Friday, October 15, 2021
Home Climate411 Truth or consequences: global warming consensus thinking and the decline of public...

Truth or consequences: global warming consensus thinking and the decline of public debate

-

We believe that the city fathers who withdrew endorsement of our meeting were simply following the persuasive power of the AGW consensus advocates. It is doubtful that they, not being experts, discerned any advantage to disputing the consensus. At worst, they can only be accused of lacking the courage to assail the controversy.

- Advertisment -

Related Articles

Climate, energy, ‘crisis,’ and transition: A conversation with Steven Koonin

The participants will cover the state of climate science as portrayed in “Unsettled” and the United Nation’s “Sixth Assessment Report,” the projected economic impacts...

4 More New Reconstructions Affirm The Medieval Warm Period Was ‘Warmer Than Today’

From Russia to the Indian Ocean to Antarctica, surface temperatures were much warmer than  they are today during Medieval times.

Climate Crusader Prince William Slams William Shatner Space Flight

Anyone who thinks Prince Charles and Prince Harry are the only royal climate hardliners needs to take a closer look at Prince William.