Nye Goofs! Holds up pic of Arctic while talking about Antarctic – Watch Bill Nye Debate GOP Rep. Marsha Blackburn: Nye asks if Antarctic has less ice (Climate Depot Answer: No!)

Watch Video here:

Full Transcript here: 

More from No Tricks Zone website: Global Warming Alarmist Bill Nye Confuses Antarctic Continent With The Arctic…Doesn’t Know North From South! –  ‘Er, Bill, that graphic you’re holding up is one of the Arctic, and not the Antarctic. Nye doesn’t even know north from south! And concerning global sea ice, today it is at near normal levels. Nye’s cherry-picking the single data-point of September 2013 at the single location of the Arctic is not a persuasive argument – never mind him using the wrong chart.’

Nye was not the first choice of man-made global warming proponents to debate climate on national TV. See: Warmist rips Bill Nye’s ‘Meet the Press’ debate on NBC: Warmist Dan Weiss: ‘Epic fail by [David] Gregory. Nye not that effective. Daily show does it better.’

Warmist Salon Mag. Disses Bill Nye as ‘a professional children’s entertainer’

‘Nye should not be the face of this movement’ – Warmists continue trashing Nye: Salon Mag. – Bill Nye NBC debate ‘a DISASTER’ – ‘Children’s TV host leading this ‘debate’ only enhances impression entire issue is a JOKE’

Warmist ‘cringes’ watching Bill Nye’s debate performance on NBC: ‘I cringed when he held up a picture of the arctic and said ‘antarctic’

Climate skeptics also took apart Bill Nye’s debate performance: NBC Debate Featuring Man Who Plays a Scientist on TV Crashes and Burns

Related Links:

Watch Now: Climate Depot’s Marc Morano V. Bill Nye Climate Debate on Fox With Stossel in Jan. 2014

Antarctic Sea Ice Extent is on track to have highest minimum in modern satellite era! – ‘Sea Ice Extent is 27.4% above normal as of Feb 7 2014′

Antarctic Sea Ice Sets New Record For Jan 31st: ‘Meanwhile, global sea ice area is normal’

The National Snow and Ice Data Center: 2013 Antarctic sea ice was at record highs for the satellite era, record high winter extent & summer minimum

ANTARCTICA: RECORD COLD AND GROWING ICE CHILLS GLOBAL WARMING THEORIES: ‘The southern ice sheet is growing at a pace faster than Global Warming theories can account for’

Studies show South Pole COOLING: Temperatures across most of Antarctica has been FALLING since the mid 20th century, with the exception of the Antarctic Peninsula – ‘Report finds strong evidence that there has been a cooling trend across the bulk of the Antarctic continent, with the exception of the Peninsula which has become warmer. Temperature records over the last decade appear to confirm that these trends are still continuing.’

Media Flustered at News of Antarctica Not Melting; Ice Levels At Record High

New review paper finds temperature history of Antarctica argues strongly against AGW

Warmist rips Bill Nye’s ‘Meet the Press’ debate on NBC: Warmist Dan Weiss: ‘Epic fail by [David] Gregory. Nye not that effective. Daily show does it better.’

Warmists trot out tobacco smear to demean skeptics debating climate on TV: Dem Sen. ‘Giving scientists and climate change deniers equal time is like having tobacco executives debate doctors on the safety of cigarettes’ – Climate Depot Responds: ‘The warmists have it exactly backwards. It is the global warming proponents who are guilty of the tobacco tactics.’

Democrat, Greens Fume over NBC’s Global Warming ‘Debate’ Between Bill Nye and GOP Rep. Marsha Blackburn

Watch Now: Morano V. Bill Nye Climate Debate on Fox With Stossel in Jan. 2014– Nye Cites ‘Hockey Stick’ as Proof – Says Politicians can fix potholes & the climate – Morano denounces as ‘medieval witchcraft’ – Full Transcript

Morano and Nye also debated on CNN in 2012.

Meet the Press to Host Climate Change Debate Featuring a Guy [Bill Nye] Who Played a Scientist on TV – ‘Nye has repeatedly debated Climate Depot’s Marc Morano, and, to steal part of a line from Muhammad Ali, during an early match-up, on CNN’s Piers Morgan Tonight, Morano beat Nye so bad, Nye needed a shoehorn to put his bow tie back on. So did Nye come up with some new arguments when Fox hosted a re-match? No, he didn’t bother. He trotted out the same weak arguments…And so Marc Morano trounced him again.’

Warmist Salon Mag. Disses Bill Nye as ‘a professional children’s entertainer’ – NBC’s ‘Meet the Press’ to host climate change debate between GOP’s Marsha Blackburn and Bill Nye ‘the Science Guy’ 

Former CNN producer laments ‘leading climate denier’ Morano’s TV debates: ‘Morano is a Gatling gun of dishonest sound-bites, all designed to serve climate denial the way O.J. Simpson’s lawyers drew fire away from their clients’

New paper finds the Arctic was warmer than the present during the Medieval Warm Period – Published in Global and Planetary Change

Climatologist Dr. Judith Curry’s at Senate hearing: ‘Attempts to modify the climate through reducing CO2 emissions may turn out to be futile’ – UN IPCC now making ‘a weaker case for anthropogenic global warming’ – Dr. Judith Curry, Chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of  Technology – Ice: ‘The increase in Antarctic sea ice is not understood and is not simulated correctly by climate models. Further, Arctic surface temperature anomalies in the 1930’s were as large as the recent temperature anomalies.’


1,049 Responses

      1. Actually no, Ken Ham rejects the notion that out of nothing the Universe exploded into what we have today. That is what Ken Ham presented and I do not hate him for his opinion. Disagreement and differing ideas are not hate speech; America is not Oceania of 1984–yet so we are free to discuss things.

            1. There are also clonal trees which is actually where the long lived part of the tree is the root system which sprouts new trees as new saplings from existing root system. The oldest of these is at least 80,000 years old and called “Pando”. 😉

                1. M’kay…riiiight. Try learning something and make use of your life. I am not taking any side of any argument presented here, though I have my views. Yet you seem driven to attack any research as invalid. You are the sort of religious nutjob that makes all religious people look bad. Dismissed.

                  1. I seem driven to attack ANY research as invalid? No, just poorly conceived dating of clonal colonies. Since I make my living from some of the most advanced medical science available, and pay scientists to do research, I don’t think your knee jerk observation could be any further off base. It gave me a good chuckle though.

