Warmists’ trash alleged ‘converted skeptic’ Muller as ‘absurdly naive…rubbish’ — ‘Way over simplistic & not at all convincing’ — Mann says Muller all about ‘self-aggrandizement’

Richard Muller’s email: [email protected]

He’s back! Berkeley’s Richard Muller Climate Con Continues: Muller pens NYT OPED: Claims to be ‘Converted Skeptic’ – Declares global warming ‘due to the human emission of ghgs’

Muller says we caused 0.7 warming seen in pink circle on right, even though it is completely in the noise of measurement error – & an order of magnitude smaller than natural variability’

Muller claims his ‘statistical methods’ prove man-made warming –‘How definite is the attribution to humans? The CO2 curve gives a better match than anything else we’ve tried’ [email protected]

Climate Depot Response: ‘Did your ‘statistical methods’ rule out the hundreds of factors that make up global temps? Did you rule out the Sun, volcanoes, tilt of Earth’s axis, water vapor, methane, clouds, ocean cycles, plate tectonics, albedo, atmospheric dust, Atmospheric circulation, cosmic rays, carbon soot, forests & land use, etc.? Climate change is governed by hundreds of factors, or variables, not just CO2, so please spare us your attempt at fingerprint modeling.’

Michael Mann rips Muller’s latest media blitz: ‘It seems, in the end–quite sadly–that this is all really about Richard Muller’s self-aggrandizement :(‘

Warmist William Connolley on Muller: Study is ‘purely a matter of pulling together a temperature record. They’ve done none of the attribution work you’d expect, in order to talk about attribution’Connolley: ‘And what they say…appears absurdly naive’

Analysis: Muller’s ‘Results Nothing New’: Warmist William Connolley finds new BEST results ‘rubbish’ (by which he means data analysis is nothing new, & the attribution claims not very scientific) — Stoat calls Muller a ‘prima donna,’ and quotes Ken Caldiera: ‘…I do not see the results of Muller et al as being scientifically important. However, their result may be politically important’

Prof. Roger Pielke Jr.: ‘Spot on W. M. Connolley. Muller is still rubbish’ Pielke Jr. asks: ‘Bigger issue is how NYT let itself be conned into running [Muller’s] op-ed’

Flashback: Self-loathing Muller in 2003: ‘Scientists regard with disdain those who play their conclusions to the press’ — Muller: ‘In most fields of science, researchers who express the most self-doubt and who understate their conclusions are the ones that are most respected’

Muller hope’s his analysis ‘will help settle the scientific debate’ Roger Pielke Jr. responds: ‘I want what he’s smoking’

Former Muller Co-Author Dr. Judith Curry: The method used to attribute human emissions to the warming was ‘way over simplistic and