Warmist claim: ‘The waves of extreme heat the country is likely to experience could bend and buckle rails’
Study: Global Warming Makes Couples Cheat – ‘New report blames global warming for rising rates of infidelity’
Obama: US can’t ‘exempt’ itself from global climate rules – ‘We can’t call on others to make commitments to combat climate change if so many of our political leaders deny that it is taking place’
http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/207404-obama-us-cant-exempt-itself-from-climate-fight…
Obama’s West Point speech: Calls climate change ‘a creeping national security crisis that will help shape your time in uniform, as we’re called on to respond to refugee flows, natural disasters, and conflicts over water and food’
Mankind Not Causing West Antarctic Glaciers To Collapse: ‘The warming and cooling in the South Pole is well in line with historical trends dating back thousands of years’
http://dailycaller.com/2014/05/28/mankind-not-causing-west-antarctic-glaciers-to-collapse/…
Sajak vs. Trebek – Climate Battle of Game Show Hosts! Jeopardy’s Alex Trebek: ‘I believe that climate change exists, and is contributed to by human activity’ – Cites Antarctica and Mt. Kilimanjaro as evidence
http://www.salon.com/2014/05/28/alex_trebek_tells_salon_humans_are_causing_climate_change/…
Yale says ‘Global Warming’ is better distorted phrase for propaganda — dump ‘climate change’
Yale says “Global Warming” is better distorted phrase for propaganda — dump “climate change”
What’s the point of language — especially in science? If you are naive, you might think it’s to communicate a fixed concept so everyone understands and can voice an opinion on the same thing. You would be wrong. The real purpose of scientific terms is to motivate the punters to behave differently (especially if that means “give us more money”). That’s why the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication has assigned 5 PhD’s and a guy called Feinberg to spend days, weeks and months analyzing surveys to find out which propaganda term is more “effective”. The simple answer is “global warming” eeks out more fear and pain among democrats than “climate change” therefore expect to see its use rocket. The Guardian The survey sample of 1,657 people, compiled over a two-week period late last year, found a large swathe of Americans turned off by the words “climate change”. “The use of the term climate change appears to actually reduce issue engagement by Democrats, Independents, liberals, and moderates, as well as a variety of subgroups within American society, including men, women, minorities, different generations, and across political and partisan lines,” the researchers said. Americans in general were 13% more likely to […]Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
Sent by gReader Pro…
EPA To Unilaterally Push Cap And Trade On Carbon Emissions
http://dailycaller.com/2014/05/27/epa-to-unilaterally-push-cap-and-trade-on-carbon-emissions/…
U. S. Biggest funder of UN IPCC at ‘over $43 million since the beginning’ – House panel takes hard look at UN climate change process
http://washingtonexaminer.com/house-panel-takes-hard-look-at-un-climate-change-process/article/2548950
In the true-believer corner, we have much-honored Princeton Professor Michael Oppenheimer, weighing in with more than two decades as chief scientist of the Environmental Defense Fund ($111.9 million revenue in 2012) and still a science adviser. He has played important roles as a lead author of several IPCC reports, including a special report on climate extremes and disasters. He’s by far the hearing’s most experienced insider – he was there before the beginning and, as an EDF official, helped pressure the U.S. government to ask the WMO and UNEP to organize the IPCC bureaucracy.…
Global warming: the 97% fallacy
http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/global-warming-the-97-fallacy/15069#.U4XhkfnD8uo…