Flashback: 1990 NASA Report: ‘Satellite analysis of upper atmosphere is more accurate, & should be adopted as the standard way to monitor temp change.’ – April 1990 – The Canberra Times: ‘A report Issued by the U.S. space agency NASA…’
‘The [NASA] report’s authors said that their satellite analysis of the upper atmosphere is more accurate, and should be adopted as the standard way to monitor temperature change.’
Real Science website analysis: ‘Twenty-four years later, NASA and NOAA ignore the more accurate satellite data – and report only useless, tampered surface temperatures.’
2 Responses
Has anyone considered the following?
No mention of the greenhouse effect was made in a 1979 joint publication, by the US National Academy of Sciences (NAS), the National Academy of Engineering, the Institute of Medicine, and the National Research Council, on behalf of the US government, titled “Carbon Dioxide and Climate: A Scientific Assessment”.
That was the best of the best scientists, given the task of reporting on atmospheric carbon dioxide, who never once mentioned “greenhouse effect”.
The NAS study was commissioned by the US government to address the best science of the day, on the role of carbon dioxide in atmospheric physics. Irrespective of the contents of the report, it shows that as at July 1979, the concept of a greenhouse effect as a factor on Earth’s climate was clearly non-existent.
It was Dr james Hansen’s erroneous testimony before the Energy and Natural Resources Committee of the United States Senate on 23 June 1988 that gave life to the ‘greenhouse effect” when he said the following:
“Mr Chairman and committee members, thank you for the opportunity to present the results of my research on the greenhouse effect, which has been carried out with my colleagues at the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies.
I would like to draw three main conclusions. Number one, the earth is warmer in 1988 than at any time in the history of instrumental measurements. Number two, the global warming is now large enough that we can ascribe with a degree of confidence a cause and effect relationship to the greenhouse effect. And number three, our computer simulations indicate that the greenhouse effect is already large enough to begin to effect the probability of extreme events such as summer heat waves.”
And when the UN’s IPCC was set up in late 1988, it took up the “greenhouse effect” as its ‘poster science’ and ran with it as a means of achieving an international agreement to control fossil fuel energy use, which finally happened in Paris a few weeks ago. Mind boggling!!!!!!!!
A few days ago new McLaren F1 subsequent after earning 18,512$,,,this was my previous month’s paycheck ,and-a little over, 17k$ Last month ..3-5 h/r of work a day ..with extra open doors & weekly. paychecks.. it’s realy the easiest work I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months ago and now making over 87$, p/h.Learn More right Here
ef…
➤➤
➤➤➤ http://GlobalSuperEmploymentVacanciesReportsMoney/GetPaid/98$hourly…❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