Friday, January 28, 2022
HomeMiddle ColumnRead All About it: Check out Junk Science's reporting on Climategate 3.0:...

Read All About it: Check out Junk Science’s reporting on Climategate 3.0: Read Steven Milloy’s exclusive reports on the newest emails


Click here for’s full reporting on Climategate 3.0

Climategate 3.0: Cramer, Hulme conspire against skeptics — and then worry whether it looks like they’re conspiring

Climategate 3.0: Wolfgang Cramer wants to punish journal for publishing Pat Michaels

Climategate 3.0: Mann, Jones plot to eliminate Little Ice Age, Medieval Warming Era from IPCC report

Climategate 3.0: Mann to Jones (circa 1998) — ‘Happy to make my [codes, data, etc.] available’; Mann to McIntyre (circa 2005) — Get lost

Climategate 3.0: Media only concerned with number of scientists on warmist list for Kyoto; ‘No one is going to check…PhDs’

Climategate 3.0: Greenpeace solicits Climategater to ghostwrite fact sheet; Willing to ‘pay standard rates’

Climategate 3.0: Greenpeace drafts self-serving letter-to-the-editor of The Times for Climategater signature

Climategate 3.0: Wigley claims UEA improperly withheld U.S. Government funds; ‘I am the loser’

Climategate 3.0: Worries about public learning that WWF funded the list of scientists; ‘It will be perceived to be biased’

Climategate 3.0: World Wildlife Fund commissions yet another UEA climate project

Climategate 3.0: Enviros propose hiring UEA ‘gaters for Kyoto Conference

Climategate 3.0: WWF asks for ‘gaters help against skeptical questions at Alaska media event; ‘Anything to fend off the naysayers’

Climategate 3.0: Mike Hulme’s BBC appearance likened to ‘Pope making very authoritive pronouncements’

Climategate 3.0: Tom Wigley goes ballistic over list of scientists supporting Kyoto; Asking people to ‘prostitute themselves’

Climategate 3.0: World Wildlife Fund pays Climategaters to develop list of warmist scientists for 1997 Kyoto meeting; ‘Disaster’ if skeptics build larger list

Climategate 3.0: Phil Jones attacks UK skeptic Piers Corbyn as an ‘utter prat’

Climategate 3.0: Briffa worries that manmade environmental change distorts tree-ring analysis

Climategate 3.0: Wigley accuses IPCC and lead authors of ‘dishonest presentations of model results’; Accuses Mann of deception; Mann admits

Climategate 3.0: In 2009, Schneider touts spike in warming by 2014

Climategate 3.0: No consensus among the consensus – Tom Wigley dissents from Kevin Trenberth’s observation of no warming since 1998

Climategate 3.0: ‘Interesting to note that many of the coral records utilised by Mike Mann also failed my screening procedure’

Climategate 3.0: NASA scientist on hockey stick: ‘what Mike Mann continually fails to understand, and no amount of references will solve, is…’

Climategate 3.0: Jones to Mann, May 20, 2005 — ‘The skeptic pillars are tumbling!’. Turns out to be counting chickens…

Climategate 3.0: Jones advises Mann and others on FOIA requests — ‘Leave it to you to delete as appropriate!’

Climategate 3.0: Jones to Mann: ‘I’ll delete the file rather than send to anyone’

Climategate 3.0: Mann to Revkin — ‘McIntyre and McKitrick paper is pure scientific fraud’

Climategate 3.0: Phil Jones tries and fails to have skeptic Dick Lindzen’s comments removed from draft IPCC chapter

Climategate 3.0: Climategaters used hockey stick controversy to ask for more funding

Climategate 3.0: Mike Hulme intends to ‘paint the global [vs. regional climate] picture in case there are any skeptics in the audience’

Climategate 3.0: UEA bids for 10 million pound government grant to help the IPCC

Climategate 3.0: MetOffice rebukes UEA for claiming global warming causes extreme weather

Climategate 3.0: After Fred Singer debunks Wigley paper, Climategaters ask ‘what the f*ck Wigley was trying to do’

Climategate 3.0: ‘I believe that the recent warmth was probably matched about 1000 years ago’

Climategate 3.0: Skeptics ‘a bit like the GM anarchists… self-defeating’

Climategate 3.0: Mann — Internet is the ‘downside of absolute freedom of dissemination’

Climategate 3.0: Climategater to World Bank – Economic damage estimates from global warming should be ‘treated very skeptically’; ‘Our methodology is so flaky’

Climategate 3.0: UEA got $143K from World Wildlife Fund to prepare COP-5 propaganda brochures

Climategate 3.0: Mann (circa 1999) skeptical of Marcott (circa 2013)

Climategate 3.0: Jones says ‘I would ignore the so-called skeptics until they get to the peer-review arena’; Meanwhile Jones’ colleague works to prevent skeptics from publishing

Climategate 3.0: Phil Jones to Michael Mann (May 1999): ‘The skeptics are fighting a losing battle’


More Climategate 3.0 from here.

- Advertisment -

Related Articles

Scientists And Media Outlets Increasingly ‘Scolded’ And ‘Pressured’ To Blame Extreme Weather On Humans

“Powerful science leaders hope that identification of the role of climate change in extreme weather events will ‘spur more immediate action’ to mitigate climate...

Caribou and Muskoxen Buffer Climate Impacts for Rare Plants

Large herbivores help rare species persist in a warming arctic

Mark Krebs on Energy Efficiency under Biden’s DOE (Part IV of IV: More Issues)

A. We have been weighing-in as best we can on pro-electrification dockets. Collectively, we have filed comments in several ongoing Federal energy and environmental dockets....