Home Middle Column Analysis: 'Can We Really Call Climate Science a Science?': The 'panoply of... Middle Column Analysis: ‘Can We Really Call Climate Science a Science?’: The ‘panoply of people and organizations supporting (AGW) is the equivalent of the (old Soviet) Central Committee’ By Marc Morano - September 19, 2011 117 0 Share Facebook Twitter WhatsApp VK Digg Tagsal goreconsensus busterintimidationipccscience Facebook Twitter WhatsApp VK Digg Previous articleWSJ: ‘Another Nobel laureate breaks from the climate change pack’Next articleMore warmists lament Gore’s ineffectiveness — Chris Mooney: ‘Basically Gore appeals to liberal academic type people, like me’ Marc Morano - Advertisment - Search Related Articles Former PM on Australia’s Net Zero Pledge: “frankly, this [is] duplicitous” Climate411 "They’ve ceased to be a party for anything or anybody other than themselves": Mr Carbon Tax, former Aussie PM Kevin Rudd, has slammed Prime... Read more Biden’s Climate Agenda Dies In The Senate Climate411 However, it seems like the Clean Electricity part of the bill is dead in the water, thanks to the resolute opposition of Joe Manchin,... Read more Cooked Up Consensus: Lynas et al “Should Rather Be Classified As Propaganda, Bad Science”…”Truly Brazen” Climate411 The entire paper had not even examined whether there was a consensus on “human influence being the dominant cause of the observed warming”. How... Read more
