Sunday, September 26, 2021
Home Climate411 Peter Ridd: It’s the science that’s rotten, not the Great Barrier Reef

Peter Ridd: It’s the science that’s rotten, not the Great Barrier Reef

-

Sixty years ago, when these cycles of death and destruction were first being discovered by scientists, it was legitimate to be concerned about whether they were unnatural. But there is now abundant evidence, almost totally ignored by the International Union for Conservation of Nature, that the reef is fine. The coral always recovers vigorously after major mortality events. Coral remains abundant on all 3000 reefs. The amount of coral, while fluctuating dramatically from year to year, is about the same today as when records began in the 1980s. The coral growth rates have not declined — if anything they have increased, as would be expected from the slight increase in temperature over the past century. Corals like it hot and grow faster in warmer water.

- Advertisment -

Related Articles

Green Energy Companies Fold

The whole business model of these sort of companies has been a scam from the start, pretending to supply renewable electricity to gullible consumers....

Lucy Is Going to Space!

Lucy is slated to launch in October 2021 and, with boosts from Earth's gravity, will complete a 12-year journey to eight different asteroids — a...

New Evidence That Humans Populated the Americas During the Last Glacial Maximum

Guest “another paradigm bites the dust” by David Middleton For quite some time it has been “settled science” that humans migrated into the Americas...