HomeMiddle ColumnEnviro Guru James Lovelock Admits Obvious: 'Peer-review process can be exceedingly prejudiced... Middle Column Enviro Guru James Lovelock Admits Obvious: ‘Peer-review process can be exceedingly prejudiced and exert censorship even’ By Marc Morano - July 11, 2010 246 0 Share Facebook Twitter WhatsApp VK Digg Tagscruintimidationkeylovelockscience Facebook Twitter WhatsApp VK Digg Previous article‘Independent’? Muir Russell Climategate contributor Richard Horton, had deemed global warming ‘the biggest threat to our future health’Next articleAnother Climate Con Exposed: Dutch Report on IPCC allegedly ‘cleared’ IPCC after reviewing less than half of content Marc Morano - Advertisment - Search Related Articles Day/Night temperature spread fails to confirm IPCC prediction Climate411 “Through examination of over 65 years of data at Giles it can be demonstrated that, in the absence of any other identifiable temperature forcing,... Read more Should Government Control Scientific Research? Climate411 By Andy May This is the transcript of a talk I gave to the ASME (The American Society of Mechanical Engineers) South Texas Section... Read more AFR: Climate Change is Making Kuwait Unliveable Climate411 People who work in bakeries, factories or mines deal with 130F / 54C+ on a regular basis. But for climate scientists working in comfortable... Read more
