Monday, June 21, 2021
Home Climate411 Why Would Naomi Oreskes Be On Retainer With Any Law Firm?

Why Would Naomi Oreskes Be On Retainer With Any Law Firm?

-

Just askin’. When the defendant energy companies’ law firms start that kind of probing, they may see how Oreskes’ errant and inconsistent narratives are a gift on a silver platter pointing to where even more damaging self-inflicted problems of hers can be found. Oreskes’ problems wouldn’t likely be seen as gifts to mainstream media investigative reporters, but it might end up looking like too much blood in the water to ignore, as it relates to so many people – politicians, enviros, and journalists – who never questioned anything about the ‘Big Coal & Oil execs colluding with crooked skeptics‘ accusation.

- Advertisment -

Related Articles

Hawaii Renewable Electricity Claims Unsupported by EIA Data, Emissions Unchanged

The political leadership and people of Hawaii understandably want to address the huge dependency of the state on high-cost petroleum for its electricity. But...

Corrupt EPA stacks CASAC panel with agency grant cronies; Chair is top agency grant crony

EPA’s CASAC will now be led by someone who gets paid to do research for EPA then gets to review and rubberstamp her and...

Weekly Climate and Energy News Roundup #459

“It is one thing to impose drastic measures and harsh economic penalties when an environmental problem is clear-cut and severe. It is quite another...