Michael Mann claims preventing Keystone pipeline is ‘climatologically necessary’ – Fellow Warmists Disagree
https://twitter.com/tan123/status/429412986659164160
Related Links:
Ezra fact checks Neil Young’s anti-oil sands message.
Neil Young’s hypocritical ethics
Former NASA scientist James Hansen: ‘Climate change is altering people’s lives, right now, from the United States to Africa to the Arctic. It is as clear and present a danger as we’ve ever seen’ — Hansen: ‘What we owe our kids on climate; – ‘This warming is driving an increase in extreme weather, from heat waves and droughts to wildfires and stronger storms (though mistakenly expecting science to instantly document links to specific events misses the forest for the trees).’
Oil sands not a major source of climate change, says IEA economist
Keystone XL Pipeline: “No Material Impact” on U.S. Carbon Dioxide Emissions
IHS CERA Study: Keystone XL will have ”no material impact’ on greenhouse gas emissions – Finds: Keystone XL will have “no material impact” on greenhouse gas emissions. Venezuela will be “the number one beneficiary of a negative decision” on Keystone XL. – Rail is a viable option for transporting Canadian oil sands: “Even if new pipelines lag oil sands growth, rail will fill the gap, as it is doing today.” – “Even if the Keystone XL pipeline does not move forward, we do not expect a material change to oil sands production growth.”