Analysis: Top Ten Reasons Washington Should Not Impose New Global Warming Laws or Regulations
Pentagon wrestles with false climate predictions as military funds shifted to green agenda
Weather Channel Co-Founder John Coleman: ‘Yes the trace gas CO2, invisible, tasteless, non pollutant, essential to life, continues to increase. Temps don’t!’
Yes the trace gas CO2, invisible, tasteless, non pollutant, essential to life, continues to increase. Temps don’t! http://twitter.com/JohnColemanMRWX/status/473276593503105024/photo/1
https://twitter.com/JohnColemanMRWX/status/473276593503105024…
Meteorologist Joe Bastardi on declining global temps: ‘Has the admin, the EPA or anyone that can read a chart actually looked at what global temps are now doing?’
Has the admin, the EPA or anyone that can read a chart actually looked at what global temps are now doing? http://twitter.com/BigJoeBastardi/status/473276469977034752/photo/1
https://twitter.com/BigJoeBastardi/status/473276469977034752…
New York Times: Obama is taking the ‘strongest action ever taken by the U.S. government to fight climate change’
Claim: ‘By January 2015, Obama’s CO2 rules will have cut more Democrats from Senate than CO2 from the atmosphere’
By January 2015, Obama’s CO2 rules will have cut more Democrats from Senate than CO2 from the atmosphere.
Most important issue ever? – White House on Dems opposing EPA climate rules: ‘We don’t have a problem with it’
Most important issue ever? – White House on Dems opposing #climate rules: “we don’t have a problem with it” http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0EC13420140601?irpc=932
WaPo’s Juliet Eilperin: ‘There’s 4 ways of meeting the new EPA climate target: energy efficiency, fuel switching, renewables and moving energy use to off-peak hours’
There’s 4 ways of meeting the new EPA climate target: energy efficiency, fuel switching, renewables and moving energy use to off-peak hours.
Reboot UN climate talks: UN climate chief Christiana Figueres praises new Obama CO2 regulations: Sends ‘a good signal to nations everywhere’ that America is serious about dealing with the threat of climate change
EPA regulations on CO2 will accomplish nothing for climate or public health: Obama using ‘diversionary tactic to conflate CO2 with the actual ‘carbon pollution’ of atmospheric particulate matter, to deflect criticism from Obama’s draconian CO2 proposals’
EPA regulations on CO2 will accomplish nothing for climate or public health
http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2014/06/epa-regulations-on-co2-will-accomplish.html
In his address from a children’s hospital, Obama said that his upcoming onerous, unnecessary EPA regulations on the essential, trace gas CO2 are for – wait for it – the children, alleging disingenuous co-benefits of reduced asthma attacks and heart attacks:
“in just the first year that these [CO2] standards go into effect, up to 100,000 asthma attacks and 2,100 heart attacks will be avoided — and those numbers will go up from there.”
This was a diversionary tactic to conflate CO2 with the actual “carbon pollution” of atmospheric particulate matter, to deflect criticism from Obama’s draconian CO2 proposals that will have no effect on climate. Carbon dioxide levels in each breath humans exhale are more than 100 times higher than levels in the environment, and have nothing to do with asthma or heart attacks [which even the EPA* admits].
Particulate matter has been linked by EPA-sponsored research to asthma and heart attacks, although the data is controversial. However, even if particulate matter is related to asthma, existing clean air laws on the books have already reduced particulate matter to levels far below the national standards set by the EPA, as shown in the graphs below.
For particulate matter of 2.5 nm size, existing clean air regulations reduced national levels from 2000-2012 by 33% to more than one standard deviation below the national standards set by the EPA.
For particulate matter of 10 nm size, existing clean air regulations reduced national levels from 1990-2012 by 39% to more than two standard deviations below the national standards set by the EPA.
It is clear that existing regulations on particulate matter have already cleaned up the particulate emissions that matter for public health, and that adding Obama’s unnecessary and expensive regulations on CO2 will not have any effect on public health or climate, at great harm to the economy.
Particulate matter data from the EPA:
National Trends in Particulate Matter Levels
Using a nationwide network of monitoring sites, EPA has developed ambient air quality trends for particle pollution, also called Particulate Matter (PM). Under the Clean Air Act, EPA sets and reviews national air quality standards for PM. Air quality monitors measure concentrations of PM throughout the country. EPA, state, tribal and local agencies use that data to ensure that PM in the air is at levels that protect …