Fighting AGW is a ‘mad obsession’ – New 195-Page White Paper by French Scientists Declare: ‘The battle against global warming is an absurd, costly & pointless crusade’

Selected Excerpts by the Mathematical Calculation Society, SA, a group that does mathematical modeling for the French government and others and touts its mission as providing “mathematical tools for fraud detection.” The group was founded by mathematician Dr. Bernard Beauzamy, former professor at the University of Lyon in France. 

Dr. Bernard Beauzamy

Excerpts from the September 2015 white Paper: 

The battle against global warming: an absurd, costly and pointless crusade. White Paper drawn up by SCM SA. | English summary.

Part 1: The facts

Chapter 1: The crusade is absurd

There is not a single fact, figure or observation that leads us to conclude that the world‘s climate is in any way =disturbed‘. It is variable, as it has always been, but rather less so now than during certain periods or geological eras. Modern methods are far from being able to accurately measure the planet‘s global temperature even today, so measurements made 50  or 100 years ago are even less reliable. Concentrations of CO2 vary, as they always have done; the figures that are being released are biased and dishonest. Rising sea levels are a normal phenomenon linked to upthrust
buoyancy; they are nothing to do with so-called global warming. As for extreme weather events – they are no more frequent now than they have been in the past. We ourselves have processed the raw data on hurricanes.  We are being told that =a temperature increase of more than 2ºC by comparison with the beginning of the industrial age would have dramatic consequences, and absolutely has to be prevented‘. When they hear this, people worry: hasn‘t there already been an increase of 1.9ºC? Actually, no: the figures for the period 1995-2015 show an upward trend of about 1ºC
every hundred years! Of course, these figures, which contradict public policies, are never brought to public attention.
Chapter 2: The crusade is costly

Direct aid for industries that are completely unviable (such as photovoltaics and wind turbines) but presented as =virtuous‘ runs into billions of euros, according to recent reports published by the Cour des Comptes (French Audit Office) in 2013. But the highest cost lies in the principle of =energy saving‘, which is presented as especially virtuous. Since no civilization can develop when it is saving energy, ours has stopped developing: France now has more than three million people unemployed – it is the price we …

New UN IPCC Chair ‘belongs to a privileged, protected, secretive entity headed by the UN’s former top climate official’

When Hoesung Lee was elected head of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) recently, the Seoul-based Global Green Growth Institute (GGGI) issued a celebratory press release. Lee – who hails from South Korea – has a seat on one of the GGGI’s governing bodies.

But this little-known entity is no mere institute. In fact, it’s another creature of the United Nations. As a headline on the GGGI website makes clear, an international treaty was required to bring it into existence. Membership is restricted to UN-recognized countries. Its stated purpose is “the successful outcome of the United Nations process on sustainable development.” Its Director-General, Yvo de Boer, used to be the UN’s top climate official.…

NY Mag: Famous French Weatherman Publicly Doubts Climate Change, Goes on ‘Forced Holiday’ – ‘French Al Roker Casts Doubt on Climate Change’

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/10/french-al-roker-casts-doubt-on-climate-change.html?mid=twitter-share-di

 

A well-known French weatherman has been put on an indefinite “forced holiday” after writing a book criticizing climate-change research and saying that, even if it does exist, it will probably have some very positive effects, including more tourists, lower death rates, lower electricity bills in the winter, and higher-quality wine.

 

Philippe Verdier, famous for delivering nightly forecasts on the state-run news channel France 2, has authored a new book casting doubt on the research of world climatologists. Climat Investigation, which is set to be released in time for the December U.N. climate summit in Paris, claims that misleading climate data has “taken the world hostage.”

Verdier’s views led France Télévisions, the country’s state broadcaster, to take him off the air.

 

“I received a letter asking me not to come [to work],” Verdier said in an interview with French RTL radio. “This is a direct extension of what I say in my book, namely that any contrary views must be eliminated.”

 

In his book, Verdier challenges the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, saying they “blatantly erased” data that didn’t support their conclusions in their most recent report, The Telegraph writes.…

Running Away: Yet another fake Nobel claims bites the dust, courtesy of JunkScience.com

Running Away: Yet another fake Nobel claims bites the dust, courtesy of JunkScience.com

http://junkscience.com/2015/10/07/running-away-yet-another-fake-nobel-claims-bites-the-dust-courtesy-of-junkscience-com/

The University of Montana’s Steve Running has been de-Nobeled. Running is yet another warmist who has falsely claimed to be a Nobelist. Below are images from his web site: Both Running and the University of Montana have exploited these false claims as revealed by this Google search result: Though others have raised Running’s false claim […]

— gReader Pro…

University of Montana removes Professor Running’s claim to 2007 Nobel Prize

University of Montana removes Professor Running’s claim to 2007 Nobel Prize

http://edberry.com/blog/ed-berry/u-of-montana-removes-professor-runnings-claim-to-2007-nobel-prize/

by Dr. Ed Berry 97 percent of the people who claim our carbon dioxide emissions cause climate change haven’t a clue as to what they are talking about. They might as well claim the most important medical remedy is to use leaches to suck blood. Yes, they are that far away from physical reality. They also believe 97 percent of scientists believe in their climate fiction, which is false. See here, here, and here. Since 2007, the University of Montana and Professor Steve Running have used Running’s claim to a Nobel Prize to implement their green agenda to promote the climate fraud. Here’s my September 2014 article about Running’s Nobel Prize fraud. Now, after eight long years of climate fraud, the University of Montana has removed Running’s false claim to a Nobel Prize from its website. After eight long years of defrauding Montanans and its students, the University has quietly admitted it was wrong. They did not remove Running’s false claim willingly. My friend Steve Milloy took them down. Running never had a Nobel Prize. Even if he did, it would not make him an expert on climate. He is a forest ecologist, not an atmospheric physicist. And a Nobel Peace Prize is not about expertise in any science. Professor Running lied about his claimed Nobel Prize. How can anyone believe he did not also lie about climate change? Running neither followed nor taught the scientific method. Instead, he brainwashed students to believe in the climate fraud. As a result of lies by so-called scientists across America, we have morons in our media who rate presidential candidates on how they “address” climate change. We have morons in our EPA who want to shut down America based upon their false eco-freak religion. We have morons in our population who believe their peer group about climate rather than read articles that show the truth. “Hey, if I’m a Democrat, I should believe Obama on climate change.” Yeah. Right! Will they read this simple article about how the Sun, not CO2, causes climate change? Will they listen to what these world-class physicists, Freeman Dyson, Ivar Giaever, and Murry Salby, say about climate change? No. They would rather get their education from morons. Morons who got their opinions from other morons. Myths embedded in human populations become self propagating. Myths destroy our …