Monday, January 25, 2021
Home Middle Column Fred Pearce: 'Why Are Environmentalists Taking Anti-Science Positions? On issues ranging from...

Fred Pearce: ‘Why Are Environmentalists Taking Anti-Science Positions? On issues ranging from genetically modified crops to nuclear power…’

-

Pearce: Three current issues suggest that the risks of myopic adherence to ideology over rational debate are real: genetically modified (GM) crops, nuclear power, and shale gas development. The conventional green position is that we should be opposed to all three. Yet the voices of those with genuine environmental credentials, but who take a different view, are being drowned out by sometimes abusive and irrational argument.

In each instance, the issue is not so much which side environmentalists should be on, but rather the mind-set behind those positions and the tactics adopted to make the case. The wider political danger is that by taking anti-scientific positions, environmentalists end up helping the anti-environmental sirens of the new right.

- Advertisment -

Related Articles

Study examines how clean air act affects municipal bond market

Municipal bond yields increased in response to the announcement of the proposed rule but declined after the announcement of the final standard.

Biden Senior Director for Environmental Justice Blames “Systemic Racism” for Climate Change

Introducing your new government; NYT is celebrating the appointment of visionaries like Dr. Cecilia Martinez to Biden's climate team. But Martinez has some interesting...

Study Shows Arctic Sea Ice Reached Lowest Point On Modern Record… In The 1940s, Not Today!

Regular NoTricksZone author Kenneth Richards notes on Twitter Apparently Arctic sea ice volume was as low in the 1940s as it has been in...