandals, yet?

  32. I used to criticize Obama, but then I realized that he is not ineffective. On the contrary, he gets 98 on the 1 to 100 test from ISIS. Also, for him to think that a group of terrorists that blow themselves and others up, and behead people, is going to care the slightest about some climate conference? Simply incredible.

  33. Obama and the MSM that supports him, have clearly lost their collective minds.
    They are completely bonkers! We’re screwed!
    Only TRUMP can save us from our own “Leaders”.

    TRUMP 2016/2020

  34. Didn’t I read this in The Onion? This just can’t be serious….of course except that I heard it with my own ears a little while ago.
    We still have 14 months. I hope we can survive.

    1. Yes, for the first time in my life, our government has totally abandoned it’s primary duty to protect it’s citizens.
      We now care more about a fantasy than national defense…

  35. Just when it seems Obama must have plumbed the very depths of incompetence, we’re reminded again that he has an unparalleled genius for finding new ways to fail.

  36. Yes, I’m sure a bunch of Western elitists at an elitist “conference” in Paris, gathered together to “debate” global tax policies, definitely has ISIS trembling.

  37. Let’s see the “rationale”: We are being told that climate change (global warming) is responsible for terrorism (that must explain why during the Medieval warming period there was a lot of conflict with Muslims). So the fact that we are going to “reverse” climate change (natural cyclical changes) will show the terrorists that we love them and as such they will embrace us (without suicide belts). Yep, I see that we have a great plan to combat terrorism…

  38. The earth has been warming since the last ice age. The planet has been an ice cube and water-world several times over and will be both again. The left has seized on a natural phenomena so as to promote a scheme that would skim enough off capitalism to make statist leftist central planning economic systems remotely competitive with free enterprise and to provide the government with money for liberal causes thereby enhancing the power of government and the party of government (the Democrats). They’ve found in climate science a cadre of scientists willing to fudge data in order to keep the grant money flowing so they don’t find themselves asking “do you want fries with that?”

  39. Remember folks, this is what liberals do: they cannot address serious issues because they can later be measured for success or failure. They instead focus on non-relevant things: climate change, union issues, “women’s issues”, how much or how much more should we give away in entitlements, etc. There is no end to those issues.
    These are all “issues” by which there is no real measure of success or failure – and which in the democrat case, you’ll have the MSM spinning always for the liberal.

  40. To the EMPTY SUIT in CHIEF….

    You got ‘ em now…..ISIS is QUAKING in their BOOTS……Bout Dat Klimate Change

    For good measure……Draw ANOTHER Red Line too….

    That’s SCARE the crap outta them

  41. Hold on folks, let’s consider this carefully. Thinking about the latest warnings coming out of Washington, its clear that once again we all misunderstood Obama (as he’s much too clever for most of us); when he said “ISIS is contained”, he meant to planet Earth! That is why the current warning is for anywhere (on planet Earth) at anytime!
    There, you see what a success his policies have been? ISIS HAS BEEN CONTAINED!

  42. Thank God! oblabla finally takes a forceful stand against ISIS!

    THIS will show them! oblabla is NOT a man to be trifled with!

    The cowards must be trembling behind their masks!

  43. First, Obama tells us that “Climate Change” is the cause of terrorism. Now, Obama tells us that the Climate Change summit is a “powerful rebuke” to terrorism. Is Climate Change as breath mint or a candy mint…or both…or neither…or whatever Obama and his acolytes decide it is to support their ongoing fantasy agenda?

  44. We might as well change all our names to Boxer, the cart-horse from Animal Farm. Anyone who believes the Paris conference is anything other than a chance to further wreck the world, redistribute wealth upward, and deny the poor the right and ability to develop using cheap power, is a fool and a knave to the moneyed class. Oh, and the attendees get to eat some really fancy food while they are in town “saving the world.” Scorn and contempt don’t begin to cover my opinion of the elitist bloats.

  45. Obama will say that we’re sorry ‘Global Warming” has caused you to be upset. We promise to end it so you can return to your sponsorship of peace, diverse inclusiveness and helping hands around the world.

  46. Here’s to Obama:

    .
              ▄█▀█▀█▄
            ▄█▀  █  ▀█▄
           ▄█▀       ▀█▄
           █           █
           █           █
           ▀█▄▄  █   ▄█▀
             █  ▄▀▄  █
             █ ▀   ▀ █
             █       █
             █       █
             █        █
             █       █
             █       █
       ▄█▀▀█▄█       █▄█▀█▄
     ▄█▀▀    ▀            ▀▀█
    █▀                      ▀█.
    █                        █
    █           ▄█▄          █
    ▀█         █▀ ▀█        █▀
     ▀█▄      █▀   ▀█     ▄█▀
       ▀█▄▄▄█▀      ▀█▄▄▄█▀

  47. The Paris attacks were designed to stop the climate conference. Therefore, if you do not support the climate conference, you are with the terrorists. Never let a crisis go to waste.

  48. What does Barack Hussein Obama know about being an American? He was raised by Muslim-Kenyan-Communist radical leftists that hated America. All of his inner circles hated America. Even Michelle hates America.

    So, it’s no wonder that, the traitorous, Obama, disdainfully ignores his oath as President to “faithfully execute” the laws of America and to “preserve, protect, and defend” the Constitution!

    Obama’s twisted ideology to transform America into a third world cesspool is guided by his hatred of America.

    ==

    If you are happy with this, you’ll continue to be happy till the end.

    If you are not happy…what are you doing?

    Midnight’s not creeping, it’s at a gallop…

    1. Yeah,…kinda makes o’l “Malaise” Former Pres. Carter shine doesn’t Obama?

      Remember the scene from the Dirty Dozen when Donald Rickels says to the two soilders who were near an outhous when it got shelled and they all got crap covered,…” “Kinda reminds you of home doesn’t it?”

  49. I love the double entendre – Climate Summit powerful rebuke to terrorists. I guess climate change skeptics are terrorists. This administration isn’t fighting Islamofascists, it’s fighting it’s own citizens – white men who are capable of thinking.

        1. It actually activates the terrorist gene in all mental defectives – liberals, democrats, socialists, communists and generally the left…………..

  50. “What a powerful rebuke to the terrorists it will be, when the world stands as one and shows that we will not be deterred from building a better future for our children,” he added.
    Obama showing his insanity about ISIS and AGW in the same sentence.

  51. still propping up his inner-psychological-walls to prevent the real world from infringing upon his own version of reality….. this type of behavior is clinically known as “batsh*t crazy”…

  52. So those that do not bow to the cult of climate alarmists are terrorists? This man is dangerous, just look what happened on the Turkish Syrian boarder today. This can quickly spin into something very bad.

  53. in other news, the Dept of Homeland Security announced they have uncovered a credible threat by ISIS. The Islamic State has declared they will, in the next few weeks, attempt to kill all citizens living in the greater Los Angeles area. Homeland Security estimates, should ISIS succeed in carrying out this threat, that the death toll could be as high as 8 or 9.

  54. This makes zero sense. Really Barack? Ice Cream has no bones and no, you can’t use this statement. All joking aside, this is truly delusional and I’d say clinically with no exaggeration

  55. Obama’s Legacy: I was born in Kenya, Frank Davis Marshall is my father, terrorist Bill Ayers wrote both of ‘my’ books, Michele is my beard, my real last name is Soetoro, I attended college as a foreign student, my college tuition and expenses were paid for by a Saudi millionaire, I received special treatment as an affirmative action and foreign student, I was married to my roommate-lover in college and I wear the same ring today, I was a member of Man Country while living in Chicago, I use a stolen social security card, I was raised as a muslim as a child, Jeremiah Wright was my adult mentor, I am personal friends with George Soros and his children, I am a Saul Alinsky disciple, I have attempted to destroy the U.S. economy, military and healthcare system, I have attempted to start race riots and war inside the U.S., I have used the NSA, IRS, FBI, CIA and Homeland Security to destroy all those against me, I have usurped the Constitution by governing by executive order, I sleep with Che Guevara pj’s, I have never quit smoking or the use of choom and coke, I love islam and the quran, I hate Israeli Jews and Israel, I hate Christians and the Bible, I hate the U.S.A. This is the real me. Enjoy the s_ck, America. Hahaha

    1. Another day, another proof that I was right! Obama-haters are truly the biggest fake Chrisitan, real racist, bigoted, black-hating klansman tea bagger scumbags in America today. No wonder they love Trump, he’s a racist, bigoted, black-hating klasnman tea bagger scumbag as well.

      Many regulations are good and necessary. Obviously there are many regulations which might be supported or opposed by people with differing views. Just because it is a regulation does not mean it is necessarily bad. The problem with cons is that to them any regulation is bad. Some regulations are good and bad as there may be an economic cost tied to their implementation. The biggest problem is that very few of us, if any, actually know what these regulations are or how they will affect us or American business. Just saying they are bad for business doesn’t quite cut it, although in some instances this most likely is true.

      Do you have any real arguments? Or are you just a troll, trying to make reasonable people leave the conversation?
      Hey morons! We’ve been doing that for many years through many presidents. You’re research is limited by the racist evil agenda that you have.
      He is not evil, and I have no reason to believe he hates America.
      Hes a Christian, not a Muslim. He doesn’t hate America. Is he a traitor? Who has he betrayed and how did he betray them? No, Obama is not a communist, he is a democrat.
      He is also not a terrorist; as he has not committed acts of terror. Obama is married to his wife Michelle; so no he is not homosexual. Even if he was; that is no from.
      Barack Obama cannot be impeached as all you have claimed; cannot be proven and make little sense. You sound like a very uneducated a paranoid little man.
      If you truly believe that you’d prefer Putin as your President, then I will tell you to move to Russia and see what happens when you attempt to exercise your freedom of speech about things political in a public forum. I guess you REALLY miss having a White Man as President.

      1. The free stuff will be gone with the new president. Enjoy the history lesson below.

        The birther issue has not gone away, nor will it go away after Barry leaves the White House. It will probably ramp up as Barry’s circle of “friends” and wall of silence begins to crumble. As a former useful idiot he will be discarded harshly by his puppet-masters. Your opinion of the Constitution is
        not correct. Natural born requires birth on American soil. Ted Cruz is simply
        following the precedent that Barry and the Democrats have established. Both are not natural born according to the Constitution. Barry has no legitimate birth U.S.certificate, no legitimate social security card, no legitimate draft registration form, no record of anything in his life prior to running for president in 2007. He DOES have a wedding ring that says, “There is no god but allah,” on the inside. This is the ring he began wearing 10 YEARS BEFORE he was married to Miss Robinson and still wears today. We also know that Barry traveled to Pakistan with a college “roommate” at a time when Americans were NOT ALLOWED to travel to Pakistan. He did so on his own passport as his nationality is either, Kenyan or Indonesian. His entire college “career” was as a FOREIGN STUDENT as well as his book publisher’s bio of him telling readers of his Kenyan birth. The birther’s are concerned with the ENTIRE legitimacy of Barack Hussein Obama / Barry Soetoro / Harrison J. Bounel from birth. The man is a fraud from every angle from every direction, from the very beginning, whether it began in Kenya OR Hawaii. FRAUD, TRAITOR. The most dangerous man in the world.

        1. Yep, I like how to racist, bigoted a-hole resort to do what do you best. Prove that every I said was right! It’s kinda obvious you hate being called what you are, you keep playing the denial card. Racism is STILL a thing and no amount of using the denial card will change that fact! Man I guess having a black man as President REALLY is THAT bad!

          It seems obvious from the many hypocrisy in your post and the inability to formulate a refute anything I said, you resort to character assassination. that is ALL you are good at!!

          Historians say the KKK consisted of a group of Southern whites after the Civil War who were Democrats. But there’s no evidence the KKK was created by their political party.

          the Southern wing of the Democratic party, who later broke off and called themselves the Dixiecrats when the rest of the Democratic party changed positions and supported civil rights legislation. The Southern Democrats were the last vestiges of the political party landscape that existed in the lead up to the Civil War, during an era in which the Democratic party was heavily pro-slavery and the Republican party was founded on the platform of abolishing slavery. Needless to say (or maybe it needs to be said), the Democrats who founded the KKK were the philosophical ancestors of today’s Tea Party Republicans.

          It’s nonsense, probably got hung up from the last election. There are a couple of things, for one, he’s is the son of an American citizen, so no matter where he was born, he’s an American citizen. The goes back to Chester A. Arthur, who, many sources say was actually born in Canada and not Vermont. Then there was George Romney, Mitts dad, who was born in Mexico to American citizens, and he was determined to be a natural born America, and of course John McCain who was born in Panama, again to American citizens. And Cruz, with one natural American citizen parent, he was born in Canada, and held dual citizenship until last year. His father was born in Cuba, and his real name is Rafael Cruz, not Ted.

          His wedding band doesn’t bear any inscription at all. Its a series of loops inside two vertical bands.

          The rest of this makes so little sense that its kind of like believing in unicorn tears. If he were going to go to school as a foreign student then the admissions office would have had to be blind not to see he graduated from a Hawaiian private high school.

          OF course it is not true, as you well know. It is a piece of far-reich propaganda, of the kind that they’ve been manufacturing since a black man was elected president. It is bathed in racism all the way through. It didn’t sound to me like you really wanted to post a question, but rather start trouble here by posting inflammatory junk.

          Spoken like the true disgusting dirty racist, bigoted POS that you truly are.

          I guess terrorist killers hate Obama. That should be good news for Republicans, for up to now, they have believed Obama was one of them.

          We lost over 3,000 people on 911. GW Bush spent 40% of his presidency from Jan-Sept 11 on vacation and ignored MANY WARNINGS about an “imminent attack.” He did nothing. Read Richard Clark’s book.

          Considering the FACTS, you really should be asking yourself why Bush was so soft on terror.

          There is no such thing a good and evil, there are just men.

          I don’t see any evidence that Obama is destroying america.

          Muslim? No, he has a history of christian religion.

          I don’t see any evidence that he hates america.

          Whom has he betrayed?

          Do you even know the definition of the word communist?

          What violence to cause political change has he committed? (definition of terrorist according to US government under President Bush)

          Do you remember he has children, with his wife?

          No he can’t be impeached for doing nothing illegal. Just admit your racism and let’s be done with it!

  56. Yes siree, bob, the president really showed ISIS. Did it ever occur to the President that a lot of global warming is being spread by the bombs, rockets & bullets of Islamic terrorists. Why don’t you start your battle against global warming with them.

  57. Obama and the Democrat party us your enemy. This is easily understood by recognizing that they see you as their number one enemy. Not Putin,not radical islam, not China or north korea. Obango is the enemy. He us either the dumbest person on the planet, or he’s not dumb and he’s doing it on purpose. I don’t think he’s dumb. I think he’s an America hating POS.

  58. And to REALLY stick it to the terrorists, Obama will fly his entire family to the summit, at a cost of maybe $20 million. THAT will show ’em! “We ain’t scared o’ you terrorists! We be eatin’ kobe beef jus’ like before. Business as usual.”

  59. I’m sure this will be equally as effective as the Twitter hashtag approach.
    Seriously though, what about this guy seemed qualified or presidential to anyone?

  60. What an utter and complete idiot this so called president is. Pitty the politicians in D.C. are too scared of being called racists to impeach the worthless and toothless fool in chief!

    1. When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people
      to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another,
      and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal
      station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a
      decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should
      declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

  61. Is he for real? My God! Does this man have any clue? The world is on the precipice of a total war and this moron is worrying about Mother Nature. I wonder what his solution will be if we have a Nuclear Winter.

  62. I can see those terrorists trembling in their boots when Obama tells them all about the .001% average fluctuation in global surface temperatures over the past 50 years. Those terrorists might just feint on the spot. Nobel Peace Prize number 2!

  63. Here it is for all to see. Nobody can be so stupid. All the talking heads that hedge their opinion just in case they are given that coveted interview with President Zero, need to stop hedging and tell the American people and the rest of the world the truth. Everything Obamawaow has done is by design. Nobody can get it wrong 100% of the time on pure stupidity. Iraq, Syria, Egypt, Lybia, Iran… you can’t get it wrong that many times. This is all by design to take down America. It is time to clearly state the emperor has no clothes. And if the DemocRAT party wants to go down with him so be it.

    When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people
    to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another,
    and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal
    station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a
    decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should
    declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

    Let’s roll…

  64. i am trying to think how a troll could defend this assinine statement by the bamster. Maybe jerry2015 is listening and could shed some light on the delusionL HUSSEIN THE INSANE

  65. HA on you ISIS! I lowered sea levels, started the healing of our planet and reduced greenhouse gases! Take that you wusses. Whatcha gonna do now?
    Ovomit is patently delusional and very dangerous. His worst is yet to come.

  66. Assume BHO is an ISIS operative, what can he do as President to expedite the overtaking of the USA? 1) try to organize an invasion under everyone’s nose, calling it humanitarian refugees. 2) allowing anyone to come across our border into the US, undocumented. 3) Only using lip service to fight the terrorists (red line in Syria, not bombing the oil tankers that fund ISIS). 4) Make sure the number one state sponsor of terrorism is given a $150 B windfall and allow them to develop a bomb. 5) Treat our only ally in the mid east, Israel, like dirt. It’s only logical he wants the US to pay.

  67. Once again Obama taunts ISIS. Security better be really tight at this climate summit in Paris or ISIS will be able to take out a lot of world leaders at the same time.

  68. obie boy is a hoot. We’ll show those terrorists. We’ll all gather in Paris and waste a bunch of time. We have the added benefit of spewing tons of CO2 from AF1 on the way. Well, I’m off to the driving range.

  69. Obama cannot be serious. A rebuke to the terrorists. They are wetting themselves from laughing so hard, not because of fear of the Climate Change rebuke. Loony as a bedbug.

  70. Most of you are missing the point. Obama is telling you point blank who he considers terrorists to be, and it isn’t the same guys that popped into your mind when you read the word “terrorist.” Is it all coming into focus now?

      1. Globalists want to kill you also. Sooner or later, that reality will dawn on you. If you think that global warming doesn’t have anything to do with Muslim extremists, you’re right. It doesn’t. So who’s left?

  71. I do believe that weather has impacted the Clinton’s war on women…whenever there is inclement weather outside, another woman is more likely to be assaulted by Bubba.

  72. The undeniable feeling anytime from Obama when he talks about terrorism is a hollow feeling. There’s just nothing there. I get the feeling if he didn’t have to say something about IS he wouldn’t.

  73. Just like vampires, Dracula and werewolves, Climate change created my man and moderate muslims that can fight ISIS do not exist. Sadly this administration will never figure it out.

      1. You are obviously correct. The only reason we haven’t see world wide ridicule heaped on Obama is because he is literally in a position to hurt any country in the world; and would if he felt slighted enough. Look at what he has and is continuing to do to Israel. Obama is a hardline Marxist whose ONLY important task as far as he sees it is to do everything he can to harm America and the rest of the old, Christian, western countries which have plundered the rest of the world. I am quite certain that everything that he has orchestrated with his weakness in Tunisia, Iraq, Syria, Israel, Libya, Egypt and Somalia (what a long list, I’m sure I even missed some) and caused massive death and suffering is making him extremely happy. He is a very, very ill individual.

        Once the books start coming out post Jan 2016 it will get very ugly for anyone who thinks Obama has been anything other than a disaster for America and the world. Instead of comparing him to Neville Chamberlain I think we should be directly comparing him to Benedict Arnold or Vidkun Quisling. He is an evil man who laughingly goes about his grim work.

  74. all the “terrorists”(I think he means those Islamic jihadists) will simply lick their chops wondering how can they attack these feeble westerners.

  75. Barrack Obama
    Crawls Out of The White House Hot Tub
    Where He and Reggie Love
    Play Drop the Soap
    To Fight Islamo-Nazi Terrorism
    By Giving Nuclear Weapons to Iran
    And By Fighting Climate Change
    And by Crapping His Pants
    And Telling Americans to Stay Home
    And Not To Go Near Crowds
    Until Further Notice
    Or Until We Hear the Words
    Convert to Islam Or Die.

  76. This administration is living in a fantasy world. Reality to Democrats is mere words spoken. Say it and you’ll feel better about yourself. “Free Healthcare”, “Free Education”, Free Food!” And yet nothing is free, but if you say it, it is… according to liberals. No wonder we are in such a mess and the world laughs at us. Canada’s new president is going to ruin his country too but voters like fantasy so they vote for who can tell the biggest lie. Idiots!

    1. Yep. They both have little touch with reality. Indeed, when reality threatens to intrude on Obama’s world he orders a rewrite. We now hear that intelligence reports directed to the President are reviewed by his lackeys, I mean staff, and if the reports don’t align with his world view, they send them back for “corrections.” This is clearly someone out of touch with reality. Kerry is so goofy and ridiculous in his “from planet X” pronouncements that no comment can possibly clarify his in the bubble mind set.

  77. Wow. Just when you think the big O can’t step on his dork any harder he does it again. “Oooooo!” ISIS says, “We’d better watch out, rich western countries are going to reduce their carbon foot print. We are shaking in our boots and are going to retreat to our hovels and rape some children and slit the throats of some western journalists to make us feel braver.” Yep, the American President has once again spoken out strongly against the devout Muslims raging around the world.

  78. a distraction for something else? this is beyond reason. and all those other heads of state are just as daff. there will be retribution when he leaves office and hopefully it will be sweet.

  79. Obama is such a wimp ass that he could not look at a REAL President, President Hollande in the eye, shook his hand while looking away from the French President.

      1. Yes, you are correct, but at least Holland has the balls to actually do something in response to the expected attack. Anyone who thinks America, England, etc. are not in for much more in the way of slaughter is not dealing with reality.

  80. What kind of craziness is this? From a president no less!!! “They’re coming to take me away Ha Ha They’re coming to take me away Ha Ha to the funny farm where life is wonderful all the time and they’re coming to take me awaaaaaay!!”

  81. does anyone really listen to this jerk?–really?–fight terrorism with climate control?
    what’s he going to do–grow flowers and throw them at the terrorists?
    sing them another song?–play pleasant music at them?–how about cooking them a nice meal?
    PLEASE OBAMA–SERVE THE MEAL PERSONALLY, with a smile–and a pretty speech

  82. Awesome. Our world leaders are talking about how the propellant in cheese-in-a-can are going to have an impact in 100 years while ISIS is planning on making another impact in days. Priorities are in order.

  83. Wow! If I were an Islamic terrorist and I knew that global temperature might not increase by 0.3°C within the next fifty years if all the countries in the world got on board with Obama’s agenda (assuming that the global warming hypothesis is not just some sort of political fabrication), I would hardly be able to sleep at night. Score another one for Obama’s national socialism!

  84. 94Million people out of work,500K homeless,47M in food stamps,1.1M have not toilets,20TRI. in debt,Obamacare going down the sewer, and this idiot talking about global warming. That is the result of electing a black just for being black.

    1. Please. Obama’s race has absolutely nothing to do with anything. Black, white, yellow, green, hardline Marxists and western world haters are a very, very dangerous group.

      1. Yes, it does.He is a racist bigot and his skin color has been the protection of his lies,corruptions etc.Nobody dare to say anything for the fear of being called racist.

  85. Obama’s epa turned a river in my state Orange, Navajo are still PO because they claimed the water was fine and dandy. Ask the Indians how they like Obama’s ecology and they’ll stick a finger in their mouth pretending to puke…

  86. Meeting at a “global warming summit” to discuss terrorism? Yeah, those two topics are related….

    Maybe they’ll go to a girl scout meeting to discuss bowling next..

  87. ‘What a powerful rebuke to terrorists’ proclaims the Community Organizer. “Yes, look at us here holding meetings about climate, you terrorists….take that…..i am rebuking you”. I can only imagine the fear that is running through the ISIL camps after this stern warning.

  88. I haven’t said this in a while, but I haven’t encountered an article this insane in a while either. The Constitution is the only thing stopping Obama from making history’s worst tyrants look like amateurs.

    1. Unfortunately, I have to disagree with you on the constitution. We live in a post-constitutional America where the Federal government is completely untethered to any legal basis for the massive bureaucratic state we are suffering under.

      1. I have to side with the other gentleman here who said it’s being stretched to the max. But it’s still keeping the Racist-in-Chief from doing his worst. I will concede this though… it’s not unthinkable that he’d stage a power grab, and I don’t think we can rely on the military to thwart him.

    2. Just because an out of control supreme court says any wacky idea that is not part of the clearly delineated enumerated powers of the Federal government in the Constitution does not mean they are correct; only corrupt. Where in the constitution does it mention abortion, marriage, health care, redistribution of wealth?????

  89. So our biggest threat is not the armed terrorists that are actually killing people it is a largely unproven and ever changing threat that may affect us somewhere in the future and can only be conquered with money. I cannot believe the fools that fall for climate change and then yell like bratty children when you question them. That proves to me that climate change is a religion.

      1. I guess you could say climate change is a denomination of the religion of liberalism, the most nonsensical religion there is where emotion trumps logic 100% of the time.

  90. To each and everyone who voted for this little U.S. Constitution hating eunuch progressive,.especially those who voted for him the 2nd time,….happy now?

    1. No,..that’s what I thought too,..but about a year ago I decided he is not incompetent,..anyone who read his Mien Kampf “Nightmares of my Father” knows he blames the U.S. founders,.the U.S. Constitution,..(which he calls a series of negative laws),.he planned this all along,..he has had a psychopathic chip on his shoulder against the essential ideals of the U.S. since his youth,..unfortunately,..he is not an idiot,..he has a diabolical intelligence. However, our Founding Fathers knew him,.not by name but by his motives and have laid traps,..he despises not only our Constitution but the Supreme Court.

      1. Another day, another proof that I was right! Obama-haters are truly the biggest fake Chrisitan, real racist, bigoted, black-hating klansman tea bagger scumbags in America today. No wonder they love Trump, he’s a racist, bigoted, black-hating klasnman tea bagger scumbag as well

        Many regulations are good and necessary. Obviously there are many regulations which might be supported or opposed by people with differing views. Just because it is a regulation does not mean it is necessarily bad. The problem with cons is that to them any regulation is bad. Some regulations are good and bad as there may be an economic cost tied to their implementation. The biggest problem is that very few of us, if any, actually know what these regulations are or how they will affect us or American business. Just saying they are bad for business doesn’t quite cut it, although in some instances this most likely is true..

        Do you have any real arguments? Or are you just a troll, trying to make reasonable people leave the conversation?
        Hey morons! We’ve been doing that for many years through many presidents. You’re research is limited by the racist evil agenda that you have.
        He is not evil, and I have no reason to believe he hates America.
        Hes a Christian, not a Muslim. He doesn’t hate America. Is he a traitor? Who has he betrayed and how did he betray them? No, Obama is not a communist, he is a democrat.
        He is also not a terrorist; as he has not committed acts of terror. Obama is married to his wife Michelle; so no he is not homosexual. Even if he was; that is no from.
        Barack Obama cannot be impeached as all you have claimed; cannot be proven and make little sense. You sound like a very uneducated a paranoid little man.
        If you truly believe that you’d prefer Putin as your President, then I will tell you to move to Russia and see what happens when you attempt to exercise your freedom of speech about things political in a public forum. I guess you REALLY miss having a White Man as President.

        1. I feel truly honored to receive such a long blithering liberal socialist diatribe, so I suppose I should at least reply no one would spend so many words in a reply unless my comments struck home.

          Fact 1. A true Christian would never wear a ring (his wedding ring) engraved with the Arabic sentence: “There is no god but God and Muhammad is the prophet of God”

          Fact 2. If you had listened to his recorded radio interview long before he became president you would have heard his disdain for the U.S. Constitution as a flawed document because “It is only a set or series of negative laws,.it only states what the Federal Government is prohibited from doing to the people”. The good progressive socialist that he is of course he want the Federal government to me Constitutionally mandating what they must socially do for you (TO YOU). This concept is foreign to the foundation of our Republic.

