Friday, July 1, 2022
HomeClimate411How epidemiologists try to fool us with flawed statistical practices

How epidemiologists try to fool us with flawed statistical practices

-

We have just completed a study for the National Association of Scholars [1] that took a deep dive looking at flawed statistical practices used in the field of environmental epidemiology. The study focused on air quality−health effect claims; more specifically PM2.5−health effect claims. However, the flawed practices apply to all aspects of risk factor−chronic disease research. The study also looked at how government bureaucrats use these claims to skew policy in favor of PM2.5 regulation and their own positions.

- Advertisment -

Related Articles

Kerry the Climate Czar?

What else is there to say?

And The Winner Is, Germany!

A prolonged period of unfavorable weather (calm and overcast) could cause a serious energy crunch to hit one or both of Germany or the...

Claim: Data Exists Showing Polar Bear Body Condition Improves Over Summer On Sea Ice

I would seriously like to know which paper or papers this data appears in but of course, he doesn’t provide that information. Instead, it’s...