Friday, January 21, 2022
HomeClimate411Peter Ridd: It’s the science that’s rotten, not the Great Barrier Reef

Peter Ridd: It’s the science that’s rotten, not the Great Barrier Reef

-

Sixty years ago, when these cycles of death and destruction were first being discovered by scientists, it was legitimate to be concerned about whether they were unnatural. But there is now abundant evidence, almost totally ignored by the International Union for Conservation of Nature, that the reef is fine. The coral always recovers vigorously after major mortality events. Coral remains abundant on all 3000 reefs. The amount of coral, while fluctuating dramatically from year to year, is about the same today as when records began in the 1980s. The coral growth rates have not declined — if anything they have increased, as would be expected from the slight increase in temperature over the past century. Corals like it hot and grow faster in warmer water.

- Advertisment -

Related Articles

Attenborough fibbed about hundreds of dead walrus because he wanted what the WEF wants

As I point out in my new book, Fallen Icon, David Attenborough devised a three year campaign on the falsehood that hundreds of Russian walrus...

Decarbonisation tech instantly converts CO2 to solid carbon

As the bubbles move through the liquid metal, the gas molecule splits up to form flakes of solid carbon, with the reaction taking just...

To Shrink or not to Shrink, That is the Question.

BOTTOM LINE: in the very near future, USGS will probably publish data indicating GNP's glaciers are steadily melting, in line with the climate-change theory;...