Friday, October 22, 2021
Home Middle Column Gore Promotes Carbon Tax in latest '24 Hours of Reality' -- Scientists...

Gore Promotes Carbon Tax in latest ’24 Hours of Reality’ — Scientists Pan Gore’s climate claims

-

[Also see: New Study: ’2013 ranks as one of the least extreme U.S. weather years ever’– Many bad weather events at ‘historically low levels’

Gore still warning of ‘extreme’ weather, ‘increasing storms’ and ‘other extreme events’]

#

UpdateAl Gore admits flying on private jets: ‘I sometimes have to charter’

Gore: ‘I use only carbon-free electricity’

Al Gore says climate change ‘deniers’ are ‘just nuts’

#

COUNTERING THE MISINFORMATION OF AL GORE’S “24 HOURS OF REALITY: THE COST OF CARBON”
October 22, 2013: Former U.S. Vice President Al Gore’s 24 Hours of Reality: The Cost of Carbon runs from 2 pm EDT, Tuesday October 22, 2013 to 2 pm EDT, Wednesday, October 23, 2013.Mr. Gore bases his activism on several key points, all of which are either wrong or unknown. The red text in the boxes below summarizes positions taken by Mr. Gore. The corrections of ICSC scientists follow each box.

1 – Mr. Gore tells us that we face a global crisis of unprecedented proportions. “We’re dumping 90 million tons of heat trapping carbon pollution [sic] into the atmosphere every 24 hours and it’s altering our climate,” said Gore.

ICSC scientists respond:

Bob Carter, PhD, Former Head of the School of Earth Sciences at James Cook University, Queensland, Australia, ICSC Chief Science Advisor: “We do indeed [“face a global crisis of unprecedented proportions”], and that crisis is the misrepresentation of science by political activists like Mr. Al Gore. As a result, western nations are squandering money on ineffectual anti-carbon dioxide measures, and neglecting their duty to care for their citizens by not tackling the genuine hazards that accompany natural climate events and change.”

Madhav L. Khandekar, PhD, consultant meteorologist, (former) Research Scientist, Environment Canada, Editor “Climate Research” (03-05), Editorial Board Member “Natural Hazards, IPCC Expert Reviewer 2007, Unionville, Ontario, Canada: “We DO NOT face a global crisis! This is an exaggeration! Look at India and China, two countries have total population of over 2.5 billion, yet they are doing well, grain yields have increased and people [the] world-over are living longer and healthier today than they were, say, fifty years ago!“

Tim Ball, PhD, Environmental consultant and former climatology professor, University of Winnipeg (founded the Rupertsland Research Centre).  Now residing in Victoria, British Columbia, Canada: “90 million tons is a very crude estimate produced by the IPCC and within the error of the estimate of CO2 from at least two natural sources. The only place it is altering our climate is in the compute remodels of the IPCC. They are programmed so that an increase in CO2 causes a temperature increase. In every record for any time period, temperature increases before CO2 – the fundamental assumption to his claim is absolutely wrong.”

Ian D. Clark, PhD, Professor (isotope hydrogeology and paleoclimatology), Dept. of Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada:“In fact, much of the rise in CO2 is attributed to increased respiration of the biosphere. Our carbon emissions are minor compared to this natural cycling of carbon. There is absolutely no empirical scientific evidence for the increase in CO2 having affected climate.”


2 – Mr. Gore often talks about “dirty energy” causing “dirty weather” (he means extreme weather) which he says is a result of what he calls our “carbon pollution” emissions. 

ICSC scientists respond:

Professor Ian D. Clark: “Actually, our energy systems have never been cleaner, and continue to improve. The idea that we are responsible for extreme weather, let alone that we can change weather patterns is preposterous. Extreme weather is not new, it is natural. For any extreme event we have now, there is precedence in the recent past or distant past. The only difference between past events and now is our greatly expanded population and development of infrastructure that increases impact of extreme weather. The recent events Gore calls “dirty weather” come at a time when the planet has stopped warming. Only the rhetoric is increasing.”

Professor Bob Carter: “Dirty weather is part and parcel of living on planet Earth.”