          1. Here is toothless’s problem; he is attacking the position held by a very small minority (probably less than 2%) and promotes it as a majority position. He accepts the position of a larger number of people but plays it as the postion of the couragous minority. He is trying to cast the argument as a David and Goliath argument with the global warming crowd as David (the heroic position) when it is the bully crowd that is trying to stifle opposition by any means necessary….except science.

            1. Your too kind, just be honest. Toothless does not suffer from anything, nor lack anything because most animals, (except for human) do not suffer intellectually.

          2. There is amoeba’s on earth with more intelligence than Toothless! Thank God for amoeba’s the overall I.Q. in the room did not suffer from the presence of Toothless.

          3. Wrong, the oldest is tree is thought to be 5000, and the second and third oldest are thought to be 4800-ish. I say “thought to be” because the dendrochronological study of this species is extremely difficult. Ham thinks the world is 6000 years old. Nye tried to make the point that the trees are older than Ham’s estimate for Noah’s flood which is about 4200 years ago.
            Of course these are all bristlecone pines located in North Amerca above the 9000 foot elevation mark. One was actually cut down with the permission of the US Forest service in 1964 for research.

              1. Agreed. Especially for some species with very distorted trunks as is seen in the bristlecone. And, with trees at that elevation, false “winters” are very common giving many multi-ring years throughout history.

          4. It really needs to be pointed out that Ken Ham does not speak for all creationists. Those who believe in Divine origins are split into two camps: “young earth” creationists like Ham, who believe that the earth itself is only 6,000 years old; and “old earth” creationists, who believe that the earth may be billions of years old, but that the human race is only 6,000 years old. Speaking as a cheerful and unapologetic creationist, I can assure you that Ham, for all the publicity he engenders, is in the minority. He discredits the entire creationist community, although I’m sure he’s a fine man and a better Christian than I am. I just wish he’d keep his theories to himself. But he won’t; like Bill Nye, he’s a ham that can’t be cured.

          5. Hi Toothless, Reading your posst makes me think you have a problem, you see your disagreement with the way a Ken Ham see the world and you must think the whole world agrees with Ken or cares if you to see eye to eye and then you try an offend us by your written words. He is entitled to his opinion and you yours. This article does not cover either, so just maybe you should get a life. Most of us do not care about either opinion dealing with this news article.

        1. I am a creationist, but did you know who came up with the idea of the big bang theory, Hint, it was no evolutionists. It was a French priest named Lemaitre whose idea brought forth that a big bang denotes a beginning. Einstein rejected the notion until Edwin Hubble proved to him that galaxies were red shifting showing an expansion of the universe. If you actually read your Bible rather than parroting your Sunday school teachers lessons, you will find verses in Isaiah chapter 40 describing the heavens being expanded like a curtain. Stop putting God in a box.

          1. I will make it simpler for you: Ken Ham rejects that out of nothing—without an intelligent first cause meaning GOD, matter erupted—on its own. Relax homey……….

          2. This is good observation, partly. It can go further though. I am Lutheran and recently went to lecture by Father Coyne, a Catholic Priest who has a PhD in Astrophysics and used to manage the Vatican Observatory. He presented his case for why evolution does not preclude the existence of God. In addition, one must read the Bible, especially the Old Testament, as Hebrew Literature with many metaphors.

        1. And it’s not global warming by man, it’s earth warming/earth cooling climate change and in case you’ve been asleep rip van winkle, it’s global cooling now………..and Al Gore should refer to his global warming caused by man as “The Inconvenient Truth Theory” which is an oxymoron just like it’s professors……And the global warming so called scientists tried by faking the facts…..which goes to show you progressives have to lie all the time to get yourselves heard otherwise nobody would listen to you. And just remember, John Kerry, Maurice Strong, Al Gore, Nancy Pelosi and the brothers Rockefeller were all present at the Kyoto Accord’s 1st meeting, Earth Summit 1972, way back when they started this lie about money…..a lie to make money…that’s what they are after, more money, because more is never enough!

          1. Money, Power, and to use it ultimately to destroy the USA!

            And to the NAYSAYERS, I was an extreme liberal for the middle 1/3 of my 65 years. That was EXACTLY what WE wanted 30 years ago! That is BO’s [BOStinks!] ONLY purpose in everything he is doing!

      2. I could hold up a picture of North America covered in glaciers from centuries ago — so what? Does Bill Nye think that we should try to cover the U.S. in ice again? Newsflash: ICE MELTS. Thieves want to use it as an excuse to take our money.

      3. Oh, and your a scientist I presume. NOT! Oh, just shut up until you know what your talking about, and I have a very strong sense that Toothless is another term for Brainless.

        1. ” Oh, just shut up until you know what your talking about…”

          If that were applied to the political left in the US, we’d silence more than half the nation and 80% of the democrat party.

      1. Apparently, people tuned in to see a hoaxer in a white lab coat sliding upside down on the pole, but he slid right-side up, revealing little, if anything, interesting.

    1. Bill Nye is not now, nor has he ever been a scientist. He has a BS in engineering, so some scientific training, which AFAIK he has never even used. The guy is just someone who wears a white lab coat on TV.

          1. “There is no such thing as science. Anything that is useful is speedily absorbed into engineering. All the rest is speculation.” – James P Hogan from “Kicking the Sacred Cow”

            1. that is BS… pure and simple.. engineers are paint by numbers guys… methodical and patient – good ones don’t veer from their comfort zones and rarely, if ever “discover” anything….. except how NOT to do something following a failure analysis.

              Engineers must follow “prudent and sound engineering principles” and “Recognized” approaches.

              A scientist will make discoveries by positing hypothesis and theories and then testing both in a rigorous way…. EXCEPT for climatologists – they seem to be able to ignore empirical data that contradicts their theories.

              1. It was a quip by a writer on how humanity uses new discoveries. It is foolish to read it as a comparative worth statement. Leave that level of angst for the libs.

                  1. Da_mn, I didn’t know they were German, scientifically speaking. But you re right.
                    OK, back to our true subject, ” the sky is falling, the sky is falling, the north pole is now the south pole ” ” raise our taxes without any representation, without a iota of thought on how to stop the 4 seasons “.

          2. Gee then all the advance math and advanced physics and chemistry I was required to take to have my BSEE and MSEE presented to me was really liberal arts study??? We better notify the engineering and science schools in the universities of the grave error and mis-representation they are presenting to future students. I guess my tenure at various R&D facilities was really a social experiment!

