HomeMiddle ColumnWarmists Lament: Cap-and-dividend: the worst possible way to regulate GHG emissions. Why... Middle Column Warmists Lament: Cap-and-dividend: the worst possible way to regulate GHG emissions. Why not? By Marc Morano - May 11, 2010 181 0 Share Facebook Twitter WhatsApp VK Digg Tagscapandtrade Facebook Twitter WhatsApp VK Digg Previous articleCongressman Says Climate Science Should Be Simplified to ‘Sixth Grade Level’ Because Americans ‘Don’t Get’ ItNext articleUN warning: “Massive loss in life-sustaining natural environments likely to deepen to point of being irreversible after global targets to cut the decline by this year were missed’ Marc Morano - Advertisment - Search Related Articles La Nina is Not Going Away. What Does This Mean for This Summer’s Weather? Climate411 But first, the bottom line:  the summer effects of La Nina are modest, but will push the western side of our region towards cooler... Read more WUWT Contest Runner Up, Professional: NASA Knew Better #NASA_Knew Climate411 The minor incremental static warming effect from slowly increasing concentrations of GHGs is readily overwhelmed by the performance of the heat engine. Read more Weekly Climate and Energy News Roundup #504 Climate411 Quote of the Week: “It is the facts that matter, not the proofs. Physics can progress without the proofs, but we can’t go on... Read more