          Fact 3. He is not black,…anymore that my children who are Eurasian, are either white or Chinese. We have yet to elect an African American, Black, Negro, Colored,..all respectable terms use through out different times.

          Fact 4. He aids and abets terrorism by both by his lack of action and his words,..he ignored the popular uprising of young people in Iran who wanted change,..while they were being massacred in the streets, and refuses to call them by the name other moderate Muslims who fight them call them,.”Fundamental Islamic extremists”.

          Fact 5. The Christian Syrian refugees would be in comparison to the Muslim refugees could quite easy be vetted by both their long term memberships in their Syrian Church and because they camp away from the Islamic camps our of dreadful fear. Obama ignores them.

          I could go on and on,..Yeah,.. Obama is going down in history as the most destructive of our nations highest Chief Executive Officers we have ever had. He was psychologically wounded in his formative years,.. therefore he displays a chip on his shoulder against his own exceptional nation wanting to right some imaginary imperial colonial period wrongs.

          Have a nice day Mark.

          1. Yep, I like how to racist, bigoted a-hole resort to do what do you best. Prove that every I said was right! It’s kinda obvious you hate being called what you are, you keep playing the denial card. Racism is STILL a thing and no amount of using the denial card will change that fact! Man I guess having a black man as President REALLY is THAT bad!

            It seems obvious from the many hypocrisy in your post and the inability to formulate a refute anything I said, you resort to character assassination. that is ALL you are good at!

            Historians say the KKK consisted of a group of Southern whites after the Civil War who were Democrats. But there’s no evidence the KKK was created by their political party.

            the Southern wing of the Democratic party, who later broke off and called themselves the Dixiecrats when the rest of the Democratic party changed positions and supported civil rights legislation. The Southern Democrats were the last vestiges of the political party landscape that existed in the lead up to the Civil War, during an era in which the Democratic party was heavily pro-slavery and the Republican party was founded on the platform of abolishing slavery. Needless to say (or maybe it needs to be said), the Democrats who founded the KKK were the philosophical ancestors of today’s Tea Party Republicans.

            It’s nonsense, probably got hung up from the last election. There are a couple of things, for one, he’s is the son of an American citizen, so no matter where he was born, he’s an American citizen. The goes back to Chester A. Arthur, who, many sources say was actually born in Canada and not Vermont. Then there was George Romney, Mitts dad, who was born in Mexico to American citizens, and he was determined to be a natural born America, and of course John McCain who was born in Panama, again to American citizens. And Cruz, with one natural American citizen parent, he was born in Canada, and held dual citizenship until last year. His father was born in Cuba, and his real name is Rafael Cruz, not Ted.

            His wedding band doesn’t bear any inscription at all. Its a series of loops inside two vertical bands.

            The rest of this makes so little sense that its kind of like believing in unicorn tears. If he were going to go to school as a foreign student then the admissions office would have had to be blind not to see he graduated from a Hawaiian private high school.

            OF course it is not true, as you well know. It is a piece of far-reich propaganda, of the kind that they’ve been manufacturing since a black man was elected president. It is bathed in racism all the way through. It didn’t sound to me like you really wanted to post a question, but rather start trouble here by posting inflammatory junk.

            Spoken like the true disgusting dirty racist, bigoted POS that you truly are.

            I guess terrorist killers hate Obama. That should be good news for Republicans, for up to now, they have believed Obama was one of them.

            We lost over 3,000 people on 911. GW Bush spent 40% of his presidency from Jan-Sept 11 on vacation and ignored MANY WARNINGS about an “imminent attack.” He did nothing. Read Richard Clark’s book.

            Considering the FACTS, you really should be asking yourself why Bush was so soft on terror.

            There is no such thing a good and evil, there are just men.

            I don’t see any evidence that Obama is destroying america.

            Muslim? No, he has a history of christian religion.

            I don’t see any evidence that he hates america.

            Whom has he betrayed?

            Do you even know the definition of the word communist?

            What violence to cause political change has he committed? (definition of terrorist according to US government under President Bush)

            Do you remember he has children, with his wife?

            No he can’t be impeached for doing nothing illegal. Just admit your racism and let’s be done with it!

            1. “I like how to racist, bigoted a-hole resort to do what do you best. Prove that
              every I said was right!” ?

              Mark,..either you were so upset that you couldn’t write straight or English is your 2nd language.

              I like how to racist, bigoted a-hole resort to do what do you best. What the hell does that mean? Sorry,..can’t understand that sentence at all. I am also the product of public education,..so my math sucks as bad as your English,..so I cant be too proud.

              His wedding band,..I believe you are correct, I can admit an error.

              However,..as I replied

              Question: Is this most of your reply another of your copy/paste comments or is it directed to me?
              because you replied to many topic statements that I never made.

              Question,…Why in the world do you think I ever supported any of the RINO Bush dynasty? I didn’t ever,..and I don’t now, esp. Jebby boy.

              I did not realize any of the Bush babies were still in office,..gosh you write as if they were.

              Your support Obama at this late juncture,..even while the walls are caving in. You have an amazing loyalty to this progressive socialist who is probably the most economically and politically destructive presidents this nation has ever had. 46.5 million people, or about 1 out of 9 Americans are on food stamps and the number is growing! Middle class jobs are disappearing,..more people now have to work min. wage or two jobs with little a chance for advancement,.welcome to the service industry. Insurance premiums are becoming outrageous,..cheaper now to pay the IRS fines. Our society under Obama is more dysfunctional than ever,.race riots and discontent,.blacks are now resenting even Obama,.they have fallen further under him on the social-economic strata. And now the ISIS, his “J.V. team” controls a huge chunk of Syria, Lebanon and Iraq, and has terrorised our NATO partners..Putin has moved in,.what a mess!

              One final note:

              It is remarkable that you accuse me of being “racist or bigoted” You don’t know who the hell I am,.. I married someone from a different race and also can speak her mother tongue. I rarely use language directed at a person I am dialoguing with, I might call their writing a long blithering liberal socialist diatribe as I believe yours is. The clearest indication that someone has completely lost a debate is when they resort to childish insults, such as…”racist, bigoted a-hole”

              Have a nice day Mark

    1. Susan,.yes you are correct, after watching the crowd of horrible Turkeys gobble their curses at the French-Turkish soccer match when they asked the Turks for a moment of silence,.and now after the way they shot the Russian Jet and the Syrian terrorists shot the Russian pilots dangling from their chutes,..o’l Vlad will show no mercy,..then NATO reacts,..then,.well DEFCON 1,..and all the Obama supporters will be knocking on the “Prepper’s” doors,..the same people laughing at them just before the S-it hit the fan!

  91. handful. child rape, beheadings and death is what islam is. so there are a few people in western countries that practice some other form of islam….but the majority, billions, believe in sharia law. mohammad was a child rapist beheader who was a warrior killer. this has been going on for 1400 years. this is nothing new, its not a strain, or a few crazies. every single country they control and every convert was by death and the sword. its either a death cult or a political movement. just because a few practice a version that fools see as a religion doesn’t make it one. and obama knows this….as does the press who repeats the big lies….like the green one. was cold and hot 5 times before man was even on the planet fools.

    1. Yes. Islam is a cult. Just compare it to the characteristics of a cult:

      Well, what are some of the characteristics of a cult? (a)
      excessively zealous and unquestioning commitment to its ideology; no discussion
      is allowed, (b) Questioning and doubts are punished, (c) leadership dictates in
      great detail how members should think, act, live and feel, (d) the group is
      elitist, claiming special, exalted status for itself, (e) the ends justify the
      means, and (f) a preoccupation with bringing in new members. Sound familiar?
      Sounds a lot like Islam to me.

    2. Another point. We are fighting devout Muslims not radical Muslims. ISIS is comprised of the most devout Muslims there are; they read the plain language of the Koran and consult their Imams and go out and kill anyone who disagrees with them, even other Muslims. I believe it is a fact that Muslims kill more Muslims than any other vector. The Koran tells devout Muslims that anyone who is not a Muslim is an infidel; it is OK to lie to an infidel, it is OK to rape the infidel’s six year old children, it is OK to kill the infidel. Seems pretty clear to me.

  92. Yes, Mr. Obama, I’m sure the terrorists have seen the error of their ways and will lay down their arms and become compliant little eco-warriors instead.

    1. Every single “world leader” thinks Obama is an imbecile. Once Jan 2016 rolls around the scorn that will be heaped on Obama will be incredible. And then the books will start coming out about how Obama has single handedly set the world on fire. Literally.

  93. OBAMA: “TAKE THAT, YOU BAD GUYS YOU”. That’s suppose to scare ISIS. REALLY? As for bombing all those gasoline trucks, why did you have to warn them. Isn’t this excise suppose to kill the bad guys?

  94. What an idiot…ISIS doesn’t give a toot about climate change or our children’s future…for that matter obama doesn’t care either or he’d cut down on Gov’t spending. If college kids think their debt is high now…wait till they start paying back obama’s national debt!

  95. how stupid can Obama be? Climate change ( so what) is a non issue especially since there has been none now in 18 years. Obama’s stupidity is just breathtaking .

  96. “What a powerful rebuke to the terrorists it will be, when the world stands as one and shows that we will not be deterred from building a better future for our children” Obama said.

    What a Fucking Moron! Do Obama and his liberal pals actually believe these environmental fairy tales?

    Na Na Na Na Na Na! We’re gonna build a better world 4R chilrens! And ISIS can’t stop us!

  97. The sad part is there are plenty of young idiots that will buy into this tripe. The same ones that have allowed their campuses to be overrun by the absolute lunacy. it is fun to watch the grown up liberal freaks get eaten by their young creations, though.

      1. In their “flicker rate” induced Alpha state. Mandate for ths in England in 50s… Why? Because the British govt. wanted the working class to have a better life? Mandates for HD tvs only? Even better for all the people?

  98. I’m sure that Obama’s unbelievably fierce rhetoric has the troops of Da’esh quaking in their sandals. At this very moment the terrorists are plotting their next move; a bid to overcome their chief rival in the dirty business of terrorism: Climate Change. This is our ‘leader’, a huge failure on all things foreign and domestic. Obama’s legacy will be one of being without a doubt the worst President to ever serve in the history of the United States.

      1. Exactly. Jimmy Carter is a soft soap Marxist. Obama is a hardline Marxist. Their time in office will be compared and Obama will win the brass ring as the most clueless President ever. Unfortunately, Obama believes deep in his evil soul that everything that has happened under his Presidency is a good thing for the world. Obama HATES America and all of the western, Christian world.

        1. Another day, another proof that I was right! Obama-haters are truly the biggest fake Chrisitan, real racist, bigoted, black-hating klansman tea bagger scumbags in America today. No wonder they love Trump, he’s a racist, bigoted, black-hating klasnman tea bagger scumbag as well

          Many regulations are good and necessary. Obviously there are many regulations which might be supported or opposed by people with differing views. Just because it is a regulation does not mean it is necessarily bad. The problem with cons is that to them any regulation is bad. Some regulations are good and bad as there may be an economic cost tied to their implementation. The biggest problem is that very few of us, if any, actually know what these regulations are or how they will affect us or American business. Just saying they are bad for business doesn’t quite cut it, although in some instances this most likely is true
          Do you have any real arguments? Or are you just a troll, trying to make reasonable people leave the conversation?
          Hey morons! We’ve been doing that for many years through many presidents. You’re research is limited by the racist evil agenda that you have.
          He is not evil, and I have no reason to believe he hates America.
          Hes a Christian, not a Muslim. He doesn’t hate America. Is he a traitor? Who has he betrayed and how did he betray them? No, Obama is not a communist, he is a democrat.
          He is also not a terrorist; as he has not committed acts of terror. Obama is married to his wife Michelle; so no he is not homosexual. Even if he was; that is no from.
          Barack Obama cannot be impeached as all you have claimed; cannot be proven and make little sense. You sound like a very uneducated a paranoid little man.
          If you truly believe that you’d prefer Putin as your President, then I will tell you to move to Russia and see what happens when you attempt to exercise your freedom of speech about things political in a public forum. I guess you REALLY miss having a White Man as President.

  99. There are no limits to our Presidents’ stupidity. The man is a disgrace. He shows us everyday that he is a friend with our worst enemies and an enemy of any American that holds views that do not mirror his own.

  100. Man Obama is such a dolt, he rebukes thee isil !! Thou hath been rebuked!! You can stop killing now….

    A handful of killers???? Un….believable, the ability this guy has to deny reality is legendary.

  101. After watching the crowd of horrible Turkeys gobble their curses at the French-Turkish soccer match when they asked the Turks for a moment of silence,.and now after the way they shot the Russian Jet and the Syrian terrorists shot the Russian pilots dangling from their chutes,..o’l Vlad will show no mercy,..then NATO reacts,..then,.well DEFCON 1,..and all the Obama supporters will be knocking on the “Prepper’s” doors,..the same people laughing at them just before the S-it hit the fan!

    1. You don’t think the NATO nations won’t find a way out of supporting unstable, unreliable Erdogan? Because I foresee a sudden death to his ambitions if he doesn’t cool his jets right speedily. IFYKWIMAITTYD.

      1. One can only hope,…However, the syncopathic mainstream media will not leave his side until they see the walls actually crack,..Trump is making fools of them everyday,..and massively stirring up the right base,..don’t know what to really make of Trump,.yet,.but I am loving the monkey show!

  102. “Terrorists will NOT stand in the way of our exploitation of taxpayers for a farsical scare tactic hoax. The flogging of the middle class will continue as planned.”

    1. Gilbert,..It is for internal consumption,..our eunuch in Chief has a mission,.remember,.to fundamentally transform the U.S.,..and dang if he aint 3/4 there already!

  103. If someone wrote a fictional novel about islamic terrorists avenging climate change, it wouldn’t sell because it would be considered too idiotic. but now we have the so-called leaders of the western world using it as an excuse!!!!! mind blowing.

  104. In the near future, there will a new verb to indicate someone bloviating as would a delusional clown. This verb will be “obama”. As in, “Hey, look at that loony guy talking about climate scan over there! He’s getting red in the face and hyperventilating; I think he’s going to obama!”

    1. Both, he believes his crap and thinks we are stupid. And judging from his steady 45% approval rating, there are an awful lot of stupid people out there.

  105. “What a powerful rebuke to terrorists it would be…but enough about the Republicans. Let’s invite ISIS to the summit! I’m sure they’ll have some important things to say.”

    1. This video is a spoof,..excellent work like the one where they put words in Hitler’s mouth,..however they ARE laughing and astounded at Obama for these reasons and more!

    1. Now you’re talking my language. Target list: Mecca, Medina, Tehran, Riyadh. There are many, many more but this is a good start. I would like to start with five to ten fuel air exposives over Tehran’s government buildings and move on from there. Every attack is answered by another response. No need for troops. We’ll have to spend some time pounding any early warning systems and anti-air craft batteries into the mud to start.

      1. Not exactly a proportionate response! Might as well put a cross on it and call it the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch – er, the Holy FAE of Peoria. ;> Guaranteed to put an end to all religious arguments.

  106. LOL America, you broke it, you bought it. At least it was fun, hip, and historic to vote for the black guy.

    And we’re doubling-down on stupid with Hillary high in the polls. *smh*

    1. There is a letter for you in the mail. It says that you need to report immediately to your re-education camp, where you will be permitted to embrace all liberal orthodoxy and beliefs. Hate is Love. War is Peace. Welcome to your future.

  107. You could not make this stuff up if you tried.
    I am sure all the world leaders surrounded by armed guards, getting into bullet proof vehicles and more security than fort Knox, really made ISIS sit up and take notice of how really afraid they are for their safety.

  108. Let me get this straight – ISIS murders 130, wounds hundreds, bombs a Russian civilian airliner killing 224 – yet somehow is saving the planet from global warming? Only in Obama’s warped world view.

    1. Hardline Marxists who hate America and all western, Christian nations have tunnel vision. They only care about tearing us down. The reason his comments sound so ridiculous is that we are rational and live in the real world. He, and many other hard leftists, are always blaming EVERYTHING on climate change is because it is the holy grail of control over the masses of clueless citizens who will thank them for saving them from some vague, but dangerous sounding threat. Climate change will allow them to tax us to death AND make us slaves to their dictates to stop the boogy man = climate change.

  109. “And the almigjty O raised his hands to the heavens, and in a thunderous whiney voice declared” WITH GLOBAL WARMING I REBUKE THEE! ” and peace reigned upon the Earth once more.”

  110. Excellent work like the one where they put words in Hitler’s mouth,..however they ARE laughing and astounded at Obama for these reasons and more!

  111. Actually Barry the Terrorist probably think you are the biggest FOOL to ever lead a Country. Of couse leading from behind may contribute to their contempt for you. But not to worry….all you have to do is quote some verses from the Quran which will be no problem for you and they will spare your sorry ass………………NOT!!!!!

  112. From what Obama is saying, he has definitely lost his grip on reality. His is mentally incapable of functioning as POTUS and needs to be removed from office into a mental health facility and remain there until well.

    1. Another day, another proof that I was right! Obama-haters are truly the biggest fake Chrisitan, real racist, bigoted, black-hating klansman tea bagger scumbags in America today. No wonder they love Trump, he’s a racist, bigoted, black-hating klasnman tea bagger scumbag as well

      Many regulations are good and necessary. Obviously there are many regulations which might be supported or opposed by people with differing views. Just because it is a regulation does not mean it is necessarily bad. The problem with cons is that to them any regulation is bad. Some regulations are good and bad as there may be an economic cost tied to their implementation. The biggest problem is that very few of us, if any, actually know what these regulations are or how they will affect us or American business. Just saying they are bad for business doesn’t quite cut it, although in some instances this most likely is true

      Do you have any real arguments? Or are you just a troll, trying to make reasonable people leave the conversation?
      Hey morons! We’ve been doing that for many years through many presidents. You’re research is limited by the racist evil agenda that you have.
      He is not evil, and I have no reason to believe he hates America.
      Hes a Christian, not a Muslim. He doesn’t hate America. Is he a traitor? Who has he betrayed and how did he betray them? No, Obama is not a communist, he is a democrat.
      He is also not a terrorist; as he has not committed acts of terror. Obama is married to his wife Michelle; so no he is not homosexual. Even if he was; that is no from.
      Barack Obama cannot be impeached as all you have claimed; cannot be proven and make little sense. You sound like a very uneducated a paranoid little man.
      If you truly believe that you’d prefer Putin as your President, then I will tell you to move to Russia and see what happens when you attempt to exercise your freedom of speech about things political in a public forum. I guess you REALLY miss having a White Man as President.

  113. Coup d’etat. It is the only way to get rid of this deranged megalomaniac. The congress, if it knew what it was doing, could do the right thing, but that hallowed institution is nearly as pathetic. Where the he11 is our military when it is needed? It needs to take over a government run by an ignorant extreme NPD afflicted Indonesian citizen.

    1. The full breadth of the US Federal government (Executive, Legislative
      and Judicial branches along with the MASSIVE number of agencies
      populated by millions of Federal workers) is, collectively, to blame for where we are. if we add in the K Street boys who feed off of our tax dollars you see that it is a conspiracy to suck every single dollar out of the regular people in the country. Every element works with all the others in a nearly impregnable mass of laws, rules, bureaucratic obfuscation, executive orders, department heads ordering the mindless armies of little bureaucrats to do this or that. It never ends. A bureaucracy is a living, breathing organism with its own set of desires and needs. At the root is that every single Federal worker depends on our tax dollars for their daily bread. Unfortunately, at this point it is not simply daily bread but the gold standard in job security and a fantastic retirement that WILL be funded no matter how high taxes go. After all, we made those Federal retirees a promise! Forget about the promises to our troops suffering under the VA’s incompetence or what will happen to those on Social Security when the money dries up and benefits begin to be slashed.

  114. Geez that Obama is a brilliant guy…………..here I was worried about being shot or blown up this weekend at the shopping mall, but now I am just worried about the planet heating up so I am sending all my shopping money to Greenpeace.

  115. BahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahAhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahhahahahahha!

    Our president believes in the tooth fairy , pixi dust and global warming .

    And the absolute funniest fantasy. He believes he’s intelligent. ROFLMAO!! Stop please! I can’t breath from the laughing.

  116. This is what happens when you hire a shadowy Choom Gangster of unknown origin, who was raised by Muslims, Communists, and Black Liberation Theologians, to do a job meant for an accomplished, competent, proven, known, vetted, trusted, respected, and patriotic natural born citizen.

    Why this lying, cheating, thieving fraud remains in office is beyond comprehension. How the punk ever got there in the first place is even more disturbing. Most bizarre era in US history bar none.

    1. This last seven years and the next one will be looked back on with not only incredulity, but to the informed among us, with revulsion that our pitifully weak, so called conservatives in the GOP showed themselves to be quislings; traitors to what they bleat out at re-election time as promises and then turn their backs, flipping us off, and go laughingly in to their august chambers to create an even bigger, more costly Federal, freedom killing machine.

      It’s getting harder and harder to even take a breath in America without a nasty, self important bureaucrat looking down their nose at us and telling us that we must comply with the thousands of new regulations being churned out every three or four months. I just read an article yesterday that said that the O administration was finalizing another 2400 rules; and this was just for the last three months of nameless, faceless, unelected bureaucrat labor!

    1. Sadly, most people don’t see this. They get their news from the liberal media, and don’t even see all of this. (plus, they can’t put two and two together anyway)

  117. Fun math time:
    1.75 trillion proposed spending at this climate change talk
    28 million people in the country of Syria
    = $62,500 per person
    Seems like we could buy them all houses with air conditioning and they don’t need to come here after all

  118. Yes, wasting time and money on your climate change fraud will really put those terrorists in their place! From the Messiah to the Embarrassment in two terms. Can’t wait to move him out of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. #CruzCountry

      1. In fact it has already happened. The administrations policies on the border and with its handling of the invasion from the southern border, and, of course, its tireless efforts to bring in as many “refugees” as possible with little or no back ground checks, Obama has thrown open the doors for terrorists of all stripes, welcoming them to America and saying: “Go and slaughter these white, Christian, evil slave owners.” This is how he views America and the entire western, Christian world. He even believes his ridiculous statements that they can freely purchase AK 47’s at our wide open weapons sales events (gun shows) with which to kill us.

  119. I don’t see why we don’t fight violence and rape over there the same way we try to solve it in our colleges?
    A gigantic “Be a Buddy not a Bully” seminar and lots of motivational speaches about diversity, gender equality, and affirmative consent.
    That will surely get them to see the error of their ways

  120. I’m sure that ISIS will be impressed. They kill a bunch of people and President Obama counter attacks with a meeting. That’s amazing. President Obama is clearly insane.

    1. At this point, I’m convinced he is mentally ill. Either that, or just incredibly stupid. I suppose there’s a reason his college transcripts are sealed.

  121. lolololol. Only in America could a far left mentally deranged marxist loon and defender of the worst aspects of islam like Obama be elected to anything. Part of America’s ongoing punishment for the crime / sin of slavery!

  122. What a f++**KKing idiot for a president. When the climate is stormy or otherwise our children won’t have much concern if they are ruled by terrorists and the women will not care about climate when they are trying to fight terrorist rapists? Does Obama really have a brain???

  123. Cheer up, people! Only 422 more days of this moron then he’ll be off to run for King of the UN. And John Kerry is no longer a senator. It’s a two-fer!

  124. Obama kinda makes o’l “Malaise” Former Pres. Carter shine doesn’t he?

    Remember the scene from the Dirty Dozen when Donald Rickles says to the two soldiers who were near an out house when it got shelled and they all got crap covered,…” “Kinda reminds you of home doesn’t it?”

  125. Yeah but I thought that we had terrorists because of climate change/globull warming etc.
    So what nutty is saying here is that if we take on globull warming/climate change etc, then we will have defeated ISIS….really??
    This kind of reasoning, can only take place in a lefties twisted mind folks!

    1. No, I think he’s saying this: “Nyah, nyah, nya nyah, nyah. Look at us, ISIS! You attacked Paris, and we’re still here, having our little kumbayah picnic! You didn’t scare *us* away! You big bullies…” Yeah, I know, real mature.

  126. Obama has a Narcissistic personality disorder. Thats when a person is excessively preoccupied with personal adequacy, power, prestige and vanity, mentally unable to see the destructive damage they are causing to themselves and others.

    I was associated through a work relationship with a narcissist. It’s maddening. You can’t trust a word they say.
    .

  127. 30 plus years ago we were warned about the pending ice age. The response to confront that is the same as today – increase taxes, increase regulations
    If you dig down deep enough into the environmental movement, you will find that it not SUVs and air conditioners that are destroying the planet. They believe human beings to be the cause. Every generation, or two, some scaremonger pontificates that the world cannot support all of new humans that will exist in X number of years. Google these names: Robert Malthus, Ernest Callenbach, Paul Ehrlich.
    The problem is that now too many people are disciples of this religion.

  128. Barack Hussein Obama’s domestic and foreign policies of unsecured borders and global weakness have made climate change a moot subject. He has undoubtedly been the worst and most disloyal U.S. President, both at home and abroad.
    I doubt he will remain in this country after his term expires. Will likely slink off and return to Kenya or another of the third world countries he so admires and has sought to reconstruct in the USA.

  129. I am so tired of this nut job we have as a President. I know the Demorats will fix the election so we are stuck with the witch. I hope I can get enough money together by then so I can get the hell out of this country. I don’t think I can stand another four years of Obama. Hilary is a joke and the only people who will vote for her are the ones that get their news from People Magazine or Readers Digest or Jet Magazine or High Times. God help us all.

    1. We’ve lost the Country. Obama and the Democrats have finally imported enough immigrant and illegal voters to fix almost every national election going forward. You have to give evil credit to Ted Kennedy in his foresight in the 1960’s to fix immigration to favor the Democrats. Foreign voters now control the American elections. When will African-Americans wake up and realize it is the Democrats keeping them poor by importing 2 million laborers into the US every year.

  130. Although I am not one to indulge conspiracy theories, at this point it is almost tempting to start wondering whether in fact Obama really is the Manchurian Candidate. He is that bad of a President. Of course the reality is that he is merely an arrogant, narcissistic, liberal ideologue who suffers from delusional thinking. He truly believes that the power of his thoughts and words is enough to shape world events. He has become an embarrassing laughingstock whose lack of reality has now become a real threat to the long-term security of our country. I only hope with all of my heart that my fellow Americans are wise enough to NOT elect Hillary Clinton as the next President. She is the worst of the worst and her election will signal that our Republic has entered its waning days.

    1. Obama is not a Muslim and is most likely an Atheist. He joined a “Christian Church” in Chicago for political purposes. However, he is feels solidarity to the “downtrodden” and counts Muslims in that group. He absolutely hates all non-minority Americans except for those on the extreme left. He is not worried if a few Muslim terrorists get in the US and kill people as long as he can import millions of Muslim and other non-European Democratic voters. He absolutely is the Manchurian Candidate.

  131. Actually – there was a misprint. The article actually read:

    AP Top News at 4:20 p.m. EST

    WASHINGTON
    (AP) – President Obama declared Tuesday that next week’s climate change summit in Paris would be a “powerful rebuke” to terrorists, speaking alongside French President Francois Hollande at a joint
    news conference. “Next week, I will be joining President Hollande and world leaders in Paris for the global climate conference,” Obama said during his prepared remarks, which focused mostly on the efforts to fight the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

    “What a powerful rebuke to the terrorists it will be, when the world stands as one and shows that we will not be deterred from building a better future for our children, I think it is absolutely vital for every country, every leader, to send a signal that the viciousness of a handful of killers does not
    stop the world from doing vital business, and that Paris … is not going to be cowered by the violent, demented actions of a few,” Obama said about the upcoming climate conference.” He added: “Climate change is the real threat, not a few radicals running around killing people.”

