Tuesday, July 5, 2022
HomeClimate411Plain English Lost on the High Court of Australia

Plain English Lost on the High Court of Australia

-

Coral reefs can be messy, and so can court cases. And so it is with the case of Peter Ridd, sacked by James Cook University because he exercised his intellectual freedom. The only thing that is neatly settled from this case is apparently ‘the science’, never mind that this is only because anyone who publicly disagrees with it is censored or sacked. In the case of Peter Ridd, even after he managed to raise over A$1.4 million to appeal his sacking by James Cook University all the way to the High Court of Australia, he lost.

- Advertisment -

Related Articles

Putting Coal Into the African Perspective

In fact you can honestly say that by building coal powered stations in southern Africa, you can reduce CO2 emissions!

There Are Two Fundamentally Irreconcilable Constitutional Visions

Of the three decisions discussed, the one likely to have the most far-reaching impact is West Virginia

Another Energy Imbalance Paper.

He studied energy changes from the atmosphere, ocean, land, and ice as climate system components from 2000 to 2019 and compared this to the...