            It seems you have been watching too much of the “Big Bang Theory” and listening to Sheldon Cooper. Almost all modern day advances have been made by engineers who not only know how things work, they also know why.

            1. Good observation, especially since getting one’s science form the “Big Bang Theory” is the same as getting it from “Bil Nye the Science Guy.” And the scientists at the Planetary Society tapped recruited a children’s show personality, Bill Nye, to be their CEO. What is their message: we are bunch of children? interplanetary exploration is child’s play?

              1. Bill Nye is an entertainer. He follows in the same footsteps as Don Herbert (Mr. Wizard). I really don’t believe he incorrectly identified Antarctica with a photo of the Arctic. He was probably handed the incorrect photo by an assistant and didn’t check it.

                As to interplanetary travel, the human species is restricted to the back yard (solar system) until technologies can be developed to overcome the physics restrictions. Unfortunately there needs to be a compelling advantage to society to justify the expenditures required to inhabit are neighbors. To go beyond our backyard will take a marriage of engineering and theoretical physics (the sciences). You know, Wolowitz working and partnering with Sheldon!???

            2. “Almost all modern day advances have been made by engineers who not only know how things work, they also know why.”

              This claim is fanciful, and besides being unprovable, almost certainly false.
              I have great respect for engineers. My grandfather was one of the first aeronautical engineers in the country — but that doesn’t make them original researchers.

              You think engineers are discovering new drugs and new cancer therapies? They are not. You think engineers are actually doing the work in condensed matter physics? Particle physics? Cosmology? They are not. In areas of basic investigation, engineers are simply not participants for the most part.

              But all this is beside the point: Bill Nye is not qualified to talk about science or engineering. He got a degree many years ago and has not kept his skillset current. In most technology areas, your skills erode at a rate between 15% and 25% per year. That’s like saying somewhere between 4 and 7 years after graduation, you have lost everything you’ve learned if your didn’t keep up in your trade. He hasn’t. He’s an entertainer pretending to be a scientist. He isn’t.

              1. I spent over 40 years in Research and Development so don’t tell me that the 40 years of my work has been fanciful!!! Your use of the today’s communication is one of the achievements that I was part of the pioneering work that resulted in Chicago where the first cell sites were established. Further my career involved providing the latest technology for the defense of our country working with theorists to adapt technology that today is key for our safe lives.

                Your insults tell me to explain any further to a layman is fruitless.

            1. There are engineers who are doing science, not just applying it, just as there are scientists who are essentially doing engineering. The point of an engineering degree is generally practical one. Note, I don’t say engineers don’t have scientific training, or don’t learn science.

          1. A BS in “Gender Studies” is also available. Anything to give the weak minded a college degree. After all, a university education and research are now mainly about faculty salaries.

          2. I personally think BS degrees in business are soft. With that said if a person takes the classes to heart and utilizes the methods taught then yes, they are a scientist. It may not be the stereo typical lab coat way but it is science.

            1. Seriously Defiant, I honestly didn’t know! I didnt mean to sound like I’d been living under a rock for the past 20 or so years. I knew Bill Nye was a leftist loon tune yet I always tought Michio Kaku was a cut above. I did some research and yes, Mr. Kaku is as nutty as Nye!

      1. Correct. A scientist is (to me) someone who has one or several PhDs. All Nye has is a BS yet he walks around acting like he’s at Stephen Hawking’s level!

          1. It just goes to show that there’s a fine line between genius and insanity! I used to have a lot of respect for Hawking, not anymore. Especially how he came out and announced a few years ago that “religion is just something to keep people from being afraid of the dark!” No, I’m no religious nut and whether people want to believe in God or not is their perogative. Even Albert Einstien believed in a higher being. When I heard Hawking say that I thought to myself you know Stephen, thoughts like that are best kept to yourself! A lot of people soured on him after that remark.

            1. I’m not a Hawking fan either, but human activity is certainly accelerating the natural cycle, the question is, how do we slow it down? Even if it were not related to carbon pollution (it obviously is), it’s still happening and at an alarming rate, faster than what the planet has seen before! You can second guess motive and imagine all the conspiracy you chose, but people can’t live under water! As the storms and droughts get stronger and last longer in places they shouldn’t, something will need to be done, a stitch in time saves nine and that’s the approach we should be taking! Why are people afraid of change? The uneducated opposition to climate change is obviously fueled by fear, why? Do they believe if they make believe it isn’t real, that it will go away?

        1. You’ve just insulted all those that have made your life an easy and comfortable life. The same insults we used to get from the political science, and liberal arts crowd.

            1. A hell of a lot more then the uninformed or misinformed commenting here based on my education and 40 year career with the 2 top high tech companies in world.

              1. Big deal. I have ONLY worked 30 years, all for top 100 companies, currently Boeing. I can tell with all certainty that about HALF the engineers here work and few develop anything. Most simply push paper from here to there. Graybeards like yourself are the biggest problem we have. Go on with your bad self.

                1. Know all about Boeing. Especially when the government pulled a satellite contract from them because of poor contractor performance and awarded the contract to another DOD contractor to complete the job.

                  Worked for all top 100 companies in 30 years?? Sounds like someone who can’t hold a job. If you truly worked government contracts, you would have known that the paper work you spoke of are government required documentation and is required contractually.

    2. He is the perfect example of why liberals are losing this argument. Climate change yes,winter,spring summer and fall.
      When they started losing the argument on global warming it became climate change.

    3. We belonged to the Planetary Society, whose focus is promoting interplanetary space exploration, but cancelled our membership when Bill Nye took the position as CEO. Bill Nye is a TV personality who continually uses straw men and other childish fallacies to promote his arguments which he is not qualified to make because he has an undergraduate degree in engineering but is tackling very difficult subjects that require a scientist with a PhD, like Stephen Hawking or Alex Filippenko, to understand and explain the subtleties. Bill Nye needs to stop degrading the scientific community and go back to having a children’s program.

  1. ‘The warmists have it exactly backwards. It is the global warming proponents who are guilty of the tobacco tactics.’

    A tactic of the left through and through.

    Who do they accuse of being “anti-science”? Who is actually “anti-science?”
    Who do they accuse of being “money-driven”? Who gets billions of dollars of government funding annually for very sketchy science?
    Who do they accuse of “politicizing” the “debate”? Who actually “politicizes” the debate?