    Obama and other administration officials have been criticized for their insistence that climate change is a threat to national security on par with terrorism. President Obama made it
    clear that he has a plan to tackle global warming: “We will buy every person on the planet a Tesla…if the government pays for it, then it is free….and it runs on electricity that comes out of the wall in anyone’s house…so it creates absolutely no pollution. And we could give them to poor people and the historically under-utilized and oppressed. Then there would be no more need for oil or gasoline. The radicals, commonly referred to as ISIL, would run out of money when the need for oil
    dries up.” “Besides, they’d all have a Tesla, so they’d be too busy to even think about offending other people. If we give a Tesla to every human being, especially those that are oppressed and under pressure from Global Warming, like those poor unfortunate souls in ISIS, then they would have transportation to get to the UN operated Sympathy and Understanding Sessions at the World Comfort
    and Peace Sanctuary.”

    President Obama opined: “With my plan in place, I will have solved Global Warming, Peace in our
    Time, Global Cooling, Ozone Holes, Climate Change, White Privilege, Black Oppression,
    Polar Bear Stuff, Glass Ceilings, Rape and Sex Deranged White-trash Presidents and the Ills besetting HRH (Sir Edmund) Corkscrew Whitewater, Queen of the Cattle Futures and the Winner of the Battle
    of Fort Marcy Park and the Battle of Mount Carmel….with only 46 children killed…. And don’t forget about LGBTFUQCKU – I solved that too. Let’s go over to Ben and Jerry’s and pack some fudge.” God Bless America!

  132. Obama is an A*****E anyway so why bother listening to him? EVERYTHING that comes out of his mouth is a lie! The man just canot be believed! Climate change is causing terrorism! What a DOOFUS!

  133. There is no evidence whatsoever that the very small increases in average
    atmospheric temperatures observed over miniscule time frames in
    relation to geologic time have any human cause. The climatology journals
    won’t publish a study that corrects for a sophomoric statistical error
    that all of the models they have published contain showing strong
    correlation between the miniscule amounts of estimated human-produced
    CO2, in comparison to total atmospheric CO2 concentration, and the small
    increases in atmospheric temperatures, which disappears when the
    non-stationerity of CO2 concentrations and temperatures are corrected
    for as they must be.Global warming science is very biased and often scammed as the hacked emails demonstrated a few years ago.

  134. On my god Obama is an absolute idiot. Sure Obozo, ISIS – the “contained JV team” is quaking in their boots at your stupid summit. While you Barack do nothing to protect the American people and instead open the Southern Border to future terrorists who are also most likely to be big Democrat voters.

  135. Obama has finally gotten into a situation that he cannot talk his way out of. This is the turning point to the next global conflict. It all stems from the progressives (in USA and Europe) and their reverse logic on dealing with life’s realities…

    Thanks to Obama’s lack of strategic thinking, and his stubborn way of sticking to the progressive playbook at all costs, the Middle East is fully destabilized. Terrorists cannot be fought globally when there are other regional conflicts being fought. The terrorists will up the ante, knowing they can’t be stopped and eventually China will use the opportunity of a weakened western condition to gain benefit. All while Russia is on war footing in the Middle East.

    Thanks Obama!

  136. I’m almost speechless. This SOB knows exactly what he’s doing – he could give two sh**s less about ISIS or the United States. It will ONLY be through the grace of God we’ll still have a United States left when this bastard leaves office (if he does).

  137. Obama is not strictly a Muslim and is most likely an Atheist. He joined a “Christian Church” in Chicago for political purposes. However, he is feels solidarity to the “downtrodden” and counts Muslims in that group. He absolutely hates all non-minority Americans except for those on the extreme left. He is not worried if a few Muslim terrorists get in the US and kill people as long as he can import millions of Muslim and other non-European Democratic voters. He is the Manchurian Candidate.

    1. You have to have balls to take on a real enemy. Global climate change is his way of ignoring the real global problem. I believe he made a deal with the terrorist. No whole scale attacks in this country while he is President and he will release prisoners from Getmo. Well except for Boston and the Army base there has been no full blown attacks in this country. Just wait till the lop eared monster is out of office. There will be full blown attacks in this country.

  138. Can Obama have a shred of credibility, even with his most fervent supporters? His list of lies is getting real long.
    This is what we get with an “affirmative action” president. He should have stayed on as president of the Choom Gang.

  139. Thanks to Obama this country is going to hell. Climate change is just a way for this nut job not to have to deal with the real problems in this county besides the bottom feeders we call terrorist. Did you know there are people in this country with two and three different social security cards? Yep. This is how it works. You have a bottom feeder named Mary Anne Smith ( made up name). She also has a card for Mary A. Smith and then another one for M. A. Smith. On top of that she may have tree or four kids with the same amount of cards. That way she has more money to buy beer and vodka for her and her live in drug dealing boy friend. What a country

  140. The terrorists are going to be really really mad when they find out they will just have to play second fiddle to climate change as the greatest danger to mankind. What do they have to do for Obama to take them seriously?

  141. I would rather see a rebuke of ISIS in the form of wiping them out instead of a gathering of world leaders conspiring to cripple the first world economies in the vain, impotent posturing of controlling the world’s climate.

  142. if he really believes that, then he is a bigger idiot than I previously thought:ISIS doesn’t give a rap about the climate or the future of our children other than that our children be converted or beheaded. Get real: lock-n-load.

  143. There is most certainly a pattern to climate change… …but it’s not what you may think:

    For at least 114 years, climate “scientists” have been claiming that the climate was going to kill us…but they have kept switching whether it was a coming ice age, or global warming.

    1895 – Geologists Think the World May Be Frozen Up Again – New York Times, February 1895

    1902 – “Disappearing Glaciers…deteriorating slowly, with a persistency that means their final annihilation…scientific fact…surely disappearing.” – Los Angeles Times

    1912 – Prof. Schmidt Warns Us of an Encroaching Ice Age – New York Times, October 1912

    1923 – “Scientist says Arctic ice will wipe out Canada” – Professor Gregory of Yale University, American representative to the Pan-Pacific Science Congress, – Chicago Tribune

    1923 – “The discoveries of changes in the sun’s heat and the southward advance of glaciers in recent years have given rise to conjectures of the possible advent of a new ice age” – Washington Post

    1924 – MacMillan Reports Signs of New Ice Age – New York Times, Sept 18, 1924

    1929 – “Most geologists think the world is growing warmer, and that it will continue to get warmer” – Los Angeles Times, in Is another ice age coming?

    1932 – “If these things be true, it is evident, therefore that we must be just teetering on an ice age” – The Atlantic magazine, This Cold, Cold World

    1933 – America in Longest Warm Spell Since 1776; Temperature Line Records a 25-Year Rise – New York Times, March 27th, 1933

    1933 – “…wide-spread and persistent tendency toward warmer weather…Is our climate changing?” – Federal Weather Bureau “Monthly Weather Review.”

    1938 – Global warming, caused by man heating the planet with carbon dioxide, “is likely to prove beneficial to mankind in several ways, besides the provision of heat and power.”– Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society

    1938 – “Experts puzzle over 20 year mercury rise…Chicago is in the front rank of thousands of cities thuout the world which have been affected by a mysterious trend toward warmer climate in the last two decades” – Chicago Tribune

    1939 – “Gaffers who claim that winters were harder when they were boys are quite right… weather men have no doubt that the world at least for the time being is growing warmer” – Washington Post

    1952 – “…we have learned that the world has been getting warmer in the last half century” – New York Times, August 10th, 1962

    1954 – “…winters are getting milder, summers drier. Glaciers are receding, deserts growing” – U.S. News and World Report

    1954 – Climate – the Heat May Be Off – Fortune Magazine

    1959 – “Arctic Findings in Particular Support Theory of Rising Global Temperatures” – New York Times

    1969 – “…the Arctic pack ice is thinning and that the ocean at the North Pole may become an open sea within a decade or two” – New York Times, February 20th, 1969

    1969 – “If I were a gambler, I would take even money that England will not exist in the year 2000” — Paul Ehrlich (while he now predicts doom from global warming, this quote only gets honorable mention, as he was talking about his crazy fear of overpopulation)

    1970 – “…get a good grip on your long johns, cold weather haters – the worst may be yet to come…there’s no relief in sight” – Washington Post

    1974 – Global cooling for the past forty years – Time Magazine

    1974 – “Climatological Cassandras are becoming increasingly apprehensive, for the weather aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another ice age” – Washington Post

    1974 – “As for the present cooling trend a number of leading climatologists have concluded that it is very bad news indeed” – Fortune magazine, who won a Science Writing Award from the American Institute of Physics for its analysis of the danger

    1974 – “…the facts of the present climate change are such that the most optimistic experts would assign near certainty to major crop failure…mass deaths by starvation, and probably anarchy and violence” – New York Times
    Cassandras are becoming increasingly apprehensive,
    for the weather aberrations they are studying may be the
    harbinger of another ice age

    1975 – Scientists Ponder Why World’s Climate is Changing; A Major Cooling Widely Considered to Be Inevitable – New York Times, May 21st, 1975

    1975 – “The threat of a new ice age must now stand alongside nuclear war as a likely source of wholesale death and misery for mankind” Nigel Calder, editor, New Scientist magazine, in an article in International Wildlife Magazine

    1976 – “Even U.S. farms may be hit by cooling trend” – U.S. News and World Report

    1981 – Global Warming – “of an almost unprecedented magnitude” – New York Times

    1988 – I would like to draw three main conclusions. Number one, the earth is warmer in 1988 than at any time in the history of instrumental measurements. Number two, the global warming is now large enough that we can ascribe with a high degree of confidence a cause and effect relationship to the greenhouse effect. And number three, our computer climate simulations indicate that thegreenhouse effect is already large enough to begin to effect the probability of extreme events such as summer heat waves. – Jim Hansen, June 1988 testimony before Congress, see His later quote and His superior’s objection for context

    1989 -“On the one hand, as scientists we are ethically bound to the scientific method, in effect promising to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but – which means that we must include all doubts, the caveats, the ifs, ands and buts. On the other hand, we are not just scientists but human beings as well. And like most people we’d like to see the world a better place, which in this context translates into our working to reduce the risk of potentially disastrous climate change. To do that we need to get some broad based support, to capture the public’s imagination. That, of course, means getting loads of media coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have. This “double ethical bind” we frequently find ourselves in cannot be solved by any formula. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest. I hope that means being both.” – Stephen Schneider, lead author of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Discover magazine, October 1989

    1990 – “We’ve got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing – in terms of economic policy and environmental policy” – Senator Timothy Wirth

    1993 – “Global climate change may alter temperature and rainfall patterns, many scientists fear, with uncertain consequences for agriculture.” – U.S. News and World Report

    1998 – No matter if the science [of global warming] is all phony . . . climate change [provides] the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.” —Christine Stewart, Canadian Minister of the Environment, Calgary Herald, 1998

    2001 – “Scientists no longer doubt that global warming is happening, and almost nobody questions the fact that humans are at least partly responsible.” – Time Magazine, Monday, Apr. 09, 2001

    2003 – Emphasis on extreme scenarios may have been appropriate at one time, when the public and decision-makers were relatively unaware of the global warming issue, and energy sources such as “synfuels,” shale oil and tar sands were receiving strong consideration” – Jim Hansen, NASA Global Warming activist, Can we defuse The Global Warming Time Bomb?, 2003

    2006 – “I believe it is appropriate to have an over-representation of factual presentations on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening up the audience to listen to what the solutions are, and how hopeful it is that we are going to solve this crisis.” — Al Gore, Grist magazine, May 2006

    Now: The global mean temperature has fallen for four years in a row, which is why you stopped hearing details about the actual global temperature, even while they carry on about taxing you to deal with it…how long before they start predicting an ice age?

    The actual Global Warming Advocates’ chart, overlayed on the “climate change” hysterics of the past 120 years. Not only is it clear that they take any change and claim it’s going to go on forever and kill everyone, but notice that they often get the trend wrong…

    The actual Global Warming Advocates’ chart, overlayed on the “climate change” hysterics of the past 120 years. Not only is it clear that they take any change and claim it’s going to go on forever and kill everyone, but notice that they even sometimes get the short-term trend wrong…

    Worse still, notice that in 1933 they claim global warming has been going on for 25 years…the entire 25 years they were saying we were entering an ice age. And in 1974, they say there has been global cooling for 40 years…the entire time of which they’d been claiming the earth was getting hotter! Of course NOW they are talking about the earth “warming for the past century”, again ignoring that they spent much of that century claiming we were entering an ice age.

    The fact is that the mean temperature of the planet is, and should be, always wavering up or down, a bit, because this is a natural world, not a climate-controlled office. So there will always be some silly bureaucrat, in his air-conditioned ivory tower, who looks at which way it’s going right now, draws up a chart as if this is permanant, realizes how much fear can increase his funding, and proclaims doom for all of humanity.

    2006 – “It is not a debate over whether the earth has been warming over the past century. The earth is always warming or cooling, at least a few tenths of a degree…” — Richard S. Lindzen, the Alfred P. Sloan professor of meteorology at MIT

    2006 – “What we have fundamentally forgotten is simple primary school science. Climate always changes. It is always…warming or cooling, it’s never stable. And if it were stable, it would actually be interesting scientifically because it would be the first time for four and a half billion years.” —Philip Stott, emeritus professor of bio-geography at the University of London

    2006 – “Since 1895, the media has alternated between global cooling and warming scares during four separate and sometimes overlapping time periods. From 1895 until the 1930’s the media peddled a coming ice age. From the late 1920’s until the 1960’s they warned of global warming. From the 1950’s until the 1970’s they warned us again of a coming ice age. This makes modern global warming the fourth estate’s fourth attempt to promote opposing climate change fears during the last 100 years.” – Senator James Inhofe, Monday, September 25, 2006

    2007– “I gave a talk recently (on fallacies of global warming) and three members of the Canadian government, the environmental cabinet, came up afterwards and said, ‘We agree with you, but it’s not worth our jobs to say anything.’ So what’s being created is a huge industry with billions of dollars of government money and people’s jobs dependent on it.” – Dr. Tim Ball, Coast-to-Coast, Feb 6, 2007

    2008 – “Hansen was never muzzled even though he violated NASA’s official agency position on climate forecasting (i.e., we did not know enough to forecast climate change or mankind’s effect on it). Hansen thus embarrassed NASA by coming out with his claims of global warming in 1988 in his testimony before Congress” – Dr. John S. Theon, retired Chief of the Climate Processes Research Program at NASA, see above for Hansen quotes

  144. That rebuke to the terrorists was so powerful that even I shivered. I can imagine how fearful ISIS must be. Why, I am almost feel sorry for them now!

    1. Another day, another proof that I was right! Obama-haters are truly the biggest fake Chrisitan, real racist, bigoted, black-hating klansman tea bagger scumbags in America today. No wonder they love Trump, he’s a racist, bigoted, black-hating klasnman tea bagger scumbag as well.

      Many regulations are good and necessary. Obviously there are many regulations which might be supported or opposed by people with differing views. Just because it is a regulation does not mean it is necessarily bad. The problem with cons is that to them any regulation is bad. Some regulations are good and bad as there may be an economic cost tied to their implementation. The biggest problem is that very few of us, if any, actually know what these regulations are or how they will affect us or American business. Just saying they are bad for business doesn’t quite cut it, although in some instances this most likely is true.

      Do you have any real arguments? Or are you just a troll, trying to make reasonable people leave the conversation?
      Hey morons! We’ve been doing that for many years through many presidents. You’re research is limited by the racist evil agenda that you have.
      He is not evil, and I have no reason to believe he hates America.
      Hes a Christian, not a Muslim. He doesn’t hate America. Is he a traitor? Who has he betrayed and how did he betray them? No, Obama is not a communist, he is a democrat.
      He is also not a terrorist; as he has not committed acts of terror. Obama is married to his wife Michelle; so no he is not homosexual. Even if he was; that is no from.
      Barack Obama cannot be impeached as all you have claimed; cannot be proven and make little sense. You sound like a very uneducated a paranoid little man.
      If you truly believe that you’d prefer Putin as your President, then I will tell you to move to Russia and see what happens when you attempt to exercise your freedom of speech about things political in a public forum. I guess you REALLY miss having a White Man as President.

      1. See,..I can copy paste too,..isnt it cool??

        Obama kinda makes o’l “Malaise” Former Pres. Carter shine doesn’t he?
        Remember the scene from the Dirty Dozen when Donald Rickles says to the two soldiers who were near an out house when it got shelled and they all got crap covered,…” “Kinda reminds you of home doesn’t it?”

    1. Another day, another proof that I was right! Obama-haters are truly the biggest fake Chrisitan, real racist, bigoted, black-hating klansman tea bagger scumbags in America today. No wonder they love Trump, he’s a racist, bigoted, black-hating klasnman tea bagger scumbag as well

      Many regulations are good and necessary. Obviously there are many regulations which might be supported or opposed by people with differing views. Just because it is a regulation does not mean it is necessarily bad. The problem with cons is that to them any regulation is bad. Some regulations are good and bad as there may be an economic cost tied to their implementation. The biggest problem is that very few of us, if any, actually know what these regulations are or how they will affect us or American business. Just saying they are bad for business doesn’t quite cut it, although in some instances this most likely is true.

      Do you have any real arguments? Or are you just a troll, trying to make reasonable people leave the conversation?
      Hey morons! We’ve been doing that for many years through many presidents. You’re research is limited by the racist evil agenda that you have.
      He is not evil, and I have no reason to believe he hates America.
      Hes a Christian, not a Muslim. He doesn’t hate America. Is he a traitor? Who has he betrayed and how did he betray them? No, Obama is not a communist, he is a democrat.
      He is also not a terrorist; as he has not committed acts of terror. Obama is married to his wife Michelle; so no he is not homosexual. Even if he was; that is no from.
      Barack Obama cannot be impeached as all you have claimed; cannot be proven and make little sense. You sound like a very uneducated a paranoid little man.
      If you truly believe that you’d prefer Putin as your President, then I will tell you to move to Russia and see what happens when you attempt to exercise your freedom of speech about things political in a public forum. I guess you REALLY miss having a White Man as President!

  145. ya, one hell of a powerful rebuke. You’ll show them. I mean, a bunch of Liberals getting together to talk about the weather……..sure will scare the hell out of those who have no problems decapitation any and everyone they disagree with. What an embarrassment.

  146. Obama believes the fight against “extremism” is just a side show that can’t deter him from the real crises, Climate Warming/Global Change or whatever the idiots call it now.

  147. There would be no ISIS if Omoron hadn’t been in a hurry to remove US troops from Iraq to put a check next to one of idiotic campaign promises. Had they been there they would have snuffed that crap out in the early stages. Then introduced chaos to the area by arming Islamic nut bags to oust Assad because he crossed Obama’s “redline” and Obama is too chicken $hit to make him pay the price with direct American involvement. Then once they started becoming a problem due to an ineffective response Obama downplays their effectiveness by calling them the JV team and proceeding to twittle his arrogant fingers for the next two years.

    Obama and his limp-wristed, weak-kneed, bottom-boy approach to foreign policy is directly to blame for what we see today. He has the blood of everyone who has died at ISIS’ making on his hands.

  148. Global warming is the cause of terrorism in the Middle East and around the world according to John Kerry, Martin O’Malley, Bernie Sanders, Barack Obama, Hilary Clinton, and other Democrats. With a straight face they make this claim, ignoring any and all other evidence to the contrary.

    But if that is so, if global warming causes terrorism, then I think the Democrats need to answer this question: “Why does global warming only turn Muslims into terrorists?”

    There are Jews in the Middle East and Africa. There are Christians in the Middle East and Africa. There are animists, Zoroastrians, Hindus, and others. But only certain Muslims, often from wealthy families, turn into terrorists. The Jews, Christians, animists, Zoroastrians, Hindus, and the rest never seem to be affected by global warming in that way.

    Perhaps instead of spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to explore insect mating habits, the federal government should spend some cash on why global warming turns only Muslims into terrorists.

    Or maybe it doesn’t.

  149. Every Muslim is quaking in their boots at the thought of a bunch of socialists telling each other cautionary tales from the land of lunacy. Sounds right to me.

  150. Obama has now far surpassed Jimmy Carter as the U.S. most inept, stupid, racist. bigoted, worthless piece of shit to occupy the white house. For thoses who claim this trailer trash reject is an American are as goofy and obtuse as he is.

  151. it seems that every day this president sets new records for foolish and/or stupid remarks by a world leader. Do we really have to put up with this traitor for another 14 months?

  152. ERMA GHERD! what will ISIS do now that oHole has stated this? Run for cover? Throw down their weapons and surrender to the NWO?

    Nah….hows about laugh their collective asses off at our Ass-in-chief

  153. The polar bears habitat is secure! Wow! The terrorist took that on the chin. C02 levels are falling. That blackened their eye of the terrorist for sure! The terrorist response is poultry with a few hundred more people bing murdered. The terrorist are withering under the pummeling from fraudulent climate change data and gaining converts. What a fight, ladies and gentlemen. What a fight!.

  154. Whenever I hear obama speak I am reminded of what Einstein said:

    The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has limits. And

    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity and I am not sure about the universe.

  155. Yeah, I’m sure ISIS is terrified of the UN’s massive global warming fraud. I imagine they sit around during their terror briefings actually shaking their heads in disbelief at the west who is more concerned with the climate scam than with them chopping innocent people’s heads off…

  156. Climate change causes terrorism…..how clueless can this guy get? I imagine ISIS would be easy to defeat, they are probably too busy laughing their a$$es off at our “leader”.

    “Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a piece of s**t by the clean end.”

  157. I’m sure ISIS is shaking in their boots over climate change. Obama has no clue about what is going on in the world. He is in denial…..part of his pathological narcissism

  158. Seriously, is this guy on drugs? Like the terrorists give a rats backside about “climate change.” They know it gets hot and cold, after that, big whoop! I really wonder if this guy has lost his marbles. It’s like he operates in another universe.

  159. And, still the cowardly, inept, incompetent and impotent RAT Bastrd RINO’s are deaf, dumb and blind. What will it take for these “useless idiots” to protect” the folks who voted for them?

  160. Some one please get the President a check-up!
    We won’t see the next sun set if we don’t destroy ISIS (The JV).
    What is the use of worrying about the climate?
    None of us will be here to be affected by it if we leave up to ISIS.
    They will kill us all and it won’t make a difference!

  161. If anyone believes we are being led by an intelligent President of the United States you might as well have failed every class you have ever taken. Obama is the epitome of dumb@$$. Climate change? Yeah, I see the leaves changing colors at the exact time they did last winter. And it isn’t one degree colder or warmer. Climate change is a bunch of liberal backed political bull to overtax businesses and individuals

    1. Well, every year they do dumb down the US educational system because it’s just TOO HARD for the marginalized. Climate (swings) will also be skewed because of the leap years, anyway; if you’re 40 years old you’ve already added 10 days to the calendar – winter comes earlier, as does spring. If you’re older than 30 years old, you’ve already seen many “historic” storms, even though past storms seem to be nastier than many new “historic” storms (10 years ago I couldn’t get my TRUCK out of the driveway, no problems since.) It’s easy to take advantage of the young. It’d be like negotiating a car purchase with a 2 year old that just likes the color but doesn’t understand anything beyond the color.

  162. This President is in Disney world! Along with the rest of The European Liberals. Except …..when they are attacked they are not Weenie Cowards and blame it on Workplace violence and lack of gun control.

    1. Bill Clinton chimes in Jeb!
      “It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is. If the–if he–if ‘is’ means is and never has been, that is not–that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement….Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true.”

  163. Yet, the idiots who voted for him still love and defend him.
    That’s because most get a Govt. Check of some sort.
    Any who can’t see the damage done to America should just stay away from voting.

  164. Future online dictionaries will have a picture of Obama alongside the definition of “stupid” so government school graduates can grasp the word’s meaning.

  165. This president is such a child. Obama is a pure mental midget among his international peers.

    We can’t get through 2016 fast enough – if he doesn’t get us killed by then.

  166. Reminds me of the story of when Caligula wanted to have a military victory like his antecedents. He took two legions to what would become England
    to defeat the Britons. When he failed to find the Britons, he declared war on his old nemeses, Neptune. He had his soldiers collect seashells and returned to Rome with the loot of the sea, Neptune’s treasures
    .

  167. Not just the Obama Regime but every mentally deranged progressive and utopian statist really believes in this rubbish and that one we are all living in caves again without electricity or fossil fuels all will be well with the world and the Islamofascists will just hug us and go back to their goat herds in the desert.

  168. It is not stupidity. It is outright arrogance to the nth degree. He is the consummate narcissist in that he believes he is smarter than everyone else. Trouble is everyone, but his most loyal supporters who are equally clueless, see him as an utter fool. Who in their right mind would make such an idiotic statement at a time like this? The rest of the Free World leaders are rolling their eyes and our Founding Fathers are turning in their graves. All thanks to the leftist MSM who helped elect this POTUS (omitting the T & U).

  169. Our Idiot-in-Chief is on crack laced with fairy dust. I cannot make the connection between terrorism and so-called climate change. Haven’t heard of any wars over farmland or water rights. WTF am I missing here??

    1. Bernie Sanders actually claims that Climate Change played a large part in the Paris Attacks. he actually believes that.

      “When you have drought, when people can’t grow their crops, they’re going to migrate into cities, and when people migrate into cities and they don’t have jobs, there’s going to be a lot more instability, a lot more unemployment and people will be subject to the types of propaganda that al-Qaeda and ISIS are using right now,” “So where you have discontent, where you have instability, that’s where problems arise, and certainly, without a doubt, climate change will lead to that.”

      Modern liberalism is becoming increasingly indistinguishable from mental disease. Seriously… I clicked on an article a few days ago about a University’s yoga classes being canceled because a student was offended and felt that yoga was a “cultural appropriation” and was therefore insensitive to cultures that had been victims of imperialism etc etc. This is some sort of mass insanity phenomenon like Jonestown. You get enough people who lack the ability to critically reason and feed them some nonsense and really, anything can happen.

  170. Mr. President, I regret to inform you that your climate summit is a BIG JOKE and the ISIS fighters are laughing their butts off at YOU! Do you know the story of Don Quixote? That is YOU, Mr. Prseident, a FOOL jousting with WINDMILLS!!!

  171. Our enemies wake up every day trying to diminish, destabilize and destroy the United States. When barry from honolulu wakes up a noon he dreams of building windwills, transgender washrooms and hammocks for illegal alien invaders.

    Each day he becomes more untethered from reality. How about killing isis instead of worrying about your pet peeve global warming?

    He does not comport to the American experience. He is not one of us.

  172. Wow. What a powerful rebuke. Islamic animals are running amok killing innocent men, women and children all over the place and our President’s response is to blather on about atmospheric CO2. Talk about stuck on stupid! Modern liberalism is no longer distinguishable from mental disease. What an utter and complete freak. The man is utterly obsessed with politics and irrelevant garbage and has no interest at all in doing his actual job. Very, very strange. If someone had told me 30 years ago we would have a weirdo like this for President there is no possible way I would have believed it.

  173. So the global government will now be having a summit for the FINAL PUSH to install CARBON TAXES ON EVERYONE as a militarized weapon to CONTROL ALL OF US by controlling our power and he’s spewing this nonsense to appease the politically ILLITERATE??

    WAKE UP PEOPLE AND EDUCATE YOURSELVES!

