Sunday, October 24, 2021
Home Climate411 How epidemiologists try to fool us with flawed statistical practices

How epidemiologists try to fool us with flawed statistical practices

-

We have just completed a study for the National Association of Scholars [1] that took a deep dive looking at flawed statistical practices used in the field of environmental epidemiology. The study focused on air quality−health effect claims; more specifically PM2.5−health effect claims. However, the flawed practices apply to all aspects of risk factor−chronic disease research. The study also looked at how government bureaucrats use these claims to skew policy in favor of PM2.5 regulation and their own positions.

- Advertisment -

Related Articles

More Embarrassment: COP26 Luxury EVs to be Recharged Using Diesel Generators

A shortage of coal powered EV charging points has allegedly forced COP26 organisers to deploy diesel generators, though they plan to fuel the generators...

German Energy Prices “Going Through The Roof”, Supply Tightens As Leaders Botch Energy Policy

Electricity prices for industry have tripled, and household electricity will rise from 31 euro-cent/kWh to around 40 euro cent/kwh. Well over half of the...

Hubble Snapshot of ‘Molten Ring’ Galaxy Prompts New Research

In this particular snapshot, a science discovery followed the release of a Hubble observation of a striking example of a deep-space optical phenomenon dubbed...