Friday, October 30, 2020
Home Middle Column Fred Pearce: 'Why Are Environmentalists Taking Anti-Science Positions? On issues ranging from...

Fred Pearce: ‘Why Are Environmentalists Taking Anti-Science Positions? On issues ranging from genetically modified crops to nuclear power…’

-

Pearce: Three current issues suggest that the risks of myopic adherence to ideology over rational debate are real: genetically modified (GM) crops, nuclear power, and shale gas development. The conventional green position is that we should be opposed to all three. Yet the voices of those with genuine environmental credentials, but who take a different view, are being drowned out by sometimes abusive and irrational argument.

In each instance, the issue is not so much which side environmentalists should be on, but rather the mind-set behind those positions and the tactics adopted to make the case. The wider political danger is that by taking anti-scientific positions, environmentalists end up helping the anti-environmental sirens of the new right.

- Advertisment -

Related Articles

No, @ClimatePower “Climate Change” Isn’t Making It Harder to Vote

A press release from a political group called “ClimatePower2020” makes ridiculously wild claims that “climate change” is making it more difficult to vote in the upcoming...

Friday Funny: Greta Thunberg’s perfect petroleum-free world

One crisp winter morning in Sweden, a cute little girl named Greta woke up to a perfect world, one in which there were no...

The Facts on Andrew Cuomo’s Nursing Home Policy

Wednesday morning on ABC’s The View, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo gave a factually misleading explanation for the thousands of people who died with...