  174. I know that Obama has been working to make the USA a 1-party country (democrat). Just about everything he does is working towards that goal.
    He never does anything that doesn’t help his agenda, so my question is how does global warming fit into his plans?
    Is it just another way to impoverish Americans, using high energy cost? Added CO2 taxes on your electricity bills?

    Or is there something more sinister in the works?

  175. Because ISIS, at all costs, is trying desperately to stop the climate conference. Yep. THAT’S what they’re fighting about. You go ahead and focus on folly while they cower in Al Gore’s shadow.

  176. If this wasn’t so sad (and dangerous) it would almost be amusing. How did we end up with history’s worst president at a time when we needed a strong leader more than ever before?

  177. Democrats got the U.S. into every major war of the last century:

    WW1
    WW2
    KOREA
    VIETNAM

    Now Obama, and his democrats, are going to start WW3 in the new century

  178. Obama is delusional, or our usurper in chief, radical muslim community organizer is dead set on destroying america. Its time to impeach and arrest this trader for treason. Next stop, the firing squad.

  179. Glad we finally decided to let the terrorists and Putin do what they want
    and go after the real enemy and the BIG danger here ………..CLIMATE CHANGE….

    The Obama regime is completely and utterly insane………

  180. This reminds me of another of his other purposefully weak statements regarding fighting ISIS; “..we will degrade them.” What? Like fart in their general direction?

  181. BHO’s buffoonery never ceases. I am joined by ISIS in laughing my ass off. We have a clear and present existential threat and he is worried about income redistribution via the climate hoax.
    Harvard grad! Give me a break. Release Obama transcripts from Occidental and Columbia. Was he registered as a foreign student?

  182. This is the same &igger that said that climate change (fraud) is the biggest danger that we face. The 130 dead in Paris would probably disagree….if they could..!

      1. Tell that lie to the families who lost love ones in Paris. “If you are a true believer in Global Warming, Global cooling, Climate change”….what ever its called today, then you may want to seek mental health counseling that may keep you from running into the street crying…the sky is fall, the sky is falling.

  183. I have a sneaking suspicion that ISIS/ISIL/DAESH will take heed of the brilliant minds at this climate summit and do their part to reduce emissions and lower their carbon footprint. Just think how green they will feel when they cut back on their c4 usage by 10%.

  184. GO OBAMA! YOU KNOW WHAT YOU’RE DOING!. This will send shivers of fear in ISIS when they talk about you and Climate Change.They will lay down their arms and praise “THE ONE” who saved the world by taxing people more. GO FOR IT, and don’t mind Puntin, he is ONLY fighting a war. Please also do not walk on the carpet because you will track some of the yellow puddle running down your leg.

  185. The man is totally insane and delusional if he thinks muslim terrorists are impressed with his efforts to solve ‘global warming’. As we all know, there is NO global warming and 7th century savages would rather rape, burn and pillage the world than recognize a bogus science.

  186. OMG these climate change FOOLS look more stupid by the day. Obama is an embarrassment to the American people. He is an arrogant, incompetent, narcissistic man with a very dangerous agenda.

  187. Obama reminds me of the kid in the playground who keeps getting beat up for his lunch money: “This time, I’m really mad! Don’t do it again! I’ll, I’ll show you! I’ll go to a conference on climate change. So take that!”

    1. Another day, another proof that I was right! Obama-haters are truly the biggest fake Chrisitan, real racist, bigoted, black-hating klansman tea bagger scumbags in America today. No wonder they love Trump, he’s a racist, bigoted, black-hating klasnman tea bagger scumbag as well

      Many regulations are good and necessary. Obviously there are many regulations which might be supported or opposed by people with differing views. Just because it is a regulation does not mean it is necessarily bad. The problem with cons is that to them any regulation is bad. Some regulations are good and bad as there may be an economic cost tied to their implementation. The biggest problem is that very few of us, if any, actually know what these regulations are or how they will affect us or American business. Just saying they are bad for business doesn’t quite cut it, although in some instances this most likely is true.

      Do you have any real arguments? Or are you just a troll, trying to make reasonable people leave the conversation?
      Hey morons! We’ve been doing that for many years through many presidents. You’re research is limited by the racist evil agenda that you have.
      He is not evil, and I have no reason to believe he hates America.
      Hes a Christian, not a Muslim. He doesn’t hate America. Is he a traitor? Who has he betrayed and how did he betray them? No, Obama is not a communist, he is a democrat.
      He is also not a terrorist; as he has not committed acts of terror. Obama is married to his wife Michelle; so no he is not homosexual. Even if he was; that is no from.
      Barack Obama cannot be impeached as all you have claimed; cannot be proven and make little sense. You sound like a very uneducated a paranoid little man.
      If you truly believe that you’d prefer Putin as your President, then I will tell you to move to Russia and see what happens when you attempt to exercise your freedom of speech about things political in a public forum. I guess you REALLY miss having a White Man as President..

  188. If we all make it out of this idiotic Presidency alive we will have years and years of laughter ahead of us when we reflect back on this boob’s administration.

  189. so the global warming summit is a thumb in the eye of terrorists? hell even dropping a few actual bombs on the terrorists isn’t a thumb in their eye. stickman obama thinks that a bunch of blowhard self-important losers discussing fictitious climate data is a retaliatory strike against the terrorists??? good lord we’re worse off than i originally thought

  190. Holy crap, this man is driven by demons, completely insane! As is most, if not all, world/state leaders…
    Prepare ye, prepare ye, for the kingdom of God is not far off because the kingdom of the devil is in full sway… Mark my words.

  191. If Obama’s ears weren’t so big, he might be able to pull his head out of his a-s. He is so stuck in hatred for white people, and the U.S. that he cannot see he is destroying the world. Put him in a straight jacket. Haul him off to an insane asylum till he is tried for treason, convicted, and removed from the world. Save his brain for study as it is more bizarre than Hitler’s.

  192. NASTY FUKING ARAB………DEMOCRATS WE DESTROY YOU FOR THIS NASTY FUKING ARAB AND WHEN IRAN LETS THEIR NUKE ON AMERICA, 350,000 WILL BURN TO DEATH AND DESTROY THE ATMOSPHERE, WHAT DO YOU LYING CLIMATE HOAX FUKS THINK ABOUT THAT/???? YEAH YOU WILL NEED TO HIDE DEEP AWAY FROM CIVILIAZATION WHEN OBAMA’S NUKE HITS, HE USED YOU ASSHOLES

  193. I know them Muslims don’t get into this sort of thing but do you think we could get Obamy a good lobotomy for Christmas. We can’t afford to have him thinking to much longer because his ideas are killing us. It’ll be cheap! We could get Ben Carson to do it!

  194. We deserve nothing less than Obummer and Shrillary. How can you tell? Because they were allowed to become candidates for office rather than being laughed off stage at their first appearance! We elected Obummer’s TWICE!

  195. Someone should deliver a ‘powerful rebuke’ to 0bama. Too bad the GOP is now his lapdog, so they won’t do it. The GOP is dead, a new party is desperately needed to take up opposition to the dictatorial 0bama regime. Those establishment GOP morons want to draft Romney, as if something different will happen this time. It won’t. The GOP does not want to win, get it? No matter who they run, they will bend over to the 0bama regime and coronate the HillBilly2. It’s time for a new one.

  196. “Climate summit a ‘powerful rebuke’ to terrorists”
    Shaking in their terr0rist boots right now. If only the climate summit had taken place before the Paris attacks they never would have happened.

    1. Get a cruise ship. Get several. Tell them they’re all going on an all expenses paid trip to some Socialist conference in Europe.

      Sink the ships.

    2. Get a cruise ship. Get several. Tell them they’re all going on an all expenses paid trip to some Socialist conference in Europe.

      Sink the ships.

  197. rebuke essentially means a “sharp disapproval”. How in the living heck is there not a single person in Obama cabinet of advisers that will let him know that ISIS WANTS our disapproval!! ISIS knows if Obama expresses support for them, they are doing it wrong…

  198. rebuke essentially means a “sharp disapproval”. How in the living heck is there not a single person in Obama cabinet of advisers that will let him know that ISIS WANTS our disapproval!! ISIS knows if Obama expresses support for them, they are doing it wrong…

      1. You can still impeach a president after he leaves office for treason and high crimes. It takes2/3 in both houses to impeach. Theenate does not have enough votes at this time. Even if it did, crazy uncle Joe is next in line and he’d only pardon the reprobate and his cartel of appointed butt blowers. The best we can hope for is he becomes the victim of his own folly and not us.

  199. I’ll be kind. Dear Leader is an idiot.
    I apologize to all idiots because he’s actually far stupider than that.

    So are the morons who voted for him.

    1. I would argue that your premise is wrong. You assume that obama is in a stupor and is just too stupid to understand the dangers posed by ISIS. I contend that he knows full well who these barbarians are and he has no intention of stopping them on their combined quest to destroy America. How can you not take a step farther and see what this man really is? Stop giving him the benefit of the doubt. obama is an evil totalitarian dictator wannabe that loaths the thought of free people….especially white people.

  200. Muslims are cutting off Christian’s heads, invading the USA, blow up a RUiisan commercial aircraft and now shoot down a Russian military plane shooting the parachuting pilots and then blow up the rescue helo with an American TOW missile—-

    And the best this buffoon can come up with is he’ll show them we’re united to save the planet from CO2?

  201. I’m convinced that Obama is saying things like this just to spite us.

    He hates America, he has always hated America, and he hates most of the level headed, common sense people that live here…

    1. Another day, another proof that I was right! Obama-haters are truly the biggest fake Chrisitan, real racist, bigoted, black-hating klansman tea bagger scumbags in America today. No wonder they love Trump, he’s a racist, bigoted, black-hating klasnman tea bagger scumbag as well!

      Many regulations are good and necessary. Obviously there are many regulations which might be supported or opposed by people with differing views. Just because it is a regulation does not mean it is necessarily bad. The problem with cons is that to them any regulation is bad. Some regulations are good and bad as there may be an economic cost tied to their implementation. The biggest problem is that very few of us, if any, actually know what these regulations are or how they will affect us or American business. Just saying they are bad for business doesn’t quite cut it, although in some instances this most likely is true.

      Do you have any real arguments? Or are you just a troll, trying to make reasonable people leave the conversation?
      Hey morons! We’ve been doing that for many years through many presidents. You’re research is limited by the racist evil agenda that you have.
      He is not evil, and I have no reason to believe he hates America.
      Hes a Christian, not a Muslim. He doesn’t hate America. Is he a traitor? Who has he betrayed and how did he betray them? No, Obama is not a communist, he is a democrat.
      He is also not a terrorist; as he has not committed acts of terror. Obama is married to his wife Michelle; so no he is not homosexual. Even if he was; that is no from.
      Barack Obama cannot be impeached as all you have claimed; cannot be proven and make little sense. You sound like a very uneducated a paranoid little man.
      If you truly believe that you’d prefer Putin as your President, then I will tell you to move to Russia and see what happens when you attempt to exercise your freedom of speech about things political in a public forum. I guess you REALLY miss having a White Man as President.

  202. The ridiculous connections this fool is trying to force us to make
    will simply make the rest of us into ridiculous fools as well
    once we’ve made the same foolish assumptions…
    Take a look at his real plan (pics)
    :
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f3c80a6c4c201c85e08558d469e203a529170d41c2f763254728a6d1b2f5a73e.jpg

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/360aa36a10e4960884c7ab5c81c04fbdcfe4068cacd28f4f2c21a02b7f4946f7.jpg

  203. I’ve heard, from a “reliable source” that ISIS/ISIL/Whatever, have instructed all their terrorists to commit suicide in light of Obama’s climate change meeting comments.

    The leader of the terrorists, Mustafa Dayquil, said “I can see no reason to continue living in light of president Obama’s hurtful comments. We have run out of safe spaces”.

    Rumors that Obama will order the Stars and Stripes be lowered in sympathy with the terrorists have not been verified by the White House.

  204. I can’t decide if this borders on high crimes and misdemeanors, or flies right past them. But clearly, he’s not fulfilling the duties of his office and keeping the promises he swore to keep. This is inexcusable. I cannot understand how someone hasn’t introduced articles of impeachment. He is wrecking not just the country, but the rest of the world by not confronting the worst global threat since Hitler. He thinks a fraction of a degree of warmth is more of a problem than people who saw heads off of others.

    What is the matter with this man?

  205. Barack Obama is and always has been and always will be a totalitarian at heart who will do whatever he can to destroy freedom and its strongest advocate, the USA. To assume he is an idiot, stupid, in over his head, etc…is to ignore the reality of what this man has already done to hurt this country. Name one action he has taken that has honestly been good for this country and its citizens. Every action he takes further denigrates the principles that this country was founded upon. I can think of no better way to destory this country than what obama has already done. This man is not stupid; he is evil. In any compromise between good and evil, evil always wins.

  206. .❝my neighbor’s mom is making $98 HOURLY on the internet❞….A few days ago new McLaren F1 subsequent after earning 18,512$,,,this was my previous month’s paycheck ,and-a little over, $17k Last month ..3-5 h/r of work a day ..with extra open doors & weekly paychecks.. it’s realy the easiest work I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months ago and now making over $87, p/h..Learn More right Here….
    av..
    ➤➤
    ➤➤➤ http://GlobalSuperEmploymentVacanciesReportFree/GetPaid/$97hourly… ❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦

  207. “I think it is absolutely vital for every country, every leader, to send a signal that the viciousness of a handful of killers does not stop the world from doing vital business, and that Paris … is not going to be cowered by the violent, demented actions of a few,” Obama said about the upcoming climate conference.

    But, Barry, that’s exactly what the climate conference is and it is literally planning to visit on Western economies a level of violence the terrorists can only dream about.

  208. Hi… N.H…. Long time no see ! Glad I had you on my list of followers , so I could find you..How about President Pop-Off !!! What an idiot… Hard to believe he is still at the reins.. .. Looks like he is going to fight ISIS with solar panels and windmills… That should really scare them .. LOL… Just want to see how you feel about Trump up your way .. I’m not sure he will be the nominee ,but we owe him a debt of gratitude for the things he has brought to the fore…. God Bless him for that … Otherwise , the do-nothing Repub. establishment would still be trying to foist Bush or even Romney on us (Losers of course ).. I am liking Cruz and Rubio… We’ll see what happens… Guess it is cold up your way… Beautiful weather here. (Fla)…. Ann

  209. Breaking News! ISIS, al Qaeda, Boko Haram Islamists issue joint statement:

    Because we’re terribly frightened by this upcoming Climate Change Summit we’ve decided this “Obama rebuke” is more than we can take, so we’re laying down our arms and surrendering to the West.

    P.S. Please just ignore the State Department travel warning and enjoy your air travel experience—and pay no attention to flight attendants wearing parachutes.

  210. Mr Nobama must be the outmost worst, most incompetent, most destructive, anti democtratic, lying, bambozzeling, pseudo-leader of any country/society in the world in history and for all future to come.
    How come he has not been impeached yet ???
    Rgds from Sweden/TJ

    1. thojak. Why? Because it takes a 2/3 majority in both houses of congress and there aren’t enough votes in the senate to unseat their false god of delusion, duplicity, deceit. Even if there were enough votes that would mean he’d be replaced by crazy uncle Joe Biden who would no doubt pardon his lying ass along with the rest of Obama’s cartel. That’s how the US Constitution works.
      Although I’m as angry and frustrated as many real Americans, it is also frustrating to know too few Americans know the laws in our own Constitution.
      The only reason that malevolent bag of manure took and taught Constitutional law is so he could subvert and manipulate it.
      Those pillars he had erected at his inauguration ceremony were in reference to the 5 pillars of Islam, the only law he ascribes to. The USA has a Manchurian president that the ignorant and gullible elected twice. Climate change is as big a fraud as he and his cohorts are, as is every mandate, policy, and program this arrogant, obnoxious, polluted gas bag has put his evil hand on.

  211. When this man wakes up in the morning, does he stare into the mirror and say to himself “should I begin to live in reality or continue living an illusion?” This man along with all the rest participating at this climate thing are delusional idiots. They should be gathering to put fourth a campaign to rid the world of Muslim hate mongers, who’s only intention is to kill non Muslims. People are dying for real, right now at the hands of these barbarians. No one is dying from some contrived thing in the off distant future. Climate change conference ?? !!!!! What a bunch of Goddamned idiots.

  212. That’s easy .. . they’re trying to control us. Just watch their right hand (climate control), so you don’t see what our POTUS and his henchman, Mr. Kerry, are doing with their left hand . . . If you have any wisdom at all, you will be constantly vigilant and watch BOTH hands.

  213. yes, I’m sure that hurt more than the sharp report of an M-16 on full auto…….

    seriously, if I lived in Europe and saw this on the news I’d think Obama was a stand up comedian with a really bad sense of timing.

  214. The GMO is safe fraud, Climate fraud, TPP/TIPP fraud, the manufactured (CIA/MI6/ISIS) terror porn fraud are all pushed by the same NWO Bankster cabal..they want to fleece us, poison us, and kill us. “We the People” need to tell them to go to hell!

  215. That’s it — I’ve heard thru a secret pipeline that the terrorists are really feeling the sting of Obama’s words! They are receding rapidly, afraid of the climate summit! Great work Pres!! This guy is so far ahead of him times it’s baffling — no one without a major degree or two in arrogance and intellectual sophistication could possibly relate to his plan to crush terrorism! But let’s hang in there, not doing anything rash to ISIL — or non-islamic terror — just let his words sink in. The damage may not be immediate, but it certainly will be unbelievable.

  216. Hey Hussein: Did climate change (why don’t you call it global warming any more, hmmm…?) make me write this post ?
    You stupid, arrogant, worthless, POS.

  217. .Is the United
    Nations anti-Semitic? (part 1)

    States that support terror overwhelmingly control the UN. They mouth the
    words of moderation, but defend nations that give sanctuary to terrorists.

    “When people
    criticize Zionists, they mean Jews.”

    – Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

    In our world of cultural relativism, calling someone anti-Semitic is usually
    dismissed as beyond the pale. The usual retort is that legitimate criticism of
    Israel is not anti-Semitism. At the UN, it goes much further. Israel is a
    nation designated for special treatment, much like South Africa was years ago.
    Critics use the template of apartheid South Africa for the Jewish state.
    Because apartheid is beyond the pale of civilized norms, they argue, Israel
    deserves special treatment. This allows the UN to bypass any legitimate defense
    of Israel and Zionism. No one can defend apartheid, so it must be destroyed.

    Non-democratic states overwhelmingly control the UN. They often mouth the words
    of moderation, but defend nations that give sanctuary to terrorists. How else
    can one explain that some of the most odious nations on earth are elected to
    the UN Human Rights Council? In fact, Israel’s judge and jury at the UN are
    often nations that enable terrorism and anti-Semitism.

    To accurately judge the United Nations, we need a definition. If Israel is
    treated and judged completely differently than other nations and held to a
    standard not applied to any other member nation, then that should be considered
    anti-Semitism.

    The Inter-Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Anti-Semitism (ICCA), composed of
    140 parliamentarians from 40 countries, affirmed the definition of
    anti-Semitism by the Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA). It states, “Applying
    double standards by requiring of [Israel] behavior not expected or demanded of
    any other democratic nation” is anti-Semitism.

    As Abe Foxman of the ADL said, “anti-Zionism constitutes anti-Semitism if
    Zionism is the only nationalism being opposed.” When criticism of Israel
    devolves into demonization and delegitimization of its right to exist as a
    Jewish state, you have anti-Semitism. If Zionism is described conspiratorially
    as scheming to take over the world, you are dealing with anti-Semitism.

    Robert Wistrich, of The Vidal Sassoon International Center for the Study of Anti-Semitism,
    said, “The deplorable combination of discrimination, delegitimization and
    double standards at the United Nations has in recent decades been a lethal
    source of globalized anti-Semitism.”

    Defenders of the UN claim it was created in the wake of the Holocaust, and that
    the organization annually commemorates the world’s most heinous genocide
    against the Jews. That is commendable, but historical revisionism has
    universalized the Holocaust, and its special characteristics pertaining to Jews
    have been watered down until the Holocaust has become merely one among many
    genocides throughout the ages.

    A 2014 ADL poll revealed “the most anti-Semitic region in the world is the
    Middle East and North Africa, with 74 percent harboring anti-Semitic views.”
    The Palestinian Arabs living in the West Bank and Gaza had a 93% anti-Semitic
    rating.

    If the double standard of treating Israel profoundly differently than other UN
    members is anti-Semitism, consider the following:

    The UN Human Rights

    Council Israel is
    the only nation in the world that has a standing agenda item against it at
    every session of the UNHRC. Not North Korea, not China, not Pakistan, not
    Syria, not Sudan, not Iran. The Council never has mentioned the word “Hamas.”

    From 2006 through 2013, Israel has been subjected to 45 condemnation
    resolutions. No other nation in the world comes close.

    Is the United Nations anti-Semitic? (part 2)

    Special Rapporteur on Palestine John Dugard said in 2006, “Israel’s occupation
    of the Palestinian territories has many features of colonization. At the same
    time it has many of the worst characteristics of apartheid.” In explaining
    Palestinian violence, UN “expert” Dugard sees moral equivalence with the
    partisans who fought the Nazis! Mr. Dugard is also a judge on the UN’s
    International Court of Justice.

    UN General Assembly Resolutions

    From 1947 to 1991, there were about 300 anti-Israel General Assembly
    resolutions against Israel. In 2012, there were 22 GA resolutions specifically
    against Israel, while there were only four for the rest of the world combined.

    The United Nations Relief and Works Agency

    The Palestinian refugee organization UNWRA changed the definition of “refugee”
    to create a unique status for Palestinians. While other refugees lose refugee
    status in the following generation, only Palestinians remain refugees forever.
    This allows UNWRA to receive 50 percent of the UN’s money for all the refugees
    in the world. Instead of having only 30,000 original Palestinian refugees (if
    they were counted as every other refugee in the world is), we now have over
    5,000,000 Palestinian Arabs refugees – courtesy of the UN.

    UN Security Council

    The real power of the UN lies in the Security Council. Israel is the only
    member state that has not – and cannot – serve on the Security Council. From
    1948 to 2010, there were 77 resolutions directly aimed at Israel. No other
    nation on earth even comes close to this record of infamy.

    Israel’s Exclusion from Regional Groups

    Israel is the only UN member excluded from membership in its own regional group
    in the Middle East and Asia

    The UN’s Durban Conference

    The three UN Durban Conferences on Racism have found racism in only one of the
    192 nations of the UN: Israel. One of the flyers distributed at the first
    Durban conference pictured Hitler asking the question, “What would have
    happened if I had won?”

    Ignoring and not acting against the worst nations in the world

    Anne Bayefsky, a Senior Fellow with the Hudson Institute, said: “There has
    never been a single resolution about the decades-long repression of the civil
    and political rights of the 1.3 billion people in China…. Every year, UN
    bodies are required to produce at least 25 reports on alleged human rights
    violation by Israel, but not one on an Iranian criminal justice system which
    mandates punishments like crucifixion, stoning and cross-amputation. This is…
    demonization of the Jewish state.”

    UN Special Rapporteurs Richard Falk (2008-2014) and Makarim Wibisono
    (2014-2020)

    Richard Falk is a notorious anti-Semite, infamous 9/11 conspiracy theorist and
    Boston Marathon bombing apologist.

    His successor, Makarim Wibisono, according to UN Watch, has accused Israel of
    “unconscionable use of force against the Palestinians,” and of having a “policy
    of retribution against the entire Palestinian nation.” Wibisono described
    Israel as showing “ruthless contempt for the lives of the innocent.” His home
    country has no diplomatic relations with Israel.

    UN High Commissioner for Human Rights

    Navi Pillay is the UN official who questioned the legality of the killing of
    Osama bin Laden, and is an enthusiastic supporter of the anti-Zionist Durban
    conferences. According to Pillay, “The Israeli occupation of Palestine led to
    large-scale violations of international law.”

    Is anti-Zionism at the UN anti-Semitism? You decide.

    Here is how United States can fight anti-Semitism at the UN while advancing
    American foreign policy interests: The US pays for 22% of the UN’s annual $5
    billion budget. Congress should legislate support for only humanitarian efforts
    at the UN. Don’t support or defer to an institution that glorifies
    anti-Americanism and anti-Semitism.

    Is the United
    Nations anti-Semitic? (part 3)

    End financial support for UNWRA until it adopts the definition of “refugee”
    which applies everywhere else. This would end a root cause of the conflict, as
    it would reduce from 5,000,000 to 30,000 the number of Palestinian Arab
    Refugees.

    Find democratic coalition partners to support American national security
    priorities and protect America’s allies.

    As the leader of the free world, the US should speak out unapologetically in
    the UN. Fighting institutionalized anti-Semitism hiding behind the cloak of
    anti-Zionism would be a great start.

    Soon there may be a new Islamic caliphate of al-Qaida in the Levant. So who
    will be elected to the UN Human Rights Council first, Israel or the Islamic
    State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS)?

    By ERIC R. MANDEL

    07/07/2014 23:13

    The author is the
    founder and director of MEPIN, the Middle East Political and Information
    Network.

  218. More Americans than ever before are not working with 92
    MILLION people out of the workforce

    The share of Americans in the
    workforce has sunk to its lowest point in 35 years

    Experts say it’s a sign of both
    an aging population and of unemployed people who have given up on their
    dispiriting job hunts.

    Congress is debating whether to
    renew for a sixth year an emergency program that paid benefits averaging
    $256 a week

    Americans in the workforce has sunk to its
    lowest point in 35 years. It’s a sign of both an aging population and of
    unemployed people who have given up on their dispiriting job hunts.

    The drop could accelerate in the months ahead
    because Americans who have been out of work for more than six months have lost
    their unemployment benefits. Congress is debating whether to renew for a sixth
    year an emergency program that paid benefits averaging $256 a week.

    As a requirement to receive unemployment
    checks, recipients needed to actively look for a job. Without their payments,
    many workers will likely stop looking for a job. Once they do, they’ll no
    longer be counted as unemployed and no longer considered part of the labor
    force.

    A gauge known as the labor force
    participation rate measures the proportion of working-age adults who either
    have a job or are looking for one. This rate fell to 63.2 percent last year,
    its lowest level point 1978, according to the Labor Department.

    The rate had peaked at 67.1 percent during
    the late 1990s. At the time, it was buoyed by a strong economy, the baby boom
    generation entering its peak earning years and the entrance of more women into
    the workforce.

    The rate’s decline has accelerated since the
    2008 financial crisis, partly because baby boomers are reaching retirement age
    and the unemployed have struggled to find work.

    So what happened in December? Economists
    struggled for explanations: Unusually cold weather. A statistical quirk. A
    temporary halt in steady job growth.

    Blurring the picture, a wave of Americans
    stopped looking for work, meaning they were no longer counted as unemployed.
    Their exodus cut the unemployment rate from 7 percent to 6.7 percent – its
    lowest point in more than five years.

    Friday’s weak report from the Labor
    Department was particularly surprising because it followed a flurry of data
    that had pointed to a robust economy: U.S. companies are selling record levels
    of goods overseas. Americans are spending more on big purchases like cars and
    appliances. Layoffs have dwindled. Consumer confidence is up and debt levels
    are down. Builders broke ground in November on the most new homes in five
    years.

    Bottom line: Economist Robert Shapiro says
    that the bottom line is the economy isn’t creating jobs for everyone who wants
    them

    ‘The disappointing jobs report flies in the
    face of most recent economic data, which are pointing to a pretty strong fourth
    quarter,’ said Sal Guatieri, an economist at BMO Capital Markets.

    Economists differ over which single factor
    best explains the decline in labor force participation. But few dispute that
    the trend will likely persist.

