Friday, December 4, 2020
Home Middle Column Morano on UN: 'The UN is first and foremost political, and they...

Morano on UN: ‘The UN is first and foremost political, and they have bastardized science to achieve a political end’

Marc Morano, publisher of Climate Depot and former staff member of the U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, described the climate change conference as “another summit that kicks the can down the road.”

“The UN is first and foremost political, and they have bastardized science to achieve a political end,” Morano said.

Nonbinding Treaty ‘Farce’

Unlike the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, in which industrial countries entered into a binding treaty to reduce their carbon-dioxide emissions by a collective 5.5 percent between 2008 and 2012, the Lima Accord is not binding in any way.

Each country is expected to put forth a plan by March 31, detailing the domestic policies it will enact to achieve reducing carbon dioxide emissions. These plans are known within the UN as “Intended Nationally Determined Contributions” and will be the basis for a sweeping new deal to be signed in Paris in December 2015.

Any countries that fail to submit their plans on time are expected to submit them by June. However, there are no punishments, sanctions, or legal recourse to be taken if a nation fails to submit a plan. Instead, the entire deal relies on global peer pressure and condemnation.

“A nonbinding agreement that relies on ‘peer pressure’ isn’t worth the paper it’s written on. Absolutely nothing. Current leaders cannot make promises or pledges that deal with many decades in the future and expect any of the pledges to become reality. The whole process in its current incarnation is a farce,” Morano said.

Concern for Developing Nations

Morano predicts countries will put forth plans that fit their own economies and domestic policies, instead of following parameters handed down by the richest nations. Although plans are supposed to be suited to fit each individual country’s abilities, Morano questions whether developing countries should follow through by restricting their use of the most reliable forms of energy—oil, gas, and coal.

“The developing nations are not set up to reduce [use of] lifesaving oil, gas, and coal. People in the developing world need carbon-based energy. It has been one of the greatest liberators of mankind in the history of our planet. It brought us long life expectancy and low infant mortality,” he said. “For fears of manmade climate change to limit the poverty-stricken nations’ development is immoral. We should be here to praise carbon based energy.”

- Advertisment -

Related Articles

Elon Musk: Electric Vehicles will Double Electricity Demand, but Renewables And Grid Scale Batteries will Deliver

Elon Musk claiming his coming in 2021 fully autonomous vehicles are safer than human drivers, and how renewables can supply the redoubled energy needs...

Claim: San Francisco Covid-19 Exodus – 89,000 Families have Left

Your new neighbour could be Californian; Covid-19 and presumably Covid-19 lockdowns appear to be the final straw for people living in California's filthy crime...

Bicoastal Climate Elites: Rumored Biden EPA Pick Got a 2nd Home Because of…Climate Week

Exhibit A: Mary Nichols — the head of California’s Air Resources Board and rumored top-three pick for a Biden EPA Administrator — apparently was...