Frame and Stone themselves say the IPCC models didn’t include important forcings, and may have been “right” by accident. Why did Nature publish this strawman letter? It’s an award-winning effort in selective focus, logical fallacies, and circular reasoning to be sure, but does it advance our understanding of the natural world? Not so. Frame and Stone have produced a Letter to Nature saying that 3 is a lot like 6 (they are both larger than zero). If you ignore the Summary for Policymakers, pick a line […]Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
