Published on Dec 9, 2015
Sitting next to Penn State climate professor David Titley, Author Mark Steyn calls out, “members of Rear Admiral Titley’s faculty, Michael Mann, Richard Alley, William Easterling. All of whom have falsely claimed to be Nobel prize winners on an industrial scale, as have many other climate scientists.”
Hearing: Data or Dogma? Promoting Open Inquiry in the Debate over the Magnitude of Human Impact on Earth’s Climate
US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
December 8, 2015
MARK STEYN: “Professor Ivar Giaevar, the Nobel prize winner– by the way when I say he’s a Nobel prize winner, I mean he’s a real one. He won the Nobel prize in physics in 1973. Not a fraudulent Nobel prize winner like, unfortunately, large members of Rear Admiral Titley’s faculty, Michael Mann, Richard Alley, William Easterling, all of whom have falsely claimed to be Nobel prize winners on an industrial scale, as have many other climate scientists. There’s never been a misrepresentation of credentials on this scale. It used to be a very serious business, but apparently it’s not when your cause is quote, ‘saving the planet’. But, it is revealing– it is this misrepresentation of credentials by people falsely claiming to be Nobel Laureates –is revealing because it gets to the heart of the problem here that they are attempting to cloak the science in an authority that it does not in fact possess.”
Category
News & Politics
8 Responses
“But, it is revealing– it is this misrepresentation of credentials by people falsely claiming to be Nobel Laureates –is revealing because it gets to the heart of the problem here that they are attempting to cloak the science [of climate] in an authority that it does not in fact possess.”
Wow!
http://www.globalresearch.ca/more-than-1000-international-scientists-dissent-over-man-made-global-warming-claims/5403284
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/767ed521ef0e44596b01dc7d4cd9560c77c29ebc27cd0e18ccbbd1731718d678.png
LOVE THIS !
I don’t know if Steyn and Curry were able to get in a word cross-wise when that whacky senator Markey began babbling about last year being “hottest” and various months in 2015 “hottest”. .
Markey has been thrown under the bus by NOAA and NASA, with cooperation by the liberal news media and doesn’t even understand he’s the perfect postboy for the “useful idiot” descriptor.
Both NOAA and NASA revised their claim about 2014 being “hottest”. They really had no choice. They replaced it by assigning independently determined probabilities for each recent year being hottest. (That’s also a joke.) One agency came up with 48% for 2014, the other 38% for 2014. That implies that both admit that it was less than 50/50 that 2014 was hottest.
And here’s why they had to do that. Both NASA and NOAA use only the terrestrial datasets. for some strange reason ignoring the existence of our two weather satellites! Using the EXACT SAME original analysis used by these two supposedly scientific firms, 2014 would be 3rd hottest or 6th hottest based on satellite data. That would imply we are experiencing a short term COOLING period, either 3 years or 6 years.
But what’s worse is that the DIFFERENCE in global temperature among recent years is MINISCULE, less than a few hundredths of one degree, which is considerably smaller than the uncertainty error, so MEANINGLESS. (Can you believe that neither “science” organization understood that until skeptics began correcting them? ) Markey’s claim is MALARKY.
Wow, I never knew about the Nobel prize thing
Imagine that, corrupt President of US trickles down to corrupt scientists