Dr. Tim Ball: “By ‘carbon pollution’, Mr. Gore is talking about carbon dioxide (CO2), which is anything but pollution. He is using public relations jargon not scientific terminology. CO2 is a natural gas essential to plants and thereby to life on Earth. It is at the lowest atmospheric level in at least 300 million years and only causes “warming”, “change” and “disruptions” in the manipulated computer models cited by the IPCC. A real “dirty energy” is biofuels, because it takes food right off poor people’s plates and makes the cost of all their food more expensive.”

Dr. Madhav L. Khandekar: “With clean air technology initiatives, we are able to use much cleaner energy today than say 25 years ago. We will need energy always so we must use cheap energy like oil, natural gas and clean coal!”


3 – Mr. Gore says that today’s weather is unprecedented and different to what we would normally experience were humans not emitting carbon dioxide.

ICSC scientists respond:

Dr. Tim Ball: “The weather changes all the time as anyone who studies weather history knows. It is not now more extreme and the changes are well within natural variability. It is perfectly normal. Mr. Gore’s stance only serves to underscore his ignorance of climate and climate history. How does he explain all the previous climate variability and severe weather?””

Professor Ian D. Clark: “Read any chronicles of past weather, from modern to biblical times. Floods, droughts, heat waves are not new.”

Professor Bob Carter: “The IPCC, NIPCC and scores of independent scientists have investigated whether there is anything unusual about today’s weather. None of the scientists involved has been able to show that the intensity or frequency of modern weather extremes exceeds that of the natural climate events that have occurred throughout geological history. Of course unusual, or damaging, weather events get mentioned in the news media, for reporting such hazards is one of their most important functions.”

Dr. Madhav L. Khandekar: “Weather outside is NO more different than say fifty years ago! It is our perception that has changed. Fifty years ago, we had as many heat waves, floods, droughts as we have today, we just did NOT pay much attention then. In fact, heat waves were more common in the 1920s and 1930s in North America. There were many well-known meteorologists then like J. Bjerknes and Eric Palmen who knew that earth’s climate can become warmer or colder, so why worry now? Weather today in south Asia, where 3/4 of humanity lives today has NOT changed much in last fifty years! Monsoon droughts/foods always occurred before and will occur in future!” ”

Editor’s note: The NOAA National Climatic Data Center Website shows that virtually all state-wide records for the United States were set decades in the past. Other countries’ data center Websites shows similar trends.


4 – Mr. Gore and his associates tell us that “The burning of dirty energy is raising our planet’s temperatures” (from the video on “The Cost of Carbon” here mounted on http://climaterealityproject.org/ by The Climate Reality Project).

ICSC scientists respond:

Dr. Madhav L. Khandekar: “The earth’s climate has NOT warmed in 17 years per UK Met Office! We may not see warming of the climate by more than 0.5C in next 50 to 100 years.”

While opposing the dangerous CO2-driven global warming theory, Dr. Tim Ball also points out: “warm is better than cold and the weather has been more damaging and threatening to people in the past [when it was cold].

Editor’s note: ALL global temperature measurements based on ALL measurements, ground-based and satellite, show this 17 year pause in warming, a plateau that is expected to last until at least 2018, according to the UK Met Office. For the latest in such temperature calculations see http://www.climate4you.com.


5 – Mr. Gore often tells the public that sea levels are rising dangerously at a rate that has accelerated with increasing human carbon dioxide emissions, thereby threatening small islands and coastal communities.

ICSC scientists respond:

Nils-Axel Mörner, PhD (Sea Level Changes and climate), Emeritus Professor of Paleogeophysics & Geodynamics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden explains that this is nonsense. See his write-up about this topic here.

ICSC Executive Director Tom Harris discussed the recent claim that Kiribati is sinking here.

6 – Mr. Gore presents alternative energy such as wind and solar power as the “solution” to our supposed climate woes.

ICSC scientists respond:

Professor Ian D. Clark: “The call for “clean” energy inadvertently promotes some of the more polluting schemes [e.g. biofuels]. Even wind, for example, the only significant renewable with any shade of green to it, is burdened with the need for thermal (coal) backup power and it too creates sound and visual pollution such that no one wants them nearby.”

Dr. Tim Ball: “Alternate energies are not sustainable and only exist with government subsidies. Countries, like most European countries have tried and are abandoning alternate energies.”

