Watch: Morano on Fox News on EPA Calling Skeptics NOT ‘Normal’: It’s abnormal to believe symbolic regs by U.S. govt would impact future extreme storms’

Fox News Channel – ‘Your World’ with Neil Cavuto – June 24, 2015 

https://youtube.com/watch?v=pZrEqpe-AA8

EPA Chief Suggests ‘Climate Deniers’ Are not normal human beings

Full Video of EPA Chief’s remarks here:

Climate Depot Publisher Marc Morano: “EPA chief Gina McCarthy wants conformity. They do not like dissent. That’s why warmists label and smear. That is why we have Sen. Whitehouse out there who wants to prosecute skeptics under RICO statutes. See: Democrat Sen. Whitehouse: Use RICO Laws to Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics

We have professors saying we need to be treated that what skeptics believe needs to be treated. See: Meet Prof. Kari Norgaard, the woman who wants to ‘treat’ global warming skeptics  & UK Daily Mail: ‘If you don’t believe in climate change you must be sick’: Oregon prof. Kari Norgaard likens skepticism to racism

We have people calling for Nuremberg style trials for global warming skeptics. See: Flashback 2006: GRIST’S ROBERTS CALLED FOR NUREMBERG-STYLE TRIALS FOR GLOBAL WARMING SKEPTICS

We have Nobel prize winning scientists and former UN scientist turning against the consensus. See: Nobel Prize Winning Physicist Ivar Giaever: ‘Is climate change pseudoscience?…the answer is: absolutely’ — Derides global warming as a ‘religion’ & UN Scientists Who Have Turned on the UN IPCC & Man-Made Climate Fears — A Climate Depot Flashback Report

What Gina McCarthy is saying is unless you buy the EPA’s vision of a coming climate calamity — unless we act now — you are abnormal. In other words, unless we pay more for energy, the EPA cannot protect us from bad weather. See: Pay climate protection money or else! ‘Inaction on climate change would cost billions’, major EPA study finds

The EPA study she is hyping is a study saying severe storms can be reduced by EPA climate regulations. See: EPA Claims That ‘Global Action’ On Global Warming Will Stop ‘Extreme Weather’ – Flashback 2009: Former EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson: “U.S. action alone will not impact world CO2 levels.”)

You would have to frankly be abnormal to believe that symbolic regulations by the U.S. government would impact future extreme storms and or temperature.

What is the carbon footprint of electroshock therapy? That is the next thing if they are going to treat ‘abnormal’ skeptics.”

Cavuto: “It’s just incredible. That is a nice way to frame it.”

#

Related Links: 

Flashback 2012: Meet Man Who Wants to Engineer a Master Climate Race?! NYU Prof. Matthew Liao: Humans genetically engineered to combat global warming — ‘Pharmacological enhancement’

NYU Bioethicist S. Matthew Liao again suggests ‘voluntarily’ medicating the public and shrinking humans to make them care more about global warming

The Obama administration is demonizing skeptics in every way possible. See: Scientific Cleansing: Obama Interior Secretary Sally Jewell says ‘I hope there are no climate change deniers in the Department of Interior’

Rolling Stone mag. Claims Obama’s pentagon says skeptics are a threat to national security because they are delaying ‘solutions’ to global warming! Forget ISIS, skeptics are greatest threat?! – Rolling Stone: Climate ‘Deniers’ Put ‘National Security at Risk’

2013 Article in Nature suggests ‘high-carbon addictions’ such as using your iPhone can be ‘treated’ the same way as drug addiction

Stay sane by fighting global warming? Psychiatrist claims low-carbon lifestyle can improve mental health

2012: Is Climate Change a Mental Health Emergency? ‘The uncertainty & upheaval caused by erratic weather might cause more Americans to become depressed, anxious and even suicidal’ – ‘The National Wildlife Federation report, based on the conclusions of a high-powered panel of psychiatrists, psychologists, and public-health and climate experts, made some sobering assessments. Two hundred million Americans will be subject to stress because of climate change’

British Journal of Psychiatry: Climate change ‘to harm communities’ psychosocial well-being’ – 2015 – ‘Climate change,’ say the authors, ‘is the largest global health threat of the 21st century and, despite limited empirical evidence, it is expected directly and indirectly to harm communities’ psychosocial well-being.

Claim: Global warming harms mental health…increases risk of ‘post traumatic stress disorder and depression’

‘A planned economic recession’: Global warming prof. Kevin Anderson – who has ‘cut back on showering’ to save planet – asserts economic ‘de-growth’ is needed to fight climate change

Kevin Anderson ‘cuts back on washing and showering’ to fight climate change – Admits at UN climate summit: ‘That is why I smell’ – Defends his call for ‘a planned economic recession’

 

Share:

10 Responses

  1. This is really getting scary…I really think she’d have us locked up if she could. I consider that “denier” label “hate speech”

  2. Well maybe it’s not normal to be a skeptic about the climate warming apocalypse. Because it may be true that a majority of Americans think that we cannot adapt to climate change and therefore have to dismantle our industrial civilization.

    But as Lincoln warned long ago, some of the people will be fooled all of the time.

    Still, a big minority of Americans don’t think climate change is a big threat. So America is nowhere near the point where all of the people have been fooled. And it’s too soon to predict how many will be fooled all of the time by alarmist predictions.

    Being “not-normal” is just being part of that big minority that has not been fooled yet. Among us are people who are hardly ever fooled. You might have known some as kids who did not believe in the Bogeyman or the Devil.

    Like many others, I occupy that space between what skeptics call warmists and what warmists call skeptics. In my opinion, the Modern Warm Period is something to enjoy, not something to worry about.

    I will begin to worry if the Earth starts getting colder in spite of increased CO2.

    If you have not already informed yourself of the history of warm and cold warm periods, I recommend Hubert Lamb’s, Climate History and the Modern World, 2nd edition. Many libraries have it or can borrow it for you. Or you can read chunks of it online.

    https://books.google.lu/books?id=YKaFAgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=h+h+lamb+climate+history+and+the+modern+world&hl=en&sa=X&ei=yuyMVbCOIILWU_DYgZAH&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=h%20h%20lamb%20climate%20history%20and%20the%20modern%20world&f=false

  3. This little man states that he has banged his head against the wall too many times. From the looks of him, I’d say he’s been banging his face against the wall.

  4. Mr. Morano:
    For accuracy opponents of the principle of falsifiability of claims should be labeled as “pseudoscientists” rather than “scientists.” In IPCC AR4 (opening paragraphs) the United Nations opposes falsifiability. Supposedly in the modern era falsifiability has been replaced by peer review. In this way the UN seeks to elevate cooperating pseudoscientists to the level of Gods! The UN must be reformed or abolished else pseudoscientific tyranny will prevail.

Leave a Reply