    When it comes to progs and watermelons, their accusations speak volumes about what it is they are actually doing.

    1. Funny how they never mention the volcanic activity and the product of hundreds of thousands of acres of termite mounds spewing CO2 into the air that dwarfs the human’s measly addition of gases.

      1. I guess if you’re naive enough to believe that the money left in your pocket after all taxes have been extracted is money that is given you by the government, then I suppose you could make the claim that oil companies “get money from the government”. Most of us feel, though that the money we earn is ours, not the government’s.

        “Clean energy proponents”? Such as Soyndra — oh wait, there’s no such company anymore, they went bankrupt after securing a dodgy loan granted with out tax money by a corrupt government. Well then, what about A123? Oops. Abound Solar? Whoops. Beacon Power? Ener1? There you go, a billion dollars and not one erg of energy.

        Anyway, be that as it may, “clean energy proponents” and the “global warming” industry are not identical; they have, of course, similar goals — the plundering of the treasury (or at least they have been co-opted by those who have those goals) — the big money is still in “climate change”. Billions of dollars annually in NSF grants and various handouts for foolish models that can be replicated in a few lines of R code by lagging and scaling the inputs. Any head of a department of Physics, Chemistry or Biology will tell you that their grant applications must reference “carbon footprint” or “climate change” to have the best chance of funding.

        Wake up, Nic, it’s an industry, but an industry that produces nothing but a foul-smelling residue from which no energy may be extracted.

  2. So many politicians, especially on the left, have absolutely no clue as to the factual data of the issue they are speaking on. People who don’t spot these idiotic statements are the very ones that have no clue as to what is going on in the world and vote based on what they get for free. The same examples go for gun control when a democratic zealots speak of “gun facts” such as a “30 caliber magazine clip”. First of all they should say a “30 round magazine”, a magazine and a clip are two different things. Kind of like shirts or pants….you know, both go on your body, so they are the same thing , right? For the left to have credibility with educated people they at least need to know something about the issue they are speaking about.

      1. Very true…ignorance and apathy are KEY to democrats staying in power. If facts end up getting in their way, then the racist, homophobe, teabagger, gun nut, woman-hater cards come out.

    1. It’s worse with leftist celebrities. They even know less than politicians, but their larger and dumber audience takes every word they say as the gospel truth.

    2. With that mind set, the same as Romney, the GOP will not be winning federal elections anytime soon. Keep calling non moochers, moochers and see what you get. It smacks of elitism and childish name calling.

    1. Fack you. Bill Nye is amazing. He squished Ken Ham like a bug in that debate (which was hardly even a debate. Bill Nye was presenting actual proof the entire time while Ken Ham was just saying “This is what the Bible says…”)

      I use to watch Bill Nye the Science Guy in 5th grade 5 years ago, and he was amazing. I still love his show to this date.

      Bill! Bill! Bill! Bill!

                  1. It’s hard to tell what you are, since you lie so much. Lets see, your gay and you want to be straight, 2 going on 16, and dumber than an amoeba. Is that true. Sesame Street is on another channel – try it so you don’t hurt your mental development.

                  1. Good for you, as an engineer once stated, “watch out for the technical manual, there is a lot of bad info in there and I wrote it”. Mr Nye while fascinating, be careful, he has an agenda. The entire History/Discovery network is mostly bogus. When you take a course in logic, you will discover the flaws in their arguments. Ever hear of the magazine “Scientific American” they did a great job on the Wright Brothers, and another in the ’60’s on the fellow who first put forth the theory on plate tectonics. In 1957 there was an inventory of the earths resources. Oil for example was determined to last for only another 15 yrs. (The same thing was “predicted” in the 1920’s just after the Saudi oil fields were discovered. Today as we know there is more oil in the ground than we knew existed 30 years ago. When I was 16, a fellow by the name of Paul Ehrlich stated we would be out of food by the mid ’80’s. These scams have been surfacing since the early 20th century. Try and pick up a copy of Dr Thomas Sowell’s “Intellectuals and Society”.

                  2. All lying does is get people hurt. If you don’t stop your lying little boy, I going to have to call you mommy, and have to wash your mouth out with soap.

              1. Why am I not surprised?
                BTW, at 16 you are still a child, a large one, but a child nonetheless. You have 2 more years to go before you’re legally not a child, but you still can’t buy beer.

            1. No, Toothless isn’t sinking to your level and it’s eating you up inside. How does it feel to be outclassed by a teenager? Your tears, my God are they delicious. Nomnomnom.

              1. I haven’t called him one name, I just know that at 16, you think you know everything and you don’t find out until much later on that you know almost nothing.

                I told my son’s when they turned 16, that they may as well move out of the house while they still know everything.

        1. I’ll tell you one thing, for only being a 10th grader, he’s a hell of a lot more mature than you people. At least he doesn’t have to resort to name calling to express his opinions. You all should be embarrassed.

            1. How is there not? He’s stating his opinions and beliefs without resorting to name calling. Even after you people sunk to making childish comments, he stuck to his guns, stayed level headed and outclassed every one of you in the process. But I can’t honestly say that I didn’t expect any less from the people who follow the Drudge Report.

              1. LOL you idiot, the Drudge report has stories from practically every news source out there, and yet you libs want to make it out to be a conservative site. That’s just stupid.

          1. I’ve been laughing at Wilbur Nye for years, you’re the angry Mary who wants to take Wilbur home with you, as the rest of us laugh and laugh and laugh, hahahahhaha.

          2. Please…..about 15 people believe the earth is 6,000 years old. Your prog overlords just make you think anyone who apposes your view thinks that way. It makes it easier for you run with it.

            1. Todd, the Seventh-day Adventists are educated, bible scholars, university trained, and quite conservative. One of our doctrinal beliefs is that God created the earth and everything in it in six literal days, and rested the seventh. You might not remember when Bibles all had Usher dating with each chapter. Usher dating puts creation at BC 4004. We still believe he was onto something. There are 16,000,000 of us. God bless you in your search for truth.

            2. Wrong! About 1,000,000,000 believe in some version of Science. About 4,000,000,000 believe in God, and about 1,000,000,000 believe Hindu/Budda. That makes science wrong by consensus (not including the Hindu/Budda’s) 75 per cent of the time, and God believers wrong 25 per cent of the time.
              So God believers are Correct about the beginning of the Universe 3 Time more than those who believe in Science.

