Donald Trump’s pro-business, Christie-free cabinet comforts conservatives

By Paul Mulshine | The Star Ledger
Follow on Twitter
on December 11, 2016 at 6:28 AM, updated December 11, 2016 at 9:45 AM

A lot of conservatives were worried that as president Donald Trump would abandon the right-wing positions he espoused in the campaign.

Trump has put them at ease by doing two things.

He put a lot of conservatives in key positions.

Better yet, he didn’t include any New Jerseyans – especially New Jerseyans named Christie.

Gov. Chris Christie was passed over for a cabinet post. By week’s end it was reported that he won’t even get the fig leaf of the chairmanship of the Republican National Committee.

Meanwhile Trump has been assembling a cabinet that is as far to the right as any in recent history.

“This is the most conservative cabinet I’ve ever seen,” said Phil Kerpen of American Commitment, a Washington-based free-market advocacy group. “He’s not falling for the crutch of ‘We need the same old people because they’re the ones who know how to do it.’ So far they’re all ideological conservatives.”

If Christie had been retained as head of the transition, Kerpen said, we could have expected “the usual suspects” for the cabinet, the same sort of moderate Republicans who opposed Trump in the primaries.

We certainly wouldn’t have seen people like Trump’s most controversial pick. That was Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt to head the Environmental Protection Agency.

The publisher of Climate Depot – a website that is either “realist” or “denialist” depending on your politics – pronounced it “refreshing that a Republican President is not throwing the EPA over to the green activists and the media by appointing a weak administrator. Christine Todd Whitman he is not.”

No, he’s not. Pruitt is a hard-nosed advocate of fossil fuels who rejects the idea they must be phased out in the name of climate change.

The other governor named Christie was clueless on climate change when she was named EPA administrator by George W. Bush.

In her first big interview with the New York Times back in 2001, Christie Whitman famously confused the issue of carbon dioxide and climate change with the issue of chlorofluorocarbons and the ozone layer.

And that was the high point of her tenure, during which she tried to steer Bush toward the same sort of climate-change activism that Trump is now so firmly rejecting.

As for the other …

Al Gore Announces Inconvenient Truth II: Will It Be Called ‘All The Stuff That Didn’t Happen?’

Post by Ben Bowles and Jeff Dunetz

Perhaps it’s because most of the calamities predicted in the first movie didn’t happen, hurricanes didn’t increase in frequency and strength, polar ice caps didn’t melt, NY and other coastal cities aren’t underwater,   Mt. Kilimanjaro still is snow-capped, tornadoes aren’t increasing in frequency and strength, the arctic isn’t melting, the Antarctic ice extent is growing, oh and the polar bear population is doing very well thank you. So former VP Al Gore wants to try another movie.

According to the Associated Press via Columbia, S.C. Fox affiliate WACH, Al Gore is coming out with a sequel to his fact-challenged climate change documentary, “An Inconvenient Truth.”

After the last one was so unsuccessful in predicting the future maybe people will forget and flock to this one.

In a statement, Gore called for a re-dedication to solving what he called the climate crisis and said there are reasons to be hopeful.

Of course Al Gore was in the news this week he met with President-elect Donald Trump to discuss the topic and termed the meeting productive. Then a few days later Trump proved thanfully he still wasn’t drinking the climate change Kool-aid by naming Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt, a climate change skeptic to lead the EPA, and free business from the heavy (and in many cases unconstitutional) burdens placed on the by the Obama EPA.

The other major stumbling block is the original “Inconvenient Truth” itself. The film is riddled with misconceptions and silly predictions. To make matters worse, Gore himself admitted on the tenth anniversary of the documentary this past May that the film is flawed, although he qualified his concession by insisted that he had underestimated, not overestimated, the seriousness of the problem.…