Memo To Senators: NASA’s Climate Model Failures, or The Road To Political ‘Toast’
…
Call for investigation into IPCC computer models: ‘It’s like betting our jobs, our industry and our energy and food supplies on a roll of the dice in the casino’
…
Quick, give the UN more power! UN says Oceans’ fish could disappear in 40 years
…
Team of Scientists Counter U.S. Gov’t Report: ‘Global warming alarm will prove false’ — Climate fears ‘based on faulty forecasting procedures’
[Special to Climate Depot — Reprinted with Permission]
Global Warming Alarm Based on Faulty Forecasting Procedures:
Comments on the United States Department of State’s U.S. Climate Action Report 2010. 5th ed.
May 4, 2010
Submitted by:
J. Scott Armstrong (Ph.D., MIT, 1968), a Professor at the Wharton School of Management, University of Pennsylvania, is the author of Long-range Forecasting, the creator of forecastingprinciples.com, and editor of Principles of Forecasting (Kluwer 2001), an evidence-based summary of knowledge on forecasting methods. He is a founder of the Journal of Forecasting, the International Journal of Forecasting, and the International Symposium on Forecasting, and he has spent 50 years doing research and consulting on forecasting. ([email protected])
Kesten C. Green of the International Graduate School of Business at the University of South Australia is a Director of the International Institute of Forecasters and is co-director with Scott Armstrong of the Forecasting Principles public service Internet site (ForPrin.com). He has been responsible for the development of two forecasting methods that provide forecasts that are substantially more accurate than commonly used methods. ([email protected])
Willie Soon is an astrophysicist and a geoscientist at the Solar, Stellar, and Planetary Sciences division of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. He is also the receiving editor in the area of solar and stellar physics for the journal New Astronomy. He has 20 years of active researching and publishing in the area of climate change and all views expressed are strictly his own. ([email protected])
Statement
Our research findings challenge the basic assumptions of the State Department’s Fifth U.S. Climate Action Report (CAR 2010). The alarming forecasts of dangerous manmade global warming are not the product of proper scientific evidence-based forecasting methods. Furthermore, there have been no validation studies to support a belief that the forecasting procedures used were nevertheless appropriate for the situation. As a consequence, alarming forecasts of global warming are merely the opinions of some scientists and, for a situation as complicated and poorly understood as global climate, such opinions are unlikely to be as accurate as forecasts that global temperatures will remain much the same as they have been over recent years. Using proper forecasting procedures we predict that the global warming alarm will prove false and that government actions in response to the alarm will be shown to have been harmful.
Whether …
Climate Model Magic: ‘Models are not ready for prime time and may not be for many more years if not decades. But this inconvenient fact is downplayed by the scientists involved’
…
Scientist: Models programmed to show humans responsible for global warming: ‘They are programmed to say that. They certainly weren’t programmed to say that mankind wasn’t responsible’
…
Wash. Post scrutinizes climate computer models: ‘The hubris that can be associated with a model is amazing…It’s almost like money laundering’
…
Scientist: Why Climate Models Lie: ‘The whole anthropogenic global warming scare is based on a foundation of computer generated lies’
…
Arctic Study by Japanese Scientists: ‘Both of decadal variabilities before and after 1989 in Arctic can be mostly explained by the natural variability…not due to the human activity’
…
‘Lovelock places great emphasis on proof…He is concerned that projections are relying on computer models…because models of that kind have let us down before’
…