‘The Real War on Science’ – ‘Left has done far more than the Right to set back progress’
I’ve read the Left’s indictments, including Chris Mooney’s bestseller, The Republican War on Science. I finished it with the same question about this war that I had at the outset: Where are the casualties?
Where are the scientists who lost their jobs or their funding? What vital research has been corrupted or suppressed? What scientific debate has been silenced? Yes, the book reveals that Republican creationists exist, but they don’t affect the biologists or anthropologists studying evolution. Yes, George W. Bush refused federal funding for embryonic stem-cell research, but that hardly put a stop to it (and not much changed after Barack Obama reversed the policy). Mooney rails at scientists and politicians who oppose government policies favored by progressives like himself, but if you’re looking for serious damage to the enterprise of science, he offers only three examples.
All three are in his first chapter, during Mooney’s brief acknowledgment that leftists “here and there” have been guilty of “science abuse.” First, there’s the Left’s opposition to genetically modified foods, which stifled research into what could have been a second Green Revolution to feed Africa. Second, there’s the campaign by animal-rights activists against medical researchers, whose work has already been hampered and would be devastated if the activists succeeded in banning animal experimentation. Third, there’s the resistance in academia to studying the genetic underpinnings of human behavior, which has cut off many social scientists from the recent revolutions in genetics and neuroscience. Each of these abuses is far more significant than anything done by conservatives, and there are plenty of others. The only successful war on science is the one waged by the Left.
The danger from the Left does not arise from stupidity or dishonesty; those failings are bipartisan. Some surveys show that Republicans, particularly libertarians, are more scientifically literate than Democrats, but there’s plenty of ignorance all around. Both sides cherry-pick research and misrepresent evidence to support their agendas. Whoever’s in power, the White House plays politics in appointing advisory commissions and editing the executive summaries of their reports. Scientists of all ideologies exaggerate the importance of their own research and seek results that will bring them more attention and funding.
But two huge threats to science are peculiar to the Left—and they’re getting worse.
The first threat is confirmation bias, the well-documented tendency of people to seek out and accept information that confirms their beliefs …
Wash Post reviews ‘Climate Hustle’: ‘There remains a significant coterie of skeptics, doubters and outright deniers’
…
Warmists explain how to ‘keep the world super safe from global warming’
…Roger Pielke Jr.: ‘Thank You to Rep. Raul Grijalva, Narrative Killer’
http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com/2015/03/a-thank-you-to-rep-raul-grijalva.html?spref=tw…
WaPo: ‘What will happen after people stop ignoring the evidence on climate change’
Washington Post: Man’s Carbon Sins Will Lead To A Great Flood
Washington Post : Man’s Carbon Sins Will Lead To A Great Flood
The U.S. has caused more global warming than any other country. Here’s how the Earth will get its revenge. Last year, we learned what is probably the worst global warming news yet — that we may have irrevocably destabilized the … Continue reading →
— gReader Pro…