Thursday, October 28, 2021
Home Climate411 How epidemiologists try to fool us with flawed statistical practices

How epidemiologists try to fool us with flawed statistical practices

-

We have just completed a study for the National Association of Scholars [1] that took a deep dive looking at flawed statistical practices used in the field of environmental epidemiology. The study focused on air quality−health effect claims; more specifically PM2.5−health effect claims. However, the flawed practices apply to all aspects of risk factor−chronic disease research. The study also looked at how government bureaucrats use these claims to skew policy in favor of PM2.5 regulation and their own positions.

- Advertisment -

Related Articles

The Day the Earth Fell Over

Guest “Klaatu barada nikto” by David Middleton My apologies to Robert Wise, Edmund H. North, Harry Bates, Michael Rennie and the guy who played...

Is California Experiencing More “Weather Whiplash”?

But the jury, viewing the observations, have released a definitive ruling on whether precipitation whiplash is increasing during the past 120 years in California: ...

Actress Joanna Lumley Calls For Rationing and Social Climate Credits

Joanna Lumley, whose glamorous high flying lifestyle includes long holidays in Bhutan, the Swiss Alps, and a trip on the Trans Siberian Railway, wants...