Wednesday, December 1, 2021
Home Climate411 Scientific American Goes Full Anti-Science

Scientific American Goes Full Anti-Science

-

If you look at that 2017 Scientific American piece, or the other articles that I cited in my post, you will see that those commenters are conceiving of “science” not as a special methodology, but rather as something more like: “science is what people who call themselves scientists do.”

- Advertisment -

Related Articles

CBC Understands the Difference Between Weather and Climate, Other Canadian News Outlets Don’t

What we have across the region is a modest 100 year rise in average temperatures, with no measurable long-term increase in extreme weather events,...

Why so torqued up about Suzuki’s comments? Did you sleep through the first two acts?

The phrase climate emergency crept into the global lexicon because extremists ran wild, unchecked. We now have horror-inducing descriptions of every weather event. A...

Asian climate variability and dynamics across early-to-middle pliocene warm period provide clues for future climate change

A recent study by an international research group led by Prof. AO Hong from the Institute of Earth Environment of the Chinese Academy of...