Sunday, February 5, 2023
HomeClimate411Role of Journals and their Editors in Preserving False Research Findings

Role of Journals and their Editors in Preserving False Research Findings

-

The business model of many journals promotes incentives for the author and publisher to work against sound science and interest of the public. Our position is that it is time for the public to view any meta-analysis published in the journal PLOS One as untrustworthy until proven otherwise.

- Advertisment -

Related Articles

The IPCC AR6 Report Erases the Holocene

By Andy May You won’t find much in the IPCC AR6 report on the atmospheric CO2 concentration evolution during the Holocene. They talk a...

Hyping Maximum Daily Temperatures (Part 4)

That data has never been provided and is the origin of the current saga to be resumed on Tuesday through private mediation. The post Hyping...

LA Times Claim that the World Can “quickly phase out all fossil fuels” is Completely Incompetent

After overstating and underestimating the ozone issue science complexity, resolution timeframe and uncertainty issues (while providing no scientific data, etc.) the Times then leaps to proclaim that the...