Report: UN IPCC AR5 draft leaked, contains game-changing admission of enhanced solar forcing
Many empirical relationships have been reported between GCR or cosmogenic isotope archives and some aspects of the climate system (e.g., Bond et al., 2001; Dengel et al., 2009; Ram and Stolz, 1999). The forcing from changes in total solar irradiance alone does not seem to account for these observations, implying the existence of an amplifying mechanism such as the hypothesized GCR-cloud link. We focus here on observed relationships between GCR and aerosol and cloud properties.”
…
‘IPCC was not right’: Warmists Frame & Stone’s claims ignore main IPCC predictions — ‘Why did Nature publish this strawman letter? ‘Effort in selective focus, logical fallacies, & circular reasoning’
Frame and Stone themselves say the IPCC models didn’t include important forcings, and may have been “right” by accident. Why did Nature publish this strawman letter? It’s an award-winning effort in selective focus, logical fallacies, and circular reasoning to be sure, but does it advance our understanding of the natural world? Not so. Frame and Stone have produced a Letter to Nature saying that 3 is a lot like 6 (they are both larger than zero). If you ignore the Summary for Policymakers, pick a line […]Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
…