      1. “I use to watch Bill Nye the Science Guy in 5th grade 5 years ago, and he was amazing. I still love his show to this date.” Toothless

        Therein lies the problem. We have folks who learned all about the environment from childrens “hate the industrial system that allows us to live in comfort” television programming. I am sure that Ted Turner is also an icon of such a warped childhood.

      2. You are amazing, how you can defend a lie over and over again. See I told you that the Amoebas are much more intelligent then toothless. Amoebas don’t lie like Toothless, when it comes to telling the truth, that miles beyond the Bill Nye Lie.

      3. Your having gotten educated in science by Bill Nye explains why your grasp of science is so pathetic. I was a science teacher for 35 years and made the mistake of purchasing one of his “science” videos from a science supply house. I had to send it back as the information contained in it was utterly wrong. He is a charlatan who should NEVER be cited as a science expert. The man is a legend in his own mind and your adoration of him, if typical for today’s students, is explanation of why the United States lags behind other nations in science knowledge.

      4. ROFLMAO 5th grade , 5 years ago???? That tells me everything I need to know. Unless instead of 15 you’re 25. I guess that could be true if you believe in the man made climate change fairy tale. Maybe you’re 35.

    1. Anything to advance an agenda that results in the seizure of assets from those who work and earn a living. Never let the facts get in the way of an agenda.

      1. It’s called “climate change” now because your whole warming hypothesis fell through. Smack. A theory that claims everything is an effect isn’t a theory in any serious scientific definition.You Warmers [or nee Warmers, or CC’ers, or whatever your next name will be after it’s been clearly established that the oscillations we see over century long and longer periods have nothing to do with carbon] crack me up. You don’t realize how you sound: Just like the John Birchers/Illuminati/CFR conspirators in the 1950’s. Whatever happened “proved” the theory. “It’s a communist conspiracy.””But William F. Buckley Jr. is part of the conspiracy, and he’s an anti-communist.””That just proves it’s real; they do stuff like that to throw people off.”We’re going to see much more severe and much more frequent hurricanes.Nope. Weakest hurricane season in decades. Arctic Ice is disappearing. No, it’s not. Record cold is caused by CC. This is one of the worst winters ever. Temperature Extremes! Record Snow! Nope. 1995 and 1996 were both worse, and happened during “warming.”

        Ya got nuthin’ pal. Man up and admit you were wrong and the whole AGW scam was just a way to shut down capitalism and transfer money from middle-class people in rich countries to billionaire strong-men in poor countries and let’s move on.

  3. Follow the money! “Green energy” government loans to favored friends. Now we fry birds in the south west, with 4000 acre mirror farms, along with beating them to death with windmills! Neither energy source can stand alone as economically viable.

    Nye wants the talking $, maybe a Fed. grant?

    1. If you can get ANY kind of engineering degree, you’re a pretty bright person. Engineering is an incredibly difficult course. If he’s smart enough to get a mechanical engineering degree, than he’s definitely smart enough to transfer that knowledge to science.

              1. The Drudge Report only posts your loser drivel as a way to let the rest of us know what propagandists are pushing…. Drudge didn’t write it, he only linked it. You losers are always complaining about Drudge because your crap can’t stand the light of day!

      1. Really? He didn’t prove it in the debate we are talking about today. Also, there are several different engineering disciplines – it isn’t a ‘degree’. Perhaps it would make your defense more credible if you weren’t so transparent – or incorrect.

          1. Aptitude isn’t the same thing as knowledge. Bill Nye is a poseur who doesn’t know any actual science beyond what little is hinted at on Sesame Street.

      2. But engineering has nothing to do with the subject of evolution. Neither man in the debate has advanced degrees in the science of evolution. It was just a stunt on both of their parts and it doesn’t seem that many people are all tht interested.

          1. Did you ever hear that Bill Nye had either of those degrees?

            Or, on the topic at hand, did you ever hear that Bill Nye had a degree in climatology, meteorology, atmospheric physics …?

            Because if you heard that he did, up your meds. The voices are back. Bill Nye isn’t qualified to discuss this topic. He isn’t qualified to discuss most topics in science at a level beyond Sesame Street. He’s a poseur.

            1. Whither he has the degree or not. He has valid training that means he has the ability to pick up the other stuff. It also means he has the ability to reason. You do know what that is right.

              I can take what he says, look it up, and confirm its authenticity.
              I can not say the same for you. Most of your blather is opinion steeped in stupidity.

      3. Actually, not. One can be an engineer and be able to apply formulas, strength of materials, etc. and of course be good at math.
        But that is not science. It is engineering.
        Different philosophy. Different methodology.
        Of course, we will NEVER be told what degrees or competency many of the MMGW cultists have.
        MMGW is a totally political ideological fraudulent perversion of science.

        1. You must of never taken engineering classes. It is science mixed with its application toward an end product. They don’t call it a BS for nothing.

          1. OK. Let us stipulate to the facts that a) engineers are smart b) they have scientific training and c) they are practitioners of applied science. [except Industrial Engineers and Environmental Engineers, who are a joke.]
            That said: Bill Nye never used his degree for anything, and if you listen to many of the things he says — not just in the instant case — he clearly hasn’t kept up with current events in science. Nor does he understand advanced scientific concepts very well. So: he’s probably smart, probably absorbed some scientific training and is WAY past his sell-by date. Today’s episode is one more note added in proof of that.

          2. I excelled in science in HS, In college got a double major (BS Bio and BS Chem) actually took the 8 credit physics course for fun and did well. Yet, I always made a distinction between science and technology. If I want to know how thick a beam I need for a particular application, or how to build the new Tappan Zee Bridge, or how to keep my circuits from frying when I turn the transmogrification coils on, or how to best up my yields of crystal meth (just kidding) I will call an engineer. (Materials, mechanical, electrical, chemical)
            If I want to formulate a hypothesis, devise a test for it, run the test, gather data and then rethink where I went wrong (as is usually the case) I will call a scientist. I have both in the family and respect both areas of endeavor. But, they are not the same.
            Incidentally, isn’t it usually the architecture students who keep moaning about how hard their courses are?

            1. They are, have been, and will continue to be, the same thing. Really just depends on what job you get. Will you stick with the more formal side or are you just going to use your skills like legos.

              “Incidentally, isn’t it usually the architecture students who keep moaning about how hard their courses are?”

              No, its always the guys going to business school who are whining.

