Sunday, August 1, 2021
Home Middle Column 'Have More Kids. It's Good For the Planet'

‘Have More Kids. It’s Good For the Planet’

-

What can we do? Well, Rieder says, “Here’s a provocative thought: Maybe we should protect our kids by not having them.”

The idea that we should have fewer children to save the planet hasn’t been provocative in about 50 years. It would take these students five minutes of Googling to understand that doomsayers have been ignoring human nature and ingenuity since the 18th century, at least.

They might read about Paul Ehrlich and our “science czar” John Holdren, who co-authored a 1977 book suggesting mass sterilizations and forced abortions to save the world. (We’re decades past the expiration date.); or about Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who not long said that she always assumed Roe v. Wade was “about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.” Did she mean poor people? Did she mean people who recklessly use air conditioners? It’s still a mystery.

- Advertisment -

Related Articles

“Off Target”: Bad Economics of the Climate Crusade (mitigation not supported by mainstream analysis)

Why is such a temperature change bad? I can walk across the street and not notice the temperature change of the accumulated warming of the...

Extreme Weather In 1971

I defy anybody to claim that this year’s weather has been any worse:

Polar bear habitat update for end July 2021 compared to previous years

I don’t see a looming sea ice catastrophe for 2021, do you see a looming sea ice catastrophe?