Friday, May 20, 2022
HomeClimate411Truth or consequences: global warming consensus thinking and the decline of public...

Truth or consequences: global warming consensus thinking and the decline of public debate

-

We believe that the city fathers who withdrew endorsement of our meeting were simply following the persuasive power of the AGW consensus advocates. It is doubtful that they, not being experts, discerned any advantage to disputing the consensus. At worst, they can only be accused of lacking the courage to assail the controversy.

- Advertisment -

Related Articles

Claim: Learning Your Climate Criminal Family Tree Helps with Motivation

According to Research Associate Flossie Kingsbury, learning how your ancestors exploited the natives and burned lots of coal helps you embrace the idea of...

Faculty Freedom of Speech and Diversity is Threatened at the University of Washington

  Threats reminiscent of the loyalty oaths of the late 1940s and early 1950s.  Subtle and overt pressure against faculty holding the “wrong views”,...

Discovery Of ‘Ghost’ Fossils Reveals Plankton Resilience to Past Global Warming Events

An international team of scientists have discovered a new type of fossilisation Peer-Reviewed Publication UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON An international team of scientists from UCL...