Monday, December 6, 2021
Home Climate411 The Absurdity of Peer Review

The Absurdity of Peer Review

-

Does it catch fraud or manipulations of data? No, patently not: peer reviewers are not omniscient, so they cannot divine made-up data, nor can they check all the outputs of a lab to see when they’ve simply copy-and-pasted data between papers. If they were, we wouldn’t have the website PubPeer stuffed to the gills with people flagging potentially serious misdemeanors in published papers, nor Retraction Watch’s endless reporting of papers so dodgy they’re expunged from the literature.

- Advertisment -

Related Articles

Guardian Author Discovers the Benefits of Petroleum Based Plastic Greenhouses

Guardian Gardening expert Kim Stoddart escaped climate change in the South East of England by moving to a frigid Welsh hilltop - then discovered...

Tasmania Building a “Black Box” Recorder for Climate Change

The box, a steel and granite monolith, will be filled with hard drives to record everything we say right up until our civilisation falls,...

Three Things Not Caused by Climate Change

From the constant flood of news stories that pour into my inbox and various feeds, I can add three more things to that list...