Thursday, August 5, 2021
Home Climate411 Peter Ridd: It’s the science that’s rotten, not the Great Barrier Reef

Peter Ridd: It’s the science that’s rotten, not the Great Barrier Reef

-

Sixty years ago, when these cycles of death and destruction were first being discovered by scientists, it was legitimate to be concerned about whether they were unnatural. But there is now abundant evidence, almost totally ignored by the International Union for Conservation of Nature, that the reef is fine. The coral always recovers vigorously after major mortality events. Coral remains abundant on all 3000 reefs. The amount of coral, while fluctuating dramatically from year to year, is about the same today as when records began in the 1980s. The coral growth rates have not declined — if anything they have increased, as would be expected from the slight increase in temperature over the past century. Corals like it hot and grow faster in warmer water.

- Advertisment -

Related Articles

UK MPs Condemn Government’s 2030 Ban on New Fossil Fueled Car Sales and The Ill-Informed Push for Us All to Drive Electric

In producing probably one of the most authoritative reports on the subject ever written, we have listened to thousands of road users, from cyclists,...

Gratitude for CO2: It Continues to Feed the World

CO2 added to the atmosphere since the industrial era has had no observable impact on rainfall patterns whilst directly helping plants to grow better....

Save the Penguins!

“Our results show that if sea ice declines at the rate projected by climate models under current energy system trends and policies, the 3Rs...