Wednesday, May 18, 2022
HomeMiddle Column'Have More Kids. It's Good For the Planet'

‘Have More Kids. It’s Good For the Planet’

-

What can we do? Well, Rieder says, “Here’s a provocative thought: Maybe we should protect our kids by not having them.”

The idea that we should have fewer children to save the planet hasn’t been provocative in about 50 years. It would take these students five minutes of Googling to understand that doomsayers have been ignoring human nature and ingenuity since the 18th century, at least.

They might read about Paul Ehrlich and our “science czar” John Holdren, who co-authored a 1977 book suggesting mass sterilizations and forced abortions to save the world. (We’re decades past the expiration date.); or about Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who not long said that she always assumed Roe v. Wade was “about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.” Did she mean poor people? Did she mean people who recklessly use air conditioners? It’s still a mystery.

- Advertisment -

Related Articles

Air Conditioning a Human Right… Because Climate Change?

Guest “Goods and services aren’t rights” by David Middleton HEALTH & FITNESS | MAY 16, 2022 2:29 PMWhy Air Conditioning Should Be a Universal...

The ESG Community Lacks an Understanding of What Crude Oil is Used For

Products from crude oil are the foundation of modern society and few consumers are willing to give up those benefits. Access to inexpensive, abundant...

Can California Really Achieve 85% Carbon-Free Electricity By 2030?

So the message to Californians is, invest some hundreds of billions of dollars of taxpayer and ratepayer money over the next eight years in...