      4. And Toothless is toothless because his G.P. is his dentist. You have to be intelligent to be an M.D. so it’s okay for him to transfer his knowledge base to dentistry. Similarly, his proctologist is a credentialed archaeologist.

        1. “Engineering is the application of scientific, economic, social, and practical knowledge in order to design, build, maintain, and improve structures, machines, devices, systems, materials and processes.”

        2. Wikipedia not good enough for you? How about the Dictionary:


          Use Engineering in a sentence

          en·gi·neer·ing [en-juh-neer-ing] Show IPA

          the art or science of making practical application of the knowledge of pure sciences, as physics or chemistry, as in the construction of engines, bridges, buildings, mines, ships, and chemical plants.
          the action, work, or profession of an engineer.
          skillful or artful contrivance; maneuvering.

        1. “Engineering is the application of scientific, economic, social, and practical knowledge in order to design, build, maintain, and improve structures, machines, devices, systems, materials and processes.” <———-

          1. Keep pasting. It’s still not science. It’s a practical discipline that uses scientific results and scientific methodology. That would be: NOT. SCIENCE. It’s like claiming statistics is a branch of mathematics. Nope. Not.

        2. engineering

          Use Engineering in a sentence

          en·gi·neer·ing [en-juh-neer-ing] Show IPA

          the art or science of making practical application of the knowledge of pure sciences, as physics or chemistry, as in the construction of engines, bridges, buildings, mines, ships, and chemical plants.
          the action, work, or profession of an engineer.
          skillful or artful contrivance; maneuvering.

      1. Having been an engineering manager for 21 years I can attest that engineering is not “science”. Far from it. Science is a collection of theories that usually are, if proven, wrong.

        1. engineering

          the art or science of making practical application of the knowledge of pure sciences, as physics or chemistry, as in the construction of engines, bridges, buildings, mines, ships, and chemical plants.
          the action, work, or profession of an engineer.
          skillful or artful contrivance; maneuvering.

          1. Where are you an engineering manager at, Subway?

            What’s a matter seign? Can’t you debate without using your own childish mockery? I guess toothless is more mature than you too!

            Do you think someone who majors in political science is also qualified to direct the policies regarding Climate Science? Because there is an awful lot of engineering (rigging of elections) being performed by these political science majors. Yet I don’t hear them called engineers or scientists for that matter, just politicians.

        2. bvikay, I highly doubt you have a degree in engineering. You most likely have a business degree and as such your shapes and colors degree has no bearing on the conversation. I bet you would be laughed at if you showed this post to those you claim to “manage”. Please do show them as they are already laughing at you behind your back so it might be fresh air to have them do it to your face.

        3. Got bad news for you. The physics that Newton came up with 300+ years ago? Used in engineering every single day. Not wrong. The physics that Einstein came up with in 1906 and 1916? Used in engineering every single day. Still not wrong. The physics that James Clerk Maxwell, Faraday, Ampere and Tesla pioneered? Used by engineers every day. Still not wrong.

          When you falsify some of those theories contact me and I’ll get you your Nobel Prize.

        1. Because the title of engineer is higher than that of scientist. Engineers make things from discovers of their own and others. Scientist general just make the discovers without sometimes seeing the long game. You can also be both. You could be a Scientist in Mechanical Engineering. A scientist in biological engineering. Really. You guys are this dense. We can line the space shuttle with GOPers because they are so dense and they can fly it to space by spouting out all that hot air.

      2. Engineers can’t make up facts and come up with a “real” solution…you will be found out making up facts, just like the “faux” scientists made up “faux” numbers to make their “faux” case and were found out in the end!

        1. No they were not. You need to go back and read more on that one. The emails that came out were those about modeling that happen in all scientific endeavors . Nice try. Another gop non issue. See you at the polls.

          1. Nice try, and not true. The emails clearly show a conspiracy to deny publication to warming skeptics and to falsify scientific results. Two whitewashes by their bosses don’t change the facts. Anyone can read the emails for themselves and decide what the meaning is of “hide the decline.”

            1. Nope, read em and don’t agree. One email in a long conversation could be damning for anyone but taken in context is completely different. May be you should read them.

              1. I have. They show a pattern of unethical and unscientific conduct, and they cannot be read in any context in which they display conduct worthy of adults, let alone professional researchers. The discussion of the Yamal results in particular is damning evidence of something very nearly a criminal conspiracy to deny FOIA [and their UK equivalents] requests to taxpayers who were entitled to the data by law.

    2. Mechanical engineering is known to be the easiest of all degrees to earn. I see loopy dregs with degrees in mechanical engineering who have trouble figuring out what the eyelets in their boots are for all of the time. Go figure. Women get degrees in Psychology and men get mechanical engineering degrees. Ha!

      1. Joe, what was your major, Womyn’s Studies? I have a Masters in Mechanical Engineering and believe me it’s not at all easy to attain an M.E. degree. I can also tie my boots, no problem. Does your mum still do yours?

        1. Nye does not have an advanced, academic degree. That is who we are talking about. I think he got his degree in the 70s and much has been learned since then.

          1. Regardless of what’s been learned since the 1970’s, I taught physics to engineers, scientists, and mathematicians for years, and a BS degree in ME is not — and never was — by any means considered an “easy degree.” Psychology? Psych majors didn’t even have enough mathematics prerequisites to take the courses I taught.

            That all said: Bill Nye never used his degree or his scientific training for anything, and he is, quite simply a joke.

            1. Neither one of them were qualified to debate this subject. I think Nye must be in his 60s and trying to restart his career. Perhaps the man who debated him was trying to get publicity for his creation museum or what ever it is. I think it was a publicity stunt n both their parts.

      2. Well I guess they told you, there are alot of Tech people on our side of the climate hoax. Let’s not start disparaging their degrees, Engineering is an acceptable degree from which scientific arguments can be made. Mr. Nye made a boo boo, I’m sure he’s busy wiping the egg from his face as we type.

        1. The problem isn’t his degree, it’s that he never used his degree and hasn’t really kept up with new developments in science very well. He’s an entertainer. He’s NOT an engineer, and he’s NOT a scientist.

          1. I wasn’t defending Mr. Nye, only stating that his level of education was one that could make valid scientific arguments. In this case I don’t think his argument is correct.

    3. He is listed as a comedian because “Bill Nye the Science Guy” was designed to teach younger children basic science by being funny and comedic. It was a light-hearted show that made learning fun.