    More than 1.3 million Americans lost these
    benefits when the program expired last month. An additional 800,000 will lose
    their checks in the weeks ahead.

    Economists say the likelihood of landing a
    job dims substantially after six months of unemployment. The economy remains
    1.2 million jobs shy of the 8.7 million that disappeared after the recession
    struck.

    ‘The bottom line: The economy is not creating
    positions for these people,’ said Robert Shapiro, chairman of the economic
    advisory firm Sonecon.

    Here is a chart of changes in labor force
    participation in five-year increments:

    Labor Force Participation

    1978 63.2 percent

    1983 64 percent

    1988 65.9 percent

    1993 66.3 percent

    1998 67.1 percent

    2003 66.2 percent

    2008 66 percent

    Published:
    23:49 EST, 10 January 2014 | Updated: 02:41 EST, 11 January 2014

    UK
    Daily news

  219. .Who is the world’s
    worst serial abuser of human rights, according to the UN Human Rights
    Commission? Israel

    Go to web site to see image of: US
    Secretary of State John Kerry delivers remarks to the United Nations Human
    Rights Council in Geneva March 2, 2015. Kerry accused the UN Human Rights
    Council of being obsessed by allegations of Israeli abuses and said the United
    States would defend Israel against efforts to isolate it. REUTERS/Evan
    Vucci/Pool

    Who is the world’s worst serial
    abuser of human rights? Could it be Cuba, the last totalitarian state in the
    Western hemisphere? China, the world’s largest one party state which jails
    dissidents, oppresses religious minorities and bars free expression and free
    association? North Korea, a one-man dictatorship whose gulags are notorious for
    their brutality? Belarus, where political opponents of the regime are
    “disappeared”? Uzbekistan where dissidents are boiled alive in cauldrons?
    Sudan? Libya? Russia? Turkmenistan? Venezuela? Vietnam? Zimbabwe?

    Nope.

    According to the UN Human
    Rights Council, the world’s worst serial abuser of human rights is … Israel.

    UN Watch recently did an
    analysis of the record of the UN Human Rights Council. It found that “In the
    nine years of its existence, the UN Human Rights Council has condemned Israel
    more times than the rest of the world combined.” The UNHRC has passed 61
    resolutions condemning Israel over nine years — and if all goes as expected,
    the UNHRC’s upcoming resolution on Gaza this week will make it 62. Compare that
    to just 55 resolutions condemning human rights abuses in other countries –
    including zero condemnations of China, Cuba, Russia, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan,
    Vietnam, Yemen and Zimbabwe.

    Here are the totals, as
    compiled by UN Watch. You can read the full report here:

    Total UNHRC Condemnations,
    2006-2015

    Israel: 61

    Syria: 15

    Myanmar: 12

    North Korea: 8

    Iran: 5

    Belarus: 4

    Eritrea: 3

    Sri Lanka: 3

    Sudan: 2

    Libya: 2

    Honduras: 1

    Afghanistan: 0

    Algeria: 0

    China: 0

    Cuba: 0

    Equatorial Guinea: 0

    France: 0

    Iraq: 0

    Lebanon: 0

    Russia: 0

    Pakistan: 0

    Somalia 0

    Turkmenistan: 0

    UK: 0

    USA: 0

    Uzbekistan: 0

    Venezuela: 0

    Vietnam: 0

    Yemen: 0

    Zimbabwe: 0

    Total on Israel: 61

    Rest of World Combined: 55

    Marc
    A. Thiessen@marcthiessen

    June 25, 2015 11:18 am | AEIdeas

  220. .UN, Israel &
    Anti-Semitism (part 1)

    Demonization of Israel:
    “Zionism is Racism”

    An alien observing the United
    Nations’ debates, reading its resolutions, and walking its halls could well
    conclude that a principal purpose of the world body is to censure a tiny
    country called Israel.

    Beginning in the late 1960’s,
    the full weight of the UN was gradually but deliberately turned against the
    country it had conceived by General Assembly resolution a mere two decades
    earlier. The campaign to demonize and delegitimize Israel in every UN and
    international forum was initiated by the Arab states together with the Soviet
    Union, and supported by what has become known as an “automatic
    majority” of Third World member states.

    The campaign reached new
    strength in wake of the Arab oil embargo of 1973, when many African states were
    pressured into severing relations with Israel. In 1975, following a steady
    drumbeat of anti-Israel declarations pushed through the International Women’s
    Year Conference in Mexico and then the Organization of African Unity, the
    majority of the General Assembly adopted the “Zionism is Racism”
    resolution. At the same time, it instituted a series of related measures that
    together installed an infrastructure of anti-Israel propaganda throughout the
    UN. Years later, after strenuous efforts by democratic forces, the infamous
    resolution was repealed.

    Legacy of 1975: Anti-Israel
    Infrastructure Remains

    However, the legacy of 1975
    remains fully intact: UN committees, annual UN resolutions, an entire UN bureaucratic
    division, permanent UN exhibits in New York and Geneva headquarters — all
    dedicated to a relentless and virulent propaganda war against the Jewish state.
    Together, they have made the UN into Ground Zero for today’s new anti-Semitism,
    which is the irrational scapegoating of Israel with the true intended target
    being Jews. Not only do these anti-Israel measures incite hatred against
    Israelis and Jews everywhere, but they have done not a thing to help the
    Palestinian situation. On the contrary: they give strength and succor to
    extremists.

    Paradoxically, one of the
    greatest violators of the UN Charter’s equality guarantee has been the UN body
    charged with establishing and enforcing international human rights, the Human
    Rights Council. (For more on the bias of this body, formerly known as the
    Commission on Human Rights, click here.)

    Anti-Israel Bias in the UN
    System

    The UN’s discrimination
    against Israel is not a minor infraction, nor a parochial nuisance of interest
    solely to those concerned with equal rights of the Jewish people and the Jewish
    state. Instead, the world body’s obsession with censuring Israel at every turn
    directly affects all citizens of the world, for it constitutes (a) a severe
    violation of the equality principles guaranteed by the UN Charter and
    underlying the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and (b) a significant
    obstacle to the UN’s ability to carry out its proper mandate.

    None of this means Israel
    should be above the law. Every country, including every democracy, commits human
    rights violations, and states should be held to account accordingly, both
    domestically and internationally. Yet Israel does have the right to be treated
    equally under the law. The UN Charter and the rules of natural justice demand
    no less. It is legitimate for UN bodies to criticize Israel, but not when they
    do do so unfairly, selectively, massively, sometimes exclusively, and always
    obsessively.

    Likewise, it is perfectly
    legitimate to call attention to the rights of the Palestinian people and their
    often difficult conditions. But it is something else entirely to abuse their
    cause for the sole objective of scapegoating Israel and the Jewish people.

    General Assembly Ignored
    Sudan, But Condemned Israel 22 Times

    UN, Israel &
    Anti-Semitism (part 2)

    The countless anti-Israel
    resolutions and related debates consume an astonishing proportion of the UN
    community’s precious resources. This year, during the 61th Session of the
    General Assembly (2006-2007), the time spent by ambassadors on enacting the
    22nd anti-Israel resolution of the year was time not spent on passing a single
    resolution on Sudan’s genocide in Darfur. Diplomats at foreign ministries or UN
    missions have a limited amount of time to devote to any particular UN session.
    Because every proposed UN resolution is subjected to intensive review by
    various levels and branches of government, a direct result of the anti-Israel
    texts is a crippling of the UN’s ability to tackle the world’s ills.

    UN bias against Israel is
    overt in bodies such as the General Assembly, which each year passes some
    nineteen resolutions against Israel and none against most other member states,
    including the world’s most repressive regimes. The World Health Organization,
    meeting at its annual assembly in Geneva in 2005, passed but one resolution
    against a specific country: Israel was charged with violating Palestinian
    rights to health. Similarly, the International Labour Organization, at its
    annual 2005 conference in Geneva, carried only one major country-specific
    report on its annual agenda — a lengthy document charging Israel with
    violating the rights of Palestinian workers.

    In the summer of 2004, the
    UN’s International Court of Justice at The Hague issued an advisory opinion
    that followed the script of a political campaign orchestrated by the PLO
    representative at the UN, Nasser al-Kidwa. The busiest corridor of the Palais
    des Nations, the European headquarters of the UN in Geneva, displays no less
    than ten larger-than-life panels devoted to the Palestinian cause. The clear message,
    that the Palestinians are the world’s greatest human rights victim; the clear
    implication, that Israel is the world’s greatest human rights abuser.

    There are three special UN
    entities dedicated to the Palestinian cause. The oldest is the Special Committee
    to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian
    People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories, created in 1968. In 1975,
    the General Assembly added the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable
    Rights of the Palestinian People. Supporting its work is the Division for
    Palestinian Rights. Lodged within the UN Secretariat, the Division boasts a
    sixteen-member staff and a budget of millions, which it devotes to the constant
    promotion of anti-Israel propaganda throughout the world.

    Although Secretary-General
    Kofi Annan has made important pronouncements against anti-Semitism, and even —
    before a Jerusalem audience — against some aspects of the UN’s anti-Israel
    bias, his regular statements on the Arab-Israeli conflict are
    disproportionately critical of Israel. Senior aide Lakhdar Brahimi publicly
    described Israel as a country whose policy constitutes “the great poison
    in the region.”

    Time to Take Action to End
    Bias and Injustice at the UN

    The anti-Israel apparatus within
    the UN, therefore, is of considerable magnitude, and cripples the functioning
    of the organization. The overt bias practiced against one state undermines the
    UN’s credibility and integrity. Anyone who truly cares about the UN must take
    action to end this gross injustice and criminal distraction from world
    pandemics such as disease and poverty. Given the current period of UN reform,
    now is the time. Many more UN officials, member states, NGOs, and others need
    to speak out and actively oppose this longstanding inequality. To begin taking
    action, click here.

    ww.unwatch.org/site/c.bdKKISNqEmG/b.1359197/k.6748/UN_Israel__AntiSemitism.htm

    .

  221. Former U.S. Diplomat Says Amb. Powers Instructed To Skip
    Netanyahu’s UN Speech

    KERRY PICKET Reporter 5:52 PM 10/01/2015

    Richard Grenell, a former U.S. diplomat and Fox News
    contributor, says a State Department source told him U.N. Ambassador Samantha
    Power was instructed to skip the remarks of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
    Netanyahu at the United Nations on Thursday.

    State Dept Source: @AmbassadorPower was instructed to skip
    @netanyahu‘s UN speech. — Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) October 1, 2015

    Secretary of State John Kerry was also not present at
    Netanyahu’s remarks either, according to MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell.

    Neither Amb. Power nor Sec. Kerry in the audience for
    Netanyahu’s speech at #UGNA. –#AMR Staff — Andrea Mitchell (@mitchellreports) October
    1, 2015

    Additionally, those U.S. delegates that did attend the
    Israeli Prime minister’s speech did not applaud when ovations broke out for
    remarks made by the Prime Minister about Iranian threats.

    “Here’s a general rule that I learned and you must have
    learned in your lifetime. When bad behavior is rewarded it only gets worse,” he
    said as the U.S. delegates sat quietly with their hand in their laps and others
    gave Netanyahu applause.

    The Obama administration and Netanyahu clashed on President
    Obama’s handling of the nuclear deal with Iran. Defying the administration’s
    views on the matter, Netanyahu addressed a joint session of Congress last March
    to ask members not to sign on with a nuclear deal with Iran.

    http://dailycaller.com/2015/10/01/former-u-s-diplomat-says-amb-powers-instructed-to-skip-netanyahus-un-speech/

  222. Terrorists
    At Our Universities – No Surprise

    – What exactly
    does The Muslim Student Association stand for? Can we take the
    stated intent of the group at face value or is there something more
    sinister behind the MSA?


    There was an interesting exchange between members of the MSA and David
    Horowitz, given at UC San Diego that was caught on tape recently. Mr.
    Horowitz was there to counter the M.S.A.’s Anti Apartheid Week aimed at Israel
    . Given that the MSA members at such rallies have a tendancy to display
    signs that are favorable to Hitler, its no wonder Mr. Horowitz felt
    the need to hold a counterpoint discussion.

    – During
    his Speech, a very articulate, apparently american raised Muslim female stands
    up and challenges the assertions of ties between the MSA and Al Queda,
    Hizbollah etc.. Look up Aafia Siddiqui, Ramzi Yousef, a and Ali Asad
    Chandia, for just a few former MSA members that went on to a life of
    terrorism. He asserts they did not read all of his material and he
    then asks her a few telling questions.


    He asked her or her group to denounce Hizbollah, Hamas which was
    refused in an articulate but paranoid anti US governement way.
    Next he asked her a question whether she was for or against a statement
    by Hizbollah on Jewish Israeli Genocide. She
    did not at first answer but only offered silence. When pressed for an
    answer in terms of for or against she calmly, coldly and boldly
    stated “FOR IT.” Watch the video.
    If you search on the web under “for-it-msa-student-confesses-she-wants-a-second-holocaust”
    you should be able to find it.

    – What
    is going on on our college and university campuses?
    Why would the University or the Media be silent on anti-semitic
    rallies in the first place? Is our government aware of the
    danger posed by the MSA serving as a potential fifth column of anti semitic,
    genocidal, terrorist supoport and if so what are they going to do about it?

  223. Welfare
    At All-Time High Under Obama

    APRIL 20, 2012

    The latest government figures reveal that an astonishing
    number of people are collecting public benefits such as food stamps and
    disability checks, revealing an alarming trend of dependence on government
    rather than self-sufficiency associated with the American dream.

    A record 5.4 million workers have applied for federal disability
    checks since President Obama took office, according to a news report that cites
    recent government figures. This is straining already-stretched government
    finances while posing a long-term economic threat by creating an ever-growing
    pool of permanently dependent working-age Americans, the report says.

    Since the recession supposedly ended in mid 2009, the
    number of people who have applied for disability benefits is double the job
    growth figure, according the report which includes an informative chart. In just the first four months of this year,
    539,000 joined the disability rolls and more than 725,000 applied for the
    federal benefit. That means nearly 11 million people are on disability,
    according to the Social Security Administration.

    Also this week, government figures reveal that a record
    number are getting food stamps and the figure will keep rising. This is not
    surprising since the Obama Administration has promoted the program like there’s
    no tomorrow in an effort to eradicate “food insecure households.” In fact, the
    administration has spent millions of dollars to recruit even more food-stamp recipients
    and has doled out hefty cash rewards to states that sign up the most people.
    One state even bragged about a $5 million performance bonus it got from the feds for its
    “swift processing of applications.”

    This week the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) reveals
    that 45 million
    people—one out of every seven U.S. residents—got food stamps in 2011, a
    whopping 70% increase from 2007. This represents a cost of $72 billion for U.S.
    taxpayers, which is a substantial increase from $30 billion four years earlier.
    For at least the next two years the food-stamp rolls will get even bigger,
    according the CBO, which studies economic and budgetary issues for
    Congress.

    This undoubtedly leaves the out-of-control welfare
    program vulnerable to fraud and corruption. Just last month the inspector
    general of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the agency that allocates
    food stamps, published a scathing report detailing
    how many recipients use their benefits to buy drugs, weapons and other
    contraband from unscrupulous vendors. Some trade food stamps for reduced
    amounts of cash, according to USDA watchdog.

    Judicial Watch

  224. .Obama Party
    Platform Tried To Throw Israel
    Under The Bus

    President Obama’s Democratic
    National Committee (DNC) initially removed any reference to Jerusalem
    being the capital of Israel
    from its national party platform.

    For decades the Democratic Party
    has included language acknowledging the simple fact that Jerusalem
    is Israel’s
    capital. In fact, in 2008 at Obama’s first presidential convention, the DNC Platform stated
    emphatically, “Jerusalem is and will remain the
    capital of Israel.”

    Every reference to Jerusalem was struck from
    the new 2012
    DNC Platform. Why? The DNC stated that the intentional omission of Israel’s
    capital from the DNC Platform was to come in line with President Obama’s
    policy.

    For decades, both political parties
    have acknowledged in their respective party platforms that Jerusalem
    is Israel’s
    capital. Almost every DNC Platform since 1972 has included Israel’s
    capital, until now.

    It is indisputable that Jerusalem is the Capital
    of Israel.

    Israel
    has made Jerusalem
    its capital. In 1995 the U.S.
    Congress acknowledged this fact stating, “Since 1950, the city of Jerusalem has been the
    capital of the State of Israel.” The fact is that “[e]ach sovereign nation,
    under international law and custom, may designate its own capital.”

    In fact, even the United Nation’s
    lists “Jerusalem”
    as Israel’s
    capital.

    Obama’s policy and the DNC’s
    Platform change attempt is just one more slight in a long line of snubs
    to the nation that just four years ago the DNC platform called “our greatest ally in the
    region,” and it marks a fundamental change in policy toward Israel.

    September 5, 2012

    (Here is what
    they tried to delete:

    The United
    States and its Quartet partners should continue to
    isolate Hamas until it renounces terrorism, recognizes Israel’s
    right to exist, and abides by past agreements. Sustained American leadership
    for peace and security will require patient efforts and the personal commitment
    of the President of the United
    States. The creation of a Palestinian state
    through final status negotiations, together with an international compensation
    mechanism, should resolve the issue of Palestinian
    refugees by allowing them to settle there, rather than in Israel.
    All understand that it is unrealistic to expect the outcome
    of final status negotiations to be a full and complete return to the armistice
    lines of 1949. Jerusalem is and will remain the
    capital of Israel.The parties have agreed that Jerusalem is a matter for final status
    negotiations. It should remain an undivided city accessible to people of all
    faiths.)

  225. It’s ‘Un-American’ To Impose Refugee Resettlement On The Country

    Scott Greer

    Associate Editor

    1:38 AM 11/18/2015 4789823

    “Slamming the door in their faces would be a betrayal of our values.”

    So said President Obama about the growing chorus of Americans and state
    governors who are rejecting his proposal of resettling thousands of Syrian
    refugees in the country. It was only one of the many asinine things the
    president said during his Monday morning speech at the G20 summit, but it was a
    statement that resonated with a broad spectrum of our country’s chattering
    class.

    Among America’s movers and shakers, support for taking in refugees is
    near-universal, even though the rest of the country seems horrified by the
    idea. But the liberal elite has taken the ingenuous approach in appeals to good
    ol’ American values.

    The New York Times editorial board issued a blistering denunciation of
    refugee critics on Tuesday. The Times said that it was “morally unacceptable”
    to call for a halt to allowing in Syrian migrants and an insult to the values
    the United States promotes around the world.

    Sponsored Links by The notorious Muslim civil rights group, the Council
    on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), condemned the statements of governors
    refusing Syrian refugees as “un-American.” (RELATED: Terrorism Co-Conspirators
    Say Refugee-Blocking Governors Are ‘Un-American’)

    Fox News host Shepard Smith gave an impassioned, 90-second lecture on
    the migrant matter live on TV Monday. The Fox personality said that America
    would be more like the “barbarians” if the country refused entry to these
    migrants. “If we change it to accommodate the savages, have they won? And what
    then would be left to protect? We profess to stand as an example for all the
    world. Our unique experiment in freedom, tolerance, openness, and equality, is
    our gift to societies and peoples everywhere,” Smith pleaded.

    Even the popular Twitter parody account @TheTweetOfGod got in on the
    message.

    “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe
    free. Unless they’re darker than, say, beige.”- Statue of Liberty.

    — God (@TheTweetOfGod) November 17, 2015

    At least the fake God shows more humor than The Washington Post, which
    in all seriousness asked, “Would Jesus take in Syrian Refugees?”

    The bleeding heart consensus is that if America turned away these
    migrants, it would undermine the very values our country is founded upon.

    But is America really just built upon the famous poem verse of Emma
    Lazarus asking for the world’s “huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the
    wretched refuse of your teeming shore”?

    Not quite.

    The United States is a country that is built upon values handed down to
    us from the original settlers of the continent, the majority of whom hailed
    from the British Isles.

    The late Harvard academic Samuel Huntington wrote in his phenomenal
    work “Who Are We?” that those early settlers gave this nation its
    “Anglo-Protestant” character, culture and values. These values included a hard
    work ethic, rugged individualism and democratic rights. While America has
    always had immigration, it’s not necessarily a “nation of immigrants,”
    according to Huntington. Rather, it’s a nation of settlers.

    Immigrants who arrived after America’s founding had to assimilate to
    the Anglo-Protestant culture of the settlers — often meaning they had to learn
    to speak English, accept America’s political system and adopt a self-reliant
    work ethic.

    Nowhere in this theory does it stress that America is founded upon
    being the destination for all the needy people in the world. Our country has of
    course welcomed in many people fleeing persecution throughout its history. But
    we always did it after considering the interests of our citizens first, and
    with the implied requirement that these immigrants would assimilate into our
    culture.

    When it comes to refugee resettlement, these conditions are in no way
    satisfied. For one, an overwhelming majority of Americans oppose letting Syrian
    migrants into the country, as further evidenced by the 31 governors and
    counting who’ve rejected the president’s proposal. The security threat is the
    overwhelming reason for the opposition — and there’s good reason for the worry.

    Besides the migrant involvement in the Paris attacks and the warnings
    of our own intelligence officials who say we can’t verify refugees who come to
    America, there are the examples of refugee communities in the U.S. The Little
    Mogadishu neighborhood in Minneapolis, Minnesota, is one of America’s main
    havens for Somali refugees. It has also become a breeding ground for radical
    Islam. (RELATED: America Already Has A Refugee Problem On Its Hands)

    At least 40 former residents have joined ISIS and several others have
    been caught trying to join the terror group. (RELATED: JIHADI HIGH: This High
    School Has Now Produced Two Dead American Terrorists)

    In addition to the Islamic extremism, Little Mogadishu also has a
    serious problem with crime and street gangs.

    If one of America’s core values is personal responsibility and hard
    work, many refugees are sadly not living up to that virtue. A staggering 91
    percent of migrants settled in the country are on government assistance, with
    68 percent of them on welfare.

    That’s a massive burden that’s put on the towns chosen for
    resettlement. Interestingly enough, the towns picked for these assignments have
    virtually no say in the process — the federal government just picks them
    without local approval. (RELATED: GOP Rep Wants To Block Obama’s Refugee Plan:
    ‘It’s An Open Invitation’ To America’s Enemies)

    If one of the core values of America is democracy, then our current
    refugee system goes against that principle. Our country was not founded to give
    bureaucrats the final say on matters the people have to cope with.

    Not surprisingly, the individuals who are most supportive of taking
    refugees are people who don’t have to deal with the consequences. They’re not
    settling the Syrians in Manhattan or Capitol Hill. They’re going to put them in
    towns and communities far away from the centers of power — places where elites
    won’t have to hear about the crime and the burden the new arrivals place on
    struggling areas.

    The reason why “values” figure so prominently in the arguments of
    refugee supporters, is because they offer the hope of a new, multicultural
    America. An America that discards its historic Anglo-Protestant character in
    favor of a more universal one. An America that no longer requires English and
    where an undefined sense of equality is the highest virtue.

    That’s why these elites are so willing to disregard the pleas of the
    citizenry in favor of the plight of the refugees.

    But the most important thing to remember in this debate is what a
    national government’s first obligation is: to serve its citizens. The U.S. is
    no different. Our country’s primary obligation is not to serve as the world’s
    homeless shelter, nor is it to place the interests of non-citizens over those
    of taxpayers.

    It’s to serve and protect the Americans who call this country home.

    To do anything else would be truly un-American.

    Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2015/11/17/obama-and-merkel-share-the-same-refugee-delusion/#ixzz3rqwfMpsy

  226. Did Al Gore say it? Or
    was it the Unabomber?

    It may be more
    difficult to decide than you think.

    Each quote below is
    either from Al Gore’s Book Earth in the Balance or from the Unabomber’s
    Manifesto.

    After each quote choose either Gore or
    Unabomber. At the end hit the Grade Me button and the quiz will be graded
    and you can view the correct answers. You will also have the opportunity to
    view the documentation. To be fair, I should point out that while Al and
    the Unabomber identify the “problems” similarly, they part on the
    solution. Al wants a “Global Marshall Plan” with enforcement
    across national boundaries while the Unabomber prefers the idea of
    revolution.

    I got the idea for the test, by the way, from a
    column by Tony Snow.

    There may or may not be an equal
    number of quotes from both thinkers.

    Top of Form

    Top of Form

    “The twentieth century has not
    been kind to the constant human striving for a sense of purpose in life.
    Two world wars, the Holocaust, the invention of nuclear weapons, and now the
    global environmental crises have led many of us to wonder if survival –
    much less enlightened, joyous, and hopeful living – is possible. We retreat
    into the seductive tools and technologies of industrial civilization, but
    that only creates new problems as we become increasingly isolated from one
    another and disconnected from our roots.”

    1 – Gore
    Unabomber

    “Again, we must not forget the
    lessons of World War II. The Resistance slowed the advance of fascism and
    scored important victories, but fascism continued its relentless march to
    domination until the rest of the world finally awoke and made the
    difference and made the defeat of fascism its central organizing principle
    from 1941 through 1945.”

    2 – Gore
    Unabomber

    “It is not necessary for the sake
    of nature to set up some chimerical utopia or any new kind of social order.
    Nature takes care of itself: It was a spontaneous creation that existed
    long before any human society, and for countless centuries, many different
    kinds of human societies coexisted with nature without doing it an
    excessive amount of damage. Only with the Industrial Revolution did the effect
    of human society on nature become really devastating.”

    3 – Gore
    Unabomber

    “Modern industrial civilization,
    as presently organized, is colliding violently with our planet’s ecological
    system. The ferocity of its assault on the earth is breathtaking, and the
    horrific consequences are occurring so quickly as to defy our capacity to
    recognize them, comprehend their global implications, and organize an
    appropriate and timely response. Isolated pockets of resistance fighters
    who have experienced this juggernaut at first hand have begun to fight back
    in inspiring but, in the final analysis, woefully inadequate ways.”

    4 – Gore
    Unabomber

    “Among the abnormal conditions
    present in modern industrial society are excessive density of population,
    isolation of man from nature, excessive rapidity of social change and the
    breakdown of natural small-scale communities such as the extended family,
    the village or the tribe.”

    5 – Gore
    Unabomber

    ” All pre-industrial societies
    were predominantly rural. The Industrial Revolution vastly increased the
    size of cities and the proportion of the population that lives in them, and
    modern agricultural technology has made it possible for the Earth to
    support a far denser population than it ever did before.”

    6 – Gore
    Unabomber

    “The positive ideal that is
    proposed is Nature. That is, wild nature: those aspects of the functioning
    of the Earth and its living things that are independent of human management
    and free of human interference and control.”

    7 – Gore
    Unabomber

    “Any child born into the hugely
    consumptionist way of life so common in the industrial world will have an
    impact that is, on average, many times more destructive than that of a
    child born in the developing world.”

    8 – Gore
    Unabomber

    “And tragically, since the onset
    of the scientific and technological revolution, it has become all too easy
    for ultrarational minds to create an elaborate edifice of clockwork
    efficiency capable of nightmarish cruelty on an industrial scale. The
    atrocities of Hitler and Stalin, and the mechanical sins of all who helped
    them, might have been inconceivable except for the separation of facts from
    values and knowledge from morality.”

    9 – Gore
    Unabomber

    “The modern individual on the
    other hand is threatened by many things against which he is helpless:
    nuclear accidents, carcinogens in food, environmental pollution, war,
    increasing taxes, invasion of his privacy by large organizations, and
    nationwide social or economic phenomena that may disrupt his way of
    life.”

    10 – Gore
    Unabomber

    “Industrial society seems likely
    to be entering a period of severe stress, due in part to problems of human
    behavior and in part to economic and environmental problems.”