Dr. Madhav L. Khandekar: “With lots of natural gas in U.S. we can use cleaner energy over next 25 to 50 years. Wind energy is too expensive and NOT reliable. Solar energy can be improved to become cheaper & reliable, but it may take a long time.”

Editor’s note: Wind power causes high levels of bird and bat mortality, and other ecological problems. Rural landowners and conservation organizations across the worldare increasingly opposing wind farm development. Large solar plant construction results in endangered species habitat loss, desert ecosystem disruption and change in local weather patterns. There is a serious loss of biodiversity where monoculture biofuel plantations are built.

7 – Mr. Gore has said that the climate crisis will provide “opportunity as well as danger.”

 

 

ICSC scientists respond:

Professor Bob Carter: “Yes. And the opportunity is to discontinue futile wastage of money on policies like the Kyoto anti-carbon dioxide protocol, and to introduce a cost-effective policy of preparation for, and adaptation to, all dangerous climate-related events. The money saved will run into hundreds of billions of dollars, and can be used to provide sanitation, clean drinking water and food to underprivileged persons and nations.”

Dr. Tim Ball: “What opportunity? To falsify the record to make false claims and then use the material for political and financial gain. It appears nobody has made more money from exploiting carbon credits than Al Gore.  He fits Mencken’s comment that. “The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.””

Dr. Madhav L. Khandekar: “Yes, we have opportunities to develop clean technology, like clean coal, provide good housing for all people, provide good education so they will face future extreme weather more effectively. [There is] NO need to reduce atmospheric CO2! It will do NOTHING!”


8 – Mr. Gore often speaks about misinformation coming from those he labels “deniers”. Mr. Gore said, “The misinformation includes messaging that it’s not happening, that we can’t solve it, that we can’t afford to act. However, together, with your help and the full force of our 21st century technology and media, we can stop the misinformation…” (ref. 2012 24 Hours of Reality)

ICSC scientists respond:

Professor Ian D. Clark: “This term [denier], which alludes to the Holocaust deniers, is a great insult to many alive today. It is contrary to science to defame researchers with opposing evidence. Science is advanced by the discourse between differing views. Consensus science is an oxymoron.”

Professor Bob Carter: “The best way to fight the climate deniers would be to close down the IPCC, for it is IPCC scientists who remain in denial as to the natural cause of modern climate events. The real misinformation is coming from persons such as David Suzuki, Al Gore and other IPCC supporters. The solution lies with the mainstream media, who should cease to report the ceaseless propaganda that emanates from these people about global warming.”

Dr. Tim Ball: “Use of the term “denier” is deliberate and part of the public relations campaign Gore uses all the time. It brings with it the Holocaust connotation. It’s ironic and wrong because, although it omits the word “Change”, it is the opposite of what is happening. Those called climate change deniers have careers spent trying to educate people of the extent the climate changes naturally – they are anything but deniers. The real deniers are people like Gore as the commentary and arguments made by him above prove. The crisis that has to be understood and stopped is the false crisis Gore perpetuates fro his own profit, both political and economic.”

Dr. Madhav L. Khandekar: “Once again, I see NO CLIMATE CRISIS! This is an exaggerated view of climate alarmists! Humans can live happily by becoming more technologically prepared, making good use of available fossil and other energy sources and be prepared to cope with future climate impacts, which will be NO different than what we witnessed 50 or 100 years ago! There are many scientists today who are questioning the IPCC science! Climate has changed due to natural climate variability NOT due to human-added CO2! “

#

Al Gore’s “24 Hours of Reality” is backwards, according to the International Climate Science Coalition

See here for ICSC scientists’ corrections of Mr. Gore. 

OTTAWA, Oct. 22, 2013 /CNW/ – “Al Gore’s approach in 24 Hours of Reality: The Cost of Carbon is backwards,” saidTom Harris, executive director of the International Climate Science Coalition (ICSC). “Instead of focusing on helping vulnerable people prepare for and adapt to climate change in the present, Gore concentrates on trying to stop climate change that may happen decades in the future.”

New Zealand-based Terry Dunleavy, ICSC founding chairman and strategic advisor added, “According to the Climate Policy Initiative, only 5% of the $97 billion spent across the world each year on climate finance goes to helping people cope with climate change today. The rest goes to trying to stop global warming forecast by flawed computer simulations. Valuing the lives of people yet to be born more than those suffering now is immoral, especially since we don’t know the future of climate change.”

