Award-Winning Former UN IPCC Scientist Dr. Lennart Bengtsson Dissents: ‘We cannot yet separate well enough the greenhouse effect from other climate influences’ – Declares climate models ‘more a matter of faith than a fact’

Full Interview here:

Related Links: 

Top Swedish Climate Scientist Says Warming Not Noticeable: ‘The warming we have had last a 100 years is so small that if we didn’t have climatologists to measure it we wouldn’t have noticed it at all Award-Winning  – Dr. Lennart Bengtsson, formerly of UN IPCC: ‘We Are Creating Great Anxiety Without It Being Justified…there are no indications that the warming is so severe that we need to panic…The warming we have had the last a 100 years is so small that if we didn’t have had meteorologists and climatologists to measure it we wouldn’t have noticed it at all.’

Top Swedish Climate Scientist Lennart Bengtsson (former IPCC) Also Confirms No Sea Level Acceleration…Desperate UN IPCC’s Pachauri Insisting No Acceleration ‘Is An Acceleration’! – – Lennart Bengtsson: ‘We now have satellite measurements for 20 years which indicate a steady rise of about 3 mm per year, and during that time no acceleration, See:… 20 years is certainly enough. On Monday I was involved in a public panel discussion with Pachauri who insisted that this is an acceleration. I found that I think I know more about this than Mr. Pachauri. The reference above appears to me quite compelling.’

Skeptical Swedish climatology: Dr. Lennart Bengtsson: Global warming only visible under a microscope –  Dr. Bengtsson: ‘The Earth appears to have cooling properties that exceeds the previous thought ones, and that computer models are inadequate to try to foretell a chaotic object like the climate, where actual observations is the only way to go’

Top Swedish Climate Scientist Dr. Lennart Bengtsson: CO2”s ‘heating effect is logarithmic: the higher the concentration is, the smaller the effect of a further increase’ – Dr. Lennart Bengtsson, formerly of UN IPCC: ‘The sea level has risen fairly evenly for a hundred years by 2-3 millimeters per year. The pitch is not accelerated’

‘Climate change has become extremely politicized. The issue is so complex that one can not ask the people to be convinced that the whole economic system must be changed just because you have done some computer simulations’


More High Profile Scientists who recently dissented:

Another Prominent Scientist Dissents! Fmr. NASA Scientist Dr. Les Woodcock ‘Laughs’ at Global Warming – ‘Global warming is nonsense’ Top Prof. Declares

save image

Dr. Woodcock declared there was ‘professional misconduct by Government advisors around the world’ when it comes to man-made climate change claims.  ‘The theory of ‘man-made climate change’ is an unsubstantiated hypothesis’ —  water is a much more powerful greenhouse gas and there is is 20 time more of it in our atmosphere (around one per cent of the atmosphere) whereas CO2 is only 0.04%’

‘When I ask the former NASA scientist about ‘climate change’ and ‘global warming’, he laughs.’


Green Guru James Lovelock on Climate Change: ‘I don’t think anybody really knows what’s happening. They just guess’ – Lovelock Reverses Himself on Global Warming

Green Guru James Lovelock on Climate Change: ‘I don’t think anybody really knows what’s happening. They just guess’ – Lovelock Reverses Himself on Global Warming –  Lovelock, on BBC TV, slams the global warming claims including those of of the United Nations climate panel. ‘They just guess. And a whole group of them meet together and encourage each other’s guesses.’

Lovelock was once one of the leading voices of climate alarm. See: 2006 Climate Shocker: Lovelock Predicted Global Warming Doom: ‘Billions of us will die; few breeding pairs of people that survive will be in Arctic’

Fast Forward to April 2012: ‘Gaia’ scientist James Lovelock reverses himself: I was ‘alarmist’ about climate change & so was Gore! ‘The problem is we don’t know what the climate is doing. We thought we knew 20 years ago’ 

Lovelock becomes UN IPCC’s biggest critic: Green Guru Lovelock Slams UN IPCC & Greens: ‘Whenever UN puts its finger in it seems to become a mess’ — ‘The green religion is now taking over from the Christian religion’ — James Lovelock: ”IPCC is too politicized & too internalized’ — On Green religion: ‘I don’t think people have noticed that, but it’s got all the sort of terms that religions use. The greens use guilt. You can’t win people round by saying they are guilty for putting CO2 in the air’


6 Responses

  1. When are law enforcement agencies going to start holding IPCC officials and scientists to account for engaging in misleading and deceptive conduct in relation to climate change alarmism?

    The IPCC still uses the word “likely” that humans are the cause of dangerous global warming and climate change. But “likely” is just an opinion, not a scientific proof.

    If the IPCC had scientific proof, it would have provided it by now. The IPCC has not. That’s why it can only resort to words such as “likely”.

  2. Pretty easy to do after 18 years of no warming and 10 of slight cooling. I’ve been a “denier” since the early 90s. Where’s my prize?

  3. Yet another UN IPCC scientist has switched from global warming alarmist to skeptic, based on the scientific evidence. And those faithful members of the Church of Global Warming have ostracized him for daring to voice such heresy. Just like Galileo, who dared to state that the earth circled the sun, Bengtsson has been excommunicated from the Church of Global Warming, thrown out of his job, and persecuted by the CGW establishment.

  4. Welllet,s not get ignorant about churcu matters here. Actually Pope Sylvester II (in the year 1000): demonstrated with the aid of a 3D model of his own design… That the earth revolved around the sun. That was 500 years before Copernic. The Church being opposed to science is a miconception born out of SIC: religious fanatism ironically… In fact it is the Free-Masons (code of silence) close to monarchies that opposed the diffusion of knowledge, historically speaking. But we are digressing. So today the same can be said of the little (very small indeed) Green Men who try to silence the opposition by all means. Yes they do use intimidation, scare, bribery etc just like the stone cutters did centuries ago yo preserve their wealth!!!

  5. Lennart Bengtsson

    I want to let you know of my new book for your perusal.
    ‘The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science’
    I have been silenced for 40 years by the MSM.
    Thank you.
    Historical Climatologist

    PS My website is

Leave a Reply