    11 – Gore
    Unabomber

    “What does it say about our
    culture that personality is now considered a technology, a tool of the
    trade, not only in politics but in business and the professions? Has
    everyone been forced to become an actor? In sixteenth century England,
    actors were not allowed to be buried in the same cemeteries as ‘God-fearing
    folk,’ because anyone willing to manipulate his personality for the sake of
    artifice, even to entertain, was considered spiritually suspect.”

    12 – Gore
    Unabomber

    Bottom of Form

    Bottom of Form

    Al Gore saide 1, 2, 4, 8, 9, 12 and the Unibomber said 3, 5,
    6, 7, 10, 11

    This quiz was created by Ken Crossman

    and originally located here. Enjoy!

  227. UN Myths & Facts On Israel

    MYTH “According to Security Council Resolution 242,
    Israel’s acquisition of territory through the 1967 war is ‘inadmissible.’ ”

    FACT On November 22, 1967, the UN Security
    Council unanimously adopted Resolution 242, establishing the principles that
    were to guide the negotiations for an Arab-Israeli peace settlement.

    The first point addressed by the
    resolution is the “inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war.”
    Some people take this to mean that Israel is required to withdraw from all the
    territories it captured. On the contrary, the reference clearly applies only to
    an offensive war. If not, the resolution would provide an incentive for
    aggression. If one country attacks another, and the defender repels the attack
    and acquires territory in the process, the former interpretation would require
    the defender to return all the land it took. Thus, aggressors would have little
    to lose because they would be ensured against the main consequence of defeat.

    “This is the first war in history
    which has ended with the victors suing for peace and the vanquished calling for
    unconditional surrender.”

    — Abba Eban 1

    The ultimate goal of 242, as
    expressed in paragraph 3, is the achievement of a “peaceful and accepted
    settlement.” This means a negotiated agreement based on the resolution’s
    principles rather than one imposed upon the parties. This is also the
    implication of Resolution 338, according to Arthur Goldberg, the American
    ambassador who led the delegation to the UN in 1967.2 That resolution, adopted
    after the 1973 war, called for negotiations between the parties to start
    immediately and concurrently with the cease-fire.

    UN Myths & Facts On Israel

    MYTH “Resolution 242 requires Israel to return to
    its pre-1967 boundaries.”

    FACT The
    most controversial clause in Resolution 242 is the call for the “Withdrawal of
    Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict.” This is
    linked to the second unambiguous clause calling for “termination of all claims
    or states of belligerency” and the recognition that “every State in the area”
    has the “right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free
    from threats or acts of force.”

    The resolution does not make
    Israeli withdrawal a prerequisite for Arab action. Moreover, it does not
    specify how much territory Israel is required to give up. The Security Council
    did not say Israel must withdraw from “all the” territories occupied after the
    Six-Day War. This was quite deliberate. The Soviet delegate wanted the
    inclusion of those words and said that their exclusion meant “that part of
    these territories can remain in Israeli hands.” The Arab states pushed for the
    word “all” to be added; when the Council rejected their idea, they read the
    resolution as if it was included. The British Ambassador who drafted the
    approved resolution, Lord Caradon, declared after the vote: “It is only the
    resolution that will bind us, and we regard its wording as clear.” 3

    This literal interpretation,
    without the implied “all,” was repeatedly declared to be the correct one by
    those involved in drafting the resolution. On October 29, 1969, for example,
    the British Foreign Secretary told the House of Commons the withdrawal
    envisaged by the resolution would not be from “all the territories.” 4 When
    asked to explain the British position later, Lord Caradon said: “It would have
    been wrong to demand that Israel return to its positions of June 4, 1967,
    because those positions were undesirable and artificial.” 5

    Similarly, U.S. Ambassador Arthur
    Goldberg explained: “The notable omissions—which were not accidental—in regard
    to withdrawal are the words ‘the’ or ‘all’ and the ‘June 5, 1967
    lines’ . . . ​the resolution speaks of withdrawal from occupied territories
    without defining the extent of withdrawal.” 6

    The resolutions clearly call on the
    Arab states to make peace with Israel. The principal condition is that Israel
    withdraw from “territories occupied” in 1967. Since Israel withdrew from
    approximately 94 percent of the territories when it gave up the Sinai, the Gaza
    Strip and portions of the West Bank, it has already partially, if not wholly,
    fulfilled its obligation under 242.

    The Arab states also objected to
    the call for “secure and recognized boundaries” because they feared this
    implied negotiations with Israel. The Arab League explicitly ruled this out at
    Khartoum in August 1967, when it proclaimed the three “noes.” Amb. Goldberg
    explained that this phrase was specifically included because the parties were
    expected to make “territorial adjustments in their peace settlement
    encompassing less than a complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from occupied
    territories, inasmuch as Israel’s prior frontiers had proved to be notably
    insecure.” The question, then, is whether Israel has to give up any additional
    territory. Now that peace agreements have been signed with Egypt and Jordan,
    and Israel has withdrawn to the international border with Lebanon, the only
    remaining territorial disputes are with the Palestinians (who are not even
    mentioned in 242) and Syria.

    The dispute with Syria is over the
    Golan Heights. Israel has repeatedly expressed a willingness to negotiate a
    compromise in exchange for peace; however, Syria has refused to consider even a
    limited peace treaty unless Israel first agrees to a complete withdrawal. Under
    242, Israel has no obligation to withdraw from any part of the Golan in the
    absence of a peace accord with Syria.

    Meanwhile, other Arab states—such
    as Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, and Libya—continue to maintain a state of war with Israel,
    or have refused to grant Israel diplomatic recognition, even though they have
    no territorial disputes with Israel. These states have nevertheless conditioned
    their relations (at least rhetorically) on an Israeli withdrawal to the
    pre-1967 borders.

    “There are some who have urged, as
    a single, simple solution, an immediate return to the situation as it was on
    June 4. . . . this is not a prescription for peace but for renewed
    hostilities.”

    — President Lyndon Johnson, speech
    on June 19, 1967

    UN Myths & Facts On Israel

    MYTH

    “Resolution 242 recognizes a
    Palestinian right to self-determination.”

    FACT The Palestinians are not mentioned anywhere
    in Resolution 242. They are only alluded to in the second clause of the second
    article of 242, which calls for “a just settlement of the refugee problem.”
    Nowhere does it require that Palestinians be given any political rights or
    territory.

    ***

    UN Myths & Facts On Israel

    MYTH “The Arab states and the PLO accepted
    Resolution 242 whereas Israel rejected it.”

    FACT The Arab states have traditionally said
    they accept 242—as defined by them—that is, requiring Israel’s unconditional
    withdrawal from all the disputed territories.

    The Palestinians, angered by the
    exclusion of any mention of them in the text, rejected the resolution. 8

    By contrast, Ambassador Abba Eban
    expressed Israel’s position to the Security Council on May 1, 1968: “My
    government has indicated its acceptance of the Security Council resolution for
    the promotion of agreement on the establishment of a just and lasting peace. I
    am also authorized to reaffirm that we are willing to seek agreement with each
    Arab State on all matters included in that resolution.”

    It took nearly a quarter century,
    but the PLO finally agreed that Resolutions 242 and 338 should be the basis for
    negotiations with Israel when it signed the Declaration of Principles in
    September 1993.

    UN Myths & Facts On Israel

    MYTH “The United Nations plays a constructive role
    in Middle East affairs.”

    FACT Starting in the mid-1970s, an
    Arab-Soviet-Third World bloc joined to form what amounted to a pro-Palestinian
    lobby at the United Nations. This was particularly true in the General Assembly
    where these countries—nearly all dictatorships or autocracies—frequently voted
    together to pass resolutions attacking Israel and supporting the PLO.

    In 1975, at the instigation of the
    Arab states and the Soviet Bloc, the Assembly approved Resolution 3379, which
    slandered Zionism by branding it a form of racism.

    U.S. Ambassador Daniel Moynihan
    called the resolution an “obscene act.” Israeli Ambassador Chaim Herzog told
    his fellow delegates the resolution was “based on hatred, falsehood and
    arrogance.” Hitler, he declared, would have felt at home listening to the UN
    debate on the measure. 9

    On December 16, 1991, the General
    Assembly voted 111–25 (with 13 abstentions and 17 delegations absent or not
    voting) to repeal Resolution 3379. No Arab country voted for repeal. The PLO
    denounced the vote and the U.S. role.

    “What takes place in the Security
    Council more closely resembles a mugging than either a political debate or an
    effort at problem-solving.”

    — Former UN Ambassador Jeane
    Kirkpatrick 13

    Israel is the object of more
    investigative committees, special representatives and rapporteurs than any other
    state in the UN system. The Commission on Human Rights routinely adopts
    disproportionate resolutions concerning Israel. Of all condemnations of this
    agency, nearly 49 percent refer to Israel alone (38 total resolutions), while
    rogue states such as Iran and Libya have only been criticized once each and
    Syria was never mentioned until Syrian troops began slaughtering its citizens
    in the summer of 2011. 10

    In March 2005, the Security Council
    issued an unprecedented condemnation of a suicide bombing in Tel Aviv carried
    out by Islamic Jihad. Unlike Israeli actions that provoke resolutions, the
    Security Council issued only a “policy statement” urging the Palestinian
    Authority to “take immediate, credible steps to find those responsible for this
    terrorist attack” and bring them to justice. It also encouraged “further and
    sustained action to prevent other acts of terror.” The statement required the
    consent of all 15 members of the Security Council. The one Arab member,
    Algeria, signed on after a reference to Islamic Jihad was deleted. 11 The
    Council has never adopted a resolution condemning a terrorist atrocity
    committed against Israel.

    In August 2005, just as Israel was
    prepared to implement its disengagement from the Gaza Strip, the Palestinian
    Authority produced materials to celebrate the Israeli withdrawal. These
    included banners that read, “Gaza Today. The West Bank and Jerusalem Tomorrow.”
    News agencies reported that the banners were produced with funds from the UN
    Development Program and were printed with the UNDP’s logo. 12

    History has proven that the path to
    peace is through direct negotiations between the parties; however, the UN
    constantly undercuts this principle. The General Assembly routinely adopts
    resolutions that attempt to impose solutions disadvantageous to Israel on
    critical issues such as Jerusalem, the Golan Heights and settlements.
    Ironically, UN Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338 proposed the bilateral
    negotiations that are consistently undermined by the General Assembly resolutions.

    Thus, the record to date indicates
    the UN has not played a useful role in resolving the Arab-Israeli conflict.

    “[The treatment Israel
    receives at the United Nations] is obsessive, ugly, bad for the United Nations
    and bad for peace.”

    — UN Ambassador Susan Rice 20

    UN Myths & Facts On Israel

    MYTH “The Palestinians have been denied a voice
    at the UN.”

    FACT Besides the support the Palestinians have
    received from the Arab and Islamic world, and most other UN members, the
    Palestinians have been afforded special treatment at the UN since 1975. That
    year, the General Assembly awarded permanent representative status to the PLO
    and established the pro-PLO “Committee on the Inalienable Rights of the
    Palestinian People.” The panel became, in effect, part of the PLO propaganda
    apparatus, issuing stamps, organizing meetings, and preparing films and draft
    resolutions in support of Palestinian “rights.”

    In 1976, the committee recommended
    “full implementation of the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people, including
    their return to the Israeli part of Palestine.” It also recommended that
    November 29—the day the UN voted to partition Palestine in 1947—be declared an
    “International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People.” Since then, it
    has been observed at the UN with anti-Israel speeches, films and exhibits. Over
    the objections of the United States, a special unit on Palestine was
    established as part of the UN Secretariat.

    In 1988, the PLO’s status was
    upgraded when the General Assembly designated the PLO as “Palestine.” Ten years
    later, the General Assembly voted to give the Palestinians a unique status as a
    non-voting member of the 185 member Assembly.

    Palestinian representatives can now
    raise the issue of the peace process in the General Assembly, cosponsor draft
    resolutions on Middle East peace and have the right of reply. They still do not
    have voting power and cannot put forward candidates for UN bodies such as the
    Security Council.

    In 2011, Palestinian leaders went
    to the UN to seek recognition of a state of Palestine based on the 1967 borders
    with East Jerusalem as its capital. By using the international body to
    circumvent negotiations, the Palestinians sought to avoid the necessity of
    recognizing Israel and ending the conflict, and to convince the UN to force
    Israel to capitulate to their demands.

    UN Myths & Facts On Israel

    MYTH “Israel enjoys the same rights as any other
    member of the United Nations.”

    FACT Israel had been the only UN member excluded
    from a regional group. Geographically, it belongs in the Asian Group; however,
    the Arab states have barred its membership. Without membership in a regional
    group, Israel cannot sit on the Security Council or other key UN bodies. For 40
    years, Israel was the only UN member excluded from a regional group.

    A breakthrough in Israel’s
    exclusion from UN bodies occurred in 2000, when Israel accepted temporary
    membership in the Western European and Others (WEOG) regional group. The WEOG
    is the only regional group that is geopolitical rather than purely
    geographical. WEOG’s 27 members—the West European states, Australia, Canada,
    New Zealand and the United States—share a Western-Democratic common
    denominator. This historic step opened the door to Israeli participation in the
    Security Council. Israel formally applied for membership to the Council in
    2005, but the next seat will not be available until 2019.

    UN Myths & Facts On Israel

    MYTH “The United States has always supported
    Israel at the UN.”

    FACT Many people believe the United States can
    always be relied upon to support Israel with its veto in the UN Security
    Council. The historical record, however, shows that the U.S. has often opposed
    Israel in the Council.

    The United States did not cast its
    first veto until 1972, on a Syrian-Lebanese complaint against Israel. From
    1967–72, the U.S. supported or abstained on 24 resolutions, most critical of
    Israel. From 1973–2010, the Security Council adopted approximately 130
    resolutions on the Middle East, most of which were critical of Israel. The U.S.
    vetoed a total of 43 resolutions and, hence, supported the Council’s criticism
    of Israel by its vote of support, or by abstaining, roughly two-thirds of the
    time. 14

    American officials also often try
    to convince sponsors to change the language of a resolution to allow them to
    either vote for, or abstain from a resolution. These resolutions are still
    critical of Israel, but may not be so one-sided that the United States feels
    obligated to cast a veto. In 2011, for example, the Palestinians called on the
    Security Council to label Israeli settlements illegal and to call for a
    construction freeze. The U.S. ambassador to the UN tried to convince the
    Palestinians to change the wording, but they refused. After vetoing the
    resolution, U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice still criticized Israeli policy. 15

    In July 2002, the United States
    shifted its policy and announced that it would veto any Security Council
    resolution on the Middle East that did not condemn Palestinian terror and name
    Hamas, Islamic Jihad and the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade as the groups responsible
    for the attacks. The U.S. also said that resolutions must note that any Israeli
    withdrawal is linked to the security situation, and that both parties must be
    called upon to pursue a negotiated settlement. 16 The Arabs can still get
    around the United States by taking issues to the General Assembly, where
    nonbinding resolutions pass by majority vote, and support for almost any
    anti-Israel resolution is assured.

    UN Myths & Facts On Israel

    MYTH “America’s Arab allies routinely support U.S.
    positions at the UN.”

    FACT In 2010, Morocco was the Arab nation that
    voted with the United States most often, and that was on only 35 percent of the
    resolutions. U.S. allies Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Egypt, voted with the United
    States only 32 percent of the time. As a group, in 2010, the Arab states voted
    against the United States on nearly 70 percent of the resolutions. Syria was at
    the bottom of the list, opposing the U.S. 84 percent of the time. By contrast,
    Israel has consistently been America’s top UN ally. Israel voted with the U.S.
    92 percent of the time in 2010, outpacing the support levels of major U.S.
    allies such as Great Britain, and France, which voted with the United States on
    only 73 percent of the resolutions. 17

    “The UN has the image of a world
    organization based on universal principles of justice and equality. In reality,
    when the chips are down, it is nothing other than the executive committee of
    the Third World dictatorships.”

    — Former UN Ambassador Jeane
    Kirkpatrick 18

    UN Myths & Facts On Israel

    MYTH “Israel’s failure to implement UN
    resolutions is a violation of international law.”

    FACT UN resolutions are documents issued by
    political bodies and need to be interpreted in light of the constitution of those
    bodies. Votes at the UN are not based on legal principles, but the
    self-interest of the member states; therefore, UN resolutions represent
    political rather than legal viewpoints. Resolutions can have moral and
    political force when they are perceived as expressing the agreed view of the
    international community, or the views of leading, powerful and respected
    nations.

    The UN Charter (Articles 10 and 14)
    specifically empowers the General Assembly to make only nonbinding
    “recommendations.” Assembly resolutions are only considered binding in relation
    to budgetary and internal procedural matters.

    The legality of Security Council
    resolutions is more ambiguous. It is not clear if all Security Council
    resolutions are binding or only those adopted under Chapter 7 of the Charter.
    19 Under Article 25 of the Charter, UN member states are obligated to carry out
    “decisions of the Security Council in accordance with the present Charter,” but
    it is unclear which kinds of resolutions are covered by the term “decisions.”
    These resolutions remain political statements by nation states and not legal
    determinations by international jurists.

    Israel has not violated any
    Security Council resolutions and the Council has never sanctioned Israel for
    noncompliance.

  228. The myth of ‘settled
    science’

    I repeat: I’m not a
    global warming believer. I’m not a global warming denier. I’ve long believed
    that it cannot be good for humanity to be spewing tons of carbon dioxide into
    the atmosphere. I also believe that those scientists who pretend to know
    exactly what this will cause in 20, 30 or 50 years are white-coated
    propagandists.

    “The debate is
    settled,” asserted propagandist in chief Barack Obama in his latest State of
    the Union address. “Climate change is a fact.” Really? There is nothing more
    anti-scientific than the very idea that science is settled, static, impervious
    to challenge. Take a non-climate example. It was long assumed that mammograms
    help reduce breast cancer deaths. This fact was so settled that Obamacare requires
    every insurance plan to offer mammograms (for free, no less) or be subject to
    termination.

    .Now we learn from a
    massive randomized study — 90,000 women followed for 25 years — that mammograms
    may have no effect on breast cancer deaths. Indeed, one out of five of those
    diagnosed by mammogram receives unnecessary radiation, chemo or surgery.

    So much for
    settledness. And climate is less well understood than breast cancer. If climate
    science is settled, why do its predictions keep changing? And how is it that
    the great physicist Freeman Dyson, who did some climate research in the late
    1970s, thinks today’s climate-change Cassandras are hopelessly mistaken?

    They deal with the
    fluid dynamics of the atmosphere and oceans, argues Dyson, ignoring the effect
    of biology, i.e., vegetation and topsoil. Further, their predictions rest on
    models they fall in love with: “You sit in front of a computer screen for 10
    years and you start to think of your model as being real.” Not surprisingly,
    these models have been “consistently and spectacularly wrong” in their
    predictions, write atmospheric scientists Richard McNider and John Christy —
    and always, amazingly, in the same direction.

    Settled? Even
    Britain’s national weather service concedes there’s been no change — delicately
    called a “pause” — in global temperature in 15 years. If even the raw data is
    recalcitrant, let alone the assumptions and underlying models, how settled is
    the science?

    But even worse than
    the pretense of settledness is the cynical attribution of any politically
    convenient natural disaster to climate change, a clever term that allows you to
    attribute anything — warming and cooling, drought and flood — to man’s sinful
    carbon burning.

    Accordingly, Obama
    ostentatiously visited drought-stricken California last Friday. Surprise! He
    blamed climate change. Here even the New York Times gagged, pointing out that
    far from being supported by the evidence, “the most recent computer projections
    suggest that as the world warms, California should get wetter, not drier, in
    the winter.”

    How inconvenient.
    But we’ve been here before. Hurricane Sandy was made the poster child for the
    alleged increased frequency and strength of “extreme weather events” like
    hurricanes.

    Nonsense. Sandy
    wasn’t even a hurricane when it hit the United States. Indeed, in all of 2012,
    only a single hurricane made U.S. landfall. And 2013 saw the fewest Atlantic
    hurricanes in 30 years. In fact, in the last half-century, one-thirdfewer major
    hurricanes have hit the United States than in the previous half-century.

    Similarly tornadoes.
    Every time one hits, the climate-change commentary begins. Yet last year saw
    the fewest in a quarter-century. And the last 30 years — of presumed global
    warming — has seen a 30 percent decrease in extreme tornado activity (F3 and
    above) versus the previous 30 years.

    None of this is
    dispositive. It doesn’t settle the issue. But that’s the point. It mocks the
    very notion of settled science, which is nothing but a crude attempt to silence
    critics and delegitimize debate. As does the term “denier” — an echo of
    Holocaust denial, contemptibly suggesting the malevolent rejection of an
    established historical truth.

    Climate-change
    proponents have made their cause a matter of fealty and faith. For folks who
    pretend to be brave carriers of the scientific ethic, there’s more than a tinge
    of religion in their jeremiads. If you whore after other gods, the Bible tells
    us, “the Lord’s wrath be kindled against you, and he shut up the heaven, that
    there be no rain, and that the land yield not her fruit” (Deuteronomy 11).

    Sounds like
    California. Except that today there’s a new god, the Earth Mother. And a new
    set of sins — burning coal and driving a fully equipped F-150.

    But whoring is
    whoring, and the gods must be appeased. So if California burns, you send your
    high priest (in carbon-belching Air Force One, but never mind) to the bone-dry
    land to offer up, on behalf of the repentant congregation, a $1 billion burnt
    offering called a “climate resilience fund.”

    Ah, settled science
    in action.

    2-20-14 Charles Krauthammer – The Washington Post

  229. .Settled Science? Alarmist
    global warming models highly suspect

    January 27, 2014 by Bill
    Gram-Reefer

    A new paper published in Science finds “the
    radiative forcing (that is, the perturbation to Earth’s energy budget) caused
    by human activities is highly uncertain, making it difficult to predict the
    extent of global warming,” and calling into question global warming models.

    One of several reasons for
    this high uncertainty of the claims of the anthropogenic global warning
    alarmists is the complexity of determining the cooling effects of aerosols,
    which reflect sunlight back to space, and can also seed cloud formation.

    According to the authors,
    “Aerosols counteract part of the warming effects of greenhouse gases, mostly by
    increasing the amount of sunlight reflected back to space. However, the ways in
    which aerosols affect climate through their interaction with clouds are complex
    and incompletely captured by climate models.”

    “Recent advances have led to
    a more detailed understanding of aerosol-cloud interactions and their effects
    on climate, but further progress is hampered by limited observational
    capabilities and coarse-resolution climate models.”

    The huge uncertainties with
    respect to clouds, aerosols, solar amplification mechanisms, ocean
    oscillations, and natural variability all make a mockery of the IPCC claim of
    increased confidence as its climate models increasingly diverge from
    temperature observations.

    Go to /halfwaytoconcord.com/global-warming-models/ for the model image

  230. Obama’s war on global warming is economic suicide

    The economy
    stagnates. Syria
    burns . Scandals lap at his feet. China
    and Russia mock him , even as a “29-year-old hacker” revealed his nation’s
    spy secrets to the world. How does President Obama respond? With a
    grandiloquent speech
    on climate change .

    Climate change?
    It lies at the very bottom of a list of Americans’ concerns (last
    of 21 — Pew poll). Which means that Obama’s
    declaration of unilateral American war on global warming, whatever the cost
    — and it will be heavy — is either highly visionary or hopelessly solipsistic.
    You decide:

    Global
    temperatures have been flat for 16 years — a curious time to unveil a grand,
    hugely costly, socially disruptive anti-warming program.

    Now, this
    inconvenient finding is not dispositive. It doesn’t mean there is no global
    warming. But it is something that the very complex global warming models that
    Obama naively claims represent settled science have trouble explaining. It
    therefore highlights the
    president’s presumption in dismissing skeptics as flat-earth know-nothings.

    On the
    contrary. It’s flat-earthers like Obama who refuse to acknowledge the
    problematic nature of contradictory data. It’s flat-earthers like Obama who
    cite a recent Alaskan heat wave — a freak event in one place at one time — as
    presumptive evidence of planetary climate change. It’s flat-earthers like Obama
    who cite perennial phenomena such as droughts as cosmic retribution for
    environmental sinfulness.

    For the sake
    of argument, nonetheless, let’s concede that global warming is precisely what
    Obama thinks it is. Then answer this: What in God’s name is his massive new regulatory
    and spending program — which begins with a war on coal and ends with
    billions in more subsidies for new Solyndras — going to do about it?

    The United States
    has already radically cut carbon dioxide emissions — more than any country on
    earth since 2006, according to the International
    Energy Agency. Emissions today are back down to 1992 levels.

    And yet, at
    the same time, global
    emissions have gone up. That’s because — surprise! — we don’t control the
    energy use of the other 96 percent of humankind.

    At the heart
    of Obama’s program are EPA regulations that will make it impossible to open any
    new coal plant and will systematically shut down existing plants. “Politically,
    the White House is hesitant to say they’re having a war on coal,” explained one
    of Obama’s climate advisers. “On the other hand, a war on coal is exactly
    what’s needed.”

    Net effect:
    tens of thousands of jobs killed, entire states impoverished. This at a time of
    chronically and crushingly high
    unemployment, slow growth, jittery markets and deep economic uncertainty.

    But that’s
    not the worst of it. This massive self-sacrifice might be worthwhile if it did
    actually stop global warming and save the planet. What makes the whole idea
    nuts is that it won’t. This massive self-inflicted economic wound will have no
    effect on climate change.

    The have-nots
    are rapidly industrializing. As we speak, China
    and India
    together are opening one new coal plant every
    week. We can kill U.S. coal and devastate coal country all we want,
    but the industrializing Third World will more than make up for it. The net effect
    of the Obama plan will simply be dismantling the U.S. coal industry for shipping
    abroad.

    To think we
    will get these countries to cooperate is sheer fantasy. We’ve been negotiating
    climate treaties for
    20 years and gotten exactly nowhere. China,
    India
    and the other rising and modernizing countries point out that the West had a
    150-year industrial head start that made it rich. They are still poor. And now,
    just as they are beginning to get rich, we’re telling them to stop dead in
    their tracks?

    Fat chance.
    Obama imagines he’s going to cajole China into a greenhouse-gas
    emissions reduction that will slow its economy, increase energy costs, derail
    industrialization and risk enormous social unrest. This from a president who
    couldn’t even get China to turn over one Edward Snowden to U.S. custody.

    I’m not
    against a global pact to reduce CO2. Indeed, I favor it. But in the absence of
    one — and there is no chance of getting one in the foreseeable future — there
    is no point in America committing economic suicide to no effect on climate
    change, the reversing of which, after all, is the alleged point of the
    exercise.

    For a
    president to propose this with such aggressive certainty is incomprehensible.
    It is the starkest of examples of belief that is impervious to evidence. And
    the word for that is faith, not science.

    By Charles
    Karauthammer 6-28-13

  231. .Nobel Winner to
    Obama on Global Warming: ‘Mr. President, You’re Wrong’

    By Kathleen Brown |
    July 17, 2015 | 2:46 PM EDT

    (CNSNews.com) —
    President Obama’s statements on global warming are “dead wrong,” said Nobel
    laureate Ivar Giaever, who
    rejected the president’s claims that man-made global warming is causing climate
    change.

    “I think Obama is a clever
    person, but he gets bad advice. Global warming is all wet,” Giaever said in a
    speech entitled Global Warming Revisited he
    gave on July 1 to scientists from 90 countries attending the 65th annual Nobel
    Laureate Meeting in Lindau, Germany.

    Giaever, who was born in Norway
    and became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 1964, was one of three recipients of
    the Nobel Prize for Physics in
    1973.