ICSC Energy Issues Advisor Bryan Leyland of New Zealand said, “Gore says we must focus on reality. Reality says that the world has not warmed for the last 17 years even as carbon dioxide, the gas Gore blames for climate disruption, has risen 8%. Reality says that we are near a record low for hurricanes, and other extreme weather is not generally increasing in severity or frequency.”

Leyland concluded, “ICSC scientists explain here that Gore’s claims about science are either wrong or unknown.”

SOURCE International Climate Science Coalition

 For further information:To arrange interviews with ICSC participants (listed here), contact:  

Tom Harris, Executive Director, ICSC
Ottawa, Canada
Email: [email protected] 
Phone: 613-728-9200
http://www.climatescienceinternational.org/ 

#

Related Links: 

Meteorologist Dr. Ryan Maue on Gore’s Web Show: ‘Bizarre rehearsed talk-show format going on w/Al Gore. 100% of content is about instituting carbon tax. Nothing else’

Flashback 2011: Gore’s last show did not go over so well with his fellow warmists: Flashback 2011: Greens Give Gore 2 Thumbs Down: Gore’s climate ‘reality’ show faces strongly negative reviews – Environmental allies distance themselves from Gore: ‘I actually avoided the Goreathon…Gore is now as much a hindrance as a help on climate…my heart immediately sank..most boring talk on climate, ever’

Gore Unhinged! Loses it on skeptical claims: ‘It may be volcanoes.’ Bullshit! ‘It may be sun spots.’ Bullshit! ‘It’s not getting warmer.’ Bullshit!’ — Climate Depot Responds! — Climate Depot’s Point-By-Point Rebuttal to Gore’s Highbrow Scientific Arguments

AlGorjeera — It’s Official: Al Gore is by far the most lavishly funded fossil fuel player in the global warming debate today — ‘Gore’s massive personal cash influx from oil-backed Al Jazeera makes him by far the most lavishly funded fossil fuel player in the global warming debate today. Will the media now accurately label Gore an industry funded activist every time they report on him?’

Read All About it: Al Gore’s ‘melting’ Antarctic claims refuted by reality — Climate Depot’s A-Z Global Warming Report counters Gore — Poor Al: Antarctica has been cooling and sea ice extent has been at or near record extent in past few summers’

Flashback April 2009: Democrats Refuse to Allow Skeptic to Testify Alongside Gore At Congressional Hearing

Flashback: Gore: U.S. Climate Bill Will Help Bring About ‘Global Governance’

Flashback 2007: GORE REFUSES TO TAKE PERSONAL ENERGY ETHICS PLEDGE

Flashback: The O’Reilly Factor features Climate Depot on Gore’s path to become the first ‘Carbon Billionaire’

3 COMMENTS

  1. New
    Discovery: NASA Study Proves Carbon Dioxide Cools Atmosphere

    Written by H. Schreuder & J. O’Sullivan

    A
    recent NASA
    report throws
    the space agency into conflict with climatologists after new NASA
    measurements prove that carbon dioxide acts as a coolant in Earth’s
    atmosphere.

    NASA’s
    Langley Research Center has collated data proving that “greenhouse
    gases” actually block no less than 95 percent of harmful solar rays
    from our planet, thus reducing the heating impact of the sun. The
    data was collected by Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband
    Emission Radiometry, (or SABER). SABER monitors infrared emissions
    from Earth’s upper atmosphere, in particular from carbon dioxide
    (CO2) and nitric oxide (NO), two substances thought to be playing a
    key role in the energy balance of air hundreds of miles above our
    planet’s surface.

    NASA’s
    Langley Research Center instruments show that the thermosphere not
    only received a whopping 26 billion kilowatt hours of energy from the
    sun during a recent burst of solar activity, but that the upper
    atmospheric carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide molecules sent as much
    as 95% of that straight back out into space.

    The
    shock revelation starkly contradicts the core proposition of the
    so-called greenhouse gas theory which claims that more CO2 means more
    warming for our planet. However, this compelling new NASA data more
    likely serves as the final nail in the junk science global warming
    coffin and a huge embarrassment for NASA’s chief climatologist, Dr
    James Hansen over at NASA’s GISS.

