Home Middle Column Prof. Roger Pielke Jr.: 'An argument that mitigation of ghgs makes sense... Middle Column Prof. Roger Pielke Jr.: ‘An argument that mitigation of ghgs makes sense in terms of decreasing the future costs of extreme events is not a strong one’ By Marc Morano - February 12, 2013 183 0 Share Facebook Twitter WhatsApp VK Digg Tagsastrologyazeconomicsstern Facebook Twitter WhatsApp VK Digg Previous articleWashington Post On Climate: Obama Must ‘Discuss The Science, The Real Reason To Cut Carbon Emissions’Next articleClimate Scientist Dr. Fred Singer: ‘My belief is the global warming scare will be over in the matter of a decade or so’ Marc Morano - Advertisment - Search Related Articles Aussie Bushfire Madness: Fuel Load Not an Issue, All Climate Change Climate411 Reducing available fuel seems and obvious strategy for fire risk management. But according to the CSIRO, the real culprit is climate change. Read more The Tragedy of the Climate Wars Climate411 Consistently demonizing those who think differently than you makes it harder, if not impossible, to forge alliances. Read more Environment Agency Stokes Flood Fears Climate411 Flooding is terrible for those involved, but from a nationwide wide viewpoint is no more than an irritant. To deliberately peddle the lie that... Read more
