Monday, October 25, 2021
Home Climate411 Plain English Lost on the High Court of Australia

Plain English Lost on the High Court of Australia

-

Coral reefs can be messy, and so can court cases. And so it is with the case of Peter Ridd, sacked by James Cook University because he exercised his intellectual freedom. The only thing that is neatly settled from this case is apparently ‘the science’, never mind that this is only because anyone who publicly disagrees with it is censored or sacked. In the case of Peter Ridd, even after he managed to raise over A$1.4 million to appeal his sacking by James Cook University all the way to the High Court of Australia, he lost.

- Advertisment -

Related Articles

Climate Alarmist Deception Distorting Long Established U.S. Heat Wave Data

Biden and the Democrat's Administration scientifically unsupported “extreme heat" politics is promoting climate alarmist advocates to manufacture politically contrived  deceptive propaganda schemes using graphically...

CCC’s Net Zero Plans Rely On Dramatic Rise In Windy Days

The Committee on Climate Change have been caught cheating:

Weekly Climate and Energy News Roundup #476

“The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool. ...” – Richard Feynman