Saturday, January 28, 2023
HomeMiddle Column'Have More Kids. It's Good For the Planet'

‘Have More Kids. It’s Good For the Planet’

-

What can we do? Well, Rieder says, “Here’s a provocative thought: Maybe we should protect our kids by not having them.”

The idea that we should have fewer children to save the planet hasn’t been provocative in about 50 years. It would take these students five minutes of Googling to understand that doomsayers have been ignoring human nature and ingenuity since the 18th century, at least.

They might read about Paul Ehrlich and our “science czar” John Holdren, who co-authored a 1977 book suggesting mass sterilizations and forced abortions to save the world. (We’re decades past the expiration date.); or about Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who not long said that she always assumed Roe v. Wade was “about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.” Did she mean poor people? Did she mean people who recklessly use air conditioners? It’s still a mystery.

- Advertisment -

Related Articles

NYT: Bomb Cyclone? Or Just Windy with a Chance of Hyperbole?

Wouldn't it be a tragedy if journalistic weather hyperbole got so bad, people started ignoring all the climate change hype? The post NYT: Bomb Cyclone?...

Could Growing Hemp Earn Carbon Credits?

According to the BBC, skilled hemp growers are looking to make money selling their product to the construction industry. The post Could Growing Hemp Earn...

Friday Funny: Long Term Career Plan Before Climate Apocalypse Hits

Give me your phone The post Friday Funny: Long Term Career Plan Before Climate Apocalypse Hits first appeared on Watts Up With That?.