    Already,
    leading international climatologists have been in full retreat after
    having to concede there has been no global warming for 16 years
    despite levels of atmopheric CO2 rising almost 40 percent in recent
    decades. The new SABER data now forms part of a real world double
    whammy against climatologists’ computer models that have always been
    programmed to show CO2 as a warming gas.

    As
    NASA’s SABER team at Langley admits:

    “This
    is a new frontier in the sun-Earth connection,” says associate
    principal investigator Martin
    Mlynczak, “and the data we’re collecting are unprecedented.”

    Over
    at Principia Scientific International (PSI) greenhouse gas effect
    (GHE) critic, Alan Siddons is hailing the findings. Siddons and his
    colleagues have been winning support from hundreds of independent
    scientists for their GHE studies carried out over the last seven
    years. PSI has proved that the numbers fed into computer models by
    Hansen and others were based on a faulty interpretation of the laws
    of thermodynamics. PSI also recently uncovered long overlooked
    evidence from the American Meteorological Society (AMS) that shows it
    was widely known the GHE was discredited prior to 1951. [1]

    Pointedly,
    a much-trumpeted new book released this month by Rupert
    Darwall claims to help expose the back story of how the junk GHE
    theory was conveniently resuscitated
    in the 1980’s by
    James Hansen and others to serve an environmental policy agenda at
    that time. [2]

    As
    the SABER research report states:

    A recent flurry of
    eruptions on the sun did more than spark pretty auroras around the
    poles. NASA-funded researchers say the solar storms of March
    8th
    through 10th
    dumped enough
    energy in Earth’s upper atmosphere to power every residence in New
    York City for
    two years.

    “This was the biggest
    dose of heat we’ve received from a solar storm since 2005,” says
    Martin Mlynczak of NASA Langley Research Center. “It was a
    big event, and shows how solar activity can directly affect our
    planet.”

    As
    PSI’s own space scientists have confirmed, as solar energy penetrates
    deeper into our atmosphere, even more of its energy will end up being
    sent straight back out to space, thus preventing it heating up the
    surface of our earth. The NASA Langley Research Center report agrees
    with PSI by admitting:

    “Carbon
    dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats,” explains James
    Russell of Hampton University, SABER’s principal investigator.
    “When the upper atmosphere (or ‘thermosphere’) heats up, these
    molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space.”

    To
    those independent scientists and engineers at Principia Scientific
    International this is not news. The “natural thermostat” effect
    of CO2 has long been known by applied scientists and engineers how
    have exploited it’s remarkable properties in the manufacturer of
    refrigerators and air conditioning systems. The fledgling independent
    science body has repeatedly shown in it’s openly peer reviewed papers
    that atmospheric carbon dioxide does not cause global warming nor
    climate change.

    Some
    diehard climate alarmists will still say that in the lower atmosphere
    the action of carbon dioxide is reversed, but there is no actual
    proof of this at all. PSI suggests it is time for the SABER team to
    have a word with James Hansen.

    ———————-

    [1] Brooks,
    C.E.P. (1951). “Geological and Historical Aspects of Climatic
    Change.” InCompendium
    of Meteorology,
    edited by Thomas F. Malone, pp. 1004-18 (at 1016). Boston: American
    Meteorological Association. It shows the American Meteorological
    Society had refuted the concept of a GHE in 1951 in itsCompendium
    of Meteorology.
    They stated that the idea that CO2could alter the climate “was
    never widely accepted and was abandoned when it was found that all
    the long-wave radiation [that would be] absorbed by CO2is [already]
    absorbed by water vapor.”

    [2]
    Darwall, R., ‘The
    Age of Global Warming: A History,’ (March, 2013), Quartet Books,
    London.

- Advertisment -

Related Articles

Russian President Putin Another COP26 No Show

Perhaps President Putin is too busy arranging more fossil fuel supplies for energy starved Britain, Europe and China?

South Pole’s Winter Weather Record

The Antarctic interior recorded its coldest April-to-September this year since records began in 1957. According to the US National Snow and Ice Data Centre...

“Damage and Destroy” Climate Zealots’ Final Solution?

Andreas Malm claims that property destruction is necessary for the defense of the planet and of humanity. On what moral basis, though, could he object...