Tuesday, July 27, 2021
Home Middle Column US Republicans vote to spend more on hard science, less on social-climatey...

US Republicans vote to spend more on hard science, less on social-climatey type stuff

-

US Republicans vote to spend more on hard science, less on social-climatey type stuff

http://joannenova.com.au/2015/05/us-republicans-vote-to-spend-more-on-hard-science-less-on-social-climatey-type-stuff/

US Republicans have passed a bill through the House (but not the Senate yet) aiming to get back some control over the 7 billion dollar science budget. Previously the National Science Foundation (or NSF) had all the fun in dishing out the dough, but the Republicans have had enough. Their wish list includes cutting social sciences by 55%, climate science by 8%, and putting extra money into biology, computers, engineering and hard sciences. It can’t come soon enough. Critics are howling that this will politicize science, but it’s just the opposite. Science was already politicized, and thanks in no small part to the NSF itself. This would put control of the funding back slightly closer to the voters. The NSF is almost unaccountable to the taxpayer, and if the NSF had not wasted money on so many one-sided pointless extravaganza’s (like $5m for “climate games”) and tipped so much money into “behavioural” studies, the elected members would not be knocking at their door. The NSF has only itself to blame. Ultimately, elected representatives have to be accountable for public spending, but they like to hand over control to a committee of experts. Said committee grows on the gravy train, and […]Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)

— gReader Pro

- Advertisment -

Related Articles

Hubble Finds First Evidence of Water Vapor at Jupiter’s Moon Ganymede

For the first time, astronomers have uncovered evidence of water vapor in the atmosphere of Jupiter's moon Ganymede. This water vapor forms when ice...

Claim: 1972 Club of Rome End of World Prediction Still on Track, Thanks to Climate Change

Apparently if you adjust a few factors and squint just right, the 1972 Limits to Growth is a remarkably good fit for the doomed...

Keeping Things In Balance

Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach Let me start with the standard explanation of why the earth warms when greenhouse gases (“GHGs”, e.g. water vapor,...