    Although he endorsed Obama in
    2008 along with more than 70 other Nobel-winning scientists, Giaever is now
    criticizing the president’s statements on climate change — particularly his 2015 State of
    the Union remark that “no challenge poses a greater threat to future
    generations than climate change.”

    “The biggest problem Obama
    faces is climate change? How can he say that?” Giaever asked. “I say
    this to Obama: ‘Excuse me, Mr. President, but you’re wrong.’ He is dead
    wrong…

    “So global warming really
    starts with these two people: Al Gore and [former United Nations climate head
    Rajendra] Pachauri,” Giaever continued. “And what they did – they
    made this curve popular…And what did this curve measure? Well, this curve
    measures what is the average temperature for the world for a whole year…For
    one year. So there’s an average temperature for the whole Earth for one year
    and that measures in a fraction of a degree.

    “So what does that mean? I
    think probably nothing. Let me talk about that again: From 1880 to 2015, the
    temperature has increased from 288 K [degrees Kelvin] to 288.8 K – 0.3 percent.
    I think the temperature has been amazingly stable.

    “If I take where I live in
    Albany, New York, there is roughly an 80 K difference between summer and winter
    at some time, so would you think that a 0.8 degree average on the Earth makes
    any difference to the climate in Albany? Is that sensible to you?…

    “I would say that global
    warming basically is a non-problem. Just leave it alone, it will take care of
    itself,” he added.

    On July 3, 36 Nobel laureates attending the meeting signed the Mainau
    Declaration 2015 on Climate Change, which compared
    “human-induced climate change” to nuclear war, calling it “another threat of
    comparable magnitude.”

    But Giaever reminded the assembled
    scientists that climate change “has happened all the time, has happened
    everywhere, and has nothing to do with global warming.”

    “So far we have left the world
    in a better shape than when we arrived, and this will continue, with one
    exception: we have to stop wasting a huge, I mean huge, amount of money on
    global warming. We have to do that,” he said.

    Giaever rejected the notion
    that man-made global warming is an “incontrovertible” truth, telling his Lindau
    audience that “global warming really has become a new religion. Because you
    can’t discuss it — it’s not proper.”

    But he said he was concerned
    about the United Nation’s climate change conference, which will be held in
    Paris later this year.

    “I really worry about that,
    because when the conference was in Copenhagen, that almost became a disaster
    but nothing got decided. But now I think the people who are ‘alarmists’ are in
    a very strong position.” he warned, accusing them of resorting to scare tactics
    without having temperature data to back up their claims.

    “If climate change doesn’t work
    to scare people, they can scare people by talking about the extreme weather.
    That must work,” he joked, observing that the U.S. is currently seeing a “low
    period” in both hurricane
    and tornado activity.

    Giaever resigned from
    the American Physical Society (APS) in 2011 over its
    official statement on
    global warming: “The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring.
    If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s
    physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are
    likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now.”

    In an email to APS’ executive
    director, he wrote:
    “In the APS it is ok to discuss whether the mass of the proton changes
    over time, and how a multi-universe behaves, but the evidence of global warming
    is incontrovertible?”

    Although APS warned of the
    dangers of global warming, Giaever pointed out in his speech that there has
    been only a 0.3% increase in the global average temperature (GAT) between 1880
    and 2015 (from 288 to 288.8 Kelvin), which he called “amazingly stable.”

    “Everything is going to hell.
    But the facts are that in the last 100 years we have measured the temperature,
    it has gone up 0.8 degrees and everything in the world has gotten better…We
    live better, we have better work, better health, better everything — but if we
    go [up] another 0.8 degrees, we’re gonna die, I guess,” he said sarcastically.

    Giaever also does not perceive
    a threat in rising carbon dioxide (CO2) levels, noting that “if you have more
    CO2 the plant grows faster…It’s a wonderful thing, but they don’t talk about
    that in Nature magazine, which he accused of wanting to “cash in on the
    [global warming] fad.”

    “I think the average temperature of the Earth is equal to the
    emperor’s new clothes. There was a boy who cried, ‘The emperor has no clothes
    on.’ And I would cry out and say you can’t measure the temperature for the
    whole Earth with such accuracy.”

    He added that the “optimal temperature” for the globe
    has never been establsihed.

    “What
    is the optimal temperature for the Earth? Is it the temperature we have right
    now? That would be a miracle.” he said. “Maybe it’s two degrees warmer. Maybe
    it’s two degrees colder. No one has told me what the optimal temperature is for
    the whole Earth.”

    http://cnsnews.com/news/article/kathleen-brown/nobel-prize-winning-physicist-obama-dead-wrong-global-warming-0

  232. Scientist Makes Excuses
    for 15-Year Global Warming Hiatus

    August 7, 2014

    One of the most under-reported facts about global
    warming is that, well, it’s not actually happening. The major climate change
    debates in this country have been going on for about a decade now, a time
    during which this mysterious global warming phenomenon has not been occurring.
    At least, not in the way the mainstream press contends. How many times do they
    bring up that fact on NBC Nightly News? How many times did Al Gore
    mention that in his documentary?

    Because they can’t ignore it completely, though, a
    NASA scientist addressed the recent 15 year warming “hiatus” in a lecture
    delivered at the Langley Research Center on Tuesday. Norman Loeb was quick to
    point out that though warming had slowed considerably, it had not stopped
    entirely. Even so, he was forced to acknowledge that the slowed rate was enough
    to embolden skeptics who believe the whole thing was a political hoax from the
    get-go.

    Solar radiation variability, aerosol pollution, and
    water vapor were all cited by Loeb as he delved into the reasons behind the
    hiatus. He also pointed out the coincidence of El Nino-esque climate patterns
    that have historically accompanied similar slowdowns in global warming. “For
    average climate records, thirty years is like one data point,” Loeb said in his
    lecture, though he went on to reinforce the fact that temperatures were still
    rising. “It’s really forcing us to look at our models and observations and ask
    questions.”

    Sadly, it’s unlikely that any of those questions will
    be of a particularly enlightening nature. Climate change isn’t the only
    politically-motivated brand of science, but it has certainly become the worst
    of them. The earth’s climate, according to our best historical analyses, has always
    gone through long periods of cooling and warming. This is the natural way of
    the planet and it was so long before humans walked its surface. Ice core
    samples dating back almost 700,000 years demonstrate that the latest warming
    trend is fully within the boundaries established by natural variability.

    It’s essential that scientists continue their research
    into the area of climate change, global warming, and anything else that could
    drastically affect our way of life in the next century. The problem isn’t the
    science or the data, but rather the frantic stretches from many in the field
    that attempt to link global warming with this political policy or that bit of
    corporate irresponsibility. This is where we leave the cozy confines of science
    and enter the cutthroat world of politics. Unfortunately, far too many
    mainstream news stories fail to make a distinction between the two.

    ww.fixthisnation.com

  233. Liberals: Exempt from Scrutiny

    . It doesn’t matter if you belong to the 0.1
    percent as long as you say the right things. By Victor Davis Hanson

    . Victor Davis Hanson The qualifications of a Tommy “Dude” Vietor
    or Ben Rhodes that placed them in the Situation Room during
    Obama-administration crises were not years of distinguished public service,
    military service, prior elected office, a string of impressive publications, an
    academic career, previous diplomatic postings, or any of the usual criteria that
    have placed others at the nerve center of America in times of crisis. Their
    trajectory was based on yeoman partisan PR work, and largely on being young,
    hip, and well connected politically. I don’t think either of these operatives
    has a particular worldview or competency that would promote the interests of
    the United States. But they do talk well, know the right people, and are hip.
    Again, they have no real expertise or even ideology other than that.

    . Al Gore is said to be our leading green
    activist, and the Steyer brothers the most preeminent green political donors.
    But do they really believe in reducing carbon emissions to cool down the
    planet?

    Not really. The latter made much of their
    fortune in the sort of high-stakes speculations that the Left supposedly
    despises. Many of their financial payoffs derived from promoting coal burning
    abroad, of the sort most liberals wish to stop.

    . AdvertisementAs for Gore, he cannot really
    believe in big green government or he would not have tried to beat the
    capital-gains tax hike when he peddled his failed cable network to a
    petrodollar-rich Al Jazeera, whose cash comes from the very sources of energy
    that Gore claims he hates. Do you make millions, and then in eleventh-century
    fashion repent so that you can enjoy them all the more? Gore certainly in the
    past has not lived modestly; the carbon footprint of keeping Al Gore going —
    housing, travel, and tastes — is quite stunning. Both the Steyers and the Gores
    of our human comedy know that it is lucrative business to appear green, and
    that by doing so one can keep one’s personal life largely exempt from scrutiny
    in general and charges of hypocrisy in particular. For them, 21st-century
    liberalism is a useful badge, a fashion not unlike wearing good shades or
    having the right sort of cell phone.

    . The 1 percent fetish is also not really
    ideological. Elizabeth Warren, one of its greatest supporters, is not just a 1
    percent but a 0.1 percent grandee. Her house, habits, household income, past
    corporate consulting, and net worth all reflect a desire for profits and
    refinement not accorded to most Americans. Her life is about as much a part of
    the 99.9 percent as she is Native American. She is not worried about welders
    getting some work on the Keystone Pipeline or farmworkers put out of their jobs
    in Mendota, Calif., over a baitfish.

    . Ditto Paul Krugman. He is eloquent about
    inequality and about the sort of insider privileges that give so much to so
    few. But nothing about his own circumstances suggests that he lives the life he
    professes, as opposed to professing abstractions that psychologically make the
    quite different life he lives more palatable. Certainly, Krugman’s liberalism
    means that few care that he once worked in the Reagan administration, that he
    was a paid adviser to Enron, or that he has just taken a part-time $225,000
    post-retirement job at City University of New York — one that, at least
    initially, requires no teaching. Given what CUNY is said to pay its exploited
    part-timers, the university could have offered 75 courses with the salary it
    will be paying Krugman. Or, put another way, Professor Krugman will make the
    same as do 75 part-timers who each teach one class — and thus one class more
    than Krugman will teach. Bravo for Professor Krugman to have marketed himself
    so well and to have earned all the compensation that the market will bear — and
    too bad for the part-timers, who don’t understand market-based economics, where
    there are winners like Krugman and losers like themselves who can’t earn
    commensurate hanging-around money. One last question: Is part-time teacher
    Krugman going to study the inequality inherent in the modern university’s
    exploitation of part-time teachers?

    . Such hypocrisy taxes Krugman’s supporters
    to find ingenious arguments for the idea that noble ends justify almost any
    means, and so they argue that Krugman’s advocacy for research into income
    equality trumps this minor embarrassment, or that he can be very rich and still
    fight the 1 percent, or that the salary in the metrosexual world of the
    Boston–New York–Washington corridor is not all that high. Of course, the CUNY
    billet is likely just a small stream that feeds into Krugman’s other sizable
    income rivers. Indeed, he more likely belongs not just to the 1 percent, but to
    the same 0.1 percent as Senator Warren, which he so castigates. When President
    Obama exclaimed that at some point one needs to know when one has made enough
    money, Krugman would have agreed. He could now put that agreement into action
    by donating his salary to double the meager wages of 75 part-timers, who,
    unlike himself, are contracted professors who really do teach and are not
    “generously” compensated.

    . Does the NAACP stand as our watchdog over
    racism? In theory, yes; in fact, not so much. The L.A. branch was quite content
    to overlook Donald Sterling’s sterling racialism, given his donations. Sterling
    apparently thought that supporting the local NAACP either was not antithetical
    to his racist sloppy talk and rental practices, or was a wise investment in
    progressive insurance.

    . Al Sharpton receiving a “person of the
    year” award from the same branch of the NAACP is no less absurd than Donald
    Sterling’s “lifetime-achievement award” — given that Sharpton is on record as
    an anti-Semite, homophobe, inciter of riot, former FBI informant, tax
    delinquent, and convicted defamer of a district attorney. But the NAACP brand
    nowadays functions much like our green culture, as a sort of way to display
    correct coolness. It surely would not go after Joe Biden, Harry Reid, Ruth
    Bader Ginsburg, Sonya Sotomayor — or Barack Obama — for either using racialist
    speech or denigrating others on the basis of race or tribe. Such a fact is
    widely accepted because it is just as widely assumed that the NAACP has become
    something fossilized, like Betamax in its waning days, as it existed for a bit
    longer because it had once thrived.

    Victor Davis Hanson

    National Review Online

    May 6, 2014 4:00 AM

  234. Liberal
    Physicist Says Obama Is Wrong On Global Warming

    Steve Birr 8:37 PM 10/15/

    Renowned
    physicist and self-described Democrat Freeman Dyson said President Obama is
    wrong about global warming.

    “I’m 100
    percent Democrat myself, and I like Obama,” Dyson told The Register in an
    interview published Sunday. “But he took the wrong side on this issue, and the
    Republicans took the right side.”

    Dyson
    lamented scientists are ignoring “obvious” facts about global warming, and
    continue to conflate air pollution — which he says is not behind global warming
    — with carbon dioxide, which is not technically a pollutant.

    “How does it
    happen that a whole generation of scientific experts is blind to obvious
    facts?” Dyson asked.

    Sponsored
    Links by He has taught physics for nearly 40 years at the Institute for
    Advanced Study at Princeton, and his work in electrodynamics, climate studies
    and nuclear engineering has earned him notoriety in the scientific community.

    He
    acknowledged fossil fuels emit “very unpleasant stuff” when burned, but said
    pollution from coal, oil and gas is not behind global warming. The greenhouse
    gas carbon dioxide, he alleges, is what’s behind global temperature rises.

    “Pollution is
    quite separate to the climate problem,” Dyson told The Register. “One can be
    solved, and the other cannot. And the public doesn’t understand that.”

    Dyson was
    featured in the forward of a report released Monday by the UK-based Global
    Warming Policy Foundation, where he challenged his colleagues to honestly judge
    the climatic effects of carbon dioxide. (RELATED: CO2 Emissions Are Making The
    Earth Greener)

    “To any
    unprejudiced person reading this account, the facts should be obvious: that the
    non-climatic effects of carbon dioxide as a sustainer of wildlife and crop
    plants are enormously beneficial, that the possibly harmful climatic effects of
    carbon dioxide have been greatly exaggerated, and that the benefits clearly
    outweigh the possible damage,” Dyson wrote.

    Read more:
    http://dailycaller.com/2015/10/15/liberal-physicist-says-obama-is-wrong-on-global-warming/#ixzz3oqz6nRQj

    ..

  235. Sunspot Trends Suggest Global Cooling Ahead

    By Larry Bell Monday,
    25 Aug 2014 08:54 AM

    Some recent study results linking shifts in sunspot frequency and
    climate changes over thousands of years suggest that the past 18-year-long
    period of flat global temperatures may be a prelude to a much longer cooling
    cycle.

    While causes behind these magnetic vacillations are uncertain, observable
    connections between solar and Earth climate patterns are clear. Reduced periods
    of sunspot activity correlate with cooler and very cold periods, with higher
    incidences producing opposite effects.

    If a leading theory regarding why this occurs is correct, a weaker magnetic
    heliosphere surrounding our Solar System evidenced by low sunspot activity
    permits more cosmic rays from deep space to enter Earth’s protective
    magnetosphere and atmosphere. This increased flux of heavy electrons— or
    “muons” — striking the atmosphere produces increased cloud cover, in
    turn reflecting more solar radiation away from Earth and back to space.

    Since none of this has anything to do with human-caused atmospheric CO2
    emissions, you can bet that the UN and its Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
    Change are very cool on the theory and its chilling political science
    implications. It follows that since both the Sun and climate began changing
    billions of years before the Industrial Revolution, neither conditions can be
    blamed on fossil-fueled smokestacks and SUVs.

    A notable IPCC critic is Dr. Fritz Vahrenholt, a former leader of Germany’s
    environmental movement who also headed the renewable energy division of the
    country’s second largest utility company. He recentlyco-authored a book with
    Dr. Sebastian Luning titled, “The Cold Sun: Why the Climate Disaster Won’t
    Happen”.

    Although the two don’t deny that CO2 has some warming influence, they believe
    the Sun plays a far greater role in the whole scheme of things.

    Dr. Vahrenholt expects the world to get cooler in the future for three reasons:
    we are or soon will be beginning on the downward flank of the Sun’s Gleissberg
    and Suess cycles; solar activity during the next cycle may extend our current
    very weak one; and ocean cycles will be in cooling phases over the next decades
    as well.

    A research team in Sweden which analyzed patterns of solar activity at the end
    of the last Ice Age around 20,000 – 10,000 years ago concluded that changes in
    solar activity and their influences on climate are nothing new, especially on a
    regional level. An analysis of trace elements in ice cores in Greenland and
    cave formations from China revealed that Sweden was then covered by a thick ice
    sheet that stretched all the way down to northern Germany.

    Water contained in those frozen ice caps resulted in sea levels
    which were more than 100 metres lower than at present.

    Furthermore, the August 2014 study report’s co-author Dr. Raimund Muscheler, a
    lecturer in Quaternary Geology at Lund University, observes: “Reduced solar
    activity could lead to colder winters in Northern Europe. This is because the
    Sun’s UV radiation affects the atmospheric circulation. Interestingly, the same
    processes lead to warmer winters in Greenland, with greater snowfall and more
    storms.”

    While the Sun was exceptionally active during the 20th century, many scientists
    believe that this condition is now coming to an end. Although the Royal
    Observatory of Belgium’s July average monthly sunspot count increased slightly
    for the sixth straight month despite a rare mid-month spotless day, solar Cycle
    24 still remains to be the weakest in 100 years.

    It is predicted that increased counts may continue for a few more months before
    activity once again begins to fade. In fact, long-term indicators suggest that
    the next sunspot cycle will be much weaker than this one. If so, as with other
    extended periods of inactivity as occurred during Cycles 3, 4, and 5 which
    marked the beginning of a “Dalton Minimum”, we can expect the past 18 years of
    flat global temperatures to become significantly cooler.

    Dr. Habibiullo Abdussamatov, head of the Russian Academy of Sciences Pulkovo Observatory
    in St. Petersburg and director of the Russian segment of the International
    Space Station predicts that we may soon witness the coming of a new Little Ice
    Age with a deep freeze lasting throughout this century. The last one which
    began in the mid-16th century killed millions in Europe. It mercifully ended
    soon after Washington’s troops suffered brutal winter temperatures at Valley
    Forge in 1777 and Napoleon’s bitterly cold 1812 retreat from Russia.

    Whether present cooling continues or not, is there any reason at all to panic?
    No, and by the same token if, for any reason, global warming resumes as it
    probably will along with following intermittent cool-downs, let’s remember to
    be grateful for the good times we now have the great fortune to enjoy.

    Larry Bell is an endowed professor of
    space architecture at the University of Houston where he founded the Sasakawa
    International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA) and the graduate program in
    space architecture. He is author of “Climate of Corruption: Politics and Power
    Behind the Global Warming Hoax,” and his professional aerospace work has been
    featured on the History Channel and the Discovery Channel-Canada.

  236. Top boffin
    Freeman Dyson on climate change, interstellar travel, fusion, and more – Says
    Obama Is Wrong On Global Warming.

    11 Oct 2015
    at 23:00, Andrew Orlowski

    Interview The
    life of physicist Freeman Dyson spans advising bomber command in World War II;
    working at the Institute for Advanced Study, in Princeton, New Jersey, as a
    contemporary of Einstein; and providing advice to the US government on a wide
    range of scientific and technical issues.

    He is a rare
    public intellectual who writes prolifically for a wide audience. He has also
    campaigned against nuclear weapons proliferation.

    At America’s
    Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Dyson was looking at the climate system before
    it became a hot political issue, over 25 years ago. He provides a robust
    foreword to a report written by Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
    cofounder Indur Goklany on CO2 – a report published [PDF] today by the Global
    Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF).

    An Obama
    supporter who describes himself as “100 per cent Democrat,” Dyson
    says he is disappointed that the President “chose the wrong side.”
    Increasing CO2 in the atmosphere does more good than harm, he argues, and
    humanity doesn’t face an existential crisis. Climate change, he tells us,
    “is not a scientific mystery but a human mystery. How does it happen that
    a whole generation of scientific experts is blind to obvious facts?”

    We invited
    Dyson to talk about climate change and other matters, including a question from
    your correspondent’s kids – how will we do interstellar travel?

    You were
    being invited to help solve problems in an era when things looked pretty grim,
    and those problems looked insoluble, during the Cold War, and before Norman
    Borlaug’s Green Revolution. Now we’ve conquered a lot of these, but there seems
    to be an unquenchable thirst for apocalypse.

    [Laughs] Yes.
    I don’t know why, it’s a mood of the times. I don’t understand that better than
    anyone else. It is true that there’s a large community of people who make their
    money by scaring the public, so money is certainly involved to some extent, but
    I don’t think that’s the full explanation.

    It’s like a
    hundred years ago, before World War I, there was this insane craving for doom,
    which in a way, helped cause World War I. People like the poet Rupert Brooke
    were glorifying war as an escape from the dullness of modern life. [There was]
    the feeling we’d gone soft and degenerate, and war would be good for us all.
    That was in the air leading up to World War I, and in some ways it’s in the air
    today.

    The years
    before 1914 were a tremendously promising time. Russia was getting richer, [but
    then] the whole thing fell apart. It’s comparable today – we’ve done a much
    better job with feeding the world and if you look at the number of desperately
    poor people, it has been decreasing quite steadily.

    The most
    important thing at the moment is China getting richer. What the rest of the
    world is doing doesn’t really matter.

    If you could
    give your own scientific recommendations for carbon dioxide policy at COP21 in
    Paris, what would they be?

    Certainly
    land management would be one. Particularly building up topsoil, which you can
    do in lots of ways. Not just growing trees, there are many things you can do
    which are just as good. Inducing snowfall is something you can do which hasn’t
    been discussed very much, to keep the oceans from rising. The rise of the
    oceans is a real problem and while they’re not rising as fast as people say,
    they’re still rising. That could be stopped if you could arrange that it snows
    a bit more in Antarctica. That’s something that could be quite feasible, but
    it’s not been looked at very much.

    Are climate
    models getting better? You wrote how they have the most awful fudges, and they
    only really impress people who don’t know about them.

    I would say
    the opposite. What has happened in the past 10 years is that the discrepancies
    between what’s observed and what’s predicted have become much stronger. It’s
    clear now the models are wrong, but it wasn’t so clear 10 years ago. I can’t
    say if they’ll always be wrong, but the observations are improving and so the
    models are becoming more verifiable.

    It seems
    almost medieval to suppose that nature is punishing us, rather than the
    Enlightenment view, that we can tame nature, and still be good stewards of it.

    That’s all
    true.

    It’s now
    difficult for scientists to have frank and honest input into public debates.
    Prof Brian Cox, who is the public face of physics in the UK thanks to the BBC,
    has said he has no obligation to listen to “deniers,” or to any other
    views other than the orthodoxy.

    That’s a
    problem, but still I find that I have things to say and people do listen to me,
    and people have no particular complaints.

    It’s very sad
    that in this country, political opinion parted [people’s views on climate
    change]. I’m 100 per cent Democrat myself, and I like Obama. But he took the
    wrong side on this issue, and the Republicans took the right side.

    Because the
    big growing countries need fossil fuels, the political goal of mitigation, by
    reducing or redirecting industrial activity and consumer behaviour, now seems
    quite futile in the West.

    China and
    India rely on coal to keep growing, so they’ll clearly be burning coal in huge
    amounts. They need that to get rich. Whatever the rest of the world agrees to,
    China and India will continue to burn coal, so the discussion is quite
    pointless.

    At the same
    time, coal is very unpleasant stuff, and there are problems with coal quite
    apart from climate. I remember in England when we burned coal, everything was
    filthy. It was really bad, and that’s the way it is now in China, but you can
    clean that up as we did in England. It takes a certain amount of political
    willpower, and that takes time. Pollution is quite separate to the climate
    problem: one can be solved, and the other cannot, and the public doesn’t
    understand that.

    Have you
    heard of the phrase “virtue signalling”? The UK bureaucracy made
    climate change its foreign policy priority, and we heard a lot of the phrase
    “leading the world in the fight …” and by doing so, it seemed to be
    making a public declaration of its goodness and virtue …

    No [laughs].
    Well, India and China aren’t buying that. When you go beyond 50 years,
    everything will change. As far as the next 50 years are concerned, there are
    two main forces of energy, which are coal and shale gas. Emissions have been
    going down in the US while they’ve going up in Europe, and that’s because of
    shale gas. It’s only half the carbon dioxide emissions of coal. China may in
    fact be able to develop shale gas on a big scale and that means they burn a lot
    less coal.

    It seems
    complete madness to prohibit shale gas. You wondered if climate change is an
    Anglophone preoccupation. Well, France is even more dogmatic than Britain about
    shale gas!

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/10/11/freeman_dyson_interview/

    ..

  237. Unsustainable Green

    — The $7,200 car subsidy that the Democrats and Obama have
    dictated, is yet another burden added to the mounting debt for our children and
    grandchildren. The cars are so expensive that few will buy them and so
    the government has come up with the idea of putting a 7,200 taxpayer funded car
    subsidy for those greener than though folks who buy such cars.


    In fact Obama hoped in his State of The
    State address that we will have over 1,000,000 such
    vehicles on the road by 2015. Basically Obama is hoping that we add yet
    another $7.2 billion to our national debt to meet this goal. When you add up
    the subsidies to Wind, Solar and other alternative energies plus tax rebates
    for the cars themselves it all begins to add up.

    — Feel good, anti
    free market, tax rebate policy, to promote wishful thinking on arguably non
    competitive or sustainable markets, through mortgaging our children and
    children’s futures is unacceptable. Increasing our deficit obligation as
    well as our children’s, is unsustainable and there will be a price for
    politicians to pay in the next election.

  238. Obama’s Green Energy
    Subsidy Gold Rush. Money Not Well Spent.

    .

    The Obama administration
    has bet the farm,or better said 17 billion of your money, on green energy. High risk ventures shuch as the failed
    Solyndra and others, picking winners and losers as they try to transform us
    into a low carbon economy. See the
    attached negative article from none other than the arguably hard left leaning
    NY Times.

    ww.nytimes.com/2011/11/12/business/energy-environment/a-cornucopia-of-help-for-renewable-energy.html?pagewanted=all

    The
    wild claims of the permanent jobs that will be created by these stimulus funded
    projects amount to a cost of about $10,000,000 per job. Surely the money could be better spent.

  239. Going green comes with costs

    Ethanol push takes toll on environment

    Environmentalist Craig Cox looks at a corn
    field near Ames, Iowa. Cox calls the administration’s ethanol
    policy ‘an ecological disaster.’ (Charlie Riedel / AP)

    Corydon, Iowa— The hills of southern Iowa bear the scars of America’s push for green energy:
    The brown gashes where rain has washed away the soil. The polluted streams that
    dump fertilizer into the water supply.

    Even the cemetery that disappeared like an
    apparition into a cornfield.

    It wasn’t supposed to be this way.

    With the Iowa political caucuses on the horizon in
    2007, presidential candidate Barack Obama made homegrown corn a centerpiece of
    his plan to slow global warming.

    And when President George W. Bush signed a
    law that year requiring oil companies to add billions of gallons of ethanol to
    their gasoline each year, Bush predicted it would make the country “stronger,
    cleaner and more secure.”

    But the ethanol era has proven far more
    damaging to the environment than politicians promised and much worse than the
    government admits today.

    As farmers rushed to find new places to plant
    corn, they wiped out millions of acres of conservation land, destroyed habitat
    and polluted water supplies, an Associated Press investigation found.

