Home Middle Column Prof. Roger Pielke Jr.: 'An argument that mitigation of ghgs makes sense... Middle Column Prof. Roger Pielke Jr.: ‘An argument that mitigation of ghgs makes sense in terms of decreasing the future costs of extreme events is not a strong one’ By Marc Morano - February 12, 2013 185 0 Share Facebook Twitter WhatsApp VK Digg Tagsastrologyazeconomicsstern Facebook Twitter WhatsApp VK Digg Previous articleWashington Post On Climate: Obama Must ‘Discuss The Science, The Real Reason To Cut Carbon Emissions’Next articleClimate Scientist Dr. Fred Singer: ‘My belief is the global warming scare will be over in the matter of a decade or so’ Marc Morano - Advertisment - Search Related Articles Weather Lulls: Germany Forced To Burn 20% More Coal, The Very Energy Source That’s To Be Phased Out Climate411 The energy source that Germany moves to shut down, rescued the country from widespread blackouts in 2021. Read more The Wire Criticises the “Deep Adaptation” Climate Doomsday Narrative Climate411 "Deep Adaption" appears to be a group of climate doomsday depressives whose message is too much even for other believers. Read more Column: Enthusiastic Idiocy vs. Infrastructure Optimization – Two Strategies for an Energy Transition Climate411 The COP26 model, the one built around a future temperature, is going nowhere, as was proven these past few weeks. Neither enthusiasm nor perceived... Read more
