Monday, June 21, 2021
Home Climate411 Truth or consequences: global warming consensus thinking and the decline of public...

Truth or consequences: global warming consensus thinking and the decline of public debate

-

We believe that the city fathers who withdrew endorsement of our meeting were simply following the persuasive power of the AGW consensus advocates. It is doubtful that they, not being experts, discerned any advantage to disputing the consensus. At worst, they can only be accused of lacking the courage to assail the controversy.

- Advertisment -

Related Articles

Covid Problems Disrupting UN Climate Negotiations

You couldn't make it up; Internet glitches, delegates too lazy to match timezones, and China objecting to the presence of observers at negotiations on...

Ice Follies

Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach I keep reading that one of the horrible terrible predicted consequences of the ~ 300-year gradual warming since the...

The Looming Oil Shock

Guest “You get what you pay for” by David Middleton Hat tip to Jan from the Netherlands… It’s Too Late To Avoid A Major...