    Five million acres of land set aside for
    conservation — more than Yellowstone, Everglades
    and Yosemite National Parks combined — have vanished on Obama’s watch.

    Landowners filled in wetlands. They plowed
    into pristine prairies, releasing carbon dioxide that had been locked in the
    soil.

    Sprayers pumped out billions of pounds of
    fertilizer, some of which seeped into drinking water, contaminated rivers and
    worsened the huge dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico
    where marine life can’t survive.

    The government’s predictions of the benefits
    have proven so inaccurate that independent scientists question whether it will
    ever achieve its central environmental goal: reducing greenhouse gases.

    That makes the hidden costs even more
    significant.

    “This is an ecological disaster,” said Craig
    Cox with the Environmental Working Group, a natural ally of the president that,
    like others, now finds itself at odds with the White House.

    But the Obama administration stands by its
    environmental policy, highlighting corn-based ethanols benefits to the farming
    industry rather than any negative impact.

    “We are committed to this industry because we
    understand its benefits,” said Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, who spoke to
    ethanol lobbyists on Capitol Hill recently.

    The administration believes supporting corn
    ethanol is the best way to encourage the development of biofuels that will
    someday be cleaner and greener than today’s.

    Pulling the plug on corn ethanol, officials
    fear, might mean killing any hope of these next-generation fuels.

    The ethanol industry issued a fierce response
    to the AP investigation.

    “We find it to be just flabbergasting. There
    is probably more truth in this week’s National Enquirer,” said Geoff Cooper,
    vice president of research and analysis for the Renewable Fuels Association in
    a press call with reporters Monday.

    The industry said the primary driver for such
    losses was Congress lowering the number acres allowed in conservation, not
    ethanol.

    Writing the regulations to implement the
    ethanol mandate was among the Obama administration’s first major environmental
    undertakings. Industry and environmental groups watched closely.

    The regulations took effect in July 2010.

    The following month, corn prices already had
    surpassed the EPA’s long-term estimate of $3.22 a bushel. That September, corn
    passed $4, on its way to about $7, where it has been most of this year.

    Yields, meanwhile, have held fairly steady.

    Historically, the overwhelmingly majority of
    corn in the United States
    has been turned into livestock feed.

    But in 2010, for the first time, fuel was the
    No. 1 use for corn in America.
    That was true in 2011 and 2012. Newly released Department of Agriculture data
    show, however, that this year, 45 percent of corn went to livestock feed and 43
    percent went to fuel.

    The more corn that goes to ethanol, the more
    that needs to be planted to meet other demands.

    Scientists predicted that a major ethanol
    push would raise prices and encourage farmers to plow into conservation land.

    Obama administration officials know the
    ethanol mandate hasn’t lived up to its billing.

    The numbers behind the mandate have become so
    unworkable that, for the first time, the EPA is soon expected to reduce the
    amount of ethanol required to be added to the gasoline supply.

    From The Detroit
    News: ww.detroitnews.com/article/20131112/NATION/311120035

    (Another Obama
    Disaster!)

  240. Obama Doubling Down Right Out Of Radicals’
    Handbook (China green house gas deal, government takeover of the internet,
    warns he will veto Keystone, working to give Iran more time in nuclear
    negotiations that have taken 12 years and counting)

    Posted 11/14/2014
    06:43 PM ET

    Obama toasts with Chinese
    President Xi Jinping at a lunch banquet in the Great Hall of the People in
    Beijing on Wednesday. Earlier in the… View Enlarged Image

    Defiance: Bypassing
    Congress on amnesty, and the rest of President Obama’s double-down response to
    the voters’ rejection of his policies, should shock no one. “Never let
    up” is one of Saul Alinsky’s “Rules For Radicals.”

    ‘Will Obama fade or
    fight?” asks the headline of a Los Angeles Times story reporting the
    details of how “an unbowed President Barack Obama” will, to quote the
    president, “squeeze every last little bit of opportunity” to enact
    the rest of his agenda over his final two years in office.

    “Down But Not
    Out,” Obama “Presses Ahead,” says a New York Times headline to a
    similar story.

    What a difference from
    even the Times’ token “conservative” columnist David Brooks, who once
    upon a time declared of Democrats’ success in the 2006 midterm elections:
    “The American public delivered a stunning electoral judgment against the
    Iraq War, the Republican Party and President Bush.”

    We didn’t hear then from
    the establishment media about a “down but not out” George W. Bush
    pressing ahead. We did hear right after the new Congress convened in 2007,
    however, from none other than one Sen. Barack Obama that “removing of all
    U.S. combat forces from Iraq by March 31st, 2008” was “what the
    American people demanded in the November election.”

    In the 2014 November
    election, there was “a stunning electoral judgment” against President
    Obama and his policies — which the president himself during the campaign
    conceded were on the ballot — and “what the American people demanded”
    was that he be stopped.

    But instead, the
    president will go full frontal and defy the American people:

    • Within days he is to
    issue an executive order that cannot be viewed as less than an impeachable
    offense, giving at least 6 million illegal immigrants amnesty — as criminal
    aliens taunt the law enforcement officials holding them in custody.

    • The
    “landmark” greenhouse gas pact he brings home from Beijing asks the
    Chinese only to increase emissions more slowly by 2030, while the U.S. commits
    to further decrease our output.

    • He plans through
    regulation what amounts to a government takeover of the Internet.

    • Aides warn that he will
    veto the Keystone XL pipeline, which would bring crude oil to U.S. refineries.

    • Perhaps biggest of all,
    he seems set this month to agree to a deal that would let Islamofascist Iran
    keep its nuclear program, endangering the free world in Neville
    Chamberlain-like fashion.

    No one should be
    surprised.

    Rule number 8 in Obama
    idol Saul Alinsky’s book “Rules For Radicals” states: “Keep the
    pressure on. Never let up.”

    Alinsky advises radicals
    to “Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling
    organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.”

    Barack Obama first came
    to note when in his keynote address to the 2004 Democratic convention he warned
    of “those who are preparing to divide us … who embrace the politics of
    anything goes.”

    A decade later, even with
    his agenda refuted by voters, this is a president for whom anything goes when
    it comes to what he wants the U.S. government doing. And he’s not done yet.

    Read More At Investor’s Business Daily: news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/111414-726628-obama-embraces-anything-goes-decade-after-deploring-it.htm#ixzz3JzUAGn00

    .

  241. ..Climate
    Science Is Not Settled

    We are very far from the
    knowledge needed to make good climate policy, writes leading scientist Steven
    E. Koonin (undersecretary for science in the Energy Department during President
    Barack Obama’s first term)

    Sept. 19, 2014 12:19 p.m. ET (Part 1)

    The crucial scientific question for policy isn’t whether the
    climate is changing. That is a settled matter: The climate has always changed
    and always will. Mitch Dobrowner

    The
    idea that “Climate science is settled” runs through today’s popular
    and policy discussions. Unfortunately, that claim is misguided. It has not only
    distorted our public and policy debates on issues related to energy,
    greenhouse-gas emissions and the environment. But it also has inhibited the
    scientific and policy discussions that we need to have about our climate
    future.

    My
    training as a computational physicist—together with a 40-year career of
    scientific research, advising and management in academia, government and the
    private sector—has afforded me an extended, up-close perspective on climate
    science. Detailed technical discussions during the past year with leading
    climate scientists have given me an even better sense of what we know, and
    don’t know, about climate. I have come to appreciate the daunting scientific
    challenge of answering the questions that policy makers and the public are
    asking.

    The
    crucial scientific question for policy isn’t whether the climate is changing.
    That is a settled matter: The climate has always changed and always will.
    Geological and historical records show the occurrence of major climate shifts,
    sometimes over only a few decades. We know, for instance, that during the 20th
    century the Earth’s global average surface temperature rose 1.4 degrees
    Fahrenheit.

    Nor is
    the crucial question whether humans are influencing the climate. That is no
    hoax: There is little doubt in the scientific community that continually
    growing amounts of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, due largely to
    carbon-dioxide emissions from the conventional use of fossil fuels, are
    influencing the climate. There is also little doubt that the carbon dioxide
    will persist in the atmosphere for several centuries. The impact today of human
    activity appears to be comparable to the intrinsic, natural variability of the
    climate system itself.

    Rather,
    the crucial, unsettled scientific question for policy is, “How will the
    climate change over the next century under both natural and human
    influences?” Answers to that question at the global and regional levels,
    as well as to equally complex questions of how ecosystems and human activities
    will be affected, should inform our choices about energy and infrastructure.

    But—here’s
    the catch—those questions are the hardest ones to answer. They challenge, in a
    fundamental way, what science can tell us about future climates.

    Even
    though human influences could have serious consequences for the climate, they
    are physically small in relation to the climate system as a whole. For example,
    human additions to carbon dioxide in the atmosphere by the middle of the 21st
    century are expected to directly shift the atmosphere’s natural greenhouse
    effect by only 1% to 2%. Since the climate system is highly variable on its
    own, that smallness sets a very high bar for confidently projecting the
    consequences of human influences.

    A
    second challenge to “knowing” future climate is today’s poor
    understanding of the oceans. The oceans, which change over decades and
    centuries, hold most of the climate’s heat and strongly influence the
    atmosphere. Unfortunately, precise, comprehensive observations of the oceans
    are available only for the past few decades; the reliable record is still far
    too short to adequately understand how the oceans will change and how that will
    affect climate.

    Climate
    Science Is Not Settled (part 2)

    A third
    fundamental challenge arises from feedbacks that can dramatically amplify or
    mute the climate’s response to human and natural influences. One important
    feedback, which is thought to approximately double the direct heating effect of
    carbon dioxide, involves water vapor, clouds and temperature.

    But
    feedbacks are uncertain. They depend on the details of processes such as
    evaporation and the flow of radiation through clouds. They cannot be determined
    confidently from the basic laws of physics and chemistry, so they must be
    verified by precise, detailed observations that are, in many cases, not yet
    available.

    Beyond
    these observational challenges are those posed by the complex computer models
    used to project future climate. These massive programs attempt to describe the
    dynamics and interactions of the various components of the Earth system—the
    atmosphere, the oceans, the land, the ice and the biosphere of living things.
    While some parts of the models rely on well-tested physical laws, other parts
    involve technically informed estimation. Computer modeling of complex systems
    is as much an art as a science.

    For
    instance, global climate models describe the Earth on a grid that is currently
    limited by computer capabilities to a resolution of no finer than 60 miles.
    (The distance from New York City to Washington, D.C., is thus covered by only
    four grid cells.) But processes such as cloud formation, turbulence and rain
    all happen on much smaller scales. These critical processes then appear in the
    model only through adjustable assumptions that specify, for example, how the
    average cloud cover depends on a grid box’s average temperature and humidity.
    In a given model, dozens of such assumptions must be adjusted
    (“tuned,” in the jargon of modelers) to reproduce both current
    observations and imperfectly known historical records.

    We
    often hear that there is a “scientific consensus” about climate
    change. But as far as the computer models go, there isn’t a useful consensus at
    the level of detail relevant to assessing human influences. Since 1990, the
    United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC, has
    periodically surveyed the state of climate science. Each successive report from
    that endeavor, with contributions from thousands of scientists around the
    world, has come to be seen as the definitive assessment of climate science at
    the time of its issue.

    For the
    latest IPCC report (September 2013), its Working Group I, which focuses on
    physical science, uses an ensemble of some 55 different models. Although most
    of these models are tuned to reproduce the gross features of the Earth’s
    climate, the marked differences in their details and projections reflect all of
    the limitations that I have described. For example:

    • The
    models differ in their descriptions of the past century’s global average
    surface temperature by more than three times the entire warming recorded during
    that time. Such mismatches are also present in many other basic climate
    factors, including rainfall, which is fundamental to the atmosphere’s energy
    balance. As a result, the models give widely varying descriptions of the
    climate’s inner workings. Since they disagree so markedly, no more than one of
    them can be right.


    Although the Earth’s average surface temperature rose sharply by 0.9 degree
    Fahrenheit during the last quarter of the 20th century, it has increased much
    more slowly for the past 16 years, even as the human contribution to
    atmospheric carbon dioxide has risen by some 25%. This surprising fact
    demonstrates directly that natural influences and variability are powerful
    enough to counteract the present warming influence exerted by human activity.

    Climate
    Science Is Not Settled (Part 3)

    Yet the
    models famously fail to capture this slowing in the temperature rise. Several dozen
    different explanations for this failure have been offered, with ocean
    variability most likely playing a major role. But the whole episode continues
    to highlight the limits of our modeling.

    • The
    models roughly describe the shrinking extent of Arctic sea ice observed over
    the past two decades, but they fail to describe the comparable growth of
    Antarctic sea ice, which is now at a record high.

    • The
    models predict that the lower atmosphere in the tropics will absorb much of the
    heat of the warming atmosphere. But that “hot spot” has not been
    confidently observed, casting doubt on our understanding of the crucial
    feedback of water vapor on temperature.

    • Even
    though the human influence on climate was much smaller in the past, the models
    do not account for the fact that the rate of global sea-level rise 70 years ago
    was as large as what we observe today—about one foot per century.

    • A
    crucial measure of our knowledge of feedbacks is climate sensitivity—that is,
    the warming induced by a hypothetical doubling of carbon-dioxide concentration.
    Today’s best estimate of the sensitivity (between 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit and
    8.1 degrees Fahrenheit) is no different, and no more certain, than it was 30
    years ago. And this is despite an heroic research effort costing billions of
    dollars.

    These
    and many other open questions are in fact described in the IPCC research
    reports, although a detailed and knowledgeable reading is sometimes required to
    discern them. They are not “minor” issues to be “cleaned
    up” by further research. Rather, they are deficiencies that erode
    confidence in the computer projections. Work to resolve these shortcomings in
    climate models should be among the top priorities for climate research.

    Yet a
    public official reading only the IPCC’s “Summary for Policy Makers”
    would gain little sense of the extent or implications of these deficiencies.
    These are fundamental challenges to our understanding of human impacts on the
    climate, and they should not be dismissed with the mantra that “climate
    science is settled.”

    While
    the past two decades have seen progress in climate science, the field is not
    yet mature enough to usefully answer the difficult and important questions
    being asked of it. This decidedly unsettled state highlights what should be
    obvious: Understanding climate, at the level of detail relevant to human
    influences, is a very, very difficult problem.

    We can
    and should take steps to make climate projections more useful over time. An
    international commitment to a sustained global climate observation system would
    generate an ever-lengthening record of more precise observations. And
    increasingly powerful computers can allow a better understanding of the
    uncertainties in our models, finer model grids and more sophisticated
    descriptions of the processes that occur within them. The science is urgent,
    since we could be caught flat-footed if our understanding does not improve more
    rapidly than the climate itself changes.

    A
    transparent rigor would also be a welcome development, especially given the
    momentous political and policy decisions at stake. That could be supported by
    regular, independent, “red team” reviews to stress-test and challenge
    the projections by focusing on their deficiencies and uncertainties; that would
    certainly be the best practice of the scientific method. But because the
    natural climate changes over decades, it will take many years to get the data
    needed to confidently isolate and quantify the effects of human influences.

    Climate
    Science Is Not Settled (Part 4

    Policy
    makers and the public may wish for the comfort of certainty in their climate
    science. But I fear that rigidly promulgating the idea that climate science is
    “settled” (or is a “hoax”) demeans and chills the
    scientific enterprise, retarding its progress in these important matters.
    Uncertainty is a prime mover and motivator of science and must be faced
    head-on. It should not be confined to hushed sidebar conversations at academic
    conferences.

    Society’s
    choices in the years ahead will necessarily be based on uncertain knowledge of
    future climates. That uncertainty need not be an excuse for inaction. There is
    well-justified prudence in accelerating the development of low-emissions
    technologies and in cost-effective energy-efficiency measures.

    But
    climate strategies beyond such “no regrets” efforts carry costs,
    risks and questions of effectiveness, so nonscientific factors inevitably enter
    the decision. These include our tolerance for risk and the priorities that we
    assign to economic development, poverty reduction, environmental quality, and
    intergenerational and geographical equity.

    Individuals
    and countries can legitimately disagree about these matters, so the discussion
    should not be about “believing” or “denying” the science.
    Despite the statements of numerous scientific societies, the scientific
    community cannot claim any special expertise in addressing issues related to
    humanity’s deepest goals and values. The political and diplomatic spheres are
    best suited to debating and resolving such questions, and misrepresenting the current
    state of climate science does nothing to advance that effort.

    Any
    serious discussion of the changing climate must begin by acknowledging not only
    the scientific certainties but also the uncertainties, especially in projecting
    the future. Recognizing those limits, rather than ignoring them, will lead to a
    more sober and ultimately more productive discussion of climate change and
    climate policies. To do otherwise is a great disservice to climate science
    itself.

    Dr.
    Koonin was undersecretary for science in the Energy Department during President
    Barack Obama’s first term and is currently director of the Center for Urban
    Science and Progress at New York University. His previous positions include
    professor of theoretical physics and provost at Caltech, as well as chief
    scientist of BP,
    BP.LN in Your Value Your Change Short position where
    his work focused on renewable and low-carbon energy technologies.

    By

    Steven E. Koonin

    Sept. 19, 2014 12:19 p.m. ET

  242. Al Jazeera, the mouthpiece for the Muslim Brotherhood
    and Al Queda was brought to America
    for you by Al Gore and an Obama run SEC, FCC who allowed it into our living
    rooms.

  243. Bush/Gore Grades and SAT Scores (posted March 23, 2000)

    (Updated June 17, 2005)

    Confidential college transcripts and test scores obtained by the
    Washington Post reveal that neither presidential candidate, George W. Bush nor
    Al Gore, were shining students during their college days at Yale and Harvard,
    respectively. Although each earned respectable scores on the SAT college
    admissions test (a total of 1355 of 1600 for Gore and 1206 for Bush), neither
    did that well in their college courses. Both earned a mix of B and C grades.
    Gore’s lowest grade of D came in a natural sciences course, while his top
    grades were an A in French and English, an A in Visual and Environmental
    Studies, and an A- in Social Relations. Bush’s lowest marks were a 70 (of 100)
    in Sociology and a 71 in Economics, while his highest scores were High Passes
    in History and Japanese.

    In 2005, the Boston Globe obtained comparable information on John
    Kerry’s undergraduate record at Yale. It shows that Kerry had a cumulate grade
    average of 76 over

    four years in school. His freshman year average was 71 and his
    senior year average was 81.

    Bush at Yale

    SAT Verbal Score 566
    (of 800)

    SAT Math Score 640 (of 800)

    Undergraduate Transcript

    Political Science/Govt classes 73
    (of 100) in PS14a

    71 (of 100) in PS13b

    Pass in PS48

    ——–

    Gore at Harvard

    SAT Verbal Score 625 (of 800)

    SAT maths Score 730 (of 800)

    Undergraduate Transcript

    C- in Govt16

    C in Govt 116

    B in Govt 1a

    A- in Govt154

    B+ in Govt98

    Political Science Government Classes Satisfactory in Govt99

    B- in Govt103

    Pass in Govt130

    Kerry at Yale

    First Year Courses: 61 in Geology (grade of D)

    63 and 68 in History (grades of D)

    ——–

    Kerry At Yale.

    69 in Political Science (grade of D)

    Later Year Courses: 79 in Political Science (grade of C)

    77 in French (grade of C)

    Senior Year Courses: 89 in Political Science (grade of B)

    Source: Boston Globe, June 7, 2005

    Obama….he won’t release his college transcripts or his high school
    transcripts……If he is such a whiz, surely he can post legit numbers that far
    better the scores above……waiting.

  244. Obama was going it alone when he
    cut a deal with China on climate change.
    He negotiated a deal in which the US economy was go give up significant
    percentages of carbon output between now and 2025, putting more strain on the
    US Auto Industry, manufacturers, small business, the coal and oil industry but
    in return he focused like a laser in his negotiations with china and got them
    to give up nothing, zip nada zero until 2030 after which time they might agree
    to do something on carbon output.

    So what you say, our super
    intelligent president spoke for the world (on who’s authority) and gave China
    the green light to produce as much co2 as they want. Given that they use “dirty” energy and have
    grown at 7% GDP on average per year for the past 10 or 15 years if they keep
    that up for 16 years that is potentially 270% more CO2 that he agreed to let
    them producer if they choose too.
    Hoooray. Thank goodness he is the
    smartest president ever……….I wish I was joking about the above deal. WTF

  245. Kyoto Accord Was Rigged
    Against U.S.

    Europe and Japan signed a Kyoto accord that kicked into effect in 2005 but pushed
    for 1990 emission levels a time period when America had grown economically
    during a boom and in terms of population due to immigration increasing its
    emissions by 16%.

    Its worth noting that carbon emissions for that period were down in Europe
    (England -14%, France -0.8%, Germany -17% with the 15 EU Nations averaging
    -0.8%) and Japan (+6.5) were stagnant or shrinking during those times both in
    terms of economics and population growth and to match the agreement required
    little to no effort. It becomes painfully obvious that Anti American
    sentiment extended directly into selecting the 1990 target date.

    Anyone who would go to Kyoto and sign such and
    agreement that would cost the US
    5% of their GDP and millions of jobs is a fool. Why agree to a
    document so blatantly stacked against you that only hurts your own country?..

  246. Kyoto Accord Math

    If you were in negotiations with the worlds nations and they came to you and
    said that since 1990 their carbon emissions had grown by about -1% but yours
    had grown by 16% (you were going through an economic boom and your population
    was growing) but they wanted you to sign an agreement agreeing to match 1990
    carbon levels would you sign it? Do the numbers seem fair to you?
    Does the math add up to an equitable deal?

    Think about it this way, they are offering you no pain for them and you had to
    cut 5% of your Gross Domestic Product, enter a recession and lose millions of
    jobs, would you sign it?

    That is exactly the deal Al Gore signed. Thank goodness our Congress and
    our President including Bill Clinton backpedaled on this stinker of a deal.

    Al Gore agreeing to sign this is like a kid in the school yard cutting a deal
    on his autographed baseball card collection for some used chewing gum offered
    by the older brighter kids. No wonder the rest of the world agreed to
    give him a Nobel Peace prize!

  247. Obama Wanted To Give Up 2% Of GDP In 2009….

    UN Climate Change Conf. 12/7-18 to get nations to sign climate change treaty,
    creating a body to implement controls on climate change & require those who
    accrued a ‘climate debt’ to pay up to 2% of GDP to poor nations w climate
    problems

    Use of word govt in treaty implies creating governmental entity. See pge 18:
    section 38 of the text for the wording. Page 45: Section 46 Subsection H
    containing enforcement text & the rule of law establishment

    Per “The Supremacy Clause” in US Constitution (Article VI, paragraph 2) the
    Constitution, Fed Statutes, & U.S Treaties are “the supreme law of the
    land” & signing treaties imply that it becomes law & cedes some
    sovereignty

    Americans should demand we not sign.

    Just the precedent of appearing to give up US Sovereignty is unacceptable.
    Potential to be forced to give 2% GDP as punishment for past use of CO2 idiotic
    & any 1 signing treaties to extract $ damages from US for this s/be
    impeached for treason or recalled

  248. …Kyoto Accord Remedial Math – Just how stupid
    is / was Al Gore????

    .

    If you were in negotiations with the rest of the worlds nations and they
    came to you and said that since 1990 their carbon emissions had grown by about
    -1% but yours had grown by +16% (you were going through an economic boom and
    your population was growing) but they wanted you to sign an agreement agreeing
    to match 1990 carbon levels would you sign it?
    Do the numbers seem fair to you?
    Does the math add up to an equitable deal?

    .

    Think about it this way, they are offering you no pain for them and you
    had to cut 5% of your Gross Domestic Product, enter a recession and lose
    millions of jobs. Would you still agree
    to sign it?

    .

    That is exactly the deal Al Gore signed in Kyoto. Thank goodness our Congress and our
    President, including Bill Clinton backpedaled on this stinker of a deal.

    .

    Al Gore agreeing to sign this is like a kid in the school yard cutting a
    deal on his autographed baseball card collection, in trade for some used
    chewing gum offered by the older, brighter kids.

    .

    No wonder the rest of the world agreed to give him a Nobel Peace
    prize! The only question you need to ask
    yourself is just what they are rewarding him for?

    First posted 12/2007

  249. Obama Wanted To Give Up 2% Of GDP?

    The 2009 United Nations
    Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen
    on Dec. 7-18 was intended to get member
    nations to sign a treaty on climate change. It was to create a bureaucracy to implement
    controls on climate change and would have required nations who have accrued a
    ‘climate debt’ to pay up to 2% of their GDP to poor nations to help them with
    climate problems.

    Its use of the word government in the
    text appeared to imply the establishment of a governmental entity. See
    page 18: section 38 of the text for the wording. Page 45: Section 46
    Subsection H contains the enforcement text and the rule of law establishment.

    Given that “The Supremacy Clause” in
    the US Constitution (Article VI, paragraph 2) establishes the Constitution,
    Federal Statutes, and U.S Treaties as “the supreme law of the land” our signing
    the treaty does imply that it would become law and cede at least some
    sovereignty to the UN.

    Every freedom loving American
    should demand that we do not sign any such deal in the future. Even the
    precedent of appearing to give up US Sovereignty is
    unacceptable. The unacceptable potential to be forced to give
    up 2% of GDP as punishment for having used CO2 in the past is entirely another
    matter and any idiot who signs a treaty that would extract monetary damages
    from us for global warming should be impeached or at least
    recalled.

    Thankfully back in 2009, the
    poor nations, started blackmailing the rich for a big payout and in the midst
    of it all a massive snow storm hit and everyone went home.

  250. Would You Sign The Kyoto Accord?
    Did Gore Even Read It Or Question It?

    -Would You Sign It If You Understood Only 1
    Country Gets Screwed?


    If you were in negotiations with the worlds nations and they came to you and
    said, that despite the fact that since 1990 their carbon emissions had grown by
    about -1% but yours had grown by 16%, they wanted you to sign an agreement
    agreeing to match 1990 carbon emissions levels, would you sign it? Do the
    numbers seem fair and equitable to you or would you think they believe you are
    a moron?


    Al Gore signed it. Yes Al Gore has been pushing the US
    to agree to this deal for nearly a decade. He even
    gives lectures to encourage you to sign it. In fact he is so
    supportive of this one sided deal that he made a movie about it and the
    Hollywood “scientific” community gave him an Oscar while the Nobel
    Peace Prize Committee, represented by the same nations who convinced him to
    sign it, gave him their highest award.


    Just remember that even then President Bill Clinton couldn’t support the Kyoto
    Agreement that Al brought back from Japan.
    Do you really want any US
    President to sign it?

  251. What an absolute embarrassment to our country and to the office. What a complete disgrace this person (note I didn’t say “man”) is as (allegedly) the leader of the free world. What a complete laughing stock ad disgrace.

  252. .❝my neighbor’s mom is making $98 HOURLY on the internet❞….A few days ago new McLaren F1 subsequent after earning 18,512$,,,this was my previous month’s paycheck ,and-a little over, $17k Last month ..3-5 h/r of work a day ..with extra open doors & weekly paychecks.. it’s realy the easiest work I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months ago and now making over $87, p/h..Learn More right Here….
    rv.
    ➤➤
    ➤➤➤ http://GlobalSuperEmploymentVacanciesReportNetWork/GetPaid/$97hourly… ❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦

  253. The “dignitaries” (clowns) at this summit of fools, have thousands of security forces to protect them from “terrorists,” or from “climate change.” If the answer is climate change, then why spend so much on protection against terrorists?

  254. Actually, it’s the alarmists that are inflicting “climate terror” on us via their fearmongering. It’s rather terrifying when you have people trying limit the flow of cheap energy.

Leave a Reply