Background on UN banning non warmist media.
Tell the UN to stop blacklisting our journalists! – The Rebel TV – Ezra Levant banned from media credentials at upcoming UN climate summit in Morocco Africa.
The United Nations has refused to accredit three of our journalists, blacklisting us from covering the upcoming global warming conference in Marrakech, Morocco.
The three banned journalists are full-time professionals: Sheila Gunn Reid, our Alberta bureau chief and best-selling author; and Meaghan MacSween, a producer, formerly with Global News and Sun News Network; and Alex Jones, our cameraman and editor, also formerly of Sun News Network.
These are total pros, with years of journalistic experience amongst them.
…
They’ve just made up the excuse. Because if we were indeed being blacklisted because we hold a point of view, how can the UN approve journalists who are literally paid propagandists for authoritarian regimes, like China’s Xinhua and CCTV, and even Qatar’s Al Jazeera and Russia’s RT?
Many independent western media have an explicit advocacy orientation too, especially on the subject of global warming, including online outlets like Vice, Huffington Post and Buzzfeed.
The UN even welcomes global warming lobby groups, including “community organizers” posing as journalists. Greenpeace-style blogs, like Canada’s own DeSmog Blog attend in full advocacy mode, as well as other small websites like The Tyee and the Vancouver Observer, both supported by Tides.
More here: http://www.therebel.media/let_us_report
16 Responses
Wear a Burqa..that’ll work lol
Would someone please explain to me how far science would have come if contrary opinions and experimental evidence had been banned in 1215 AD when the Scientific Method was invented at the University of Paris by Roger Bacon and Albertus Magnus? The truth is:
CO2 is a “trace gas” in air and is insignificant by definition. It would have to be increased by a factor of 2500 to be considered “significant” or “notable.” To give it the great power claimed is a crime against physical science.
CO2 absorbs 1/7th as much IR, heat energy, from sunlight per molecule as water vapor which has 188 times as many molecules capturing 1200 times as much heat producing 99.9% of all “global warming.” CO2 does only 0.1% of it. Pushing panic about any effect CO2 could have is clearly a fraud.
There is no “greenhouse effect” in an atmosphere. A greenhouse has a solid, clear cover trapping heat. The atmosphere does not trap heat as gas molecules cannot form surfaces to work as greenhouses that admit and reflect energy depending on sun angle. Gases do not form surfaces as their molecules are not in contact.
The Medieval Warming from 800 AD to 1300 AD Micheal Mann erased for his “hockey stick” was several Fahrenheit degrees warmer than anything “global warmers” fear. It was 500 years of world peace and abundance, longest ever.
Vostock Ice Core data analysis show CO2 rises followed temperature by 800 years 19 times in 450,000 years. Therefore temperature change is cause and CO2 change is effect. This alone refutes the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis.
Methane is called “a greenhouse gas 20 to 500 times more potent than CO2,” by Heidi Cullen and Jim Hansen, but it is not per the energy absorption chart at the American Meteorological Society. It has an absorption profile very similar to nitrogen which is classified “transparent” to IR, heat waves and is only present to 18 ppm. “Vegans” blame methane in cow flatulence for global warming in their war against meat consumption.
Carbon combustion generates 80% of our energy. Control and taxing of carbon would give the elected ruling class more power and money than anything since the Magna Carta of 1215 AD.
Most scientists and science educators work for tax supported institutions. They are eager to help government raise more money for them and they love being seen as “saving the planet.”
Read the whole story in “Vapor Tiger” at Amazon.com, Kindle $2.99 including a free Kindle reading program for your computer.
Google “Two Minute Conservative” for more.
There is no “greenhouse effect” in an atmosphere.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH
Fairies fly around the earth with blankets to keep the heat in, everybody!
Best,
D
Read “Vapor Tiger,” do the demos and prove it for yourself, or continue to believe the BS you are being told so you will be eager to pay ten times as much for your power and water, ride bicycles and think you are saving the planet when you are not. Be my guest…
I’ll just read my physics texts, thanks.
Best,
D
Where you hide under a contrived “handle,” have no name, credentials or credits who do you think deserves be believed when I use my real name, have a very long, very large record of produced and published films, books and magazine articles in ten national magazines, have been on the masthead of two, and you can document 3/4 of my work at Worldcat.org who do you think the readers will believe? I prove what I say while you hide and crouch in your provable ignorance.
Impressive deflection away from your Titanic discovery – the NewPhysics – not appearing in any scholarly journal.
Best,
D
Not a deflection, but a simple statement of the fact that science is not political, decided by a committee or a function of suck-ups, brown-nosers, skunks and scoundrels. I prove what I say with simple demos you can do for a few Dollars and prove what I say for yourself. Like much in America today our science has been corrupted, but it is soon going off a cliff if the likes of your masters, perhaps you, continue to distort the truth for money and power. Consider: I am genuine and you do not even dare have a name.
Your NewPhysics – why aren’t physicists discussing it now? How come you aren’t on TV, being showered in love for your awesome discovery, and all of us here patting each other on the backs, saying “yeah, I knew him when”?
Do you need a marketing person to pimp your discovery so them thar drrrty physicist listen to you?
Best,
D
Again, you claim to have a Ph.D. in Physics, even though you do not punctuate it correctly and fail to give your name, that of the institution granting your claimed degree, the title of your thesis and the library where it was filed and is now available. I will make the phone calls to confirm or dash your claim, which I am sure is 100% bullshit.
Adrian Vance
you claim to have a Ph.D. in Physics
Amusingly addled comment from our new Titan in the NewPhysics.
Surely you were just confused due to exhaustion from the media blitz you are receiving over your new discovery, amirite?
Best,
D
You are the one who claims a Ph.D. in Physics. Prove it by giving the institution granting said degree, title of your thesis and library where filed. You are a fraud.
The atmospheric physics I note was developed in 1925 by Andre Le Chatelier and I have outlined several demo experiments anyone can do for few Dollars and prove for themselves what I say. I do no ask anyone to believe me. I ask them to something very simple and put an end to this fraud. All you do is obfuscate.
You are the one who claims a Ph.D. in Physics
Why are you such a crappy fibber?
Best,
D
The climate scam isn’t about climate, it’s about an international neo communist tyranny, Communism has always been based on lies, and always outright banned dissent because the cockroaches don’t like the light of truth shinning on them.
SCAY-UM everbuddy!
Clearly there is still a market among the Faux/Breitbartian faithful for claiming that:
And, to hide their scam, scientists have recruited the natural world into going along with their plot, namely:
Has there ever been – ever – a less likely conspiracy theory ever than this one? In the history of the world?
Best,
D
It is 1984 from the Progs. Crush them, kill them, bury them.