Thursday, June 24, 2021
Home Middle Column Fred Pearce: 'Why Are Environmentalists Taking Anti-Science Positions? On issues ranging from...

Fred Pearce: ‘Why Are Environmentalists Taking Anti-Science Positions? On issues ranging from genetically modified crops to nuclear power…’

-

Pearce: Three current issues suggest that the risks of myopic adherence to ideology over rational debate are real: genetically modified (GM) crops, nuclear power, and shale gas development. The conventional green position is that we should be opposed to all three. Yet the voices of those with genuine environmental credentials, but who take a different view, are being drowned out by sometimes abusive and irrational argument.

In each instance, the issue is not so much which side environmentalists should be on, but rather the mind-set behind those positions and the tactics adopted to make the case. The wider political danger is that by taking anti-scientific positions, environmentalists end up helping the anti-environmental sirens of the new right.

- Advertisment -

Related Articles

How to compare today to the past

By Andy May In the last post, I discussed the problems comparing modern instrumental global or hemispheric average temperatures to the past. Ocean temperature...

UK Government Funded Climate Think Tank Demands Peak Cars by 2030

According to the Institute of Public Policy Research, even Electric Vehicles are not green enough to permit unfettered growth in car ownership.

Music to Soothe the Climate Denial Away?

Climate activist Naomi Oreskes now has her own theme song, after the University of Utah commissioned a musician to compose a song about climate...