  4. I liked Nye until he got on to the global warming bandwagon. He seems to be another scientist looking for more federal funding either for himself of for his cohorts now…

      1. According to wiki he is, and he is also an environmental kook, he and Ed Begley has competition to see who can have the lowest carbon footprint and they dine at vegan restaurants together.

  5. This just keeps adding on to what is already a credibility problem beyond repair for the GW alarmists. It starts with scientists and pundits like Al Gore who have made dire predictions that were supposed to have taken place by now, but instead has them crying wolf.

    Couple that with more left wingnut pundits who make comments on threads such as this one. Most of their comments consist of telling us how stupid we all are in a manner that you would expect to hear from common street thugs.

    They can’t even sound professional when trying to prove their point.

          1. The 2nd most viewed website in the world with 1,000,000,000 (that’s Billion with a B) unique monthly visitors. I think your statistics are a tad off. Welcome to 2014.

  6. Three points:

    #1 — Certain statements flowing from the mouths of people who are paid to talk, but never have to actually produce anything. Included in this group are career politicians and the media. They are so dim, and desperate for approval, that they will herd like a cow if someone speaks emphatically enough, such as President Obama loudly proclaiming as if he is Moses: “It is settled.” (what a joke)

    #2 — Q: is there “climate change” A: yes, always has been and always will be.

    #3 — Wonder what would be the results of a survey of scientists who receive <20% of their funding from a government supported enterprises ? It seems to me that, the greater the presumption for "man made" influence on "global warming" (recently renamed "climate change" — probably when the proponents noticed there is little decipherable warming) — the more money that will flow from government supported entities to scientists who study climate.

  7. Bill Nye is a gullible putz. Say anythign wacky you want to around him and he will believe it and preach it with great fervency. He’s no better than the ranting raving lunatic libtards we have to witness on TV news everyday.

  8. Bill Nye just made a simple mistake. It can happen to anybody. I say the wrong words in place of other words all the time.

    Of course Bill Nye knew which pole was which, he simply held up the wrong picture.

      1. Look, I know that global warming climate change is a scam as much as you. But Bill Nye is still an incredibly smart individual on nearly every other matter. We could use millions more people with his intelligence.

        1. I’m sorry he’s fooled you.
          There are a lot of book smart people, but if it’s not told to them they don’t have the common sense to put two and two together, or connect the dots on their own.

            1. Compared to GW? Yes. But evolution isn’t wrong, its just not a proven theory. And likely never will be. Certain aspects such as adaptation and mutation, which are proven, have been mistakenly called evolution.

  9. The climate part is moot anyway, think the real issue is just having clean air to breathe and water to drink.

    We should be worried about the stuff that gets put into the atmosphere and oceans that nature can’t undo.

    People that think we can’t damage this planet are kidding themselves, and not realizing that we need the Earth a LOT more than the Earth needs us.

      1. Bachelors in Geography.
        Geography: “The study of the environment as it relates to man.”
        That trumps buthead Nye.
        And yours is …. Let me guess…Gaia worship?

        1. I am a Biochemist you jerk!

          See, you are exactly the type of person who gets on these threads and further adds to the credibility problem of pseudo scientists like Nye.

          1. “Oh, nooooo! Atheists are so devious! They are a threat to the survival of civilization! They’re trying to exterminate us by giving kids at school evolutionist textbooks instead of Bibles!”

            Sound familiar?

  10. Simple mistake. You idiots lambasting him do not have a drop of his education. You just make truths from a book of ancient mythology. Dont get me wrong, I like conservative policies like in the fiscal/economic area, but religion? Stop being enslaved you stupid dolts. Pick up a biology book, do some physics problems, get an education.

  11. How long is a plutonium year? How long is a meridian year? Why would a being who is capable left of creating a solar system live according to a human concept of time?

  12. Lots of seminarians, country backwoods hillbillies, and other assortment of religious mind-stunted ultra Conservative freaks.
    Conservatives DONT have to be religious, plenty of us are atheists. Stop making policy based on mythology, discard religion and THINK.

      1. You must be a teabagger, judging by your response…..you automatically squawk that I am a “Obama supporter, Marxist, etc”. Freaks like you have hijacked the Conservative movement. I am a conservative.

            1. Good, the GOP of RINOs needs to be destroyed.
              That you want it to continue to abet the Marxist agenda again proves my deduction about your political core.

              1. Whats a “real” Republican to you? A backwards, hillbilly who never opened a book that wasnt the Bible, wants to lock women inside their house, hang gays on telephone wires, and administer whippings as mandated by the Bible? Christ man….

  13. I suppose by TeaBagger standards, a conservative atheist such as myself (and a scientist) who backs up Bill Nye’s POV….is automatically = “Marxist”, “Liberal”, “Democrat”, “Obama Lover”…..what else? Typical TeaBagger response I was expecting. Damn, I’m afraid of the future of the United States. Uneducated moronic herds of you folk…

  14. Teabagger primitive savages have destroyed the GOP. Enough! We need to take back the GOP from the Teabagger hijackers. They turned a once great party into a pathetic laughingstock.

  15. Bill Nye is an idiot. I was really hoping to hear a good debate between a creationist and an evolutionist but instead we got every religious nut jobs dream, an incompetent oaf named Bill Nye. It is not surprising that the guy does not know if he is upside down or not.

  16. Michio Kaku says it’s too late to stop Climate Change. Why are we trying to legislate the destruction of the economy for something that can no longer be helped? Why can’t Global Climate Change obsessionists find something else to focus their terror on? Maybe there’s nothing like it that comes with rubber stamp funding prospects.

  17. More hysteria. Back in the ’60s we confronted: the coming ice age (cover of Time magazine), the population bomb (Ehrlich), silent spring (Carson), and on and on. In the ’70s we were told the killer bees were coming to get us all. AIDs was the plague of the ’80s (at least until Bush 41 left office). It’s all mindless, unreasoning fear propagated to control the dumbed-down masses into thinking these impending calamities can only be warded off by central planning, more taxes, total state control of every minute aspect of the sheeple’s lives by the all-powerful, all-knowing, all-wise, all-beneficent state. When in reality it’s just a bunch of crooks cooking the books to enrich themselves and their cronies with bogus cap and trade nonsense, commissions earned on farcical carbon credits and on and on, it never ends. FOLLOW THE MONEY. It’s all a dressed-up version of just organised crime under the guise if science. The Borgias and the Medicis would be proud of such a scheme, not to mention the Mafia.

