Wednesday, June 16, 2021
Home Climate411 Truth or consequences: global warming consensus thinking and the decline of public...

Truth or consequences: global warming consensus thinking and the decline of public debate

-

We believe that the city fathers who withdrew endorsement of our meeting were simply following the persuasive power of the AGW consensus advocates. It is doubtful that they, not being experts, discerned any advantage to disputing the consensus. At worst, they can only be accused of lacking the courage to assail the controversy.

- Advertisment -

Related Articles

Biden’s oil & gas leasing ban ruled unlawful by federal judge

Guest “What took so long?” by David Middleton Biden’s oil lease ban lifted by federal judgeBy JENNIFER A. DLOUHY AND ROBERT BURNSON on 6/16/2021...

Celebrate: We’ve Finally Hit an “Irreversible” Climate Tipping Point

According to Professor Markus Rex, we have finally crossed the line - though years of well funded research are required to confirm that we...

Japan’s Canon Institute For Global Studies (CIGS) Presents New Working Paper On Climate Science Data Inconsistencies

A new working paper has been released, in Japanese – authored by KiryeNet – and it reports that climate change goes well beyond one...