      1. Don’t be ridiculous, of course we landed on the moon. I’m not some conspiracy nut and I’m certainly no fundamentalist wingnut. My mantra is “follow the money”, it generally explains 99.99% of everything in life. Sorry to sound so sceptical, jaded and cynical, but it is what it is.

    1. You do realise that the majority of those that you mentioned did not become what they could of becuase of the publicity that they recived. That is why aids transmission rates were not as high as they could of been. Silent spring was factual. Hell, waterways of the 70’s were drastically worse than they are today. To bad you want to make it political instead of scientific. GOPers for you.

      1. It was all hyped BS, all of it. And I’m not some yahoo from Podunk, Arkansas. First, I’m not a Republican, I’ve been a registered Democrart my whole life, albeit of a dying breed (pro-life, pro-2d amdt.). I immigrated here with my parents when I was a teen. My father was a Brit, my mother an Italian national. I served 4 years in the USMC as a noncom, then 12 years later on as a USN officer, after which I served as an international protocol officer with the UNO in NYC and Geneva and the UNFAO in Rome. I’ve seen it all first hand and it’s all rotten and corrupt, driven by filthy lucre. Keep your head in the sand, if you wish, BUT FOLLOW THE MONEY $$$.

      2. Not the least bit true. Population went to exactly where Paul Ehrlich said it would. No “publicity” stopped it. And 1/3 of the Earth’s population did not die. AIDS was predicted to “break-out” of the homosexual and IV drug user communities imminently and never did. Not because of “publicity,” “awareness,” or even condom use — read what the NIH said about how ineffective the condom programs were, especially among homosexuals. The major newsweeklies did indeed predict we were headed into an Ice Age. How could/did “publicity” stop that?
        Silent Spring was 100% rubbish and lead directly to the deaths of nearly 100 million people in the third world as a result of a malaria break-out that DDT had largely contained. A couple of birds die in the US and 100 million brown people have to die because of the white liberal guilt it produces.

        You’re brainwashed, pal. And unfortunately, your brainwashing hasn’t just harmed you. Condign punishment if that were the only consequence. Your brainwashing has cost millions of people their lives.

  18. TeaBaggers would rather get a science degree at a university run by Sarah Palin, the IQ 50 soccer mom, rather than a university run by Bill Nye or Neil DeGrassie Tyson (both because he is a scientist, and because he is a black- OH NO!)

    1. Unlike you darius, I believe in the teachings of Dr Martin Luther King Jr. Unlike you, I judge no man by the color of his skin. I judge all men by the content of their character. That is why I judge you to be an ignorant buffoon.

      1. Darius is a 14 year old pencil neck that has never had a woman. He lives in his mother’s basement playing video games with other pimply faced geeks in his neighborhood.

  19. Climate-change deniers can put their heads in a toilet and flush.
    The fossil-fuel industry cheers each time a dumb*ss starts parroting their propaganda.

    1. The new religion. The church of old told Galileo he better get that earth orbiting the sun stuff out of his head. Your problem is in calling it “science” and, the “science” is settled, it isn’t. Calling this stuff settled science denigrates the great scientist doing great things. You see those lungs they built?

      1. It’s all nothing more than a grand criminal conspiracy on a scale never before seen by mankind. The climate-change crooks are out to put the Mafia to shame!

        1. And their salesmen and women don’t do them any good with the scare tactics:

          2008 Robert Kennedy Jr. Blames No Snow on Palin: http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2013/02/10/rfk-jr-blames-sarah-palin-for-the-lack-of-snow/

          John Kerry Climate Change, “Scientists project that the Arctic will be ice-free in the summer of 2013. Not in 2050, but four years from now.”
          : http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-kerry/we-cant-ignore-the-securi_b_272815.html

          These is so much of this but these two sum up my thoughts.

  20. From The Covenant, James Michener, and it stuck with me all these years, the thought.

    “In the year 1856 the diviner Nongqawuse told the Xhosa people to burn their crops and kill their cattle because a great day would come when the sun would set in the East, the white man would be driven into the sea and fat cattle would walk out from the base on the mountain bellowing for their new owners. The dead would be resurrected, the ancestors would revive, the old would become young and fat cattle would be slaughtered for a feast. The nation divided into believers and unbelievers – as in today’s world, Anthony Fleischer says. The believers look to fundamentalist icons and to Almighty God, the unbelievers look to themselves.”

    As I recall, in the novel, many died of starvation after doing this.

    Remove the race element because all cultures, races, seem to have tribal leaders and right next to them, witch doctors, shamans, throwing some flash powder on the fire, and warning how a red moon portends disaster unless……

      1. Except when that book has truths that play out in real life it lends more credence than just being a “mythology book”. Open your eyes, look at the world around you.

  21. Lol “Nye Goofs”. Tea Baggers only hold on Bill Nye is that he switched “North” and “South” by mistake. But Mentally retarded Sarah Palin is all cool when her justification for understanding foreign policy matters regarding Russia is “They are our neighbors, in fact I can see Russia from my house.” ahahahahahhaa

    1. You show your ignorance – Palin never said that. It was said by second-rate comedienne Tina Fey who rode to fame by defaming Palin. Of course defaming a conservative makes her a hero to brain-dead liberals who parrot what their handlers tell them.

        1. Darius19 – is the 19 your age, or your IQ? I suggest you get a re-test, it appears they gave you too high a score.

          Seriously, you can find the truth on the internet yourself (although you seem to be someone who is easily confused by just about anything).

  22. Follow the money, geeks like Wilbur Nye want more and more funding from the government all of the time. They’ll say or do anything to be a recipient of government funding and wasteful spending.

  23. Moron for the “progressive” climate change cause. Progressivism is either a mental disease or the opiate of low information useful idiots. BTW, there’s more “sea ice” and more ice in Antarctica than ever before. If you look at the goofy models that the global warming cult … er, climate change cult were foisting upon the world ten/fifteen years ago, they DID NOT predict more ice and cold weather. In fact they said the ENTIRE PLANET would be getting steadily warmer because of CO2 emissions. In fact we were told snow would be a thing of the past, that glaciers would all melt off the mountains, hurricanes would become more frequent and intense as to tornadoes. All lies.

  24. WAKE UP! Follow the money…

    CFACT, who wrote this article is funded by at least $542,000 from ExxonMobil, $60,500 from Chevron, and $1,280,000 from Scaife family foundations, which are rooted in wealth from Gulf Oil and steel interests.